Regular City Council Meeting February 2, 2021

Remote, via teleconference · 3 hours 4 minutes · 3473 caption units

Council: Paul Fadelli, Mayor · Gabe Quinto, Mayor Pro Tem · Janet Abelson · Lisa Motoyama · Tessa Rudnick

Staff: Karen Pinkos, City Manager · Mark Rasiah, Finance Director

One policy item fills the evening: the December budget update and the mid-year modifications that follow. The completed audit revises the prior year's ending fund balance from minus $2.3 million to minus $110,000, and the Council is asked whether $664,000 of savings is enough.

These summaries are written with AI. An AI model (Claude, by Anthropic) drafted the summaries, titles and notes from each meeting’s closed captions, and they were checked against those captions. They can still be wrong, leave out something that matters, or weigh things differently than you would.

  • Captions are automatic and unedited. Names and words are often misspelled or misheard, and quotations carry those errors.
  • Who is speaking is often unclear. The captions rarely say, so a speaker’s name can be missing or wrong.
  • Not the official record. This is an independent site, not the City’s. For what was decided, rely on the adopted minutes.

Check anything that matters against the captions beside each summary, or the City’s recording. How these pages are made

SSignificantXCross-referenceNNote

Contents

20 sections
  1. 01Fourteen candidates, four hoursS
  2. 02Back to purpleN
  3. 03Sixty-five to seventy-fourS
  4. 04“A preventative public safety system”S
  5. 05A mental health task forceS
  6. 06“Rings kind of hollow”S
  7. 07Camps, and before and after careX
  8. 08“Not something anybody wants to cut”S
  9. 09Restore first, then rebuildS
  10. 10Almost guaranteedS
  11. 11Minus 2.3 million becomes minus 110,000S
  12. 12Twelve dollars per thousandS
  13. 13Six sixty-four, and three oh threeS
  14. 14“Skimming the surface”S
  15. 15Three amendments in one yearS
  16. 16“Never worked on”S
  17. 17“While we have zero”S
  18. 18What the note will costS
  19. 19“We ask for patience too”S
  20. 20Positions not namedS

01 Fourteen candidates, four hours captions 1–163

0:02:51Holly, I have a question.

0:02:54Yes, sir.

0:02:55Is this going to be on the radio on 88 point one?

0:02:59Yes, it should be broadcast on Comcast and on the radio

0:03:04and on our website.

0:03:05Our website.

0:03:06OK, thank you.

0:03:08You're welcome.

0:03:32Yes Holly.

0:03:43So I had to play back from the live feed

0:03:45and I thought, gapa is asking me a question again,

0:03:48so no worries.

0:03:49When I mentioned that when I mentioned the interviews,

0:03:53have you not?

0:03:53If I saw a lot of emails you notified or should I?

0:03:58I believe I believe most of them.

0:04:00I think there's one or two, I think that we're still working

0:04:03through because there are so many variables

0:04:05to each notification that the majority of them have been

0:04:08and that are the same.

0:04:11Yeah, and the information is posted online as well.

0:04:16So it's already posted online.

0:04:18Correct OK, Thanks.

0:04:20You're welcome.

0:04:26And I see you've got a list.

0:04:31Yes, that is new.

0:04:33I'm going to start doing that after all of the meetings where

0:04:36you guys make appointments that know, the other chart, again,

0:04:40that was a great.

0:04:43You know, you just put all those together,

0:04:45and that's basically your chart, isn't it?

0:04:48If I just filled in the blanks based on what actions you

0:04:52guys took last night.

0:05:33Pilot, in case anybody asks for me, I need to run upstairs,

0:05:36I left my city's phone on my desk upstairs.

0:05:39I will be right back, ok?

0:05:40OK, thank you.

0:05:49Yes all right.

0:07:05OK, and back, OK.

0:07:14So well.

0:08:31OK OK, anybody there?

0:08:39Yes, I can't remember.

0:08:40But then we can hear and see you.

0:08:41OK, the screen is kind of mostly gray.

0:08:45That's because no one has their cameras.

0:08:47I'm currently.

0:08:48OK OK, thanks, Derek.

0:08:51I think I'm OK.

0:08:55Thank you.

0:08:55Thank you once again.

0:08:56OK, bye bye.

0:09:40Is anybody oh, Gabe.

0:09:43Do you have the can you hear me?

0:09:45Yes, I do.

0:09:46Do you have my phone number?

0:09:49Yeah, I will.

0:09:51I texted to you.

0:09:54OK, all right.

0:09:55Yeah, great.

0:09:59I can't remember mohtarma, and it

0:10:02could affect thank you so much.

0:10:06Not sure what happened, I'm glad when you looked back in it,

0:10:09it fixed whenever the she was so yeah, I

0:10:12tried to log in without downloading the software,

0:10:15so I know, OK.

0:10:23Hello, Mr Mayor.

0:10:25Hello, everybody.

0:10:27Hi, Lisa.

0:10:27Hi, Janet.

0:10:28I said Hi to Gabriel, huh?

0:10:32It's been so long.

0:10:34Yeah yesterday.

0:10:35Right you do it.

0:10:40I thought I had it.

0:10:42I don't.

0:10:43I'm sorry.

0:10:44I'm I don't have that, you have much more on these phone

0:10:52numbers.

0:10:56I can take that to you, can I have it?

0:10:59OK, thank you, Ali.

0:11:56Thank you.

0:11:57All right, Lisa icaza.

0:12:06Hello, this guy, nice guy.

0:12:12Hey, good evening, everyone.

0:12:14How are you?

0:12:20Well, it's being castroville there.

0:12:25Usually wearing a nice tie, but that

0:12:27looks good, that looks good as well.

0:12:32To me, Yeah.

0:12:34Never on the Zoom.

0:12:36That's not true, like twice on Zoom.

0:12:40It just seems like too much.

0:12:42But how are you?

0:12:43Before I have done a couple of lawyering, things like, OK,

0:12:47that is crazy as it seems they're going to put all

0:12:49the time that I just took the data, run at the born again,

0:13:01that I haven't.

0:13:03Oh, I like your yellow background, Lisa.

0:13:08Your wall looks nice.

0:13:10Oh, thank you.

0:13:11Color is good.

0:13:12Do you like my sleeping bag on my your bunk bed.

0:13:19Yeah you make it sound.

0:13:22So nice.

0:13:24Sky, you've been good this year.

0:13:26So far.

0:13:28I have.

0:13:29Everything's been fine.

0:13:32And then OK, you know.

0:13:34OK, Yeah.

0:13:35We've all been I feel like is like, OK.

0:13:38Right is anybody.

0:13:40Yeah Yeah.

0:13:42How about you.

0:13:44Is it good for anybody.

0:13:45That's going to be my answer here.

0:13:47Yeah it's getting, I'm getting tired of all of it you know.

0:13:52It's getting.

0:13:55Yeah, I think everyone is.

0:13:57But if, if the coffee shop, the vaccine can come to my CVS

0:14:03down there on San Pablo avenue, I'll

0:14:05be a happier person that I want all my fellow council members

0:14:11to get vaccinated so that we can ultimately

0:14:14get back into chambers.

0:14:15That would be great.

0:14:16So we can party.

0:14:17Yeah Yeah.

0:14:19Good vaccine first.

0:14:24Yeah, you guys haven't even been right on the diet yet.

0:14:29Yeah see I still visualize that I'm

0:14:32going to be going down there.

0:14:33I may have to go now.

0:14:35I'm not going to.

0:14:52And around, I just sent her a text

0:14:59checking in with her because I still

0:15:01don't see her on the call.

0:15:03OK Because if she doesn't have any staff in there,

0:15:10she has probably.

0:15:18And Hello to everyone watching, looking at the attendee list.

0:15:22Thank you guys for showing up.

0:15:44So holly, if we had go here.

0:16:04Yes, I just upgraded can I believe

0:16:07she says she's on a camera yet, but I do believe she's with us.

0:16:11There we go.

0:16:12OK, so we have everyone.

0:16:13We are ready to start when you are mayor.

0:16:15Thank you very much.

0:16:16Hello, everyone.

0:16:18That's February 2nd.

0:16:19Regular meeting of balestrero city council

0:16:21will come to order.

0:16:23And it is seven hour, 1:00 PM.

0:16:26Clerk read the roll, man the here Potemkin to hear.

0:16:34Council member Anderson, council member

0:16:38mohtarma year council member, budnick, we have a acquired.

0:16:44Great, before we proceed, I just want

0:16:47to mention the special council meeting,

0:16:49we held yesterday, the city council met 4, 3, 2 four hours.

0:16:53And we interviewed 14 candidates for commissions and committees

0:16:58and made those assignments.

0:17:00Most of them should have been notified by now,

0:17:02but most of the information is on our website

0:17:05for the new consoles and commissions,

The recording opens before the gavel, then the Mayor reported on a special meeting held the day before.

What it covered: “the city council met 4[ hours]… and we interviewed 14 candidates for commissions and committees and made those assignments.”

Most appointees “should have been notified by now,” with the rest of the information on the city website.

His thanks: “we thank them for volunteering their time.”

The Clerk then gave the teleconference instructions: chat disabled except to hosts, hands raised by icon, and phone-only participants needing to email a request to speak in advance.

Written comments would not be read into the record.

All five members present.

Significant

Fourteen advisory body candidates interviewed in a four-hour special meeting. That process is what the September study session revisits, when the Council considers quarterly interview cycles and body-specific questions.

02 Back to purple captions 164–239

0:17:08and we thank them for volunteering their time.

0:17:12Can we have information about the teleconference and public

0:17:15comment, of the please.

0:17:17Thank you, mayor.

0:17:19The city council members and staff who are participating

0:17:21as panelists, please remember to keep your microphones muted

0:17:24whenever you are not speaking for all participants

0:17:27on the call today, except for direct chat to the hosts

0:17:29for technical questions, the chat feature has been

0:17:32disabled if you wish to speak.

0:17:34Please use the hand icon to raise your hand.

0:17:37This icon is found on the participant panel.

0:17:39If you cannot locate the icon, please refer

0:17:42to the document linked on page one of the agenda

0:17:44for the Raise Hand feature.

0:17:46Please note this feature is not available for those calling

0:17:49NBFC.

0:17:50Only three members of the public who

0:17:52wish to provide oral testimony today that you will announce

0:17:55the time to raise your hand and request to speak

0:17:58for each applicable item.

0:18:00If a member of the public has joined by phone,

0:18:02only a request to speak, can be submitted to city clerk at Ci

0:18:07that L dash subito that seet us.

0:18:12The email must contained in the subject line request

0:18:15to speak, followed by the agenda item number

0:18:18and provide a name and phone number that is used to call

0:18:20in identification purposes.

0:18:23Written comments received by the posted deadline of four

0:18:25PM today have been provided to the city council

0:18:28and posted online with supplemental materials.

0:18:31Any written comments submitted after the deadline will

0:18:34be provided to the city council and included

0:18:36in supplemental materials posted after the meeting.

0:18:39No written comments will be read into the record

0:18:41and will be ready to move on to the next item.

0:18:45Thank you.

0:18:45Next item is staff and council communications.

0:18:48Is there any communication from city staff?

0:18:56Karen, hello, sorry, I'm having some technical difficulties.

0:19:02There, I think, your honor, I'm Karen Pinkus,

0:19:05I'm the city manager, I just wanted to do a quick update

0:19:09on our local emergency.

0:19:11As we have been, we have been moved to the purple tier

0:19:16as the rest of Contra Costa County.

0:19:19However, that is still while that

0:19:21is still pretty restrictive, things like outdoor dining

0:19:25can resume.

0:19:27I'm excited to get my hair done tomorrow.

0:19:30And so we do have some we do have some a little bit of life

0:19:36that's there.

0:19:37I do want to be able to I'm still

0:19:40having trouble with my video.

0:19:41Sorry I think everyone can still hear me.

0:19:44Yes so at least you can hear me.

0:19:47We we do have.

0:19:49I know that there's been a lot of questions

0:19:50about vaccinations.

0:19:52The county has somewhat gone back

0:19:53and forth on some of the requirements based on supplies.

0:19:58So from what we've the most recent thing

0:20:01that we've been told is just continue to try to sign up.

0:20:05There is a county questionnaire that you can fill

0:20:08out to get on their waitlist.

0:20:10There's also a state questionnaire.

0:20:12And so we do have all of these links on our website just

0:20:14to let everyone know.

0:20:16And again, I just want to encourage everyone

0:20:19to stay safe and stay healthy, even though people are getting

0:20:22vaccinated, even though we're starting

0:20:24to relax some of the restrictions, we are not,

0:20:27by any means out of danger.

0:20:28So I encourage people to continue

0:20:30to follow Justin protocols, wear a mask,

0:20:33do as much outside as you can.

0:20:36Thank you.

The City Manager's pandemic report was brief and, by her own admission, technically troubled.

The position: “we have been moved to the purple tier as the rest of Contra Costa County.”

What it still permits: “while that is still pretty restrictive, things like outdoor dining can resume.”

Her own marker of normality returning: “I'm excited to get my hair done tomorrow.”

On vaccination, the difficulty was supply and shifting rules: “the county has somewhat gone back and forth on some of the requirements based on supplies.”

Her advice: “just continue to try to sign up,” using the county waitlist questionnaire or the state one, both linked from the city site.

And her caution: “even though people are getting vaccinated, even though we're starting to relax some of the restrictions, we are not by any means out of danger.”

She was also unable to get her video working, apologizing twice.

Note

The county had moved back into the most restrictive tier, with outdoor dining the concession. Vaccine eligibility was shifting week to week on supply, which a councilmember reports having discovered by telephone that evening.

03 Sixty-five to seventy-four captions 240–408

0:20:37With that, your honor, I'm doing.

0:20:40Thank you.

0:20:41Any council comments?

0:20:44I have a continuation of what the study

0:20:47manager was talking about, the beginnings of a vaccine.

0:20:52I just like a half an hour ago, I got a notice that I

0:21:00was ready to be scheduled.

0:21:04And what I found out because I called somebody and asked them

0:21:09is that their first, they would only

0:21:13do people who were 75 or older, but

0:21:16they're now doing 60 five, 74.

0:21:20So that which for me personally means I'm

0:21:23eligible to actually get a vaccine.

0:21:26And I'm planning on doing it.

0:21:29I don't know the whole.

0:21:31Rigamarole about it, because they haven't done it

0:21:33yet that I'm happy to report.

0:21:35I think it's very important that anybody who

0:21:40is in a category where they can get a vaccine go ahead

0:21:43and get it, because it's part of the it's

0:21:47one of the really major parts of how we conquer this epidemic.

0:21:53So that's another very exciting, though.

0:21:57Congratulations any other comments from council members

0:22:00similar to ama?

0:22:02Thank you, mayor.

0:22:04I just wanted to let the public know

0:22:07that I had my interview with the state auditor, which

0:22:10I'm sure many of you also did.

0:22:12And just to give the heads up that the audit is still

0:22:16in process and that that will have some comments

0:22:20and that will be about how our budget should work.

0:22:23And some recommendations.

0:22:25And I just want to give that heads up to the public

0:22:27that it's forthcoming in the next few months.

0:22:31And that should be a helpful document for all of us.

0:22:34Thank you.

0:22:35Thank you for that, Kate quintel.

0:22:37Do you have any comments?

0:22:40Yes, thank you, mayor.

0:22:41I wanted to also echo what my colleague Lisa just mentioned.

0:22:47I had my interview last Friday.

0:22:51And we spoke and I was asked many questions,

0:22:57lasted for an hour.

0:22:59And I appreciate the interview.

0:23:03And I'm not sure if my colleagues here right

0:23:07now have all been interviewed yet,

0:23:09but it was a good, honest talk.

0:23:14Ask me questions.

0:23:16And so I'm told that they will reach out to us

0:23:22probably in March sometime.

0:23:25And and we'll keep this dialogue open

0:23:28and we will deal with the changes that will be made.

0:23:35Mayor, I have some meetings that I attended.

0:23:38Is there.

0:23:38OK to do.

0:23:41OK, thank you.

0:23:42I did attend the new mayors and council members.

0:23:48It was a talk last week.

0:23:52And it was a very informal meeting as chair of the EPA

0:23:57division of Cal cities.

0:24:00We welcomed many of the new members that believe

0:24:03you were there, Paul, as well.

0:24:04So great to have you there.

0:24:06Great to have my colleagues, Lisa and Tessa there as well.

0:24:12And it was announced that I was just

0:24:16appointed to one of the statewide boards for Cal city

0:24:22statewide.

0:24:23And so that's I believe that's the first time

0:24:27anyone in El Salvador has been appointed on that position.

0:24:32So we are blessed to have Cindy Silva, who is first vice

0:24:38president for katsidis, which represents

0:24:43a 482 cities in California.

0:24:46So I look forward to working with all 482 cities.

0:24:51And I know that they're going through the same situation.

0:24:54And difficulties as El cerrito is experiencing right now.

0:24:59So we're all in this together.

0:25:01And we look forward to working with our legislators

0:25:04in California, our partners on the Senate and the Assembly.

0:25:10We did have an EPA division meeting last Thursday evening,

0:25:15and I'll have the mayor speak on that.

0:25:18And he is our delegate.

0:25:20And that was the first meeting that I chaired this year.

0:25:23And usually they would have the visit of the different cities

0:25:30and they would split that up because of COVID.

0:25:34I'll be meeting the different councils and mayors

0:25:37and city managers of assume and do that, then.

0:25:42And I'm saving money on laundering and gas.

0:25:46So I don't mind that.

0:25:48I did have a meeting with the hazardous materials commission

0:25:51and we are recommending many things to make sure

0:25:57that the county is dealing with climate change and the things

0:26:01that we need to do with transportation

0:26:04in the future to make sure our rails and roads are safe.

0:26:09And the materials that are shipped through our ports here

0:26:14and in the northern shoreline and in Richmond

0:26:18are done in a safe way.

0:26:20We know that rail is on the coast and right on the water

0:26:24there.

0:26:24And changes need to be made.

0:26:26And we look forward and working with rail on the federal level.

0:26:31And their lobbyists, and we will give our recommendations

0:26:37and it will be voted to and the recommendations will be voted

0:26:42by the board of supervisors.

0:26:44So and that's it.

0:26:46So thank you, mayor.

0:26:48Thank you.

0:26:49Council member rubberneck.

0:26:54Have anything to share?

0:26:55OK, I have a couple of things I did attend.

0:26:58I think Gabriel mentioned the things that I attended.

0:27:02Also Cal city and the mayor's conference and the East Bay

0:27:07legislators kick off and they basically

0:27:10talked about the great challenge ahead

0:27:12that we have in Sacramento this year

0:27:14and talked about Lisa and Tessa.

0:27:16We're also there about the challenge

0:27:19that we have at the local level.

0:27:21I also attended the West county mayors

0:27:24meeting a monthly meeting, and we brought up

0:27:27a variety of topics, including hospitals

0:27:29and made again for hospitals, COVID and the need

0:27:33to keep and maintain our restaurants.

0:27:36I'm happy to report today that the Board of Supervisors

0:27:39did pass unanimously a limit on the delivery

0:27:42fees for restaurants.

0:27:44So that they can capture more money

0:27:46and keep more money in our Chamber of Commerce.

0:27:49And this mare wrote a letter in support of that.

0:27:52So we were glad to see a unanimous decision.

0:27:55Moving forward, we need to keep our restaurants

0:27:57in El Reno and everywhere else.

0:28:00Any other comments, janet?

0:28:01Yes yes.

0:28:03I just wondered, what's the next excuse me?

0:28:07The maximum will be 15 percent, 15.

0:28:11Last until we're 100% able to occupy restaurants internally.

0:28:16100% And the board can come back if there's a concern

0:28:19and readjust that Walnut Creek Danville

0:28:22mafia had already have it.

0:28:24They won't impact their ordinance.

0:28:27But now the whole county has at that ordinance

0:28:29should be drafted.

0:28:30So so our restaurants are in need

0:28:33and they talk to me personally about making a profit,

0:28:36keeping a profit.

0:28:37And I think Grubhub and others have charged with the maximum

0:28:41that they can.

0:28:41So we're happy about that.

0:28:45I'd like to move on now to the oral communications

0:28:47from the public.

0:28:48At this time, many members of the public

0:28:50who wish to provide public comment

0:28:53regarding matters not on the agenda

0:28:56can send items and presentation.

0:28:58I should use to raise the hand feature to request to speak.

0:29:03And I like to ask the city clerk to proceed.

0:29:07Thank you, mayor.

0:29:09Members of the public, an opportunity

0:29:11to raise their hand.

0:29:12I will show that the public comments that the written

0:29:15public comments received by 4:00 PM today

0:29:18were posted online and provided directly to the city council

0:29:20members and for consent and consent items and items

0:29:24not on the agenda.

0:29:25We did receive comments from cordele Handler

0:29:27Gary post and Kathy henzell.

0:29:30And at this time, I see about forehands for public comment.

0:29:35Now, if you could please confirm the 3 minute time limit.

0:29:38Yes, three minutes.

A councilmember reported a change in eligibility she had learned of half an hour earlier.

The notice: “just like a half an hour ago, I got a notice that I was ready to be scheduled.”

What she found out by calling: “at first they would only do people who were 75 or older, but they're now doing 65[ to] 74.”

Which meant “for me personally… I'm eligible to actually get a vaccine. And I'm planning on doing it.”

She added: “I don't know the whole rigamarole about it.”

Motoyama said she had been interviewed by the State Auditor and that its report, with recommendations on how the budget should work, would come in the next few months.

Quinto had also been interviewed, for an hour; he reported his appointment to a statewide Cal Cities board and a hazardous materials commission meeting on rail safety. The Mayor reported that the Board of Supervisors had capped restaurant delivery fees at 15%.

Public comment then opened.

Significant

A councilmember learned the vaccine age band had dropped to 65 by telephoning to ask — half an hour before the meeting. The City Manager pointed residents to a county and a state questionnaire, and said the county had “gone back and forth on some of the requirements based on supplies.”

04 “A preventative public safety system” captions 409–442

0:29:40Thank you, sir.

0:29:41I will go to our first speaker, which is Miguel gravelle.

0:29:45Miguel, you are needed now and can begin your time.

0:29:50Thank you.

0:29:51City council.

0:29:52I'm here to speak with regards to our recreation department.

0:29:58I believe that any further reductions

0:30:01to our rec department would further reduce

0:30:03equity in our city of ossorio.

0:30:06My first point is that the rec department is

0:30:08a preventative public safety system,

0:30:11and it helps prevent crime by just

0:30:13keeping folks out of trouble.

0:30:15The second point is that our rec department is

0:30:17a preventative public health system,

0:30:19as well as it keeps people healthy to prevent

0:30:23costly health issues that could put people on the street, which

0:30:26is a problem.

0:30:27I've seen on next door, people complaining about a lot.

0:30:31Third, our recreation department is a preventative

0:30:34to housing insecurity that prevents folks from being

0:30:37without permanent housing.

0:30:40By employing hard working wage earners

0:30:42who are a paycheck or two away from not making rent.

0:30:47In conclusion, I ask you to please cut the police budget

0:30:51rather than our budget as the police react to crime,

0:30:55react to health issues and react to homelessness or helplessness

0:31:00by kicking folks out of our community.

0:31:02Whereas on the other hand, I ask you to please spare and perhaps

0:31:07increase our recreation budget as it helps prevent crime,

0:31:11prevent health issues and prevent homelessness or house

0:31:15business within our community.

0:31:17Thank you for your time.

0:31:19Thank you.

The first speaker, Miguel Gravelle, made the case for the recreation department in terms borrowed from the police budget debate.

His framing: “any further reductions to our rec department would further reduce equity in our city.”

His three arguments all run the same way. First: “the rec department is a preventative public safety system, and it helps prevent crime by just keeping folks out of trouble.”

Second: “a preventative public health system… it keeps people healthy to prevent costly health issues that could put people on the street.”

Third: “a preventative to housing insecurity… by employing hard working wage earners who are a paycheck or two away from not making rent.”

That last one is about the department's own staff, not its users.

Then the ask: “please cut the police budget rather than our budget — as the police react to crime, react to health issues and react to homelessness… by kicking folks out of our community.”

Against which recreation “helps prevent crime, prevent health issues and prevent homelessness.”

Significant

Recreation is argued for as prevention of the same problems the police respond to — crime, health issues and homelessness.

05 A mental health task force captions 443–519

0:31:22Our next speaker is me seen show.

0:31:25You are admitted and can begin in your time now.

0:31:29All right.

0:31:30Can you hear guys hear me?

0:31:32That's nice.

0:31:33All right.

0:31:33Awesome first of all, I just want to acknowledge Tessa

0:31:37for being awesome, connecting me with somebody

0:31:39from the community.

0:31:41And I was going to walk on the senior store,

0:31:43which was awesome because of what I said a few weeks ago.

0:31:46So I just love the fact that the community can be like this.

0:31:49And so thank you, Tessa, for being outstanding like that,

0:31:52connecting some citizens in a meaningful way.

0:31:55And I just want to back up again,

0:31:56guys that like this emotional, social, emotional task force.

0:32:00One of my friends who's a PhD in the mental health community,

0:32:04she said, we should say mental health

0:32:06task force might be a better thing for us

0:32:09to kind of organize.

0:32:11And I do want to call out anybody

0:32:12else who wants to come join.

0:32:15With that being said, I also want to bring to light

0:32:18what's going on in India.

0:32:19I just hope being Indian myself, I know how many Indian people

0:32:22are in this community.

0:32:24I'm really troubled.

0:32:26There's been censorship by the Indian government, which

0:32:28is supposedly the largest democracy in the world,

0:32:31but they've been censoring and doing human rights

0:32:33violations on farmers.

0:32:35So I just implore everybody here,

0:32:37the elected officials, check out with you just research.

0:32:40I always say, don't trust any one source.

0:32:43Look at everything, especially people

0:32:45on the ground, as Howard Zinn taught us, which is, you know,

0:32:48listen to people's stories.

0:32:49So we're on the ground.

0:32:50And I know it's for the farmers.

0:32:52And I just want to make a really quick connection

0:32:53to the mental health and also something we could do maybe

0:32:56to raise money for the community through some sort of activity.

0:32:59I do see a connection between what's

0:33:02going on the farmers in India.

0:33:03And what farmers here in America are experiencing.

0:33:06And that connects to our food deserts and our food crisis

0:33:10here and the expense of how expensive fruits and vegetables

0:33:13are, which is insane, because we have so much land,

0:33:17but it's not used well.

0:33:18And we have farm workers who are abused

0:33:20and we have illegal immigrants who are

0:33:22abused and not their families.

0:33:23So there's a lot of connections to what's going to India here

0:33:26and how corporate greed, corporate toxicity, I would

0:33:29say, has kind of like really polluted our waters literally

0:33:34and polluted our farmlands here in America

0:33:36and how maybe we can help raise money for the city

0:33:39while improving mental health.

0:33:40Maybe we can do some celebration of farmers

0:33:42and that would be a way to help through mental health stuff.

0:33:44And we have music and free farmer's market here.

0:33:47And we could bring in I mean, there's a lot of cool things

0:33:49we could do to celebrate farmers, give

0:33:52free food and health, and maybe even

0:33:53tips on how to be healthier.

0:33:55I would like prevent getting the virus like, you know,

0:33:57improving your immune system through diet, through.

0:34:01There's so many cool things we could do.

0:34:03But I really want to continue advocating for this task force

0:34:06because I don't have the answers.

0:34:08I would love to include older folks, young folks,

0:34:10artists, engineers, therapists.

0:34:13We've got to come together a little bit.

0:34:15And indigenous folks, if there's people in the community who

0:34:18have indigenous knowledge, you know, and the technologies to,

0:34:22you know, we can work together, I believe.

0:34:24And this is the time to do it.

A speaker returned to an idea from an earlier meeting, with a correction to its name.

His thanks first, to a councilmember who had connected him to someone: “I just love the fact that the community can be like this… connecting some citizens in a meaningful way.”

What had come of it: he had joined a senior stroll.

Then the proposal. He had been calling it a “social emotional task force,” but a friend “who's a PhD in the mental health community” advised that “mental health task force might be a better thing for us to kind of organize.”

His invitation: “I do want to call out anybody else who wants to come join.”

He also raised what was happening in India.

Nothing in this archive reports a mental health task force being formed.

Significant

A resident-organized mental health task force is proposed here and nothing in this archive reports it forming.

06 “Rings kind of hollow” captions 520–579

0:34:26If there's any time, then now it's when people we need it.

0:34:29It's a crisis.

0:34:30Right and we could do amazing things in a crisis.

0:34:32Thank you, guys.

0:34:34Thank you.

0:34:37And next week, I say, drobny, show you and me

0:34:40dating can begin your time out.

0:34:42OK, Thanks.

0:34:43Hello, everybody.

0:34:45I just want to say thank you to the last two speakers.

0:34:48I really enjoyed hearing both the comments from both of them.

0:34:52And what I want to say is somewhat related, although it

0:34:55may not seem that way.

0:34:56But the platform that we're using for the city council

0:34:59meetings, the web platform, I know that it

0:35:02could be altered in a way.

0:35:05So that we can actually see the attendees

0:35:08and know who in the community is involved.

0:35:12It's really alienating to have the meetings run like this.

0:35:18I've been in other meetings that are with this platform.

0:35:22And they're really quite different.

0:35:23And they bring people together more so

0:35:27in a time of COVID isolation.

0:35:31I'm glad that you're doing the people's business,

0:35:33but I think there's a way you can be more

0:35:36community centered in doing it.

0:35:38And I hope that you might.

0:35:39And I don't think it's going to cost you any money.

0:35:42So I'm hoping maybe you might consider changing

0:35:47the settings on your platform.

0:35:49So that we know how many attendees

0:35:51are at the meeting, who they are,

0:35:53even have them in the framework, if we want.

0:35:57So just is something to consider.

0:35:58Thank you.

0:35:59Thank you for sharing.

0:36:02And next, because Howdy Doody didn't begin your time now,

0:36:09thank you, three council members.

0:36:11My name is Howdy Doody.

0:36:12I live in those three.

0:36:13Do I just wanted to recognize item for on the Senate

0:36:22calendar, the reinstatement or appointment

0:36:26to the Climate Action subcommittee of the council.

0:36:30I appreciate that happening.

0:36:33And I look forward to that subcommittee

0:36:37meeting and returning to council with recommendations.

0:36:42And I hope you will do.

0:36:43So rather swiftly.

0:36:45It's been a long time since our climate emergency declaration

0:36:49was adopted in August of 2019 and we really

0:36:53need to show some commitment and action on climate conditions.

0:37:02And you know, that meeting, there

0:37:05was a lot of very heartfelt and, you know,

0:37:10very passionate comments from council

0:37:14members at that meeting.

0:37:15And it was it was very heartening to hear.

0:37:19But, you know, that rings kind of hollow when there's

0:37:22no action to follow it up.

0:37:24So I really am looking forward to seeing

0:37:29some recommendations come from the Climate

Another speaker asked the city to change its Zoom settings so that attendees can be seen: “It's really alienating to have the meetings run like this.” Then Howdy Goudey welcomed a consent item and used it to make a point about follow-through.

The item: “the reinstatement or appointment to the Climate Action subcommittee of the council.”

His hope: that it would meet and return “to council with recommendations… rather swiftly.”

The reason for urgency: “it's been a long time since our climate emergency declaration was adopted in August of 2019 and we really need to show some commitment and action.”

Then the sharper observation about that declaration: “there was a lot of very heartfelt and very passionate comments from council members at that meeting. And it was very heartening to hear.”

But: “that rings kind of hollow when there's no action to follow it up.”

Eighteen months separate the declaration from this change to the subcommittee's membership.

The same argument against a $570,000 diesel truck purchase is made a month later, on the same declaration.

Significant

“That rings kind of hollow when there's no action to follow it up” — said eighteen months after the climate emergency declaration, as the Council modifies the Climate Action subcommittee's membership. The same declaration is used a month later to argue against buying diesel recycling trucks.

07 Camps, and before and after care captions 580–686

0:37:32Action subcommittee.

0:37:32So thank you for moving that forward.

0:37:35And please bring your report back to council

0:37:37as soon as possible.

0:37:39Thank you.

0:37:40Thank you.

0:37:42The next speaker is making we're making do.

0:37:46And we did.

0:37:46And can begin your time now.

0:37:49Thanks Thanks so much for the opportunity

0:37:52to speak this evening.

0:37:53I'm a resident of ulcerate when I'm speaking to the agenda item

0:37:58seven regarding the budget reductions

0:38:01and really just wanted to weigh in

0:38:03that any reductions to the recreation department

0:38:05are really deeply felt by families.

0:38:07And also, you know, I've lived in Sweden

0:38:10now for over a decade.

0:38:11And my partner and I are raising two kids here,

0:38:13one in elementary school and another starting kindergarten

0:38:16this fall.

0:38:17And for us and for many other families,

0:38:19we know the recreation department truly

0:38:21serves as a critical hub for our community, providing engaging

0:38:24and fun and affordable summer camps before and after care

0:38:27when school is in session, fun and celebratory community

0:38:31activities and services year round

0:38:33while working to make them accessible to residents

0:38:35of all backgrounds and income levels.

0:38:38These connections are increasingly critical as we

0:38:40work to collectively address the many crises facing

0:38:43our communities that were discussed at the beginning

0:38:47of this meeting.

0:38:48And during the pandemic.

0:38:50The recreation department has also provided incredible safety

0:38:53oriented care.

0:38:54So that our daughter can attend school remotely and that

0:38:57my husband and I can continue to do our jobs.

0:39:00The staff at the recreation department are truly top notch.

0:39:04I'm sure you're all well aware of that.

0:39:06And I am just consistently blown away

0:39:08and grateful by their professionalism,

0:39:10conscientiousness and dedication to the health, safety

0:39:13and happiness of our children.

0:39:15I know we're in challenging times were difficult decisions

0:39:18are being made, I hope you will consider

0:39:20the immediate and lasting benefits of the recreation

0:39:23department for the physical and mental health and safety

0:39:26of our kids, for our families and for the larger

0:39:29community and austereo and making these decisions

0:39:32and do what you can to keep these invaluable services

0:39:35intact while supporting the continued employment

0:39:38of essential workers.

0:39:40Thank you.

0:39:42And I just want to say that for others that might want

0:39:45to comment on that, we do you can comment

0:39:48in the context of that item number

0:39:50seven policy matters when we have public comment that time.

0:39:57We do have one more public speaker,

0:39:59Leslie Adams, firstly, you were unmute and can

0:40:01be taking your time now.

0:40:04Hey there.

0:40:05Good evening.

0:40:07I was going to comment on the seven as well,

0:40:10but I'll wait till later.

0:40:13Right and I also want to welcome our new council members.

0:40:17And congratulations to the mayor.

0:40:20Thank you.

0:40:22Thank you very much.

0:40:24That does conclude our request to speak at this time.

0:40:27Great, thank you all.

0:40:28Thank you all for coming and commenting.

0:40:31I'd like to move on to the adoption

0:40:33of the consent calendar.

0:40:35Let me read those items for consideration.

0:40:41We have on the consent calendar black History

0:40:46Month proclamation.

0:40:49We have the.

0:40:53Lunar new year proclamation.

0:40:55Lots of good celebrations this month.

0:40:58As Howard, he mentioned, we have a modification

0:41:00to the Climate Action subcommittee assignment

0:41:03having with Janet Olson and Tessa Rudnick being part

0:41:07of that subcommittee, we have the second reading

0:41:10of the adoption of our ordinance dealing

0:41:12with our rules of water, which we discussed with a couple.

0:41:18Council meetings, we have the urban forest committee

0:41:21reapportioned reappointment of Robin Mitchell,

0:41:25and here's to Robin Mitchell, who is a nurturer

0:41:28and nurtures our city.

0:41:30Thank you, robin, for all that you do.

0:41:32And then we have the adoption of a resolution

0:41:34to set urban forest committee term limits

0:41:37to three terms instead of two.

0:41:40Do I have anyone that might want to pull an item

0:41:44or do I hear a motion?

0:41:46I'd like to move adoption of the consent calendar

0:41:50a, b, c, d, E and F second and move

0:41:57by Mayor pro tem Gabe Pinto and seconded by Janet abels.

0:42:02Then call the roll.

0:42:05Man, fidele, I may I put encanto,

0:42:09I can't remember apison, I can't remember motorama,

0:42:14I can't remember ribbeck.

0:42:16I mentioned keris.

0:42:19Thank you very much.

0:42:20We have no presentations today, no public hearings,

0:42:26and we move on to our policy matters.

A parent made the recreation case from the user side.

Her standing: a resident “for over a decade,” raising “two kids here, one in elementary school and another starting kindergarten this fall.”

What the department provides: “a critical hub for our community, providing engaging and fun and affordable summer camps, before and after care when school is in session” and year-round activities.

The qualifier that matters: all of it “while working to make them accessible to residents of all backgrounds and income levels.”

Her framing of the moment: these connections are “increasingly critical as we work to collectively address the many crises facing our communities.”

Public comment closed and the Mayor read the consent calendar.

Its items: a Black History Month proclamation and a Lunar New Year proclamation — “lots of good celebrations this month” — and the modification to the Climate Action subcommittee assignment, seating two councilmembers on it.

That is the appointment the previous speaker had welcomed and asked to move swiftly.

Also on the calendar: the second reading of the rules of order ordinance, the reappointment of Robin Mitchell to the Urban Forest Committee, and three-term limits for that committee. The calendar was adopted on a motion by Quinto, seconded by Abelson.

The budget item then filled the rest of the evening.

Cross-reference

Before and after care is what lets parents work. The swim center's staffing collapses by May 2022, after two lost years of lifeguard certification classes.

08 “Not something anybody wants to cut” captions 687–1056

0:42:30This is the adoption of our general fund budget

0:42:34update for December 20 '20.

0:42:37We're going to receive an update on the city general fund

0:42:40revenues and expenses for fiscal year 2021 through December 20

0:42:45'20 and direct staff on mid-year budget modifications

0:42:50for the fiscal year.

0:42:522021 adopted budget.

0:42:55Can we have a report from our staff, please?

0:43:01Yes, your honor, I will queue up.

0:43:04Presentation all right.

0:43:16All right, thank you very much.

0:43:17Again, I'm Karen Pinkus, I'm the city manager.

0:43:19I'm here with our finance director, mark grossetête.

0:43:23And we will be presenting to you tonight a general fund update,

0:43:26which will include the monthly reports that are

0:43:28through the end of December.

0:43:32This is meant to be a study session that we'll

0:43:37go over a little bit of review to where we were and do what we

0:43:42will propose for mid-year budget modifications

0:43:45that we will bring to you at the next meeting.

0:43:48So just to go over, I'm going to start just with a little bit

0:43:52of review, certainly for the benefit of the new council

0:43:55members, as well as some of the public and the actions

0:43:58that we have taken to date.

0:44:01I'm going to review a bit of the general fund

0:44:03balanced forecasts that we had put

0:44:06presented in the last budget.

0:44:08But we do have some updates.

0:44:09Thanks to our upcoming comprehensive

0:44:12annual financial report.

0:44:15We will go over the monthly reports.

0:44:16Will go over those with you.

0:44:18And those are attachments 1 to 3 in your packets.

0:44:23Then I would like to go over what our proposed budget

0:44:27adjustments that we will bring to you at the next February

0:44:3216th council meeting.

0:44:33And those are shown in attachment form and then

0:44:37to have a discussion in any direction of the city council

0:44:40from that point.

0:44:43So here is just a bit of a review as to where we've gotten

0:44:46so far, the fiscal year 2020 when

0:44:49amended budget, the baseline, if you recall, this is

0:44:54the conversation for this year's budget,

0:44:56began way back in February, this of 2020.

0:45:00So a year ago.

0:45:02Seems like forever ago, but it's one year ago,

0:45:05where we had a conversation.

0:45:07We actually a year ago yesterday had a town hall

0:45:10meeting with the community.

0:45:12The state auditor's report had placed Wall

0:45:16Street on the high risk list.

0:45:18And as we were projecting our baseline budget for this year,

0:45:22we recognized that we needed to make reductions right away.

0:45:26This was, again, pre COVID, the projected general

0:45:30fund revenues at that time.

0:45:32As you see, there were 42.7 million.

0:45:35And for revenues and expenditures of 42.6 million.

0:45:40So based on our financial position and then a month

0:45:42later, we're coming up on the year

0:45:44anniversary of our local emergency,

0:45:46which I will never forget.

0:45:48It was Friday, March 13th, 20 20, Friday the 13th.

0:45:52We will be in the local emergency for one year.

0:45:55And I fully expect that will remain status quo until then,

0:45:59unless a miracle happens based on our financial position

0:46:03prior to coordinate.

0:46:04And then what ended up happening with COVID in April 2020 staff

0:46:10presented city council with expenditure

0:46:12reductions of $4 million to that projected budget.

0:46:16At that time, the city council directed staff to prepare

0:46:19a one year proposed budget.

0:46:22In the previous budget cycles, we

0:46:24did a two year biennial budget.

0:46:26This we decided to do a one year budget

0:46:28and will likely do another one year budget next year

0:46:32because of the volatility and uncertainty in the economy

0:46:36and with our revenues and expenditures

0:46:38and just complete unprecedented with the unprecedented impacts

0:46:47because of covid-19.

0:46:49So in June, on June 16th, the city council

0:46:53adopted a preliminary budget, which was the starting point

0:46:57for what we ended up amending in October for the fiscal year,

0:47:032021 budget.

0:47:04We developed a budget document that is on our website

0:47:07and that is what the council approved in October.

0:47:09So the reductions ended up going the bringing the budget down

0:47:14to 39.3 million in revenues and 38.7 million

0:47:19in expenses for this fiscal year.

0:47:21You will also recall that we worked with the management

0:47:24partners, which was a consulting firm that we had originally

0:47:27contracted to do our strategic plan

0:47:29and morphed into a fiscal response plan

0:47:32to be responsive to all that was happening with COVID

0:47:37and the recession, all of the economic impacts

0:47:40that we are still frankly going through.

0:47:43And so combined, if you include not just the general fund,

0:47:46but all of our special funds, the amended fiscal year,

0:47:502021 budget is a total of 53.2 million

0:47:54and provides funding for all city services.

0:47:58So this is a chart of the cost savings

0:48:00that were implemented prior to the preliminary budget being

0:48:05adopted, 1.6 million had been identified

0:48:08by staff that was brought to the city council in April.

0:48:12We renegotiated management and confidential compensation

0:48:16and benefits and eliminated cost of living adjustments from all

0:48:19of the bargaining units.

0:48:20And once again, I would like to thank

0:48:22all of our bargaining units for working with us

0:48:24to be able to accomplish that.

0:48:26Those are ongoing cost savings, which

0:48:28will have impacts in later fiscal years of 2.698 million.

0:48:33The one time savings that we were

0:48:35able to achieve in this fiscal year, where furloughs 13

0:48:38days for all non sworn public safety

0:48:41and for all non-public safety, rather,

0:48:45and managers for an additional 13 days.

0:48:48So the one time savings.

0:48:49We achieve this year was $959,000.

0:48:54And then I wanted to just review what

0:48:56was in the fiscal response plan that was

0:48:58adopted by the city council.

0:49:00And that was incorporated into this year's budget.

0:49:03So these are all reductions, mostly personnel,

0:49:07with the exception of the one, two, three, 4/5 line down

0:49:11where it talks about public works that funding $165,000

0:49:16was shifted from the general fund to measure h.

0:49:20Finance was in changing some service delivery.

0:49:24So that was some contractual reductions.

0:49:27The rest that are listed there for city

0:49:29administration, fire, police and recreation,

0:49:32where all personnel reductions, whether through layoffs

0:49:36or through retirements or vacancies that were achieved.

0:49:40And you can see that city administration

0:49:42to in the amount of about $345,000 for your department

0:49:48and $210,000 and the police department,

0:49:52$595,000 in recreation at 166,000 dollars.

0:49:57So the total ongoing fiscal impacts

0:50:00of the implementation of the fiscal response plan

0:50:03shows $1.5 million savings.

0:50:06And if you recall, the management partners dashboard

0:50:09and fiscal response plan, which again, is included

0:50:13within the budget document, is meant

0:50:15to show that continuing these savings

0:50:18and continuing these ongoing fiscal impacts.

0:50:21So that we maintain these within our budget

0:50:24will allow us to achieve our fund,

0:50:26our general fund reserve balance goal by 2026.

0:50:33So this is a list of all of the assumptions

0:50:36of the fiscal response plan.

0:50:38And in the impacts of covid-19, the first few

0:50:42are of what we've already done.

0:50:45And the last few are some of the things

0:50:48that have been included since the adoption

0:50:52of the budget in October.

0:50:54So first and foremost, per county regulations, we do

0:50:58have reduced recreation programs and services,

0:51:00including all of the programs, the midtown activity center.

0:51:05Originally, we had discussed that that could be at least

0:51:07through the end of 2020.

0:51:09Now we are anticipating and assuming that the status

0:51:12quo will continue through 2021.

0:51:15So I just want to pause here for a second.

0:51:17I've seen the written public comments

0:51:20and I've heard the public comments

0:51:21that were given earlier.

0:51:23And there may be further down.

0:51:25I just want to make a note about recreation.

0:51:27So the recreation department was presented to the city council

0:51:32in December and discussed what they have been doing, what they

0:51:36have been providing, and a huge shout out to our recreation

0:51:40director, Chris Jones, and all of his staff

0:51:43for being unbelievably creative and responsive

0:51:46and resilient in how they have been able to work

0:51:51within the county, regulations that

0:51:53are in the restrictions that are imposed on them

0:51:56to provide the services they do.

0:51:58But the reality is this.

0:52:00The reality is we are only able to provide

0:52:04what we are allowed to provide per the county regulations.

0:52:07So the reductions in the programming and the reductions

0:52:10in the services are not as a result

0:52:13of simply financial issues.

0:52:15They are a result of COVID.

0:52:18They are a result of what we have been able to provide.

0:52:21And that we can't provide showing

0:52:24there the midtown activity center that's listed there.

0:52:27That's a big example of a service that

0:52:30we literally just cannot provide right

0:52:32now per county regulations.

0:52:33And certainly that is one of our most vulnerable populations

0:52:37that we do not intend to try to push that envelope at all.

0:52:41We want to make sure that we are providing

0:52:42a safe and effective and healthy services as we can,

0:52:47but we are restricted in what we can do.

0:52:50That said, what we have reduced and recreation

0:52:54is based on not just the demand, but also what we're allowed.

0:52:59And the demand is also important because when we adopted

0:53:05the budget in October, I really believe we had all certainly

0:53:09hoped, if not expected, that the kids would go back to school

0:53:13at some point during the school year.

0:53:15Right now, that's not looking to happen.

0:53:18And so we have to adjust accordingly.

0:53:21If the demand isn't there, if the ability

0:53:24to provide the service isn't there,

0:53:26we have to retract and scale back.

0:53:29It is not a measure of reducing services because we're

0:53:33trying to balance the budget.

0:53:34It is a matter of having to make sure

0:53:36that we are providing safe services

0:53:38and what we are allowed to provide.

0:53:40And we can be responsive to that.

0:53:43And we can ramp back up once regulations

0:53:46become the restrictions are eased or everyone's vaccinated.

0:53:50And we're looking at being able to provide

0:53:52a full complement of programs the same way we were before.

0:53:56Or maybe the demand will be different by the time

0:53:58COVID is over.

0:53:59Chris and his team has been really

0:54:01wonderful at adjusting to that.

0:54:03So I just want to make sure that the public understands

0:54:05that, you know, we absolutely understand,

0:54:09respect and count on our recreation department

0:54:12to provide the services they do.

0:54:14And we are simply having to respond to the restrictions

0:54:18that are placed before us.

0:54:20If we would do more, if we could do more,

0:54:22we certainly would do our best to do more.

0:54:25So I just want to give a shout out to Chris and his staff

0:54:28for being responsive and then just

0:54:30assure the public that this is not something I want to cut.

0:54:34This is not something anybody wants to cut.

0:54:36This is something that we are forced to respond to because

0:54:39of COVID restrictions.

0:54:42The second bullet point there is that we those were

0:54:45the elimination of those positions that were considered

0:54:50in the fiscal response plan, those

0:54:52were in the city management and recreation departments in fire.

0:54:57A little bit of the opposite occurred

0:54:59because we have staffing minimum requirements

0:55:02in our fire department.

0:55:03So if there are vacancies or layoffs or openings,

0:55:06we have to backfill them with overtime

0:55:08because we have a minimum staffing

0:55:10that we need to provide.

0:55:11And so in the previous fiscal years,

0:55:14overtime was becoming bigger, a bigger and bigger number

0:55:18and having a bigger short term impact on our budget.

0:55:21And so in order to provide some sustainability,

0:55:24we filled the three vacant positions.

0:55:26So reducing our overtime in the short term.

0:55:29But in the long term, those three vacant positions

0:55:32were filled with new firefighters that

0:55:34have a lower pension liability than our classic war

0:55:39veteran firefighters.

0:55:40So that does achieve a savings, which

0:55:43we'll go over in a little bit.

0:55:45Restructuring of the police department,

0:55:47this has also been discussed at length with the city council,

0:55:50we've reduced our sworn staff to 37 officers.

0:55:53That includes eliminating one of our divisions.

0:55:56And chief keef has been very open about continuing

0:56:00to look at how we're providing services.

0:56:03As you saw in the previous slide,

0:56:04they have eliminated about $600,000 worth.

0:56:08So as far as all of the departments have gone,

0:56:11that is the most significant to date.

0:56:13And so we have reduced those operations.

0:56:16And the chief and his team has been incredibly

0:56:19responsive in agreeing to look at how we can

0:56:22restructure and reimagine how we do our policing services

0:56:26in El cerrito.

0:56:28So the personnel reductions and savings from all

0:56:30of the vacancies and layoffs will take

0:56:33did take effect on January 1st.

0:56:36The next set of bullets are what have

0:56:38occurred that are occurring.

0:56:41This this calendar year.

0:56:43So we do have additional vacant positions.

0:56:45And this is reflected in the staffing numbers

0:56:47that mark will go over.

0:56:48And in just a few minutes, we've had

0:56:51three additional vacancies that have occurred in city

0:56:54management and recreation.

0:56:56These were voluntary resignations and retirements.

0:56:59They were not layoffs.

0:57:01And so we are keeping those positions vacant.

0:57:04One of them you all know, our human resources

0:57:07manager, Kristin Cunningham, who has appeared at this before.

0:57:12This council many times.

0:57:13Gee, we wish her well.

0:57:15She is accepted a position at the Contra

0:57:17Costa water district.

0:57:19Her I think her last day is the end of this week officially.

0:57:24But she has been a wonderful member of our team

0:57:26and we wish her well.

0:57:27But you see Alexandra or lagus, who is in your grid,

0:57:33she is the assistant city manager,

0:57:35is now up to, I believe, four jobs.

0:57:38The city manager's office now consists of me and Alex.

0:57:42And between Alex and me, we are taking on,

0:57:45especially Alex is taking on the position of interim human

0:57:48resources manager.

0:57:49She has also picked up some of the duties

0:57:52of our former assistant to the city manager, who was one

0:57:55of the lay offs, including staff liaison to the arts

0:57:59and culture commission.

0:58:01And just for everyone's edification,

0:58:03I'm re teaching myself how to update the website.

0:58:06So I'm going to be taking on some of those duties as.

0:58:10And as you know, at the last city council meeting,

0:58:13the police employees association revised,

0:58:15you approved a revised IOU so that they could defer

0:58:19their cost of living adjustment from January

0:58:21to July, which achieved a savings of about $110,000.

0:58:27We've canceled major events due to covid-19

0:58:30and we've canceled these last year.

0:58:33So I'm here to make the unfortunate

0:58:35announcement that we're going to be canceling them again,

0:58:37this year.

0:58:38I don't think anyone really ever expected it

0:58:41over the past couple of months that we would be able to pull

0:58:44this off is a safety issue.

0:58:46It is certainly a timing issue, but we

0:58:51will not be holding Earth Day and July 4th this year.

0:58:55There will be expense reductions because of that.

0:58:58And we'll talk about that in a little bit.

0:59:00Earth day, we certainly want to encourage

0:59:03people to be able to try to do their own Earth Day.

0:59:06Perhaps we won't be able to have a gathering at the community

0:59:09center like we usually do, but we're

0:59:11hoping that people will certainly acknowledge Earth Day

0:59:13and then July 4th, we just can't see

0:59:16any scenario where a mass gathering of that

0:59:18will be allowed.

0:59:19And even if it were, would we want

0:59:21to be responsible for something like that?

0:59:23So if vaccinations aren't really going to hit everyone

0:59:27in until maybe the end of the summer,

0:59:30you know, we're just going to have to play that by ear again.

0:59:32But at this point, as Chris and I

0:59:34have talked about with I think many of you

0:59:37in many community members, it takes

0:59:39a lot of planning to pull off a July

0:59:414th festival, he and his crew.

0:59:43And right now is when we would already be contacting vendors

0:59:47and food and all of that stuff.

0:59:49And and no one in no one would want

0:59:52to even commit to something like that at this point.

0:59:54So just making sure that we're making the sad announcement

0:59:59that it is true.

1:00:00This year, we will be canceling both Earth

1:00:02Day and July 4th and the rest will be determined.

1:00:06But that is what we're looking at right now.

1:00:09And then other expense reductions, which will again,

1:00:11we'll go over in a little bit.

1:00:13Mark, we'll talk about in a monthly report,

1:00:16particularly in some of the departments,

1:00:18as we have been looking at trends.

1:00:20And we have been looking at because of covid, I

1:00:23think milperra time Quinton mentioned before, you know,

1:00:27people aren't traveling, people aren't going places.

1:00:30There's a lot of things that not even traveling as far

1:00:34as a conference, but even traveling as far as

1:00:36and meeting those things aren't happening.

1:00:39And so there's a lot of expense reductions

1:00:40that are kind of a ripple effect that are coming in,

1:00:45a lot of our line items, again, due to COVID.

1:00:48So there are some silver linings to the cloud.

1:00:52So the general fund forecast and this

1:00:54is where has allowed me to be able to provide

Her review: in February 2020 the city projected $42.7 million in revenue; after COVID, staff proposed $4 million in reductions, and the October budget came down to $39.3 million in revenue and $38.7 million in expenses ($53.2 million across all funds). Savings included $2.7 million ongoing from renegotiated compensation and no cost of living increases, and $959,000 one-time from 13 furlough days.

The fiscal response plan's personnel reductions — city administration about $345,000, fire $210,000, police $595,000, recreation $166,000 — totaled about $1.5 million a year, meant to reach the general fund reserve goal by 2026.

The City Manager opened the budget item by addressing the speakers directly.

Her framing of the session: a study session reviewing where things stood, with “mid-year budget modifications that we will bring to you at the next meeting.”

Then the recreation answer. The reductions there are driven by closure, not preference: the city is “simply having to respond to the restrictions that are placed before us.”

Her statement of intent: “if we could do more, we certainly would do our best to do more.”

And plainly: “this is not something I want to cut. This is not something anybody wants to cut. This is something that we are forced to respond to because of COVID restrictions.”

She credited the department for adapting, noting the uncertainty ahead: “we're looking at being able to provide a full complement of programs the same way we were before — or maybe the demand will be different by the time COVID is over.”

The eliminated positions in the fiscal response plan were “in the city management and recreation departments.”

Fire went the other way: “we have staffing minimum requirements in our fire department,” so vacancies there generate overtime rather than savings.

Police sworn staff had been reduced to 37, eliminating a division; three more vacancies in city management and recreation, including the human resources manager, would be held open; and the police association had deferred its cost of living increase, saving about $110,000.

Earth Day and the Fourth of July were canceled again.

Significant

Recreation cuts are driven by COVID restrictions on what can be offered, the City Manager says, not by the budget. Fire works in reverse: minimum staffing means a vacancy costs overtime, so the city filled three firefighter vacancies.

09 Restore first, then rebuild captions 1057–1190

1:00:58some positive developments for the city council

1:01:02and for the city.

1:01:03So the city, as you know, works with Baddeley associates.

1:01:09They are independent auditor to complete

1:01:12the comprehensive annual financial report, which

1:01:15is the cafo for 1920, which will be presented to the city

1:01:18council at your next meeting.

1:01:21We have scheduled Mr. Badawi to be

1:01:22able to come and present the cafo to you

1:01:24at the next meeting on February 16.

1:01:28So the general fund balance will again, be in a deficit position

1:01:31as expected.

1:01:35However, what I would like to do is take a look at this chart.

1:01:40So this chart is what was adopted in the annual budget.

1:01:45And so if you look at twenty, seventeen, 1820 1819 these

1:01:51are the actual budget numbers through that

1:01:56are listed in our cafer.

1:01:59So the fund balance here, which is the difference between.

1:02:05The revenues we get and the expenses we spend,

1:02:09whatever our annual surplus or deficit is, is our balance.

1:02:13The balance builds on each other each year.

1:02:17So in 2018 at the end of 2018 we had

1:02:20$87,000 in our fund balance.

1:02:24I'll remind you that our minimum balance should

1:02:27be 10% It was at 0.2% In 2019 and this was partially

1:02:34due as we had went over at the time with you,

1:02:38that revenues were overestimated and expenditures

1:02:43were underestimated.

1:02:44A lot of this was unfortunately due to the increased

1:02:48fire season and impacted firefighter overtime

1:02:52significantly.

1:02:53So our annual deficit at that year

1:02:56was $144,000 added to the $87,000

1:03:00gave us a negative on balance of $56,000.

1:03:03So in a serious deficit position.

1:03:07This column here, the 1920 unaudited column,

1:03:10is what we had expected, what we had projected,

1:03:14this was our worst case scenario, the 2.3 million

1:03:18deficit was based on what we thought our sales tax,

1:03:22especially sales tax, would be.

1:03:26Which would have put us at a negative reserve of 5.9

1:03:30percent, this year's adopted budget assumed, as we say,

1:03:35the 39 million 39.3 million revenue, 38.7 million expenses

1:03:41would have achieved a surplus of $663,000

1:03:46which you add to the 2.3 would give us a fund balance of 1.7.

1:03:52So I am pleased to report, however,

1:03:55that our deficit is much lower than originally

1:03:59projected, which was 2.3 million.

1:04:02Our actual edited, audited ending total fund balance

1:04:05is a negative $110,000.

1:04:09That is significant difference.

1:04:11This is due largely to better than expected sales

1:04:16tax receipts, which we have discussed

1:04:17in previous monthly reports, particularly

1:04:20the online sales due to the county

1:04:23pool and the online sales.

1:04:25So thank you, everyone who has ordered from Amazon,

1:04:31and that actually has helped us out significantly.

1:04:33So we get a portion of that.

1:04:36Also, deferred sales tax receipts.

1:04:38We were concerned, this was part of our calculation

1:04:41that the governor had allowed for a deferral of businesses

1:04:45to pay their sales tax receipts.

1:04:48So we were not sure when they would

1:04:50be able to be counted toward.

1:04:53Would it be able to be counted toward the previous fiscal year

1:04:55or would we have to count it in this fiscal year?

1:04:57And the auditor was allowed us to take a significant level

1:05:02of what we thought were going to be

1:05:03deferred sales tax revenue receipts

1:05:05and count them in this fiscal year.

1:05:08And the real property transfer tax was

1:05:10much higher than anticipated.

1:05:12And also the expense reductions that we took, the actions

1:05:15that we took at the end of last fiscal year,

1:05:18including the furloughs of all of our staff, all

1:05:21of our non-public safety staff, and in some

1:05:25of the immediate reductions that we

1:05:27made prior to July one of 2020.

1:05:30So this is wonderful news as far as it negative 110

1:05:35is not negative 2.3 million, but it's still negative

1:05:40and we are still in a deficit position.

1:05:43And so it's very positive and it's very good news.

1:05:46But we have to make sure we keep our eye

1:05:48on the ball to note that we're still in a deficit

1:05:51position for this year.

1:05:52But what this provides us with is a chance

1:05:56to end this fiscal year with a positive fund balance, which

1:06:01was not anticipated in the fiscal response plan

1:06:03and not anticipated in our budget.

1:06:05So I'm going to turn over to in a second

1:06:08to go over the monthly reports.

1:06:10But I just want to make sure that that is very

1:06:12clear to the city council is, the more quickly we can restore

1:06:16ourselves to financial health.

1:06:19The better off we will be much more quickly that we can bring

1:06:23back some of the services we were anticipating cutting,

1:06:26which, again, was what we discussed when we adopted

1:06:30the fiscal response plan, the idea was we would be

1:06:32able to get to a high level of fund balance,

1:06:35including our emergency fund, and then

1:06:38we can take a look at restoring some of the services that

1:06:41had been cut.

1:06:42This and last fiscal year.

1:06:44So with that, I'm going to turn it over to be able to discuss

1:06:50the monthly reports.

1:06:53And if I think you can all see these.

1:06:56So, mark, if you want to go ahead and just

1:06:58let me know if I need to.

1:07:00When you're ready for me to go to the next slide,

1:07:03or if I need to focus on something.

1:07:11I just want to check to see if you can see

1:07:13the numbers and the narrative and everything

1:07:15else that goes with that.

1:07:17If not, I could share my screen with you.

1:07:20And share the staff report instead

1:07:22with exactly the same thing.

1:07:24Is this a good.

1:07:30OK, why don't you go ahead.

1:07:32OK, so this is the income statement

1:07:37for the month of December to July through December,

1:07:39the same format that we've used in the past over the past five

1:07:42to six months.

1:07:44And before I start digging into the numbers,

1:07:47I would like to draw your attention to the very last line

1:07:50in on this chart, the very bottom line.

1:07:54And as Karen pointed out back in 1819,

1:07:58the difference between revenues and expenses

1:08:02was a negative 143,000.

1:08:04So that last line is not fund balance.

1:08:06It's simply the excess of revenues or expenditures

1:08:10over the revenues that was made during that year.

1:08:14So that the negative $143,000 in the draft audited 1920s.

1:08:19It was that same number.

The City Manager set out the logic connecting cuts now to services later.

The fund balance history: $87,000 at the end of 2018, 0.2% against a 10% minimum; a $144,000 deficit in 2019 left it at minus $56,000. The worst case for 2019-20 had been minus $2.3 million.

The audited result is minus $110,000, thanks largely to sales tax — online sales through the county pool and deferred receipts the auditor allowed to count — higher transfer tax, and the furloughs. That gives the city a chance to end this year with a positive balance.

Her statement of it: “the more quickly we can restore ourselves to financial health, the better off we will be” and the more quickly “we can bring back some of the services we were anticipating cutting.”

That was the premise of the fiscal response plan: reach “a high level of fund balance, including our emergency fund, and then we can take a look at restoring some of the services that had been cut.”

The finance director then took over for the monthly reports, in “the same format that we've used in the past over the past five to six months.”

The report covers July through December — the halfway point of the fiscal year.

Significant

The cuts are justified as temporary: reach the fund balance target, then restore services.

10 Almost guaranteed captions 1191–1430

1:08:21The difference between actual revenues and actual expenses

1:08:25was half that, just 72000, as you pointed out, primarily

1:08:30because revenues came in much higher

1:08:32than we had anticipated in our projections.

1:08:35So that's the number that adds to or takes

1:08:37away from fund balance.

1:08:40But do you have a person that can help us those figures?

1:08:47I do not.

1:08:48And this is my screen rather than looking, OK, my god,

1:08:53why don't I do that?

1:08:54Why don't I go ahead and I'll stop sharing my screen.

1:08:57And you can share yours.

1:08:58Let's do that again, ok?

1:09:02And I just past, present, you should be able to screen share.

1:09:11Now Yeah, well, let's do that.

1:09:17A lot of numbers, a lot of numbers.

1:09:20Yes, it's a busy spreadsheet.

1:09:23There you go.

1:09:24Thank you.

1:09:26Oh, we can see that I'm going to make that a little bigger.

1:09:29There you go, that better?

1:09:32Yes, yes, great.

1:09:33OK, so down here, like I'm saying,

1:09:37it's number 140,000 negative is simply the difference

1:09:40between revenues and expenses.

1:09:41That's not fund balance.

1:09:4372,000 is almost half of that is also

1:09:46the difference between revenues and expenses

1:09:49in the last fiscal year.

1:09:50It was cantera in 2020, so that was 72,000 moving back

1:09:55to the current fiscal year.

1:09:58The column that I'm looking at here

1:09:59is the July through December, actual revenues and expenses.

1:10:04And let me move it out of the way.

1:10:07Next to that, we have budget expectations,

1:10:09that's where we expect numbers to be at taking

1:10:13into consideration timing.

1:10:14And so on and so forth.

1:10:15So that's the actuals versus budget expectations.

1:10:20And then we have the third call, the shedded column.

1:10:22Here is the variance of the difference between the actuals

1:10:25and the budget expectations.

1:10:28And right next to that is the adopted budget, the budget that

1:10:31was adopted back in October.

1:10:33So these are the primary full columns I'll be referring

1:10:35to in my presentation tonight.

1:10:39And then the last column here is just to give us

1:10:41a benchmark in terms of how much of the budget has been expended

1:10:45and in the 50% time of this fiscal year, which is to six

1:10:49months, and you'll notice that, for example, property taxes

1:10:53at approximately 49 percent, the budget is

1:10:56half the year being concluded.

1:10:59So you might recall that back in November, October

1:11:02and before that number was quite small because we got

1:11:05a big chunk of property tax, as we always

1:11:08do in the middle of December.

1:11:10The next piece of that's happening

1:11:12is a piece of it happened in January.

1:11:14Another piece happened in June.

1:11:15But a big chunk happens once again in April.

1:11:19So this number would jump up.

1:11:20Each time you get those chunks of taxes.

1:11:24You also notice that I've shown a negative 90,000

1:11:27versus expectations.

1:11:29We we're expecting closer to 5.1 million, but it came in at 5.0.

1:11:33So we showed it as a negative 90,000 positive expectations.

1:11:37So what does that do to us?

1:11:38You might recall back in October when we passed this budget,

1:11:42we made it a point to impress on you that these numbers were

1:11:47estimates that everything was changing, it was happening

1:11:50and revenue numbers were very difficult to estimate.

1:11:53How come up with very specific numbers are more tight numbers.

1:11:57So we come back to you here at midyear.

1:12:00And one of the items that I would be seeking modification

1:12:03on is this particular property tax

1:12:05line item to make up for the shortfall of $90,000 dollars.

1:12:09In other words, we are going to say

1:12:10we expect these 90,000 to repeat itself maybe in the second time

1:12:14around.

1:12:15And therefore, we're going to ask you to help us modify

1:12:17this budget by 200,000 just for this one single line item

1:12:21alone.

1:12:21So that's how we figure out what needs to come forward

1:12:24as a budget modification simply based on experience

1:12:27in the recent past, based on budget expectations up

1:12:30to this point in time.

1:12:31So more on that later.

1:12:33Sales taxes.

1:12:34So, yes, Karen pointed out the thing that actually brought us

1:12:38out of that hole in 1920 was this number here,

1:12:4169, 75 and more on back when the presentation

1:12:45happened at the next meeting.

1:12:47But 6.97 five, we had anticipated

1:12:50something like, I would say 6.3 or 6.45 0.3 or 5.4 million.

1:12:56And due to the deferrals and through due to the county

1:13:00pool that we benefited from, this number jumped up

1:13:03by about a million and a half since the last assumptions back

1:13:07in April, may and June of last year.

1:13:09So that's a significant improvement that contributed

1:13:11to the 2.3 million deficit being reduced

1:13:14to a negative hardington $1,000.

1:13:17So how does the current scenario compare

1:13:19with that number in prior years, property sales taxes that

1:13:23have come in at around seven point five, 7.3 and so

1:13:27on, the anticipated sales taxes to come in at four, five.

1:13:33And up to this point through December,

1:13:35we have had team income in the expectation was

1:13:383.25 being 50% of that number.

1:13:42And so we expect sales taxes to fall short by about $2,000.

1:13:48And that's the second item that we

1:13:49are asking, seeking to modify at the mid-year modification.

1:13:53In other words, reduce this estimate

1:13:55by approximately 200,000 just to be conservative

1:13:59and that you will see on the next slide.

1:14:01Next year slight do taxes.

1:14:05They are trending fairly well.

1:14:06The difference is 122,000 will catch catch up

1:14:10on that property transfer tax.

1:14:12That is the next big one here.

1:14:14The estimated property transfer taxes to be Clozapine,

1:14:172.4 million in the budget.

1:14:20But as of December, we have more in the war, around two million,

1:14:23which in most of it, by the way, and we've

1:14:26achieved that to the end up to receipts

1:14:28through the end of December.

1:14:30And we hope that that trend will continue into the future.

1:14:34But there is no guarantee of that.

1:14:36Like I always said, franchise taxes is another area

1:14:40that we are seeking to modify.

1:14:41In the past, franchise taxes have been around 1.5 million

1:14:45in that range.

1:14:46The budget was five, the expected half of that.

1:14:50But it looks like we are trending down by about 140,000.

1:14:54So we are seeking to reduce this number by 2 to 1.2

1:14:58might actually come in, but they are being conservative.

1:15:01We are seeking to reduce that number by 200,000 to.

1:15:03These are three of the major expenditure revenue reductions

1:15:07that we are seeking to make a the media amendment,

1:15:12keeping in mind that these estimates will be based back

1:15:14in October when everything was fluid,

1:15:18business licenses are gradually coming in.

1:15:20We are up by 29,000 from the budget of 850 prior years.

1:15:24We've hit as much as 910 to 920000.

1:15:27And we recognize that business license taxes would

1:15:30be impacted by COVID as well.

1:15:33And to that reduction was reflected

1:15:35in these 850,000 of which we received 821 so far.

1:15:40And I would expect some part of that, some small piece

1:15:42of that to trickle in between.

1:15:44Now and the end of the year.

1:15:47And before I pause for any questions here,

1:15:50let me just run down this list of the major difference

1:15:56between budget expectations and the general fund

1:15:59charges for services is this line that we see here.

1:16:03In the past, we've had about nine, five to 6.9 million

1:16:08in revenues from charges for services.

1:16:11But we noticed that we are trending significantly

1:16:14behind the estimate for the fiscal year,

1:16:16which is 5.2 million.

1:16:18So that is one of the things that we

1:16:19are seeking to modify to the Amendment process at media.

1:16:23Again, remember, keep in mind that these estimates will

1:16:25be made back in July and August prior to the adoption

1:16:30of the budget in October.

1:16:31And in March.

1:16:32The assumptions was that things would settle

1:16:34down by the end of December or at least

1:16:36the first part of January.

1:16:37And none of that has happened at this stage.

1:16:39So that accounts for the fact that we are behind

1:16:42on that sort of revenue, even if charges

1:16:46are just allegations between general fund and other funds.

1:16:49And this happens fairly routine day of each quarter.

1:16:53We are looking at a quarter of its costing

1:16:55to the general fund, to the other funds,

1:16:57and that's how we are back on target

1:16:58with the 51% past allocation.

1:17:01So with that being said, with half to complete,

1:17:04we've achieved about 51% of taxes,

1:17:08but overall revenues at 44% And that

1:17:11is not unusual at this point in time of the year.

1:17:14But with these further reductions in revenue,

1:17:18we expect to see these numbers moving up

1:17:20as we move to the second half of this fiscal year policy

1:17:23at this point to take any questions you

1:17:24might tab on the ribbon side of this table here.

1:17:32Any council members have questions?

1:17:38Can I see here?

1:17:41Lisa, what's on your mind?

1:17:43Yes, thank you, Mary.

1:17:45So I do.

1:17:47So for the charges, for services.

1:17:49I have a question about that.

1:17:51So, mark, can you confirm that that is primarily fees

1:17:55that we would have charged for parks and rec programs,

1:17:57is that correct, to charge us for services

1:18:01as a combination of several departments involved?

1:18:04What is the building department meaning?

1:18:06Community development, public works department for permits

1:18:09and things like that.

1:18:10And of course, the rec programs, as you mentioned, of the budget

1:18:14here is predominantly 80% of this budget.

1:18:17Is the rec program revenue source.

1:18:20The remaining 1.2 million is from building services

1:18:23per and that type of thing.

1:18:25So that is probably what it involves.

1:18:30Thank you.

1:18:36And the other member, council member with questions.

1:18:41And I might just add at this point

1:18:44that the Intergovernmental revenues,

1:18:46you have big chunks of revenues planned

1:18:48for the next few months.

1:18:49So, for example, we expect $2.8 million

1:18:52in vehicle licensing fees.

1:18:55You've already got one point for us

1:18:56back in January, which will be reflected in the next report.

1:19:00We expect to receive approximately 1.7 million

1:19:03in revenues from the Kensington contract, approximately

1:19:08$300,000 each month.

1:19:09So that would come in over the next six months.

1:19:11So when you add these pieces, which are fairly well, almost,

1:19:14I would say guaranteed it would achieve this number

1:19:17that you see here is the budgeted numbers.

1:19:18So we're not seeking any modifications to that line

1:19:21item, even though it shows a negative 95,000

1:19:24at this point in time.

1:19:27We gone down to the expenditure side of the budget to once

1:19:33again, we have the same set of columns,

1:19:35the actuaries, I just want to point out

1:19:38that they should read the title to this column,

1:19:40should read draft audited.

1:19:42So it's one of those typos.

1:19:44It should be the exact same title as the first column

1:19:46have to have cable up here.

1:19:48So that could be amended.

1:19:49But that being said, personnel costs, as you know,

1:19:53constitute around a big chunk of general fund expenses.

1:19:57And we can see that the budget itself 29.49 million

1:20:01up the budget, up the adopted budget back in October.

1:20:05It was for personnel costs.

The revenue picture was explained in terms of what is still to arrive.

On intergovernmental revenue: “you have big chunks of revenues planned for the next few months.”

The specifics: “we expect $2.8 million in vehicle licensing fees. You've already got one point four” million “back in January.”

And from Kensington: “approximately 1.7 million in revenues from the Kensington contract, approximately $300,000 each month” over the remaining six months.

His characterization of both: “fairly… almost, I would say, guaranteed.”

Which is why a line showing “a negative 95,000 at this point in time” needs no correction: “we're not seeking any modifications to that line item.”

The modifications sought: property tax down $200,000; sales tax, which reached $6.975 million last year, down $200,000; franchise taxes down $200,000; and charges for services — about 80% of them recreation fees — well behind the $5.2 million budgeted. Transfer tax had already reached about $2 million of $2.4 million budgeted.

He also flagged a column mislabeled in the packet: the heading “should read draft audited. So it's one of those typos.”

Significant

A revenue line showing minus $95,000 needs no correction because the vehicle license fees and the Kensington contract, about $300,000 a month, are “almost, I would say guaranteed.” The report already sets actuals against “budget expectations… taking into consideration timing.”

11 Minus 2.3 million becomes minus 110,000 captions 1431–1700

1:20:08And as Karen pointed out, if you compare this number

1:20:11with the numbers that we've had in the past 3, 2 four years,

1:20:14we've seen significant reductions

1:20:16of the order of $2 to $3 million or the cost savings that

1:20:19were put in place as part of the budgeting process

1:20:22back in October.

1:20:23So the 29 point four, I would say,

1:20:26is the adopted budget as of October with all

1:20:29those cost savings thrown in.

1:20:31But we've also had cost savings on the personnel side

1:20:35since then.

1:20:36But in the last month, as I've pointed out,

1:20:38and we seek to modify this number

1:20:41by introducing those cost savings

1:20:43into the amended budget.

1:20:46But at this point in time, 50% of the are being complete.

1:20:49We had 15.6 million in terms of total personnel costs

1:20:54against an expectation of two, 4, 5.

1:20:57And the primary reason for that is this 15.6 million

1:21:01includes 850,000 fully reimbursable chalo or.

1:21:08Yes, office of emergency services, the Governor's

1:21:11Office of emergency services.

1:21:13Over time that was incurred by the fire department

1:21:16in responding to the fires that we've recently

1:21:19seen over the past six months.

1:21:21So once that is factored into effect,

1:21:24it out, as the case may be before an 19,000 disappears,

1:21:28I just let it be there because you've already paid those out.

1:21:32And those reimbursements are coming to us,

1:21:34you know, sometime later in spring.

1:21:36I'm sure that during my cash flow statement

1:21:38that I'm presenting a couple of slides from here.

1:21:42So by and large, remember, it's 53% or 50%

1:21:48The effect of this one out.

1:21:49It drops to around 49% 49 to five.

1:21:52So we are back on target as far as expenses

1:21:54on the personnel side goes.

1:21:56And that's an important piece for us

1:21:57because that drives significantly the expenditure

1:22:00component of the budget.

1:22:01As you know, 80% to 90% of the budget is personnel costs.

1:22:05And that he also knows that we have savings

1:22:07on a number of other line items that I mentioned,

1:22:09professional services, purchased property and services.

1:22:12These are contractual payments providing

1:22:14for temporary services.

1:22:16All of these are built into these other services.

1:22:18We have significant savings on the supply side.

1:22:21And that could be part of the reason

1:22:22why is because the recreation department is not spending as

1:22:26much on supplies due to the quality restrictions

1:22:28and everything that's going on with that financing costs,

1:22:33interest and principal payments on installer

1:22:35leases and other things.

1:22:36And of course, financing uses for the capital

1:22:40that service payment on the city hall property

1:22:43and for retiree pensions.

1:22:45So these are expected expenses.

1:22:47And that's why you see the exact number here on the year

1:22:50to budget expectation side.

1:22:53Again, taking everything into consideration,

1:22:55we add to the cost of that budget and expense

1:22:58of that 50% of the budget in terms of the timeline

1:23:02to the end of December.

1:23:04And I might mention here, the adopted budget delivers

1:23:08is expected, was expected to deliver 663,000 surplus

1:23:13and the modified budget would be different from that.

1:23:17And as we get into the budget modification proposals,

1:23:20this is the number that we're trying to achieve through some

1:23:23of dose modification changes.

1:23:25And we seek direction on making sure that we get

1:23:27to this number at some point.

1:23:29Why do we need to do that?

1:23:31Because, as John pointed out, we ended last year

1:23:34with a negative 10,000 deficit.

1:23:36And if you said that deficit of against the 663,

1:23:39then you would end up with a surplus.

1:23:41But unfortunately, there are changes

1:23:42that we need to feed into.

1:23:44This thing has to do with the revenue reductions and cost

1:23:48reductions at the same time.

1:23:50So when we get into the slide on that kind of touch on that.

1:23:54Tomorrow, yes.

1:23:56Before I ask any questions, any other questions, unless before.

1:24:02So this was the moment that you said all the figures

1:24:07and that job personnel cutbacks and the staffing cutbacks

1:24:12and the furloughs would be able to demonstrate

1:24:15a little more information.

1:24:18And we've moved from, as you say, that 2.3 million deficit

1:24:24to $110,000 which is a good achievement.

1:24:30You seemed very proud about the 72 down here.

1:24:33Can you explain what that is at the bottom of the net change

1:24:39in the fund balance for.

1:24:41I can't move my screen down here.

1:24:44Yeah what is that.

1:24:46What is that.

1:24:46To represent.

1:24:48So I think it's important to recognize is that the budget is

1:24:54a roadmap, right.

1:24:55It's a living, breathing document that needs

1:24:57to be modified as we go along.

1:25:00And one of the things we try to do

1:25:01is try and stay within budget, meaning in terms

1:25:04of both revenues and expenses.

1:25:06This number here represents the difference

1:25:09between revenues and expenses.

1:25:12And if you compare this number to the previous year,

1:25:14for example, the difference between revenues and look

1:25:16at the budget, the actual revenues and expenses

1:25:18was 143 approximate, 243,000.

1:25:21And despite these different uncertainty surrounding

1:25:26revenues, we've managed to land this budget

1:25:29within 72,000 of revenues.

1:25:33Expenses have been coming that close

1:25:35because we've been monitoring this over the last six months,

1:25:37as you know, over the previous year.

1:25:40And so it's a remarkable achievement for a number

1:25:44of different reasons.

1:25:45But typically for a budget to have

1:25:47a plus or minus 3% variation of the actual

1:25:50is to be within plus or minus 3.

1:25:52A variation of the budget is quite normal,

1:25:54and this is almost zero variation

1:25:56given the fact that it's only 72,000 on a $40 million budget.

1:26:00And that's that.

1:26:02OK, and you don't expect the real property transfer

1:26:06tax to diminish now, right?

1:26:09We're getting indications that the housing costs.

1:26:12I'm going up here and Alfredo and

1:26:15in some places in the Bay area, you're right, because sales.

1:26:19Sales are happening here, sales are happening.

1:26:22The median price has moved up from 890000 by about 24%

1:26:26to a little over a million.

1:26:28So every million that a house sells for

1:26:31brings in about 2000 in real property transfer taxes.

1:26:34And the more activity, you have, the more transactions we get.

1:26:38How many thousand was that, mark?

1:26:39I couldn't hear a 12,000 to a million.

1:26:44It's 12 bucks per 1,000.

1:26:46So 10,000 per million.

1:26:48And then a quick question, can you

1:26:50explain how the actuals, are the actuals

1:26:54ever modified when you look back in, as I'm going through?

1:27:00And then how frequently are when actuals become actuals

1:27:04and stay actuals can actually mean actually

1:27:08for the current year, for the past year, past

1:27:12and for past months, because I notice that there's

1:27:15some slight shifts in actuals.

1:27:17Right so once it's audited, it's not modified,

1:27:21but pending an audit, the auditor

1:27:23goes back into the actuals and looks

1:27:25at all the actual containers.

1:27:26It could easily be transferred here.

1:27:28These need to be moved into another place.

1:27:30So they actually do get modified during the audit process.

1:27:33And that's part of the reason why we

1:27:34call this the ordinary thing.

1:27:37For the previous few months, they put the numbers where

1:27:39they think they should fall.

1:27:42And then the auditor comes back, takes a look at it

1:27:44and say, look, these numbers need to be

1:27:46moved forward or backward.

1:27:47And those changes do occur.

1:27:49Once it happens, it stays that way.

1:27:57And you're going to get to the cash balance in the next slide.

1:28:02So we can talk about that.

1:28:06I'm absolutely wondering if there are no further questions

1:28:09on this, and I'm sorry, just so next month or next meeting,

1:28:19we're going to talk about the cafo.

1:28:21Is there any information, different than what you're

1:28:24talking about that the cafer will explain

1:28:26to us on revenues and expenditures, the kind

1:28:30of presentation by the auditor?

1:28:32Will no one be an independent presentation.

1:28:35And then no to touch on much more beyond simply

1:28:38the operating budget he'll be tapping into

1:28:41and all the other kinds of things.

1:28:44That's an important presentation for us.

1:28:46And it's more global than just the.

1:28:48Exactly OK.

1:28:52It's a Quinto.

1:28:53And could you explain to us and our residents

1:28:58again, the 663 and the importance of that number?

1:29:05So back in October, when we put the budget together.

1:29:08And it before council as a proposed budget staff

1:29:12came up to the council and said, we

1:29:14expect to make approximately 39.376 in revenues

1:29:19from all of these different sources.

1:29:21And here's what we expect to spend 38.713 million.

1:29:26And we told council the difference

1:29:28between revenues and expenses would be the surplus,

1:29:31the budget surplus.

1:29:33And we also stated the council that we

1:29:35hope to build this budget surplus over time

1:29:37to help build the fund balance, that we constantly remind

1:29:42council that building fund balance by, I say, a nickel

1:29:47and diming the difference between revenues and expenses

1:29:50is not the way to go.

1:29:52We have to take steps to establish a reasonable amount

1:29:57of fund balance through a strategic change

1:30:00in the structure or the cost structure of the agency.

1:30:03And that's an important step that we need to take.

1:30:05And that's why the strategic plan comes in,

1:30:07because it provides us with the basis for making those changes.

1:30:11Thank you, mark.

1:30:12I appreciate that.

1:30:13Sure so if I move on to the next slide.

1:30:17And I hope you can see this, I'm just going to keep rolling up.

1:30:20Let me know if you cannot see the general

1:30:22fund balance sheet artistic.

1:30:28It's there.

1:30:28Excellent So we now have the draft auditor general fund

1:30:33balance sheet for the last fiscal year,

1:30:36six, 30, 20, and the prior fiscal year six, 30, 19.

1:30:40And we have now nailed the cash amount as 9.1 million

1:30:46in other assets from taxes receivable,

1:30:49as Karen pointed out.

1:30:50We got sales taxes and other sources of revenues

1:30:54right out at the close of the fiscal year.

1:30:55So this number represents what came in after that

1:30:58as deferred revenues.

1:31:00And then, of course, we have to do to then

1:31:01do from the other expenses our total assets of 12.974 million

1:31:06dollars, which is an increase of approximately $3 million

1:31:09over the prior year.

1:31:11So that's an important thing to keep

1:31:12in mind as we go down here.

1:31:14We have the liabilities, things that we all others primarily,

1:31:20we owed $9 million from the train.

1:31:22And that's reflective.

1:31:23That has a liability.

1:31:25And that was paid off back in July, as you know.

1:31:28And Don Hayes, the fund balance, it's a snapshot of assets

1:31:32and liabilities, trade off.

1:31:33And the fund balance was a negative 10,000

1:31:37in prior presentation.

1:31:38This fund balance was a negative $2.3 million.

1:31:41And now that the audit has been concluded,

1:31:44it's been firmed up as just a negative current 10,000.

1:31:48And to the right of that is our running balance

1:31:51sheet for the current fiscal year,

1:31:52which is for 2021, fiscal 2021.

1:31:56And this is as of December the 31st of 2020.

1:31:59So halfway through the fiscal year, we have 4.4 million

1:32:03in cash, property taxes that just come in.

1:32:05So cash went up and then, of course,

1:32:08have a small amount of taxes that would come in January.

1:32:11So those receivable and those would be reflected

1:32:13in the next financial statement to go

1:32:16to plan for 8 and 1/2 million.

1:32:18And that's the amount that's reflected here.

1:32:22And that's going to be paid back at the end of this fiscal year

1:32:26or early July.

1:32:27And that's a guarantee, right, that Iran will be paid,

1:32:33keeping my fingers crossed that revenues

1:32:35will continue to come in.

1:32:36There are certain guarantees on the revenue side.

1:32:39The tax side is guaranteed, the vehicle license fees

1:32:42are guaranteed, the Kensington contract fees, and so on.

1:32:47But the revenue that is soft, like I've always said,

1:32:51is the section below that, which is the charges for services.

1:32:54We are seeking a modification on that fines and penalties.

1:32:57We are seeking modification on that.

1:32:59So few of those things are a lot softer

1:33:01than the property taxes and others

1:33:03that we have fairly strong guarantees on.

1:33:07So part of the reason we have this cash flow statement

1:33:10is to alert you to things that might be soft

1:33:15or might change ahead of time so that we

1:33:18can take appropriate action.

The completed audit produced a large revision to the prior year's closing position.

Total assets: “12.974 million dollars, which is an increase of approximately $3 million over the prior year.”

On the liability side: “we owed $9 million from the” revenue anticipation note, “and that was paid off back in July.”

Then the correction. The fund balance had been reported as “a negative $2.3 million” in a prior presentation.

But “now that the audit has been concluded, it's been firmed up”: the finance director puts the audited ending fund balance at “a negative $110,000.”

Personnel costs included $850,000 of fire overtime on wildfires that the state will reimburse. The finance director called the year's gap between revenues and expenses — $72,000 on a $40 million budget — “almost zero variation.”

The current year position at 31 December: “4.4 million in cash,” boosted because “property taxes just come in.”

Significant

The completed audit put the prior year's ending fund balance at minus $110,000, against a worst-case projection of minus $2.3 million — about $2.2 million better than projected. The fund balance later swings to plus $2.6 million by May 2021.

12 Twelve dollars per thousand captions 1701–1930

1:33:20And that's the next slide on this.

1:33:22So at this point in time, be sure negative

1:33:24fund bonds of $3.5 million.

1:33:26But this is a moving target.

1:33:28Like I said, as money keeps coming in,

1:33:30this number will start shrinking and this

1:33:32will sink by a significant amount in April,

1:33:36particularly because you get a significant chunk

1:33:38of property taxes that comes in at that point in time.

1:33:41They're hoping that by the end of June

1:33:42that this number on a budget basis

1:33:45was that positive, six out of 63,000.

1:33:49That was what the plan was.

1:33:51And they are hoping to move towards that.

1:33:52With the budget modifications that we have proposed to you

1:33:55at the end of this slide, set a positive for any questions

1:33:59you might have on this balance sheet.

1:34:04Where would that track excuse me,

1:34:06where would the transfer payments come from?

1:34:08Which line do we look to?

1:34:11Is it the nine million?

1:34:13I think that up here.

1:34:15Exactly I'm giving up.

1:34:18Yes so this number will start going up with the property

1:34:21taxes that come in Kensington, contract vehicle licensing

1:34:25fees and other avenues.

1:34:26And once this creep's above 9 million dollars,

1:34:30we would pay off the train at the end of June.

1:34:36And you weren't overly positive that we can get there.

1:34:41Are you all positive?

1:34:44Just looking back over the last six months.

1:34:46And looking outwards in terms of the broader economy,

1:34:49I think that the vaccine.

1:34:51That's being rolled out there's a very good chance that

1:34:53everything will work out well.

1:34:55And that's kind of what's playing out here,

1:34:56is an opportunity for us, not to wait

1:34:58till 2020 to turn this thing around, but to do it this year

1:35:01if possible.

1:35:02So that's being optimistic like that,

1:35:05although the answer is yes, we will have

1:35:09the money to pay the train.

1:35:10Thank you.

1:35:10That that is what we are.

1:35:12That is exactly what we are making

1:35:14sure this budget reflects, is that we will pay off the trend.

1:35:19So any other questions?

1:35:27OK, so we're got to absurd slide here, which is the cash

1:35:31flow forecast at cash flow.

1:35:34And I'm going to shrink this a little bit.

1:35:37So you get more of that.

1:35:39There we go.

1:35:41Now, the cash flow that we put together here

1:35:43differs from the previous cash flows

1:35:46that I presented during a number of different ways.

1:35:50First and foremost, you'll notice that there is

1:35:52a yellow highlighted rule here.

1:35:54And what that represents is that we've

1:35:56taken the charges for services line that we previously had.

1:36:01And we broke it out.

1:36:02We broke it out into fees for services

1:36:04from non recreational programs and departments and fees

1:36:09for services from the general fund recreation program.

1:36:12So that's but that's a major difference

1:36:14that they put down here.

1:36:15So we can keep track of how that thing

1:36:16evolves as time goes along.

1:36:19Now, his presentation last month,

1:36:21the recreation program director pointed out

1:36:24that he was expecting revenues to be

1:36:27lower by about approximately 1.5 million from the budget.

1:36:31And so there's no number here represents

1:36:34that modification right there.

1:36:36And the reason we introduced these modifications

1:36:38on this particular document is that we now

1:36:40have moving forward from here.

1:36:42We will now have a projected year end estimate.

1:36:45We think this budget will land.

1:36:48So he ended up that budget, which is the last column, that

1:36:51is the column that matches what's in the budget book,

1:36:54and also the previous income statement.

1:36:56But more importantly, next to it, we have a projected year.

1:36:59And previously, this was just a total column.

1:37:01Now it's moving closer to being, we have, you think, this budget

1:37:05plan by the 30th of June.

1:37:07So his expectation was to land revenues or recreation services

1:37:11at approximately 2.4 million.

1:37:14And the caveat here is that everything works

1:37:16out as planned in the next six months

1:37:19that we can get out there.

1:37:20And some of these programs ahead and get started on getting

1:37:23this thing back on its feet.

1:37:24And given those conditions, he expects to be

1:37:27able to achieve this goal.

1:37:29But if things take a turn for the worse,

1:37:31then we come back and look at each

1:37:32of these individual numbers and make appropriate modifications

1:37:36and bring it back to you as well.

1:37:38So that's the primary purpose of highlighting this role

1:37:40to show you exactly where are the other recreation

1:37:44programs revenues.

1:37:45I expect it to be over the next six months.

1:37:48May interrupt you.

1:37:51You said that before they were bundled together,

1:37:53these fees for services.

1:37:55And now in this reporting, you've separated

1:37:56out recreation and other.

1:37:59That that is correct.

1:38:02So this gives us a greater clarity

1:38:05in terms of how that number on the previous slide

1:38:07is evolving over time.

1:38:08Looking forward, because that slide that we looked

1:38:10at previously looks backwards.

1:38:11This fund is looking forward.

1:38:12It's a forward looking document.

1:38:14It's forecast.

1:38:16So that's an important change you made to this document.

1:38:19And here was an opportunity for us to do that.

1:38:22And the following slide, we have proposals

1:38:24for budget modifications.

1:38:27Those have been factored into this.

1:38:29Forward looking forecasts of cost savings

1:38:32have been factored in.

1:38:33Adjustments to revenue have been factored in.

1:38:36Adjustments to staffing costs have been factored into it.

1:38:41The fire department is filing for reimbursement

1:38:46of all its expenses, the 900,000 number

1:38:49that you see right now being factored in,

1:38:53which was not that previously in my November presentation.

1:38:56The fire departments or yes, overtime costs of 850,000

1:39:00have been separated out here.

1:39:02So you can see how that thing hangs

1:39:05relation to all of it costs.

1:39:07Hopefully there won't be any more any further fires

1:39:10or any other need for.

1:39:11Yes the time.

1:39:12So be sure.

1:39:12And do the 0.

1:39:13The next six months to that.

1:39:16These are the primary differences between this cash

1:39:19flow document that they are looking at

1:39:20and the ones previously presented to you.

1:39:22The format of the document is exactly the same.

1:39:25The difference is that it's been split up

1:39:27and you have a lot more ventilation in.

1:39:31We have the costs and revenues are coming in

1:39:34and down here is not a budget surplus that we had in mind.

1:39:38663,664 1,000.

1:39:41And right next to it.

1:39:43Here is where we think we land with the budget amendments

1:39:47that they're proposing for your consideration tonight.

1:39:49Again, these amendments have not been made yet on paper, these

1:39:54on this forecasted document.

1:39:56And once council reviews these amendments

1:39:58and blesses them at the next council meeting,

1:40:01they will be put into the system as a budget Amendment.

1:40:03So they just a working document for us.

1:40:05And down here is our estimated cash

1:40:08position at the end of June 30.

1:40:10Like I said, it's about nine million, 9.3 million.

1:40:13And we'll be keeping our eyes riveted on that,

1:40:15because the moment this thing drops significantly

1:40:18below this number that's been before,

1:40:20that's a cause for concern.

1:40:22I doubt very much if that's what happened at this point in time.

1:40:25That's the number of.

1:40:27Eyes on it, and that being said, we've split up the property

1:40:32taxes, you might notice that I broken out the property taxes

1:40:35and timeline.

1:40:36It is that exactly how much we're going to expect

1:40:38in each of the coming months.

1:40:40So here's the big chunk of change

1:40:41that comes in the middle of April, the 3.5 billion

1:40:45in taxes.

1:40:46And we get some part of it back in June

1:40:48as well, be read on the sales forecast for the next six

1:40:52months on the premise.

1:40:53That sounds good to me.

1:40:55It has to reduce our sales budget by 200,000.

1:40:58So these numbers.

1:40:59Now have now been revised to reflect

1:41:02the change of the original budget was 6.45.

1:41:06And now taking 200,000 out of that leaves us with 6.5.

1:41:11And we've done the same with franchise taxes.

1:41:15And that's about the primary changes on the revenue side

1:41:19of the receipts side of the balance sheet up this cash flow

1:41:22forecast a pause here for any questions you might have.

1:41:26And then we can move on to the next slide.

1:41:28And I'm sure of picked up on the.

1:41:32A quick question, so in relation to property taxes

1:41:37and the property transfer tax, I noticed on the first document,

1:41:44then this document that the.

1:41:48If you could explain a little bit about how property transfer

1:41:52taxes, you know, they've been really helping us,

1:41:56then how does that relate to property taxes,

1:41:59which seem to be going down?

1:42:02So probably try to patch their transactional effects

1:42:05every time someone any time someone

1:42:07sells a piece of property in her tracks

1:42:09and it qualifies for that.

1:42:10And attracts the fans for taxpayer dollars 2000 up,

1:42:14the sale price of a property is sold for a million.

1:42:17The city gets $12 per thousand, which is $12,000.

1:42:20So that is transactional, defined by market forces.

1:42:23The buyer and the seller decide about the selling prices

1:42:25and that results in that.

1:42:27Property taxes, on the other hand,

1:42:29consists of a number of different things

1:42:31that are based on real property that are assessed annually

1:42:35by the county assessor.

1:42:36And that's the one that you see on your property tax bill.

1:42:40And so we get a chunk of that because some of the properties

1:42:43within the city's footprint and changes

1:42:47aren't as frequent as the market value of properties

1:42:51because these are based on assessed values.

1:42:53And therefore, to a significant degree,

1:42:56we can predict what those numbers

1:42:57would look like in the upcoming fiscal year.

1:43:00It's very difficult to predict property transfer taxes

1:43:02because it depends on market activity, on market forces,

1:43:06on setting prices.

1:43:07And we've seen the budget together.

1:43:10We anticipated that property transfer

1:43:12taxes would be about $12,000 a month based

1:43:15on x number of properties.

1:43:17But we've seen that up to about 335,050 $1,000 a month.

1:43:21And that's how we end up with this huge one $2.2 million

1:43:24property tax transfer tax.

1:43:26That's at the end of December.

1:43:29Thank you.

The finance director explained the difference between the city's two property revenues, and why one cannot be forecast.

The transfer tax mechanism: “the sale price of a property… sold for a million, the city gets $12 per thousand, which is $12,000.”

Its nature: “transactional, defined by market forces. The buyer and the seller decide about the selling prices.”

Property tax is different: based on “assessed values” set “annually by the county assessor,” where “changes aren't as frequent as the market value.”

Which is why “to a significant degree, we can predict what those numbers would look like in the upcoming fiscal year.”

And the transfer tax cannot be: “it's very difficult to predict property transfer taxes because it depends on market activity, on market forces, on setting prices.”

The cash flow forecast now separates recreation fees, expected about $1.5 million below budget, and projects about $9.3 million in cash on 30 June — enough, the finance director said, to repay the revenue anticipation note.

The budget had assumed a monthly figure well below what actually arrived.

Significant

The transfer tax is $12 per thousand of sale price, so a million-dollar sale yields $12,000 — and it moves entirely with the number and price of sales. It exceeds budget by more than a million in FY2020-21, and the Finance Director later tracks it monthly against a target number of sales.

13 Six sixty-four, and three oh three captions 1931–2140

1:43:31Any other council member have a question, janet?

1:43:34No, I'm OK.

1:43:37Mark, do you have a question?

1:43:40Yes, I do.

1:43:40Thank you.

1:43:41Thank you, mayor.

1:43:42Mark, I have a question regarding the numbers.

1:43:47Again, still looking at where we're at.

1:43:51And I appreciate you explaining this in layman's terms.

1:43:58And I know our audience, our residents do as well.

1:44:01So looking at this general fund and looking at what are.

1:44:08The 664 on the bottom, right? can you explain that.

1:44:15And explain what the surplus that we thought it would be,

1:44:21the 60 four, 664.

1:44:24And the reality of the three of three.

1:44:27Sure and Gabe can I just say I agree.

1:44:30That's with the numbers.

1:44:31I think those are the key numbers down there that we need

1:44:33to understand as city council and what you're

1:44:36asking us to do going forward.

1:44:39Explain those two numbers to it in layman's terms.

1:44:42And I'm an audience and all of us can know exactly what needs.

1:44:49What is going on.

1:44:50Appreciate that, mark.

1:44:52Sure so starting with the last column,

1:44:55which is the adopted budget column, the blue column.

1:44:57I recall that.

1:44:59This was a column that was adopted

1:45:01by the council as the adopted budget back in October.

1:45:05And council adopted a budget that showed 39.376 million

1:45:11in general fund revenues and 38.712 million

1:45:17in general fund expenses made up of all

1:45:20these different types, expenditure categories,

1:45:22primarily personnel costs.

1:45:25The difference between the revenues

1:45:27that we thought we'd bring in and the revenues

1:45:29and the expenses that we plan to spend is the surplus.

1:45:33In this case of 664 thousand, it's a positive number.

1:45:37It's a positive surplus.

1:45:38It adds to general fund reserves and helps

1:45:41build general fund reserves.

1:45:42So that was the budget.

1:45:43Better the plan back in October.

1:45:46But by things.

1:45:47He also cautioned readers of the budget

1:45:51was that the times were exceptionally fluid.

1:45:56Forecasting was an issue for us.

1:45:58And we just took a stab at some of these numbers,

1:46:00particularly sales taxes and real property taxes.

1:46:04And we said that we'd come back to council sometime

1:46:07after December with any revisions

1:46:10that we thought we wanted if any of these numbers

1:46:13were found to be soft.

1:46:15So that being said, as I pointed out previously,

1:46:18we feel that property taxes should be lowered by about

1:46:23200,000 sales taxes by another 200,000

1:46:27and franchise fees by 200,000.

1:46:30So if you put those three changes into this little box

1:46:33here and into lowering your revenues,

1:46:36naturally, your surplus would also shrink.

1:46:39And that's how it comes down to this 303.

1:46:41So that's on the revenue side of the business,

1:46:44on the expense side of the business.

1:46:45You've also suggested that we reduce costs in terms

1:46:48of keeping vacancies open, as Karen pointed out,

1:46:51and natural attrition, retirement and separation

1:46:55that has happened in the last month

1:46:56has resulted in savings as well.

1:46:58So factoring those savings on this expense line item

1:47:02from the personnel cost line item

1:47:03does give us some benefits.

1:47:05And so that has improved this bottom line number.

1:47:09But keep in mind that this number is here.

1:47:13We have reduced revenues for services by about 1.5 million,

1:47:17and that has contributed to the reduction of this number

1:47:20from the previously anticipated 664,000.

1:47:23So in answer to your question, why are we looking at here?

1:47:26We are asking then, can we mention this?

1:47:28We are asking that council give us direction in terms

1:47:31of restoring the 664,000 by making

1:47:35appropriate further reductions that match

1:47:39this difference between three them

1:47:40three and 6,060 four, which is approximately $2,000.

1:47:43So that's the best time to be addressing the proposed

1:47:47reductions through the Amendment process

1:47:50that we are bringing forward to.

1:47:51Thank you.

1:47:52And listening to what the governor

1:47:53had to say the last few days and will be basically dealing with

1:47:58COVID until the summer time.

1:48:01And they do.

1:48:02The governor did mention that, you know,

1:48:06we're not the regular folks under 65 who are healthy.

1:48:11Most people are not going to get their vaccine

1:48:14until the end of the summer, maybe even the end of fall.

1:48:18So looking at that and being very, very

1:48:21conservative about these four service

1:48:25and the different departments.

1:48:28This is COVID related.

1:48:30And I want to make sure that we look at that.

1:48:33And we look at, for example, the things that we are not

1:48:37able to provide because of COVID and sheltering

1:48:40in place for the year.

1:48:42So looking at that, I want to make

1:48:44sure that we know recreation will

1:48:47not be open for the most part.

1:48:50Some will, but for the most part, no, it will not.

1:48:53And and this is why else retail has a very, very low COVID

1:48:59rates and illnesses and people dying because

1:49:03of the leadership of our city, making

1:49:07sure that people are safe.

1:49:09And so we are going to continue to do that.

1:49:12And we're not going to take any chances when it comes to COVID.

1:49:17And we're going to listen to our health

1:49:19department and the county and our governor.

1:49:21So that we don't have any choice on what we're going to provide.

1:49:26And not provide for.

1:49:27You know, that comes from a higher level,

1:49:30at the county level, as well as the state level.

1:49:35Yes, ma'am.

1:49:37Yes, if I could, I did two questions.

1:49:40And if I could go back down to that number again,

1:49:43the three are three.

1:49:45So what you're really the city staff is asking us to look,

1:49:48if we're going to, in fact, end up

1:49:50on the positive side of things.

1:49:52How do we deal with that?

1:49:54$303,000 deficit coming up.

1:50:00Because we're going to have to maybe even make

1:50:01some cuts into the next fiscal year as well.

1:50:04Is that correct?

1:50:07That that is true.

1:50:08We need to make cuts in the next fiscal year.

1:50:11So this is a surplus.

1:50:13So deficit.

1:50:16So then the.

1:50:20But we currently short as far as where we need to get as far as.

1:50:25$300,000 That's correct.

1:50:28That's the difference between the 3 and the six.

1:50:32So that's what we need to think about when we are looking

1:50:35for things to whether it's recreation or other services

1:50:38or other departments.

1:50:40I had a hypothetical question.

1:50:43You know, we're in the middle of a game,

1:50:45talked about the state budget.

1:50:47Our new president is talking about the $1.9 trillion

1:50:51and he wants to have state and local revenue coming to cities

1:50:57to help us out where they can.

1:51:00Republicans have a dramatically reduced amount of money

1:51:03and don't include state and city revenues.

1:51:07If we, in fact, get if in fact, we

1:51:10succeed in keeping local appropriations

1:51:14in the federal budget that might come to us,

1:51:17where would that go with that?

1:51:20That just come off the top or to our reserves

1:51:22or what are we talking about?

1:51:23How would we use that?

1:51:25So any one time revenues from the federal or the government

1:51:29would automatically flow into either government

1:51:32reimbursement line item.

1:51:34And you would see that correspondingly

1:51:36happen over here.

1:51:37So, for example, let's say we get a population

1:51:41based support from the government,

1:51:45that number coming right here.

1:51:46And go right down to the bottom line.

1:51:48And it would go to reduce any deficit we might have.

1:51:51And to demonstrate a surplus if, in fact, that's what happens.

1:51:55That is correct.

1:51:56And certainly, if that were to happen.

1:52:01So fingers crossed, everyone, we certainly would bring that

1:52:04back to the city council because we

1:52:06would need to amend the budget again to assume those revenues.

1:52:10At the end of the day, the city council

1:52:12makes the decision as to where the expenditures go

1:52:15or if it goes into reserves.

1:52:16I can tell you right now, as your city manager,

1:52:18I would certainly anticipate that we

1:52:21try to build our reserves as soon as possible,

1:52:23because, again, the closer we are to financial health,

1:52:27the better off we are at the long term.

1:52:29And we will be able to provide better service longer the

1:52:33our bond rating will increase all of the there's so

1:52:38many ripple effects to making sure

1:52:40that we have even two percent, even 5% of our general fund.

1:52:46So if we were to say, get a million dollars, that

1:52:48would be extremely helpful.

1:52:50And again, it would allow us to be healthier, more quickly.

1:52:53And so management partners that we worked with

1:52:57said it will take 3, 2 four years

1:52:59anyway to get to where we want to get to.

1:53:01So that federal money coming in, which we should all

1:53:04write letters about, will help us in jumpstarting

1:53:08that reserve fund if we get it.

1:53:09I mean, we can probably count on that amount, but.

1:53:12Right and we're certainly not I mean,

1:53:13there's no expectation of that.

1:53:15And in fact, that is exactly why we haven't even

1:53:19though, real property transfer taxes coming in very well,

1:53:22we are not proposing to increase that.

1:53:24We are not proposing to add a lot of revenue,

1:53:27because I have instructed mark and I have instructed

1:53:30all of our staff that we need to be as conservative as possible

1:53:33when it comes to revenues.

1:53:34It's just too volatile out there.

1:53:36And any additional revenues that we achieve

1:53:39is icing on a little cake.

1:53:41But we have a long way to go.

1:53:43So we just really want to make sure that we're being

1:53:46as conservative as possible.

Councilmembers asked for two numbers to be explained in ordinary language.

Quinto's question: “the 664 on the bottom right — can you explain that, and explain what the surplus that we thought it would be… and the reality of the three[ hundred] and three.”

Another councilmember agreed: “I agree… those are the key numbers down there that we need to understand as city council and what you're asking us to do going forward.”

And the ask: “explain those two numbers… in layman's terms, and I'm an audience and all of us can know exactly what… is going on.”

The $664,000 is the surplus the adopted budget assumed, set in October.

The $303,000 is what is now projected, after lowering property, sales and franchise taxes by $200,000 each and recreation fees by about $1.5 million, partly offset by vacancy savings.

So the gap between them is about $300,000 — the further cuts needed to hit what was already adopted.

Asked where federal relief money would go, the City Manager said that would be the Council's decision, but she would aim to build reserves; staff were not raising the transfer tax estimate despite strong receipts, to stay conservative.

Significant

Two councilmembers ask for the budget's two headline numbers to be explained “in layman's terms” — the $664,000 adopted surplus against the $303,000 now projected. Closing that gap means finding about $300,000 more.

14 “Skimming the surface” captions 2141–2330

1:53:47In our estimate, being fiscally conservative,

1:53:50especially now during our difficult time,

1:53:53is good government.

1:53:54And between now.

1:53:55And when we have to do the tranh again, it's up to the counsel

1:54:00to make sure that we improve our numbers.

1:54:03So we can get a better credit rating.

1:54:06Because that right, mark, if that is true.

1:54:08Absolutely speaking of conservative,

1:54:13so if staff is asking for delta of 300 thousand,

1:54:18isn't that essentially skimming the surface?

1:54:24I would be interested in knowing more about additional cuts

1:54:27that we could consider.

1:54:29So that we can be able to address a slightly faster.

1:54:35Certainly in Marken can jump in here as well, as I've just

1:54:40said, the quicker we get to financial health,

1:54:43the better off we are more quickly at this point

1:54:47because we're being so conservative

1:54:49with revenues that would anticipate

1:54:51cutting further expenditures.

1:54:54If if the city council directs us to at least make

1:54:58that $664,000 which again, would be about a

1:55:01$300,000 further cut between now and next week.

1:55:06I can tell you that that would at this point,

1:55:09we have cut around all the margins,

1:55:11we've cut a lot of our expenses.

1:55:13And we'll show that in the next slide, where we talk about what

1:55:16budget modifications we're proposing just

1:55:19as a point of order for the minimum

1:55:23that we get at the minimum being that $303,000 surplus.

1:55:27If the city council my recommendation

1:55:30would be to at least get us to that success

1:55:32before the city council had a higher target than that,

1:55:35then that whatever that delta would be

1:55:37is what we would bring you.

1:55:39My what I would tell you, though,

1:55:41is what those reductions would be at this point

1:55:43would be additional people.

1:55:46The what we have tried to do and.

1:55:51And I'll just sort of preface this by saying that we are

1:55:53currently in negotiations with bargaining units,

1:55:56so I'm going to it sounds like I'm going to be

1:55:57a little vague, so I apologize.

1:55:59But that is because we are negotiating

1:56:01at the table and not in public.

1:56:04But there are negotiations underway.

1:56:07And I would anticipate there would be further positions that

1:56:11would be cut.

1:56:12They would be non-public safety positions.

1:56:15So it would be across all of the other departments,

1:56:17other than police and fire.

1:56:19And that is essentially where the reductions would come from.

1:56:23We have tried to look strategically at positions

1:56:27that, again, I think as we had talked

1:56:29about before with the previous layoffs

1:56:32that we did per December, we have

1:56:35tried to make sure that, again, we're not looking

1:56:38to reduce programs outright.

1:56:40We're not looking to reduce we still have all this work

1:56:43that we need to do.

1:56:44And that we're offering the cuts in those positions

1:56:48would be strategic to allow us to continue

1:56:51to provide the portfolio of services

1:56:53that we offer in a reduced manner.

1:56:57Again, the city manager's office is one of the best examples

1:57:00of that, where Alex and I are still providing

1:57:03the same amount of services.

1:57:05It is just now spread pretty thin.

1:57:08But that is what we are looking to achieve.

1:57:10If there are additional expenses and contractual services

1:57:13or anything like that.

1:57:14We're able to try to come up with as well,

1:57:16we can certainly add that.

1:57:18And then the flip side of that is if revenues do increase,

1:57:23then that delta also increases.

1:57:24So again, the further, we cut, the better off we are.

1:57:29But that at the end of the day is at some point, the more

1:57:33people you cut, then you are cutting

1:57:35into our portfolio of services.

1:57:36You are cutting into work, not being done.

1:57:39And so we have tried to really maintain as much

1:57:42of our service levels as possible, if we can.

1:57:46But anything further than that, you know, that that is

1:57:50the deeper you go, the deeper.

1:57:52You're putting, the more programmatic services

1:57:55that you are indeed affecting.

1:57:57So, you know, if the city council were

1:58:01my recommendation is that I would like the city council

1:58:03to direct staff to be able to at least achieve

1:58:06that $664,000 that we budgeted.

1:58:09However, if the council were to set

1:58:11a target of a million dollars, then we would get to work.

1:58:14This week and we would take a look at that.

1:58:19It would be much more drastic.

1:58:24I want to also remind everyone that we

1:58:29have a few months between now.

1:58:32And when we have to apply for the training again,

1:58:37so it will be better on the long run

1:58:40to improve our credit rating.

1:58:44So what we're doing now, in my opinion, is most important.

1:58:49And, you know, and this is something that, you know,

1:58:54I know my colleagues know the importance of making sure we

1:58:59improve our credit rating.

1:59:01We don't want to get too low, the rating that we're at now,

1:59:07because that would be a horrible, horrible situation.

1:59:12So it's important that we look at what is out there.

1:59:17And what we can do now.

1:59:19So I appreciate our city manager or, you know,

1:59:23just telling it like it is not making a rosy picture

1:59:28and just telling us the truth.

1:59:30So thank you, Karen.

1:59:31And thank you, mark.

1:59:33This is what we want to hear.

1:59:35So can I add here if I can speak,

1:59:39I was going to save some comments

1:59:42after the public comment.

1:59:45But I am following on what council member Rudnick

1:59:49mentioned, I just and what you just said,

1:59:53Karen, is I would like some more information, not just

1:59:57following on what we need to do here,

2:00:00but in our overall budget.

2:00:05What else can we cut.

2:00:07And I've been looking moving forward,

2:00:10it's been concerning that the recreational department.

2:00:14It has been focused on and that those are the only services.

2:00:17We've been focusing on and the personnel, it's

2:00:19not my favorite thing to do.

2:00:21And I know that we have to do certain things

2:00:24and cut certain services.

2:00:25And we're going to get those back.

2:00:27But it's 2 to three years, possibly.

2:00:29My concern is that.

2:00:30And I've said and I ran for city council saying everything

2:00:33has to be on the table.

2:00:34Every department, I think, should be thinking

2:00:37about what they should cut and.

2:00:40There's always seems to be a difficult time

2:00:42with information on the budget, and I

2:00:44was just hoping that we could.

2:00:47And it probably is a request that we

2:00:49talk about every department, including public works,

2:00:53including fire, including police.

2:00:56Think about another 1% cut.

2:00:58Can we do it?

2:01:00If we can't do it, let us know, get the information

2:01:03and come back to us at the next meeting.

2:01:05And not just have recreational information.

2:01:08I've always talked about plan B, and C. We need to not only see

2:01:12recreation, but we need to see can we get 1% or 2%

2:01:16of the fire, police, community development and everything

2:01:20else, if we can't, I across the board cuts,

2:01:23you know, you did a litany of incredible things

2:01:26that we've done with furloughs and cuts

2:01:28and but I may be speaking for the rest

2:01:33of the council members.

2:01:34I would love to see how stretched.

2:01:36We are in each department so that we can

2:01:39make those critical decisions.

2:01:40The council has to make going forward.

2:01:43And I'll just leave it open to other council members.

2:01:46And I'd like to add taraneh threw out a million in cuts.

2:01:52I don't know what that looks like.

2:01:54So for me, it would be beneficial to know what does.

2:01:57And for the community, what does a million of cuts

2:02:00look like here in our city?

2:02:03And then what would be a menu of options

2:02:05of what is more correct, what a million would look like?

2:02:10I'm not saying, we're going to make a million in cuts,

2:02:12but it would be nice to know that looks like.

2:02:15And what the impact would be on the community.

2:02:18And the other topics from.

2:02:20Yes on that list up.

2:02:22I know first, I would like to thank staff for all this work,

2:02:27and I would like to acknowledge that this stuff is

2:02:30really difficult. We're talking about people.

2:02:33And these decisions are not just America,

2:02:36but they impact people's lives.

2:02:38And I really appreciate the time that council and staff

2:02:42are putting in to make these decisions in a way that will be

2:02:46good for the city, equitable and very difficult for many people.

2:02:53I would like to go back to the ending balance,

2:02:56that showing the 9.319 mark that is in your spreadsheet

2:03:03and, you know, bringing all those back.

2:03:07So that if you look at how this budget is set up,

2:03:11that nine nine million of that 9.3

2:03:15has to be there in cash in order for us to pay off the trend.

2:03:20Right so that, you know, what we're

2:03:21looking at is $9.3 million that will have if you know,

2:03:28everything in this budget works out from January to June,

2:03:32the way that it's shown with the projected year end

A councilmember asked whether the proposed adjustment was serious enough.

Her question: “if staff is asking for [a] delta of 300 thousand, isn't that essentially skimming the surface? I would be interested in knowing more about additional cuts that we could consider, so that we can be able to address” the problem faster.

The answer restated the principle: “the quicker we get to financial health, the better off we are.”

But it also named the limit reached: “at this point, we have cut around all the margins. We've cut a lot of our expenses.”

The recommendation: “at least get us to that” $664,000 — “if the city council had a higher target than that,” staff would work to it.

And the option offered plainly: “if the council were to set a target of a million dollars, then we would get to work this week… It would be much more drastic.”

Quinto tied the urgency to a deadline: “we have a few months between now and when we have to apply for the” revenue anticipation note “again, so it will be better in the long run to improve our credit rating.”

His warning about the rating: “we don't want to get too low… because that would be a horrible, horrible situation.”

The City Manager said further cuts would be non-public-safety positions, under negotiation with bargaining units; another $300,000 would mean five to six more layoffs.

A councilmember, following Rudnick, asked every department, including police and fire, to show what a 1% or 2% cut would look like, and what a million dollars in cuts would mean. Rudnick noted that $9.3 million of the year-end cash must go to repay the note, leaving only the $300,000 cushion.

Significant

Staff say the city has “cut around all the margins” and offer a $1 million target if the Council wants one — “it would be much more drastic.” The urgency is the credit rating before the next note application, since a worse rating raises the cost of the borrowing the city needs to make payroll.

15 Three amendments in one year captions 2331–2560

2:03:36changes that we anticipate now.

2:03:40So our only extra cushion.

2:03:42There is that $300,000 for our city.

2:03:46So that, you know, shows to me how dire it is that we need

2:03:53to have a bigger cushion there.

2:03:56You know, I think council member Quinn talked

2:03:58about our credit rating and how that's

2:04:01going to impact your trend.

2:04:04Having more cash on hand is going to allow

2:04:08us to have a smaller trend.

2:04:10So all these things are, you know, all these things

2:04:14are working together.

2:04:15And it is terrible.

2:04:17But I think we really need to have

2:04:19more cushion in our budget.

2:04:22And it is tough to push for cutting people,

2:04:26but that's what we have left.

2:04:28And I think that this is an unfortunate situation.

2:04:33We need to look at every single thing.

2:04:36And I agree with the rest of my council members that, you know,

2:04:39we need to have a whole menu of choices because, you know,

2:04:46anything can happen in terms of our projected

2:04:50income between now and June.

2:04:53So I think that as conservative and safe

2:04:56as we can be to make sure that we're

2:04:58going to be good through the end of the fiscal year.

2:05:01And then, you know, again, I'm looking forward to that five

2:05:05year projection based on today about how

2:05:09track are we to getting to that restoration of our reserves.

2:05:13So, again, thank you, staff.

2:05:17This is really horrible what we're asking you to do,

2:05:21but we need you to do it.

2:05:22And we're counting on you to tell.

2:05:26And I think, like Gabe said, tell it to us

2:05:29like it is like it is an ugly.

2:05:32Can we get, as Lisa was saying, some commitment

2:05:35about the options that we might get back

2:05:38as far as other departments?

2:05:40I know there's not probably much you've

2:05:43got to have bare bones here, but we

2:05:45need to visualize what other options are,

2:05:47including rec department.

2:05:50Yes I mean, at the outset, $300,000 would be,

2:05:56you know, again, we're looking we're still in negotiations.

2:05:59So I'm trying to be very I'm trying to be mindful of that.

2:06:06But an additional $600,000 or additional $300,000 we're

2:06:12probably looking at another five to six people

2:06:15that would need to be laid off.

2:06:17In order to achieve that.

2:06:19And at that point, you are indeed cutting into much

2:06:23further where we're at as far as offering programs,

2:06:26as far as work not getting done, we

2:06:28would have to do a major restructuring of any department

2:06:31that lost that many of people or whether or not it

2:06:34was across the board.

2:06:35And I would definitely need to do

2:06:38some further research in that.

2:06:40But I can assure you it would be 5 to six full time positions.

2:06:45And across the board, though, and across the board

2:06:48at this point, it would be not just recreation, not just

2:06:52recreation.

2:06:53No and in fact, we need to see where they are.

2:06:58And in fact, what.

2:07:00The if you were to, again, direct us to at least achieve

2:07:07the $664,000 that is not just in reparations,

2:07:11the $300,000 and further reductions

2:07:13would not just come from reparations.

2:07:15OK, well, right now, we don't know where they're coming from,

2:07:18so we need to visualize where they might be coming from.

2:07:22So we can make those kinds of decisions

2:07:25that impact our residents.

2:07:26So and when we have anything further to report to the city

2:07:32council with respect to negotiations,

2:07:34we would do that in question.

2:07:36Does this request take a motion guy or anything?

2:07:40All right.

2:07:40You've heard what we said, Carol, right.

2:07:42It can we?

2:07:43Well, I do have a few more slides that I

2:07:45would like to go through.

2:07:47So that we can show you some of what

2:07:49we're contemplating already.

2:07:53And if I may, we do need to hear from the public

2:07:57before the council takes any action on this item.

2:08:03So, holly, perhaps you can put me back as presenter

2:08:09and then I can finish up the slide show you.

2:08:20Just one second.

2:08:29So OK.

2:08:44So this is a slide, so attachment for in the city

2:08:49council packet showed our proposed budget adjustments

2:08:53as by department with an offset, that's actually the next slide.

2:08:58But this slide, I decided to add.

2:09:00So that we could show it just divided between revenues

2:09:04and expenditures.

2:09:05So what I will do is sort of walk through this.

2:09:08And mark, actually, you can jump in.

2:09:11Sorry, I'm moving the window, mark.

2:09:14You can jump in if you have anything to add on that.

2:09:17So these are the proposed revenue

2:09:19adjustments that mark just talked about,

2:09:21the total flexibility that.

2:09:24Oops, sorry.

2:09:26OK, before I begin, I just want to share

2:09:29that mid-year adjustments happen every year anyway, we regularly

2:09:36over the past, while I've been here for going on 20 years now,

2:09:40every mid-year we come and report to the city council

2:09:45on these various topics.

2:09:47And if there are any adjustments to make,

2:09:49we provide that at mid-year and in the city council will review

2:09:54it and take a look at it this year has been unique because

2:09:57at the end of each quarter, as opposed to just once per year,

2:10:00and it's going to be now three times

2:10:03this will be the third or the second time,

2:10:06you would be amending the budget as opposed

2:10:08to just once in normal years.

2:10:10So the mid-year is a normal thing that we usually

2:10:15work with the Council on.

2:10:16But what's not normal is how we're continuously monitoring

2:10:20and having to make even bigger adjustments

2:10:23because of the COVID emergency.

2:10:26So making these adjustments, a lot of these adjustments

2:10:29would be within the normal course of business.

2:10:32And for example.

2:10:34Oh, yes, is a very significant one.

2:10:37So it was budgeted at, I believe, $450,000

2:10:41in the budget, but we expended $850,000 worth of expenditures

2:10:49and an additional $100,000 that we can retain,

2:10:54that we can get reimbursed for equipment.

2:10:58So in the budget right now, it says

2:11:00450,000 and reimbursement for revenue

2:11:04and 450,000 in expenses.

2:11:06So we need to increase that to make sure that it

2:11:09reflects the actuality of the 850,000

2:11:12that we did spend in overtime.

2:11:15So on the revenue side, that's right here,

2:11:17we would increase the revenue number by $550,000

2:11:20to reflect the reimbursements we expect to get in here.

2:11:25These two.

2:11:26I'm sorry, these two, the reimbursement here

2:11:28that was expended, we would adjust

2:11:30the expenditure line to show what was actually spent.

2:11:35I'm going back to the revenue side right now.

2:11:38Fines and citations.

2:11:40This is from the police department.

2:11:41We are proposing to reduce that by $75,000

2:11:44because we've written less tickets

2:11:48during good times, less people driving, less people parking.

2:11:53In fact, we had not enforced parking for quite some time.

2:11:57We only just recently started enforcing parking fines.

2:12:02And so over here on the expenditure side,

2:12:05the personal savings from the police department,

2:12:08this is a due to actually an additional vacancy that did

2:12:11occur, that on AI believe, on a recruit

2:12:17that we were not expecting.

2:12:18And then we are shifting body.

2:12:21One can release a $45,000 to grant to the grants

2:12:26that we've received to pay for this instead of general fund.

2:12:29So that $75,000 since the 75 $1,000 property taxes

2:12:35is what went over earlier.

2:12:37We're asking you to amend the budget.

2:12:40$200,000 for each of the categories

2:12:42of property tax, sales tax and franchise tax.

2:12:47Coming back to hear the charges for service,

2:12:49this is also what talked about, that the reduction would be

2:12:54made in this is primarily because of the recreation

2:12:58programs that we're just not able to offer.

2:13:00So the total revenue adjustments would

2:13:03be one point six, $9 million.

2:13:05Back over here on the expense side,

2:13:08I want to show these numbers, which offset.

2:13:11So as we told you, we decided to fill

2:13:15the vacant positions in the fire department

2:13:17in order to reduce our overtime.

2:13:19The original intent was to hire all of those firefighters

2:13:24in the beginning of the fiscal year.

2:13:26But because of covid, we had had a hiring

2:13:29freeze up through July.

2:13:31And so we did not do any recruiting at that point.

2:13:34We decided to begin the recruitment

2:13:36again, starting in July.

2:13:38And so it has taken several months

2:13:40for all of the firefighters to be hired.

2:13:43They are now all hired.

2:13:44They're now also it because of the lag time in recruiting

2:13:49and between recruiting and getting them actually on board.

2:13:54We did expend more overtime than we had that we had anticipated.

2:13:59And so we need to make an adjustment of $530,000

2:14:03to overtime.

2:14:04However, because we did not hire those people,

2:14:08we achieved $530,000 in offsetting salary savings

2:14:13because those people were not on board yet.

2:14:15So these two expenses offset.

2:14:18I already explained these personal savings

2:14:22and recreation, this is all due to the additional vacancy that

2:14:26had been unexpected and the professional services,

2:14:30savings and recreation.

2:14:31So because just with these charges for service,

2:14:35the offset of the programs were not able to offer

2:14:38or the different types of programs

2:14:40were not able to offer the camps, that type of stuff.

2:14:43We also have achieved a significant amount of savings

2:14:45as a result. It doesn't necessarily match,

2:14:48but it is a significant amount of savings.

2:14:51And this is the not the instructors

2:14:54and the private contractors that offer classes

2:14:58and some of the supplies, all of the things

2:15:01that we're just not spending money

2:15:03on because we're not offering the same amount of programs.

2:15:06And so that is $817,000.

2:15:09And the $600,000 is what also pointed out

2:15:14in the previous slides of what the staff reductions would be

2:15:18that offset this $600,000 here.

2:15:22So the total expense adjustments are $33,000.

2:15:27So what that in that general fund impact is and this is what

2:15:31we had discussed, again, I agree with you,

2:15:34mayor fidele, this is not a recreation department deficit.

2:15:38This is a general fund deficit.

2:15:40So all of this together, I don't want to pin it

2:15:42on the recreation department.

2:15:44This is a while.

2:15:46We know that those fees and services

2:15:48are we have the data to show that at the end of the day,

2:15:52we don't pit departments against one another that way.

2:15:55This is all general fund money, which

2:15:57is why you're correct in that we would want to spread out

2:16:01the any reductions or any expense

2:16:04or revenue adjustments are spread out.

2:16:06And they are not they will not be focused solely

2:16:10on the recreation departments.

2:16:11So as we were discussing, all of this put

Staff described how unusual the year's budget process had become.

The normal cycle: “the mid-year is a normal thing that we usually work with the Council on.”

What was different: amendments “at the end of each quarter, as opposed to just once per year… this will be the third” or second time “you would be amending the budget as opposed to just once in normal years.”

Her framing: “what's not normal is how we're continuously monitoring and having to make even bigger adjustments because of the COVID emergency.”

One adjustment illustrates the scale: fire overtime reimbursable by the state, “budgeted at, I believe, $450,000… but we expended $850,000 worth of expenditures,” with “an additional $100,000 that we can get reimbursed for equipment.”

Nearly double the budgeted figure, offset by reimbursement.

Other adjustments: fines down $75,000 with fewer tickets; $530,000 of fire overtime offset by salary savings from firefighters hired late; recreation savings of $817,000 in instructors and supplies; and $600,000 in staff reductions. The City Manager agreed with the Mayor that this is “a general fund deficit,” not a recreation deficit, so reductions would be spread out.

Significant

The budget was being amended at the end of each quarter rather than once mid-year — by the City Manager's count, “the third or the second time” this year.

16 “Never worked on” captions 2561–2800

2:16:14together would provide us with a $303,000

2:16:17surplus instead of the $664,000 surplus, which at the end

2:16:23would bring us $293,000 fund balance.

2:16:27That would be positive.

2:16:28However, we are recommending further reductions

2:16:32to meet the $664,000.

2:16:35That is what our recommendation is, that we would bring

2:16:38you an additional $300,000 worth of savings at the next meeting.

2:16:42And we would go over that with you

2:16:45that we would include in the midyear adjustments in addition

2:16:49to these numbers.

2:16:53And on the next slide, this is what was in your packet,

2:16:56this shows all of those as they offset by department.

2:17:01So in the fire department, again, the cost, the savings

2:17:06from not having hired firefighters

2:17:08was $530,000 which would offset the overtime of $530,000

2:17:13leaving a zero net effect.

2:17:15Same is true.

2:17:17An additional $550,000 in overtime reimbursement

2:17:20would offset the $550,000 in costs for net effect of 0

2:17:24on the Donald Trump personnel savings of $30,000.45 $1,000

2:17:31for the body.

2:17:31One camberley offsets the $75,000 drop in revenue

2:17:37because of tickets, which, again, has a net effect of 0.

2:17:41This does again reflect the recreation department.

2:17:44This is where the gap is shown $91,000 in staff reductions

2:17:50and $817,000 in professional services,

2:17:54instructor supplies, et cetera.

2:17:56That would bring a savings of $908,000 to offset in part,

2:18:00the 1.5 million that we're expecting

2:18:03will not meet our revenue projections because again,

2:18:06solely because of copen and then the further revenue adjustments

2:18:11offset each other as well.

2:18:13These are the requested revenue adjustments

2:18:16for the tax categories and the cost savings that it offsets.

2:18:22So that the total net general fund

2:18:23effect is $657,000 which again results

2:18:27in the $303,000 surplus.

2:18:30In order to achieve this, the budgeted adopted budget

2:18:34surplus of 664,000 staff would bring you back revenue further.

2:18:40I'm sorry for further expense adjustments.

2:18:42$300,000 and at this point have pretty much

2:18:48concluded the presentation.

2:18:50And if there's any additional discussion or direction

2:18:52or questions, I just want to point

2:18:54out that the financial advisory board

2:18:57will be meeting next week.

2:18:58So I am sure that this will be a topic of discussion

2:19:01and that is a public meeting where we would

2:19:05be able to also entertain questions from the public

2:19:08on things moving forward.

2:19:11And then at the next meeting, as we said, we would present,

2:19:15we will have two presentations.

2:19:16One will be from our auditor, Mr badawi,

2:19:19and he would present the cafo to you

2:19:22and you would be asked to receive and filed a cafo

2:19:25and then he will do a presentation where you

2:19:28can ask him specific questions.

2:19:30And then we would propose we would bring you the proposed

2:19:32mid-year adjustments based on this

2:19:35and tonight's discussion for your approval

2:19:38at the next city council meeting.

2:19:40And with that.

2:19:42Thank you for the comments, quintel.

2:19:47Thank you, mayor.

2:19:48My question to Karen, our city manager.

2:19:52Now, I know we're going to have six

2:19:58years dealing with difficult periods

2:20:01and trying to get back in the black.

2:20:04Can you explain to residents and our audience regarding

2:20:10callipers and our responsibility with callipers

2:20:14and if that is in the equation?

2:20:18It as I said, I don't know if wants to jump in,

2:20:20we actually are working with our financial advisors right now.

2:20:24And we are hoping to bring you a presentation

2:20:28on that specific topic.

2:20:29Mark, do we know when that might be?

2:20:36You're still needed.

2:20:37There you go.

2:20:38There you go.

2:20:39Yeah, it'll be the first meeting in March.

2:20:42And mitchard advisors come in and make

2:20:44a presentation on the complete callipers story,

2:20:46including OPEB.

2:20:48And so they'll look at callipers performance

2:20:52for the recent four years and look ahead for the next five

2:20:56years as well.

2:20:56So that'll give you a complete picture of what the costs

2:20:59and what the trends are.

2:21:00So that's an important presentation for us.

2:21:03OK, thank you.

2:21:04And no, with our past, this was something

2:21:10that was never worked on.

2:21:12So I appreciate Karen looking at this and working with

2:21:17and our advisors.

2:21:20And we need to think ahead and to make sure

2:21:25that we think about that portion that we

2:21:31need to work on as well.

2:21:32And include that in what we are planning to do now.

2:21:37Because, you know, looking at what we're doing,

2:21:39where we are nickel and diming, we're

2:21:42not being aggressive enough.

2:21:44But I truly believe what we need to do with the trend.

2:21:49We need to do what we can between now and applying

2:21:53for the trend to make sure that our credit

2:21:56rating is as not at the miserable state that it is now.

2:22:02And so this is important that we look at this.

2:22:06So I appreciate everyone understanding how

2:22:10difficult this situation is.

2:22:12Thank you, mayor.

2:22:14And and, mark, what you're doing with the purse

2:22:17is a great effort to stabilize.

2:22:23We've asked and it's two things, one is actually

2:22:27a complete presentation, particularly given

2:22:29the fact that we have new council members

2:22:32and also as a refresher for existing council members,

2:22:34I'm proud of callipers.

2:22:35Tory has been over the recent past.

2:22:37That's number one.

2:22:38And number two is to suggest to council alternatives that might

2:22:42be out there that we might consider at some point

2:22:44to be coming back with those.

2:22:45It's kind of tough until we get a little more

2:22:48sustainable to be able to deal with purs

2:22:51and get our rates stabilized.

2:22:53So I appreciate that effort.

2:22:55Before I go to public comment, is there any other.

2:22:59Yes similar to yaama back to the staff report

2:23:06and ask about the $1.3 million redevelopment agency last year.

2:23:12Any status on that may maybe a little bit of background for us

2:23:16on what that is.

2:23:19Thank you for next time, you're saying for next time.

2:23:26You say you want to report next time are now, since it was

2:23:30in the current staff report, if you could get just a little bit

2:23:33of information on that.

2:23:34And if it's additional information

2:23:36is to come in the cafo presentation,

2:23:39that would be good to know as well.

2:23:41So I can start and then Mike and even maybe mike,

2:23:45mark, mark and Scott.

2:23:48And then I, me anyway.

2:23:53So yes.

2:23:54So the $1.3 million is money that is currently included.

2:24:04OK, you might have to jump in, make

2:24:06sure I don't get this right.

2:24:07The money is included right now as a non spendable

2:24:12part of our general fund.

2:24:14Correct and the reason that it is in dispute that way is

2:24:17because it is currently in litigation with the state

2:24:21and maybe maybe skyland.

2:24:23Actually, let me backtrack and I why don't you start with why

2:24:26we're even in litigation.

2:24:27That probably is a better place to start.

2:24:29Sure I'd be happy to address that.

2:24:32And we can certainly expand on it more for the next meeting.

2:24:36So as part of redevelopment, dissolution, the and I'm

2:24:42speaking in very general terms right now.

2:24:46In essence, the state did a review of the redevelopment

2:24:49agency's former assets and concluded

2:24:53that there is about 1.9 million in cash

2:24:56and several properties where that in redeveloped assets,

2:25:02that should be in terms of the cash

2:25:07allocated to all of what are referred

2:25:09to as the taxing entities in the county,

2:25:11and that the properties should either

2:25:13be retained by the city for public purposes

2:25:16or sold with the revenue from those sales distributed

2:25:21to the same taxing entities.

2:25:23Our view was that under the redevelopment law,

2:25:28the successor agency was actually

2:25:30allowed to retain those assets.

2:25:33And that they had been previously transferred

2:25:35to the municipal services corporation, which

2:25:38is a public benefit nonprofit corporation that the city had

2:25:41created and that had and that those assets had been conveyed

2:25:44to the corporation to further the goals

2:25:47of the redevelopment agency.

2:25:49We have been in litigation with the state for over five years

2:25:53on this topic.

2:25:55We only recently got a hearing on an appeal.

2:25:58And as a result of the undecided nature of that litigation,

2:26:03some of the final fate of those assets has been undecided.

2:26:10But in the meantime, in order to wrap up

2:26:13the former redevelopment agencies affairs

2:26:16without conceding any of the points in the litigation,

2:26:20we entered into an installment payment plan

2:26:23with the state in which the successor agency

2:26:28to the former redevelopment agency over a period

2:26:31of installment payments, did transfer the disputed amount

2:26:35of funds to the taxing agency, to the taxing entities

2:26:38and the properties that were in dispute if sold

2:26:43with the proceeds going to the taxing entities

2:26:45or were retained by the city.

2:26:47So all of the things that the state demanded that we do

2:26:50have actually been done.

2:26:52So all of those obligations have actually

2:26:54been satisfied at this point.

2:26:56But the final fate of whether or not

2:26:58we were actually obligated to do those things remains undecided.

2:27:02And so when we get a final decision

2:27:04from the appellate court, either everything

2:27:07the state told the city and the redevelopment agency to do

2:27:11will have been completed or the city will receive back

2:27:16some portion of those assets because the court

2:27:19will decide that, in fact, the agency

2:27:21was allowed to retain the.

2:27:26Thank you.

2:27:27That was right.

2:27:28It's very complicated if you have questions about it.

2:27:30I am happy to feltham.

2:27:33But but council member, you do bring up a good point, which

2:27:36is if for some reason, we were to lose that litigation,

2:27:40we would have to address that on our balance,

2:27:42on our financial statements.

2:27:44And so that is yet another something

2:27:48looming out there that we need to make sure

2:27:50that we're aware of, that you're aware of

2:27:53and that we end up accounting for.

2:27:55If there's actually ever a decision made here.

2:28:02I see a hand raised.

2:28:03They can remember, Edison.

2:28:05Yes I just wanted to go back to what is it.

2:28:10We need to do at this time?

2:28:12And I can see it as a 2-step process.

2:28:16And one step is deciding financially.

2:28:23How much money do we need to improve our situation

2:28:29by in the budget, and I think for sure

2:28:34we would all agree we need to do certain things rather

2:28:38than just letting it slip away.

2:28:41The area where I think we may or may not agree

2:28:46is on the details of what we would choose to be,

2:28:51the items that we would cut back on and.

2:28:58I think it would be nice, I don't know if we have time

2:29:02for it to have departments say, what

2:29:06if it were their department, what is it that it would be?

2:29:11And I think that would give us some guidance about what we

2:29:16would choose, because if we're not

2:29:18all that familiar with the Department

2:29:20and it's in our operation, it's a little

2:29:24hard to just sort of whack, it.

Quinto credited the current work by contrasting it with what came before.

His assessment: “with our past, this was something that was never worked on. So I appreciate Karen looking at this and working with… our advisors.”

His point about sequencing: “we need to think ahead… and include that in what we are planning to do now.”

Then his objection to the scale of the response: “looking at what we're doing, where we are nickel and diming, we're not being aggressive enough.”

What he wanted concretely: “we need to do what we can between now and applying for the” note “to make sure that our credit rating is… not at the miserable state that it is now.”

The Mayor then thanked the finance director: “what you're doing… is a great effort to stabilize.”

The Mayor valued the coming CalPERS presentation “particularly given the fact that we have new council members and also as a refresher for existing council members.”

Motoyama asked about $1.3 million held as non-spendable in the general fund; the City Attorney explained it is tied to litigation with the state, over five years old, about the former redevelopment agency's assets. The city had already paid the state through an installment plan, and an appellate ruling would decide whether some of it returns.

Abelson proposed a two-step approach: first decide the dollar goal, then see options from each department.

Significant

“We are nickel and diming, we're not being aggressive enough” — the Mayor Pro Tem's objection to a $300,000 adjustment against the scale of the problem. He calls the credit rating “miserable.”

17 “While we have zero” captions 2801–3000

2:29:27So to speak, but but we do need to get to that goal of.

2:29:35That ultimately puts us in sound financial shape.

2:29:40And so I just want to say that to me, that's the big picture

2:29:45of what we're talking about.

2:29:47And it's a very painful point and.

2:29:52Elsa Riedel's history, in my opinion,

2:29:54it's certainly I actually feel like this is the worst

2:29:57time in my entire life.

2:30:00And the life of anybody who is alive right now.

2:30:04And never had world is wearing masks.

2:30:12Know, it's not like it's just something

2:30:14going on in El Serena.

2:30:15It's not like it's just something

2:30:17going on in the United States.

2:30:19It's everywhere.

2:30:21And a lot of people have died.

2:30:24A lot of people died.

2:30:26And this is you know, I don't think we in our history when

2:30:34in this century.

2:30:36And last century.

2:30:38Have anything that could compare to the way it is now?

2:30:43This is very different.

2:30:45And so what that means is that we may not necessarily

2:30:51be able to do things.

2:30:54The way we've been doing them, the way we want to do them.

2:30:58And I think we kind of need to keep

2:31:00that in mind as we go through these items and first of all,

2:31:06we don't know what.

2:31:08We're going to be able to do it because we don't know when

2:31:11things are going to be under control with the pandemic,

2:31:16we don't know if people can gather

2:31:20some things, some activities, assume that people gather

2:31:25and it doesn't really work to do it or something.

2:31:32So there's a lot that we have to think about.

2:31:34But I think we first in deciding what to do as a council,

2:31:38we need to think about what is our goal, the dollar,

2:31:42what is the dollar amount goal.

2:31:44And then we can go through and decide which items.

2:31:48In which.

2:31:50Are going to be impacted.

2:31:52So and that's basically what I was asking Karen for,

2:31:57is to visualize the options we have throughout all

2:32:01of our city departments.

2:32:03Thank you.

2:32:04And if and I really like the approach of that I've seen

2:32:09used.

2:32:11When I worked at Uc Berkeley, which worked

2:32:14and things were bad, not really this,

2:32:16that anyway is that everybody had

2:32:19meaning departments in this case,

2:32:21everybody has to come up with what?

2:32:25They would give up if they had to give up something,

2:32:28and usually it's $1 ultimate dollar amount.

2:32:33So it would be like across the board cut.

2:32:37To me, that's kind of a starting point,

2:32:39because I don't know that we want

2:32:41to do an across the board cut because we've

2:32:45already been cutting.

2:32:46And so it's kind of all over the place.

2:32:49And I think we've tried to do it in a way

2:32:52that is as painless as possible, although still painful.

2:32:58But I think we need to see what our alternatives are.

2:33:03And so I don't know if it's time to do that.

2:33:08I have to talk to the public first.

2:33:11No, I don't know.

2:33:13I'm not asking.

2:33:14I'm not talking about.

2:33:15Oh, Yeah.

2:33:17Generally, generally speaking, again,

2:33:21my recommendation would be that you direct

2:33:23me to at least provide reductions

2:33:25so that we can meet the original amended

2:33:28budget goal of $654,000.

2:33:30That would likely consist of at least

2:33:34three full time positions.

2:33:37And that is what we would discuss

2:33:38with you in closed session.

2:33:41But we would also be able to provide

2:33:43that next at the next meeting with the mid-year adjustments.

2:33:49I think I saw Tessa Rudnick up next council member

2:33:53that I can defer to the mayor pro tem.

2:33:55He can go first, then I'll go second.

2:33:58OK, thank you, mayor.

2:34:01Thank you, Tessa as well.

2:34:03You know, I want to remind our residents.

2:34:07And I found out about things that should have been done

2:34:11years ago, but was never done.

2:34:13But the majority of cities in Contra Costa County doing it.

2:34:18And I found out by speaking to city managers

2:34:21and different mayors and council members,

2:34:25we did not make those changes back in the last recession.

2:34:31And and this started.

2:34:33And we pretended everything was fine.

2:34:37And and there's not a right thing or wrong way.

2:34:40But I just want to remind everyone

2:34:42how we got to the situation.

2:34:44And the situation is, is that we never save for a rainy day.

2:34:49We cut big government hand when all the other cities,

2:34:54the majority of cities saved money, saved and made

2:35:01cuts, 30% in personnel and many and most of the cities

2:35:06in Contra Costa county, many of those cities

2:35:08still have skeleton crews.

2:35:11So we are still living with big government and El Cerino

2:35:16and we are a small bedroom community.

2:35:18And we just don't have the money to do this more.

2:35:22Looking at when I had the former Treasurer John Chung

2:35:27speak in 2017 about what is in store.

2:35:32And in the years by 2020 all the way to twenty, 20 six,

2:35:37you know, he warned us about what we needed to do and save

2:35:41money for scalper's and unfunded liability,

2:35:44but in previous leadership did not decided not to do that.

2:35:48But I look at the other cities in my county

2:35:51and they were able to do it.

2:35:53And even the cities that have a lot of scandal, they have

2:35:56seven million dollars, $10 million in reserves

2:36:00while we have zero.

2:36:01So I want to make sure that we deal with reality.

2:36:06Reality is that we need to do what

2:36:10we have to do to save our credit rating and improve it.

2:36:14This is part of the near future.

2:36:16And the important things that the council needs to work on.

2:36:20We need to save money for callipers.

2:36:22We need that money.

2:36:23I'm not counting any future money,

2:36:26whether it's coming from the state

2:36:27or the federal government.

2:36:28But if we do get something like that,

2:36:30that's going to our reserves, period, and that's

2:36:34what I recommend.

2:36:36And we need to do with the things

2:36:38that we haven't dealt with the last 10 years.

2:36:42And and this is not good government.

2:36:46This is bad government that we've been doing.

2:36:49And looking back on it and speaking to everybody else.

2:36:53And as a state board member of cities, that is the truth.

2:36:57And we need to learn what good government is

2:36:59about in our new city manager campaign

2:37:02because she does know what good government is

2:37:05and good government is making government smaller

2:37:08during these difficult, difficult times.

2:37:10And we need to do this.

2:37:12Now, for the sake of our city and our residents.

2:37:15Thank you, council member Rudnick.

2:37:19You know, it's great to be a new council

2:37:22member because I do believe that this is the start of a shift.

2:37:28And we really need to, as a city.

2:37:30And as a community, really be realistic about what it is

2:37:35that El cerrito does, can do, should do, will do,

2:37:40and that we have a baseline of understanding for me.

2:37:44What would make me feel comfortable

2:37:45is to know that we're meeting that 664 number.

2:37:50But also I really want to explore what we can do to get

2:37:54to that million dollars, because while it's painful,

2:37:57and it's horrible.

2:37:58And I go through in my mind, the math of who's and what's

2:38:03in the portfolio, but there's no decision that we can really

2:38:07make or make declarations about until we

2:38:10have the analysis of what it is that we need to really look at.

2:38:16And a lot of the community members

2:38:18have been speaking of equity, and I,

2:38:21I sincerely connect to that.

2:38:23This is a general fund issue.

2:38:25So the pain has to be spread out within the general fund

2:38:29and all the different departments

2:38:31that touch the general fund.

2:38:33Because, again, you.

2:38:36We keep talking about rec, but those stories that you read

2:38:39and just the mental health impact of children

2:38:43to be able to be in those spaces in the rec department,

2:38:47it's so valuable and I'm not suggesting we're going to gut

2:38:51rec, but what we really need to do

2:38:54is make sure that we are calibrated and that, you know,

2:38:59that there's an expansion.

2:39:00And there's a contraction and we're

2:39:02going into contraction mode.

2:39:04So those are my thoughts.

2:39:08Anyone else?

2:39:12So, Sydney Clarke, we're ready for public comment

2:39:17at this time.

2:39:17Members of the public who wish to provide public comments

2:39:21for this item should raise the Raise Hand

2:39:25feature to request to speak.

2:39:28Thank you, Senator Clark, for proceeding.

2:39:31Thank you, ma'am.

2:39:31Republican members of the public,

2:39:33an opportunity to raise their hand.

2:39:35I will just recognize public comments received by advance

2:39:38deadline on this item, which included make you

2:39:43and I miss Diana John Jacob, yakuts, amadi, sir.

2:39:48And my caller mayhap is shown Mary Jo Jackson was housemen,

2:39:55Daniel Schulman, Sarah Clower, Justin

2:39:58Clifford and Leslie Adams.

2:40:02And at this time, we have three members of the papacies

2:40:05requested to speak.

2:40:06If you could please confirm the 3 minute time limit.

2:40:09Three minutes.

2:40:11Thank you, sir.

2:40:12I'll go to our first speaker tonight is Cathy Campbell.

2:40:15Cathy unneeded and can begin your time now.

2:40:19Great, thank you so much.

Quinto set El Cerrito against its neighbors.

His account of what other cities did: cuts of “30% in personnel” and “many of those cities still have skeleton crews.”

Against which: “we are still living with big government in El Cerrito, and we are a small bedroom community. And we just don't have the money to do this.”

His warning from 2017: he had brought the former State Treasurer to speak “about what is in store” through “twenty twenty six.”

What that warning was: “he warned us about what we needed to do and save money for CalPERS and unfunded liability — but previous leadership decided not to do that.”

Then the comparison that carries the weight: “I look at the other cities in my county and they were able to do it. And even the cities that have a lot of scandal, they have seven million dollars, $10 million in reserves — while we have zero.”

His conclusion: “I want to make sure that we deal with reality. Reality is that we need to do what we have to do to save our credit rating and improve it.”

And: “we need to save money for CalPERS. I'm not counting any future money.”

Rudnick wanted to meet the $664,000 and explore a million: “This is a general fund issue. So the pain has to be spread out.” The City Manager said reaching $664,000 would likely mean at least three full-time positions.

Significant

“Even the cities that have a lot of scandal, they have seven million dollars, $10 million in reserves — while we have zero.” Quinto says he had the former State Treasurer speak in 2017 and warn about saving for CalPERS and unfunded liability, “but previous leadership decided not to do that” — the specific failure he attributes to them.

18 What the note will cost captions 3001–3200

2:40:22I really want to urge that the cuts be made to address

2:40:25the entire 1.04 million deficit as seen on page

2:40:29sixteen, the draft fiscal year 2021 general fund statement

2:40:33of revenues and expenditures.

2:40:36The suggested level of $300,000 in cuts

2:40:40is just I fear again, not going to be enough.

2:40:44We have this one point.

2:40:45Oh, for deficit six months in.

2:40:48And how do you as counsel know that there

2:40:49won't be an additional one million

2:40:51deficit in the next six months?

2:40:53If there is, we lose the entire surplus and end up in a deficit

2:40:57yet again at the year end.

2:41:00I understand that the city manager does not

2:41:02want to lay people off, but we are well past the time

2:41:05to make aggressive cuts.

2:41:07There has to be tough choices made.

2:41:09I also don't understand why public safety is not

2:41:12on the table, either with layoffs

2:41:13or with the creating efficiencies

2:41:15in their departments.

2:41:18You know, I'm curious because the city manager said

2:41:20before recreation was being cut due to covid, which is true,

2:41:24but we don't want to see them cut

2:41:26through the financial the finance issues.

2:41:29And again, I understand this is painful, and layoffs or people.

2:41:34But as the mayor said earlier, everything

2:41:36needs to be on the table, including public safety.

2:41:40And I appreciate both the mayor and councilperson person

2:41:43saying we need to see what these cuts are

2:41:45going to potentially look like.

2:41:48I would personally love to see a transparent list

2:41:50with a menu of cuts that would equal a million.

2:41:54So maybe a list of more than a mission's worth of cuts.

2:41:57But showing us.

2:41:58And you can kind of pick from the menu or not.

2:42:00And let the community speak to their priorities

2:42:03so that we can back the council to make these tough choices,

2:42:07because we all understand that there are tough choices here.

2:42:11And when you give direction to the staff,

2:42:13I just want to make sure that you

2:42:15direct them to look at all the departments,

2:42:18including public safety.

2:42:20The mayor said everything should be on the table,

2:42:21but I keep hearing the city manager talk about cuts

2:42:24and not mentioning public safety.

2:42:26There needs to be equity in the paint and.

2:42:29It options, you can look at the impacts, impacts.

2:42:34Community, the community want to keep.

2:42:39For example, I would also love to request

2:42:42that these cuts be in the packet, the Thursday before.

2:42:44So that the community can educate

2:42:46themselves and advocate for the preferences

2:42:48at the next meeting.

2:42:49Thank you.

2:42:52Thank you, speaker.

2:42:56Our next speaker is Dan Schulman.

2:42:58Dan, you were an immediate and can begin your time now.

2:43:03We're still there.

2:43:04We go 3 three minutes, Dan.

2:43:08Dan, are you with us?

2:43:15She's working full time.

2:43:17We're good about that.

2:43:19Go ahead.

2:43:19Thank you.

2:43:20Cool Yeah.

2:43:21So thank you, counsel.

2:43:23I think I really like the questions you're asking.

2:43:27I've been trying to listen the whole time.

2:43:29I pray for my kids to bed.

2:43:30So thank you for asking these great questions.

2:43:34I got to admit, though, I don't understand the answers

2:43:37that you're getting back.

2:43:39I thought council member abels and I thought

2:43:41you kind of nailed it with your question

2:43:43at the end of the process, you described.

2:43:45But at least from the answers.

2:43:47I've heard some for church.

2:43:48So far, it doesn't seem like that's

2:43:50what's happening as best as I can

2:43:53understand it from listening.

2:43:55There's going to be some approximately 300k worth

2:43:58of cuts brought to the next meeting,

2:44:00we don't know what they are now, and it doesn't

2:44:03sound like you're going to get much of a choice

2:44:05as to what they are.

2:44:08And then I'm in your shoes.

2:44:09I'd imagine you kind of have to vote

2:44:10for it because otherwise it kicks the can down the road

2:44:13too far.

2:44:14And we're kind of on a tough timeline here.

2:44:18And so I guess to me, it feels like maybe you

2:44:21need to be asking for a scenario cutting more, which I know,

2:44:29which is like just like prior speakers.

2:44:32I mean, that would be bad and unfortunate and unpleasant

2:44:35for the staff to have to consider what

2:44:38might happen to the Department.

2:44:39But there's possible cuts.

2:44:40So I get that.

2:44:42But the only way you as council members can make a choice

2:44:45is if you have a choice to make.

2:44:47And I just to me, it doesn't seem like you have one yet.

2:44:51So that would be my suggestion here is just to hopefully

2:44:58maybe maybe the right approach.

2:44:59I don't know the logistics of this,

2:45:01but maybe you ask for a scenario that cuts more, that spreads

2:45:05out across the departments, and then you don't

2:45:06have to agree to cut all of it.

2:45:09Maybe you choose to cut some, but not all of it.

2:45:13And you have some measure of some ability

2:45:16to dictate where it happens.

2:45:20Yeah, I guess that's my thought.

2:45:21I mean, you know, I think I do agree with the prior speaker.

2:45:23You know, everything should be on the table.

2:45:26And this is probably a terrible idea.

2:45:29But I was just thinking, you know, it's been raining.

2:45:32So do we need all of our fire stations going 24/7,

2:45:36fully staffed for the rest of february?

2:45:38You know, how much would that save

2:45:40if we cut that back a little bit because we had a bunch of rain

2:45:43recently and maybe that's a terrible idea.

2:45:45I'm not I'm not a fire expert, but but I

2:45:48don't know, like, you know, are we thinking

2:45:49about all the options here?

2:45:51So anyways.

2:45:53Thanks for the questions.

2:45:54I hope, I hope.

2:45:55I hope you are able to choose, you know,

2:45:59and I just kind of choosing from an option of one.

2:46:03Thank you.

2:46:04Thank you.

2:46:05Our next speaker is double double unmute

2:46:09and can begin your turn now.

2:46:11Hi Thank you.

2:46:12And I'll keep it brief, but I do want to reiterate

2:46:15what Kathy and Dan just said.

2:46:18I totally agree that the $300,000 that we're looking at

2:46:24is razor thin.

2:46:25And 600 is not a whole lot more to play with in a time.

2:46:29That's uncertain like this.

2:46:32So I know that these are very hard times.

2:46:34And I can see the reluctance on the part of the city manager

2:46:40to make these cuts and obviously in people and time

2:46:45and services, which is why I think,

2:46:49you know, we've heard some really great comments

2:46:51from the city council today from st. Paul and gabin

2:46:56and Janet and Lisa, you know, some great new sort of reality

2:47:04waking.

2:47:06Comments that I find really encouraging,

2:47:08and I think that the more you can be really clear, like Dan

2:47:12said, and give staff, like the directive to do it,

2:47:16the more they can actually comply with us

2:47:21and help dig us out of this.

2:47:22I also am looking forward, as I've said many times,

2:47:25to seeing that five year plan on where we're

2:47:28going to be in five years.

2:47:30And I also wanted to ask in all of this,

2:47:33what do you think the amount of the tranh

2:47:38is going to be in july?

2:47:40How much are you anticipating and what

2:47:43is the interest rate that you think you're

2:47:45going to be paying on it?

2:47:47Because that could be a two or $300,000 out of the budget

2:47:53that you may not be expecting right now.

2:47:57So that's a number that should be anticipated.

2:48:01I also hear that there's some discussion with callipers

2:48:05and some options.

2:48:07I think I know exactly what you're talking about there,

2:48:11those that does cover cost.

2:48:13So I would urge everybody to really keep

2:48:14an eye on that when those discussions

2:48:17begin and ask tough questions.

2:48:19And with that, I will yield to the next one.

2:48:22Thank you.

2:48:26Is there a fourth speaker?

2:48:28We do have one speaker showed up and you

2:48:32can begin your time now.

2:48:34Yeah hi, Thanks.

2:48:35Yeah, I agree with the last three speakers.

2:48:38And I agree with all five city council people

2:48:41that it's really imperative to seek greater,

2:48:46greater cuts than the additional $300,000

2:48:51that was being proposed.

2:48:53This evening.

2:48:54I have worked in city administration.

2:48:58I've had to cut budgets.

2:49:01I have been asked by the city manager

2:49:04to come up with a 5% or 10% budget reduction.

2:49:08I've had been asked to, again, show

2:49:12what the impact will be of that reduction on the community.

2:49:15Who will be hurt?

2:49:17How will it impact the families in the city that I worked?

2:49:22And I would hope that that's the kind of direction

2:49:25that you can give to the city manager

2:49:27as well, because I agree.

2:49:30I think both Tess and Janet said something about that.

2:49:33We had a great presentation about numbers tonight.

2:49:37That's numbers.

2:49:38What does that translate into how

2:49:41it's going to impact everyone?

Public comment on the item asked for deeper cuts. Cathy Campbell urged cuts covering the full $1.04 million deficit, with public safety on the table and a menu of cuts in the packet. Dan Schulman asked the Council to request a larger scenario so it had a choice to make.

The speaker's advice on process: “the more you can be really clear… and give staff the directive to do it, the more they can actually comply… and help dig us out of this.”

The next speaker's standing request: “I'm looking forward, as I've said many times, to seeing that five year plan.”

Then the question: “what do you think the amount of the” revenue anticipation note “is going to be in July? How much are you anticipating, and what is the interest rate that you think you're going to be paying on it?”

The reason: “that could be a two or $300,000 out of the budget that you may not be expecting right now. So that's a number that should be anticipated.”

The speaker also flagged the CalPERS discussions then under way: “I would urge everybody to really keep an eye on that when those discussions begin, and ask tough questions.”

A final speaker, who had worked in city administration, asked for the impacts of each option and said public safety, almost half the budget, should be on the table.

Significant

A resident points out the note's interest could cost “two or $300,000” not yet in the budget — about the size of the gap the Council is trying to close. A councilmember asks in May 2021 for that cost to be tracked “so that we have a sense of how much it costs for us to continue to utilize” the borrowing.

19 “We ask for patience too” captions 3201–3279

2:49:43The impacts are going to be felt differently.

2:49:46And we can mitigate some harm if we are really careful

2:49:49and think about what we're doing.

2:49:52I also want to just add one more comment about public safety.

2:49:57I I'm continually shocked when I see that no one's

2:50:02looking at public safety.

2:50:04I don't understand.

2:50:04Is almost half our budget.

2:50:06I know Councilman puto in the past and says,

2:50:09we will never cut public safety.

2:50:11I don't understand how we can say that at the same time, talk

2:50:14about wanting small government.

2:50:17And it doesn't make sense to me.

2:50:21So I don't think you can actually

2:50:23do what you want to do.

2:50:25And as Paul said, as I said, everything on the table.

2:50:29Thank you.

2:50:34That does conclude our request to speak on this item.

2:50:41Any further comments from our city council members?

2:50:50A quick appreciation for city staff,

2:50:53because I know how much work is involved with this, and so

2:50:58to Karen and staff, thank you so much,

2:51:00because we are the we're asking a lot of you by doing this.

2:51:05And I think Councilman moriyama mentioned that as well.

2:51:08This is tough, but it's necessary.

2:51:13And and in addition to just being tough work,

2:51:16the morale is tough, and one of the questions

2:51:22I was going to ask Karen is with all of these cuts.

2:51:26Staff's burden becomes heavier and our residents will not

2:51:31be responded to as quickly or have as many things that

2:51:35can get done, and that's something

2:51:37that we all have to remember.

2:51:40We're we're going to be making cuts,

2:51:42but our staff will be downsized, as I have said,

2:51:46and it's time to reshape it and move forward.

2:51:51I did I did have a request out where I mentioned,

2:51:54every department needs to make some cuts.

2:51:56And I don't know whether we need to just get a commitment

2:52:00from the city manager.

2:52:03Now as to what might come back to us

2:52:05at the next city council meeting.

2:52:07You said you would come back with an additional 300,000

2:52:11cuts in addition to what we may ask for now.

2:52:16That's not any part of me.

2:52:21I'm sorry, I didn't want to interrupt.

2:52:22I'm just saying there's general agreement,

2:52:24I think that we all want to just visualize more options for us.

2:52:29Absolutely can't afford an all fired police.

2:52:33Every department, there are places

2:52:34where we can cut the personnel.

2:52:37We have a tough time with the contracts.

2:52:41That's not something we easily can tap into.

2:52:43And they have responded across the board.

2:52:46You've got a mission's worth of cuts

2:52:47based on colas and other things that we've cut and furloughs.

2:52:51If you look at the list, it's a pretty dramatic list of cuts

2:52:54that our staff is getting, but we're not done,

2:52:57and we need to move forward.

2:52:59And I just wanted to parallel just in me.

2:53:02And then I'll shut up.

2:53:04I mentioned earlier, the League of California cities

2:53:08meeting that they conducted last week where the East Bay

2:53:14legislators came to talk to us.

2:53:16And I think I said earlier, they said,

2:53:18this has never been a more difficult time

2:53:21to lead, especially locally.

2:53:24So I want to thank Lisa for even attempting to come into this.

2:53:28It's difficult. So we ask for patience,

2:53:31too, with our residents.

2:53:32We love to collaborate.

2:53:34We need more of that.

2:53:35But we also need patience because we're

2:53:37all good people up here, including all of our staff

2:53:41and our city manager.

2:53:42But we need to have your support and your goodwill is as well

2:53:48as your criticism, because we're all trying to do

2:53:51the best that we could do.

2:53:53And we're going to move forward.

2:53:55And so now I'll shut up and see if anyone else has some.

The Mayor closed the item with something between an appeal and a defense.

On staff concessions: “they have responded across the board. You've got a” substantial “worth of cuts based on COLAs and other things that we've cut, and furloughs.”

His assessment: “it's a pretty dramatic list of cuts that our staff is getting, but we're not done, and we need to move forward.”

Then a report from a League of California Cities meeting where East Bay legislators had spoken: “this has never been a more difficult time to lead, especially locally.”

His thanks to a newly elected colleague “for even attempting to come into this. It's difficult.”

And the request: “we ask for patience too with our residents. We love to collaborate. We need more of that.”

His framing of what he wanted: “we're all good people up here, including all of our staff and our city manager. But we need to have your support and your goodwill — as well as your criticism.”

Significant

“We need to have your support and your goodwill — as well as your criticism” — the Mayor naming criticism as something wanted rather than resented.

20 Positions not named captions 3280–3473

2:53:58Gabe, can my comment to city manager, campinas.

2:54:03Karen, is it possible for you to send to us a reminder

2:54:09to our new council members the recommendations

2:54:13from our adviser, especially since they were not part

2:54:20of the Council before, make sure that they know

2:54:24what the different options are?

2:54:27Sure, I can certainly do that.

2:54:29And just to sort of expand on what seems to be,

2:54:33you know, and correct me if I'm wrong

2:54:35or if there's a consensus and/or if there's a motion

2:54:37at the end of all of this.

2:54:39But certainly, again, as I had previously pointed out,

2:54:43we will be talking positions.

2:54:45And I'm trying not to I apologize for being vague,

2:54:50but I do not want to name positions

2:54:53where they find out tonight at a council meeting

2:54:55that they may be laid off.

2:54:57So I'm not naming positions right now that if there were

2:55:01any positions as a result of any of our negotiations

2:55:05with any of our bargaining units, again,

2:55:07that would be brought to the city council

2:55:08to authorize in closed session to have

2:55:11those conversations in any meeting

2:55:13confers with any of our units.

2:55:15So I just I want to share that.

2:55:16And I again, I apologize that that sounds vague,

2:55:19but I'm trying to be very sensitive to the fact

2:55:22that any menu of options includes layoffs.

2:55:25It's just a magnitude of how many.

2:55:27And from where and at what point that becomes real is, again,

2:55:32if we're laying off in one person

2:55:35that does a insane amount of work, that can't be replaced.

2:55:38I mean, these are things that we are considering.

2:55:41So, again, the 300 if it was $300,000 at the minimum,

2:55:45that we will be able to do that.

2:55:47But I'm certainly happy to provide a reminder

2:55:51of the fiscal response plan menu that

2:55:53was discussed over the summer.

2:55:56I'm happy to do to provide additional options.

2:56:01And that is up to the council.

2:56:02So that there could be a menu.

2:56:05But the minimum I'm hearing would

2:56:07be at least to try to achieve the $664,000 as adopted.

2:56:12And so from there, what I will do

2:56:14is I will work with our staff over the next week

2:56:17to prepare some things for you to look at.

2:56:21But again, if there's anything that

2:56:23is required to be negotiated, I would bring

2:56:26that to you in closed session.

2:56:29Thank you.

2:56:29Thank you, Lisa.

2:56:35Think it's a good break.

2:56:36Thank you, mayor.

2:56:37That's a great reminder that if we make everybody in town

2:56:40unhappy to the same extent, I think we've done a really

2:56:44good job of being pretty fair.

2:56:46So we are all you know, everyone's going to be unhappy.

2:56:50I think this is kind of a given here.

2:56:52So and I appreciate all the work that staff is doing.

2:56:55I did want to just raise up what Sherry

2:57:00spoke about, about the impact.

2:57:03And it would be I know this is extra work on top of just

2:57:06the numbers part, but for you to bring us back as you lay out

2:57:10these options for us, some of that impact,

2:57:13and if there are obvious equity impacts, if there are impacts

2:57:18that are significant to services, that would be really

2:57:21great for us to understand.

2:57:24I do.

2:57:25I would like to see that sort of minimum cuts

2:57:29to get to the 600,000.

2:57:31I also would like to see the bigger menu of potential cuts

2:57:38that will can really get us back to a better place.

2:57:41I think council member Rudnick mentioned a million.

2:57:45Other people have mentioned that million.

2:57:47And that was probably a good target.

2:57:49So I would like to see that as well.

2:57:51So thank you for all the extra work.

2:57:55And that's.

2:57:56And again, if we don't make we don't make those cuts

2:57:59this year, we're just knocking at the door

2:58:02the next fiscal year budget that we have to start planning for.

2:58:06And we all.

2:58:07But we don't know what toll that will happen.

2:58:09So what will happen?

2:58:11Do I hear emotion from anyone?

2:58:15I'll move that.

2:58:17We ask staff to bring us back a menu of options

2:58:22for potential cuts, including one targeted option

2:58:27A for the $664,000 and then an option

2:58:33B of a mission's worth of cuts.

2:58:37And I would like to have included in that the impacts

2:58:41from those cuts as well.

2:58:42From all departments, from all departments, everybody,

2:58:45everything.

2:58:46Everything's on the table.

2:58:47And I will second that.

2:58:48I think TSA already did, didn't you?

2:58:51May I may I clarify, are you asking for a million of cuts

2:58:58or are you asking for a million in surplus?

2:59:01Because that's a very different thing if you're asking

2:59:04for a million in surplus.

2:59:06That would be about $600,000 in cuts.

2:59:09But if you're asking me a million.

2:59:10And that would be.

2:59:13So I just want to clarify what the intent is.

2:59:18I would say a million in cuts.

2:59:21And you can tell us how much surplus that will generate.

2:59:26It's been the motion has been made by council member

2:59:29multicamera and seconded by council member rubberneck,

2:59:33can we have a roll call, please?

2:59:35Me if I may put some people I can still remember avieson.

2:59:44She said, I can't remember.

2:59:47Let me hold on one sec, ok?

2:59:49You need it.

2:59:51Council member of the Council member mccalman.

2:59:55I can't remember when I motion carries.

3:00:01Thank you all tonight.

3:00:04Necessary and a good, good discussion

3:00:06among city council members, staff and our residents.

3:00:10The next agenda item is city council, local and regional

3:00:13leaders on assignments.

3:00:15Are there any report?

3:00:18I'll start.

3:00:20We've had a few meetings.

3:00:23I had my first board meeting with recycle more,

3:00:26which is a great assignment.

3:00:29Thank you for that assignment.

3:00:30And welcome with a lot of stuff with sb

3:00:351383 which is about for the community

3:00:39members who don't know.

3:00:4030 three, it is separating out organic waste.

3:00:44So food waste from the waste stream

3:00:48because it creates higher methane exposure or production.

3:00:54And there's a lot of going back and forth with the state

3:00:58as far as when they're going to start this enforcement

3:01:00process because it impacts it'll in because of COVID,

3:01:06there's delays.

3:01:07So it'd be really helpful if it could be pushed back.

3:01:11But we are going full force as if it's

3:01:13not going to be pushed back.

3:01:14I also went to the Save Alta Bates task force meeting,

3:01:18and that's a really important meeting for our region

3:01:21because the 80 corridor, as we know,

3:01:24is fairly deficient in hospital bed.

3:01:27And so it's a very interesting group,

3:01:30lots of different stakeholders.

3:01:32And those are my big outside assignment

3:01:36meetings that I went to.

3:01:39Good for you.

3:01:40Any other reports?

3:01:42Georg kento well, I look forward to attending my first meetings

3:01:47with the urban forest committee, and I'm

3:01:50just so proud that our city is a tree city.

3:01:53USA, grateful to the parsley's unqualifiedly and Genevieve

3:02:00for making that happen.

3:02:02And looking at what we need to deal with climate change.

3:02:06And that we need a plant, more trees.

3:02:10But we also know what needs to be done with our temperatures

3:02:17getting much, much warmer.

3:02:19So I look forward to working with our new are our brand

3:02:24new group.

3:02:26We did put one person on that.

3:02:29That's part of the committee.

3:02:30She attended one meeting already.

3:02:32And this past meeting, this meeting this evening,

3:02:36having Robin Mitchell back, I welcome,

3:02:40and I look forward to working with all of the committee

3:02:43members and again, as the liaison to fab,

3:02:49grateful to all five members for getting the job done.

3:02:53And look forward to joining them next week

3:02:55as well for the second meeting.

3:02:57So thank you, mayor.

3:03:00And the other reports.

3:03:03Those of us who are still waiting

3:03:04to go to our new assignments, I think

3:03:08it did forget to share that last Monday I attended

3:03:11the full meeting for the Arts and culture

3:03:13commission, which there are so many great projects that

3:03:20are on the way.

3:03:21But they also are really kind of tempering

3:03:23and waiting for a big project.

3:03:26So that they've been saving a lot of their money.

3:03:28So that they can invest in a really exciting

3:03:31project for the community.

3:03:33We saw a great presentation.

3:03:35There's going to be pardon me if I don't say it's either

3:03:39the electrical boxes or that there's going to be

3:03:44no artwork on some of them.

3:03:47And so I'm really excited to see what comes from it.

3:03:51Again, thank you all very much, appreciate the effort

3:03:54is there's no more comments.

3:03:57It's 948 and this meeting is adjourned.

3:04:00Thank you very much for that.

3:04:05Thank you.

The City Manager explained why she would not be specific, and the item closed with a motion, which carried, directing staff to bring back a menu of cuts: option A for “the $664,000” and option B for a million in cuts, with their impacts, “from all departments.”

Quinto's request: that she send new councilmembers “the recommendations from our adviser, especially since they were not part of the Council before, [to] make sure that they know what the different options are.”

Then her own qualification about the coming modifications: “we will be talking positions.”

And the reason for vagueness: “I apologize for being vague, but I do not want to name positions where they find out tonight at a council meeting that they may be laid off.”

Motoyama asked for impacts, including equity impacts, alongside a $664,000 option and a bigger menu of potential cuts, and moved that; Rudnick seconded and it carried. Asked to clarify, the motion asks for a million in cuts; a million-dollar surplus, the City Manager noted, would need about $600,000 in cuts.

The modifications return at the following meeting.

Liaison reports followed, including a first RecycleMore board meeting on SB 1383 — “separating out organic waste… because it creates higher methane” — where “we are going full force as if it's not going to be pushed back.”

And the Save Alta Bates task force, “a really important meeting for our region.” Quinto reported on the Urban Forest Committee and the Financial Advisory Board; a councilmember on the Arts and Culture Commission. Adjourned at 9:48 p.m.

Significant

Positions are deliberately not named in public so employees do not learn from a broadcast meeting that they may be laid off.