Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 2021

Remote, via teleconference · 4 hours 18 minutes · 4549 caption units

Council: Paul Fadelli, Mayor · Gabe Quinto, Mayor Pro Tem · Janet Abelson · Lisa Motoyama · Tessa Rudnick

Staff: Karen Pinkos, City Manager · Holly Charléty, City Clerk · Michael Pigoni, Fire Chief

Presenting: Mark Van Gorder, PG&E Government Relations

A four-hour meeting. The Council assigns an equity and inclusion work plan to the Human Relations Commission, originating in the Mayor's request to add equity to staff reports. Then a study session on boards, commissions and committees that produces October's resolutions — and draws objection from committee volunteers.

These summaries are written with AI. An AI model (Claude, by Anthropic) drafted the summaries, titles and notes from each meeting’s closed captions, and they were checked against those captions. They can still be wrong, leave out something that matters, or weigh things differently than you would.

  • Captions are automatic and unedited. Names and words are often misspelled or misheard, and quotations carry those errors.
  • Who is speaking is often unclear. The captions rarely say, so a speaker’s name can be missing or wrong.
  • Not the official record. This is an independent site, not the City’s. For what was decided, rely on the adopted minutes.

Check anything that matters against the captions beside each summary, or the City’s recording. How these pages are made

SSignificantXCross-referenceNNote

Contents

41 sections
  1. 01ConvenedN
  2. 02Why the meetings stayed remoteS
  3. 03Over eighty percentS
  4. 04Who counts the childrenS
  5. 05A motion that failed two to fiveS
  6. 06The six-month reportX
  7. 07The budget subcommitteeS
  8. 08“Get off the high risk list”S
  9. 09Discounts, and a paradeX
  10. 10PG&E's pole-fire explanationS
  11. 11“Chris is also very sick”S
  12. 12“Secrecy is the refuge of scoundrels”S
  13. 13Compensation for a closed caféS
  14. 14Come to my house for lunchS
  15. 15A land acknowledgement, and October 11thS
  16. 16Albany, the night beforeS
  17. 17One email, one weekS
  18. 18Consent, and a contingencyS
  19. 19Three more propertiesS
  20. 20“Make your yard look neat”S
  21. 21A simple request that got biggerS
  22. 22The five whysS
  23. 23“Because it is the law”S
  24. 24Fitness reports in the NavyS
  25. 25“Not have it go on for two years”S
  26. 26Why the study session existsS
  27. 27“They are not elected officials”S
  28. 28A process never formally adoptedS
  29. 29Experts and lay citizensS
  30. 30“No more preferential treatment”S
  31. 31Three meetings, or noneS
  32. 32Notify the Council firstSS
  33. 33“More of a problem than a benefit”S
  34. 34Expertise lost to a term limitS
  35. 35What reappointment costsS
  36. 36A limit that applies only when fullS
  37. 37Five committeesS
  38. 38Questions for the interviewS
  39. 39Authority to removeS
  40. 40Whatever it likesS
  41. 41An outgoing division presidentS

01 Convened captions 1–45

0:14:09That's Gary city Clerk can we proceed to work with me?

0:14:17We do have other council members on the on the call.

0:14:19We know where to put her.

0:14:24Well, at seven talk and September twenty one,

0:14:28regular city council meeting of Eldorado

0:14:32is called to order for the city clerk

0:14:35please call the roll fidele present mayor Potemkin Town

0:14:40council member, Apison here, council member

0:14:43mohtarma er council member.

0:14:46Rodney er we have a quorum.

0:14:48Thank you.

0:14:49You.

0:14:49Well, those of us who want to do the Pledge of Allegiance

0:14:52or a moment of silence, please join me I

0:14:55pledge allegiance to the flag flag of united States.

0:15:01America America, and to the Republic

0:15:05for which we stands one nation, one under God

0:15:12indivisible invisible with liberty and justice

0:15:15for all or all Thank you.

0:15:20Welcome back, everyone.

0:15:22In our city clerk.

0:15:23Please read the instruction for teleconference and public

0:15:26comments and keep me posted Council members and staff who

0:15:30have participated as panelists.

0:15:31Please remember to keep a microphone muted whenever you

0:15:34are not speaking to ensure compliance with the Brown Act

0:15:37and to address security concerns.

0:15:39Attendee images videos will remain disabled as the chat

0:15:42feature for all participants The members of the public who wish

0:15:46to provide oral testimony The mayor will announce the time

0:15:49for public comment on each applicable item If you wish

0:15:52to speak, please like the hand icon to raise your hand If you

0:15:55cannot locate the icon please refer to the document linked

0:15:59on page one of the agenda for the RES and feature attendees

0:16:02joining by phone can dial Nine to raise their hand when

0:16:06it's your turn to provide comments,

0:16:09your name will be called and you will be prompted to unmuted

0:16:11yourself attendee's joining by phone will be prompted to dial

0:16:14Star six to meet themselves.

0:16:16Mabior ready to move on to the next item Thank you.

0:16:19And the next item is the council staff

0:16:21Communications where we talk about report on closed session

0:16:26commission appointments and informational reports

0:16:28on matters of general interest to the city

0:16:31announced by the City Council on Staff and City Manager.

The meeting opened remotely, with all five members present.

The Clerk gave the teleconference instructions: the mayor “will announce a time for public comment on each applicable item,” with attendees raising a hand or dialling star nine by phone.

Council and staff communications cover “report on closed session, commission appointments and informational reports on matters of general interest.”

The evening would run past four hours.

It opened with the City Manager's report, and the Council's budget subcommittee reported after her.

Note

A four-hour meeting, most of it on two policy items: the equity work plan and a study session on the city's advisory bodies.

02 Why the meetings stayed remote captions 46–127

0:16:35I understand we're going to begin tonight's council staff

0:16:40communication with a special report from our audit committee

0:16:49Thank you, Mayor.

0:16:50Fidele.

0:16:51We can begin with the city council subcommittee

0:16:56if they would like to begin their report out.

0:16:58And then I do also have some announcement.

0:17:00Why don't you begin Why don't you

0:17:01start and then we'll go to the audit committee next year.

0:17:04Enough All right just to report on our local emergency that

0:17:09continues unfortunately or unfortunately First

0:17:13and foremost, as we are all meeting via Zom

0:17:16and worked well, this is was decided

0:17:19by the mayor a couple of weeks ago

0:17:21following a sort of in-person experiment if you will,

0:17:26in August.

0:17:28Since then, however, Six AB three sixty one

0:17:32was a piece of legislation signed by the governor

0:17:35last week that allows agencies to continue to remit, to meet

0:17:40remotely There had been an executive order in place

0:17:44by the governor.

0:17:44I went over this and my city manager

0:17:46updater couple of weeks ago that was set

0:17:49to expire on September 30th.

0:17:51The Assembly and Senate stepped up and passed legislation which

0:17:54the governor signed, which would allow legislatively

0:17:58and through, I believe, twenty twenty four

0:18:02would allow for agencies that are subject to the Brown Act

0:18:05to continue to meet remotely without the previous

0:18:09teleconferencing rules.

0:18:10The original Brown stated that if any city council member,

0:18:15or any member of a public body that is subject to the Brown

0:18:18Act wanted to meet remotely had to be in a remote place

0:18:22or in a public place that was noticed

0:18:25and allowed for the public to be able to be there as well.

0:18:28It didn't allow for things like this.

0:18:30It was written obviously many decades ago.

0:18:32And didn't contemplate a Zoome meetings or teleconferencing

0:18:36that has changed again It has to be within the context

0:18:40of an emergency.

0:18:41The governor has declared a state of emergency

0:18:43We have declared a local emergency Well,

0:18:46we'll be working with Jordan is our assistant city attorney

0:18:49and Sky, our city attorney on various components of what that

0:18:53would mean for the city to continue to meet remotely We

0:18:58have received word from our contra Costa health officer

0:19:02that there are strongly recommending at this time

0:19:04to continue in person to continue

0:19:07virtual meetings because the Delta

0:19:12variant is still out there.

0:19:13And though the Bay Area is doing rather well

0:19:16and California is doing rather well,

0:19:18nationwide they are still strongly recommending

0:19:20that we continue to meet virtually

0:19:23not just city councils, but boards,

0:19:24commissions, committees.

0:19:25So I'll be working with You your Honor.

0:19:27I'll be working with our city attorneys and staff

0:19:30to make sure that we're facilitating

0:19:31what needs to be done.

0:19:32There is a requirement at the city council

0:19:35affirms this every 30 days.

0:19:37So that would be some sort of resolution

0:19:39It needs to be adopted by the city council every 30 days.

0:19:43In order to continue to move forward.

0:19:44So we anticipate that would be a template type of resolution

0:19:48that we start would create in conjunction with our city

0:19:52attorney That would be a consent item for the council

0:19:55to consider at least through.

0:19:57I'm i'll talk with all of you further as far as is

0:20:01at this point, I don't want to say through October

0:20:05or November, end of the year.

0:20:06I think that that still needs to remain to be seen.

0:20:09Will continue to report.

0:20:10But at least every thirty days this does allow the council,

0:20:13the ability to reflect and decide if that

0:20:15is continuing to go forward.

0:20:17So we will talk about this further on October 5.

0:20:20But at this point i can assume that October will resume

0:20:25and I can assume that all of our county boards, commissions

0:20:28and committees for the month of October

0:20:29will continue to meet virtually as well in addition,

The City Manager explained the legislation that governs how this meeting is being held, which she believed runs through 2024, subject to the Council reaffirming it every 30 days.

The background: an executive order allowing remote meetings was “set to expire on September 30th.”

What replaced it: AB 361, “signed by the governor last week,” which allows agencies “to continue to meet remotely” through 2024.

Why it was needed: the original Brown Act required any member attending remotely to be “in a remote place or in a public place that was noticed and allowed for the public to be able to be there as well.”

The reason: it was “written obviously many decades ago” and “didn't contemplate Zoom meetings or teleconferencing.”

The condition attached: it “has to be within the context of an emergency.”

And the mechanism: “the city council affirms this every 30 days” by resolution, expected to be “a template type of resolution… a consent item.”

The county health officer was “strongly recommending… to continue virtual meetings because the Delta variant is still out there” — not just councils but “boards, commissions, committees.”

The city had run an “in-person experiment” in August and gone back.

Significant

AB 361 is the statute behind the thirty-day renewals — passed a week before this meeting to replace an expiring executive order. The City Manager's phrasing is that it gives the Council “the ability to reflect and decide if that is continuing” every thirty days.

03 Over eighty percent captions 128–183

0:20:33I just wanted to give a kind of another brief update

0:20:37on board to do with covid-19 and we're doing really

0:20:42well as far as vaccinations.

0:20:43We know that his staff were well over 80 percent

0:20:46vaccinated as of last week.

0:20:48We have now in place per a county health order

0:20:52that first responders including our police and fire,

0:20:55we'll need to either be vaccinated

0:20:56and proof of vaccination or submit to weekly testing.

0:21:00We have implemented that.

0:21:01We have also implement part of our recreation staff doing

0:21:05the same because the school district also

0:21:07has a similar mandate We also know that we're working

0:21:11with with our colleagues in other cities and the county

0:21:15to keep an eye on updates from Kalachakra

0:21:18As you know, the president President Biden,

0:21:20announced a vaccine mandate as well

0:21:22for employer of one employees or more,

0:21:25which would be subject to.

0:21:27So we're all working on all through all of that.

0:21:29But again, we have a really high vaccination rates.

0:21:31So that's very good news for us in the city.

0:21:34And speaks very highly of our our city state.

0:21:37And so we will be continuing to do that again.

0:21:40We're not done yet.

0:21:41Unfortunately, while we're doing well.

0:21:43And I'm looking right now at the Contra Costa County website

0:21:46eighty five point five percent Contra Costa County

0:21:50is vaccin which is excellent.

0:21:52And el Reno is well over 90 percent.

0:21:54They don't have exact figures because they

0:21:56sort of stopped counting and give her the county website.

0:22:00So we're doing really well We've got to stay focused.

0:22:03We've got to continue.

0:22:04We still have a masked mandate in all indoor places.

0:22:07And you've also probably heard the Contra Costa county now

0:22:10has a vaccine, a vaccine showing for certain types

0:22:15of businesses, including restaurants,

0:22:18bars, and exercise facilities.

0:22:22This will impact some of our recreation program.

0:22:24So we're going to be doing is stay tuned for that.

0:22:26We'll put the word out for particular programs.

0:22:29But our staff is continuing to this has just

0:22:32been yet another kind of head spinning thing

0:22:35that we've had to come up with.

0:22:37But our employees are super flexible super resilient

0:22:40and have just been so creative and willing

0:22:43to be able to do whatever it takes to comply with all

0:22:45of the county health orders and federal, state and federal

0:22:48health orders, all of the restrictions that are upon

0:22:50and still find a way to be able to provide

0:22:52service to our residents.

0:22:54So once again, we ask everyone's patience and compassion

0:22:58and hope that you're all continuing

0:23:00to take care of yourselves, be safe

0:23:02and take care of each other.

The vaccination picture was given alongside the new mandates the city had implemented.

City staff were “well over 80 percent vaccinated as of last week.”

The county order: “first responders including our police and fire will need to either be vaccinated and [show] proof of vaccination or submit to weekly testing.”

Implemented — and extended to “part of our recreation staff… because the school district also has a similar mandate.”

The county figure: “eighty five point five percent Contra Costa County is vaccin[ated],” with El Cerrito “well over 90 percent” — though exact figures were unavailable because the county “sort of stopped counting.”

Still in force: “a mask mandate in all indoor places,” plus a new county requirement for “vaccine showing for certain types of businesses, including restaurants, bars and exercise facilities.”

That last one “will impact some of our recreation program[s].”

Her assessment of staff: “yet another kind of head spinning thing that we've had to come up with,” managed by people who are “super flexible, super resilient… and willing to do whatever it takes.”

Significant

El Cerrito's vaccination rate exceeded 90 percent, above a county already at 85.5 — though the county had stopped publishing exact city figures. The relaxation that follows on 1 November applies only where a host can verify every person present, which an ICU nurse tells the Council in October is a mistake.

04 Who counts the children captions 184–250

0:23:04And with that, that is all I have,

0:23:06as far as our local emergency I also council member Davison,

0:23:11did you have a question?

0:23:12I had a question in in the tracking that's happening

0:23:16that we will be hearing about.

0:23:19There's a group of what I think it's 12:00

0:23:21under if or are under twelve.

0:23:26I'm not sure which those to which I find very concerning

0:23:31that of course, they are not vaccinated

0:23:35And so the students in that age group are

0:23:40are exposed every day to others who have

0:23:45likewise not been vaccinated.

0:23:47So are we keeping track of that particular group

0:23:50to see what's happening?

0:23:55There?

0:23:56Not Yeah, not not that I'm aware of right now.

0:24:01Thank you.

0:24:02Recreation director is letting you know

0:24:04that the health audit exempts twelve

0:24:06and under from the requirement.

0:24:07So we're not tracking we're not checking that the school

0:24:12district, however is performing I believe, weekly testing

0:24:18But what we're responsible for is our staff.

0:24:20And so what we're trying to do Thank

0:24:23you so the school district is providing the weekly testing.

0:24:26We are we are providing that weekly testing or vaccine

0:24:29mandate of our staff And so all of the protocols that we've

0:24:33had in place for the last eighteen months,

0:24:36for all of our programs, Maskin social distancing and and

0:24:40limiting the number of people in various classes has remained.

0:24:45And so we'll be continuing to do that.

0:24:47So that was kind part of partnering with the school

0:24:50district We do not collect that information of our I

0:24:53wasn't thinking we would be collecting that

0:24:55but rather reporting it on that would.

0:25:00That's a school district is handling that part

0:25:04So we won't get those numbers No, we won't have those.

0:25:08But these updates, is there any way we could.

0:25:11I would find personally really useful because those are

0:25:17the kids in our environment.

0:25:19And we don't have the authority to collect data.

0:25:23I don't believe on those that those people participating

0:25:27in our programs unless there is a mandate that we require

0:25:31to someone show that data in order

0:25:33to participate in a service But 12

0:25:36and under is exempt from that So we're not able to collect it.

0:25:40But I was wondering about is if we could be told what

0:25:43the statistics are that are being collected I assume,

0:25:47by what the county or something the school district

0:25:50does have a data dashboard on their website

0:25:53as to how many cases in their school

0:25:55have been tested positive.

0:25:57So that is on the county website.

0:25:59So anyone can check the county website The school

0:26:02district has a dashboard so we would

0:26:04have to individually do that.

0:26:07That's on the school.

0:26:07That's the school district.

0:26:08Collect that data.

0:26:09And it's on their website we do get a report.

0:26:13If someone has been exposed.

0:26:15And then we have protocols in place

0:26:17like, say, we have an after school program,

0:26:19one the kids test positive.

0:26:21We would be notified of that.

0:26:22And then we would notify the others.

0:26:24But we wouldn't collect that data ourselves.

Abelson asked about a group the mandates do not cover, and found the city is not tracking them; the school district is.

Her concern: children “under twelve” who “of course are not vaccinated,” and who are “exposed every day to others who have likewise not been vaccinated.”

Her question: “are we keeping track of that particular group to see what's happening?”

The answer: “not that I'm aware of right now.”

The reason: “the health order exempts twelve and under from the requirement,” so the city is “not checking.”

The city's responsibility is narrower than she assumed: “what we're responsible for is our staff.” The school district handles weekly testing for students.

She adjusted the ask: not collection but reporting — “I was wondering… if we could be told what the statistics are that are being collected.”

The answer: the district “does have a data dashboard on their website as to how many cases in their school have been tested positive” — so “we would have to individually do that.”

Her reason for wanting it: “those are the kids in our environment.”

Significant

Children under twelve are exempt from the vaccination requirement, so the city does not collect case data on them — it is notified only when a child in its programs tests positive; the school district publishes its own case dashboard. Staff's explanation was that the city has no authority to collect the data because twelve and under are exempt from the mandate.

05 A motion that failed two to five captions 251–299

0:26:32Council member Motorama Thank you, Mayor.

0:26:35So could you also address the eviction moratorium

0:26:39in our local ordinance?

0:26:42Yes, thank for reminding me We do the eviction moratorium

0:26:46that we have had in place for businesses and residents

0:26:50goes along with the county state to emergency,

0:26:52which has continued So at this time, that is still continuing.

0:26:56We have not received an end date for that yet.

0:26:58So that is still in effect.

0:27:00Oh, just an update at the County Board of Supervisors today.

0:27:04They had a motion to extend the eviction moratorium

0:27:08and it failed.

0:27:11And the legal counsel at the county

0:27:14said they could not extend to retail businesses

0:27:18But the county can deal with providing legal funds to help

0:27:22people through the post Sept or 30th time for evictions

0:27:28and what's also in place is the state law.

0:27:32I believe aB eight 3, 2 which talks about capping the amount

0:27:37of increase or for rent.

0:27:39So none of this sounded.

0:27:41I listened today.

0:27:42John Joy was a champion Tenants rights

0:27:45and extending that moratorium but it failed on a two

0:27:49to five vote.

0:27:51But maybe another vote if covid gets more serious

0:27:55And there's other details coming forward and also making sure

0:28:00that everyone knows all the council members,

0:28:02knowing that the public knows there are funds

0:28:05available for tenants and landlord

0:28:08to be able to either pay their rent or pay their house

0:28:13if their tenants are paying.

0:28:14So anyone can we we are not administering that.

0:28:19That is federal and state program.

0:28:20But certainly please get in touch with our housing analyst

0:28:25at the city and/or our community development department.

0:28:28We can try to point you in the right direction,

0:28:30but just make sure that that people

0:28:32know that there are funds available out there to be

0:28:35accessed.

0:28:35If anyone is having trouble paying their rent

0:28:38or if you have a tenant that is not if you're a landlord

0:28:41that is having trouble as well.

0:28:43There's money available, there's funding and grants available.

0:28:46And Karen that was the point of the supervisors who voted

0:28:49against extending let's use up the money we have before we

0:28:53ask for more money.

0:28:54So we need to get people involved

0:28:56to sign up right Any other comments or questions

0:29:00of our city manager?

Motoyama asked about the eviction moratorium, and the answer included news from that afternoon.

The local position: the moratorium “for businesses and residents goes along with the county[-]state emergency, which has continued.” No end date had been set.

But at the County Board of Supervisors that day, “they had a motion to extend the eviction moratorium — and it failed.”

The margin: “two to five.”

The legal constraint given: county counsel “said they could not extend to retail businesses.”

What the county can do instead: “providing legal funds to help people through the post September 30th time for evictions.”

And the reasoning of those who voted against, as Fadelli understood it: “let's use up the money we have before we ask for more money.”

The City Manager pressed on that: there are “funds available for tenants and landlord[s]” — federal and state money the city does not administer, but can direct people toward.

Her ask: “make sure that people know that there are funds available out there to be accessed.”

Significant

The county board declines to extend its eviction moratorium on a two-to-five vote, with supervisors arguing the existing rent relief money should be spent first. El Cerrito's own moratorium runs with the county and state emergency, which “has continued,” so it remains in effect with no end date yet.

06 The six-month report captions 300–326

0:29:02I just have one more thing to report.

0:29:03Which is related to the subcommittee's

0:29:05report coming up.

0:29:07As the council knows, the state auditor progress report

0:29:11was due last week, six months after the report was issued

0:29:15You have all received the matrix that was in your packet that

0:29:20was submitted on our website.

0:29:23On various parts of our website and our financial transparency

0:29:26agent is on our there's a specific state

0:29:28to report page the update including a cover

0:29:30letter and an executive summary has

0:29:32also been updated on that link.

0:29:36And so for my next city manager update,

0:29:38I'll make sure to put the link there.

0:29:40But if someone goes to the state auditor

0:29:42report page on our website or go to the search

0:29:44engine on the website and click state auditor report,

0:29:48you can see the latest update that

0:29:49was provide to the state auditor per our requirements

0:29:53to update them every six months.

0:29:55And the next update will be march

0:29:5816th of twenty twenty two.

0:30:02And with that, I'm happy to turn it over to the city

0:30:04council Subcommittee.

0:30:07It sounds like a good segway mayor pro tem.

0:30:09Do you have a question No, I don't.

0:30:12But I wanted is it OK to make an announced nant Sure.

The City Manager reported on the city's obligation to the state auditor.

The deadline: the progress report “was due last week, six months after the report was issued.”

What was submitted: a matrix in the Council packet, posted to the city website alongside “a cover letter and an executive summary.”

Where to find it: a “specific state[ auditor] report page” reachable from the site's search.

The cycle: the city must “update them every six months,” with the next due 16 March 2022.

The city is required to update the state auditor every six months.

The financial transparency portal carries the same material.

Cross-reference

The high-risk designation obliges the city to report progress to the state auditor every six months, published on the auditor's own site. Getting off that list is named as a goal here and again in December, when the incoming mayor makes it a priority “once and for all.”

07 The budget subcommittee captions 327–390

0:30:17We're going to get to Councilman after this subcommittee.

0:30:19OK, let's do that afterwards.

0:30:21OK so a good way to the city council finance ad

0:30:26Hoc Committee update Thank you.

0:30:28Thank you.

0:30:29Mayor Fidele We'll keep this brief The City Council formed

0:30:34of Budget Subcamp which is an ad hoc committee meeting

0:30:37This committee is only together up until we are completed

0:30:41with our annual updates to the state auditor This was created

0:30:47in order to support the city's response to the state

0:30:49auditor's recommendations.

0:30:51The Budget Committee has had the following meetings.

0:30:55Council member Motoman self met one time staff.

0:30:59This subcommittee we've also met with a group

0:31:02of community members who self organized and requested

0:31:05a meeting with us.

0:31:07We had four meetings with city manager

0:31:09which included the city manager the assistant city manager

0:31:13the finance director as well the cab

0:31:15of the chair of the Financial Advisory

0:31:18Board. also known as Fab.

0:31:21The Budget Subcommittee reviewed the city manager's

0:31:23initial response to the auditor and also reviewed the six month

0:31:27follow up, which I highly suggest access

0:31:30either from the packet to this meeting or in any of the places

0:31:34that city manager Pincus highlighted We provided

0:31:37feedback as far as each submission

0:31:41and also we correlated the direction

0:31:44and that was provided by council through the Fiscal

0:31:47Sustainability Workshop Thank you.

0:31:52You, council member Redneck's.

0:31:53So i also want to thank council member

0:31:56Rudnik for really spearheading the formation

0:31:59of the subcommittee.

0:32:00So I think it's been a really great

0:32:01way to get some more time to really dive

0:32:04into our budget issues.

0:32:06So it's been I think I would agree

0:32:09that it's been a helpful body and really

0:32:13useful for all of us.

0:32:14So the budget subcommittee provides the management

0:32:18with direction for the budget updates that are forthcoming.

0:32:21We have been working with our staff

0:32:23to look at those monthly reports and also looking forward

0:32:29We want to make sure that there is sufficient information.

0:32:32And we are thinking that it might be more

0:32:35on a quarterly basis because we can get a fuller

0:32:38report of what is happening.

0:32:41So what we've been really requesting

0:32:43is actionable information in the format that

0:32:45is accessible to everyone that's going to be useful We're also

0:32:49a focusing on the ten and five year five

0:32:52and ten year forecasts to make sure that those are part

0:32:55of our that quarterly report.

0:32:57So we can really see where we're going with the budget changes

0:33:00that we've made.

0:33:01And then also to understand the budget on a department

0:33:05by department basis.

0:33:06So those are that has to come in the hopefully

0:33:11at the beginning of November that will encapsulate

0:33:13this past quarter And I think council member Rubberneck

0:33:20and Mohtarma for the extra effort they're putting in

0:33:22and the subcommittee, it's very much appreciated

0:33:26and we feel very supportive with your support on this

Rudnick reported on a body the Council had created for a single purpose.

Its scope: the ad hoc committee is “only together up until we are completed with our annual updates to the state auditor,” and was created “to support the city's response to the state auditor's recommendations.”

What it had done: met once with staff, held “four meetings with city manager” including the assistant city manager, the finance director and the Financial Advisory Board chair.

And one meeting not requested by the city: “a group of community members who self organized and requested a meeting with us.”

Its work: reviewing “the city manager's initial response to the auditor” and the six-month follow-up, providing feedback on each submission, and correlating the direction from the Fiscal Sustainability Workshop.

Fadelli credited Rudnick with “spearheading the formation of the subcommittee,” calling it “a really great way to get some more time to really dive into our budget issues.”

Motoyama described what they had been asking staff for: “actionable information in the format that is accessible to everyone.”

And a change of cadence: monthly reports might become quarterly, “because we can get a fuller report of what is happening.”

Plus the five and ten year forecasts as part of that quarterly report, and the budget understood “on a department by department basis.”

Significant

Quarterly rather than monthly reporting is floated here, in a subcommittee created solely to answer the state auditor — “it might be more on a quarterly basis because we can get a fuller report.” The Financial Advisory Board splits evenly on that same question in May 2022 with one member absent, producing no recommendation.

08 “Get off the high risk list” captions 391–450

0:33:30I have a question as to will we get a response

0:33:32back to the document that we presented to the auditor?

0:33:36When might that be I do expect that we will hear back

0:33:41from them, the last update that we provided to them in

0:33:46may, I believe losing track of time.

0:33:48Sorry, I believe was in May that we did our we submitted

0:33:52the corrective action Plan and they did follow up with me

0:33:56as far as asking some questions asking

0:33:59for additional documentation or a few things here and there.

0:34:02And then on there on the state auditor website,

0:34:05they did post a response essentially saying

0:34:07all of these areas, the risk areas are pending still,

0:34:11which is not a surprise So we're hopeful that with this update

0:34:15maybe there will be some more completed or at least some

0:34:19some note, some notice that there has been movement made

0:34:22because the city council has done a lot of work,

0:34:26and we have ended the year much better than anticipated.

0:34:30In due to very conservative revenue projection

0:34:35and the budget cuts that we made So

0:34:37that is, as you all heard during the last general fund update.

0:34:40So that's good news that we hope that the state auditor will

0:34:43look favorably upon We have increased our budget monitoring

0:34:47the subcommittee has been a part of that updating our reports

0:34:51as they discuss arrived.

0:34:52So we do expect that we will hear back from them

0:34:55at some point with their essentially

0:34:57their answer to our update, which, again,

0:34:59they will post on their website I'll be sure to again, provide

0:35:02that to the city council I can tell you that I don't

0:35:07because we're the city council still has to approve

0:35:10the fiscal sustainability plan as discussed

0:35:13at the last meeting on August thirty.

0:35:14First, that'll come within the next couple of months for you

0:35:17all to take a look at and approve and adopt.

0:35:21We will provide that to the state auditor at that time.

0:35:23But the next time, we don't have to we don't have

0:35:25to report back until March.

0:35:28When I plan to send once this council approves that plan,

0:35:32I plan to send it to the state auditor in the interim,

0:35:34just as a as an update.

0:35:36So I'm really hopeful that as of the next reporting period,

0:35:40that we will have made such significant progress

0:35:43My goal is to try to get off the high risk list.

0:35:46If we can.

0:35:47I believe that we've done a lot of work.

0:35:49This council has really taken this seriously.

0:35:52And I'm very proud of all of us together.

0:35:55As a community to take all of this seriously.

0:35:58and address the issues in that report.

0:36:00So I also want to think the subcommittee

0:36:02of council member reznik Imodium they have

0:36:05been wonderful to work with.

0:36:07And they have provided excellent feedback, comments,

0:36:10suggestions and frankly been a very

0:36:11good sounding board for staff.

0:36:13So I just want to thank you both very much for that.

0:36:17I'm very optimistic that the progress we've made

0:36:20is going to be looked favorably on by the state auditor.

0:36:25Well, let's just do right So let's move

0:36:29on to council communications that may be important or not

A councilmember asked whether the auditor responds, and the City Manager set out what the city is hoping for.

Her question: “will we get a response back to the document that we presented to the auditor?”

The history: after the corrective action plan was submitted in May, the auditor “follow[ed] up with me… asking some questions, asking for additional documentation.”

And then posted a response saying “all of these areas, the risk areas, are pending still — which is not a surprise.”

The hope for this round: “maybe there will be some more completed, or at least some notice that there has been movement made.”

The evidence she would point to: “we have ended the year much better than anticipated, due to very conservative revenue projection[s] and the budget cuts that we made.”

What still has to happen: the Council must approve the fiscal sustainability plan, expected “within the next couple of months.” The next mandatory report is not until March, but she planned to send the plan “in the interim, just as an update.”

And the goal, stated plainly: “my goal is to try to get off the high risk list, if we can.”

Her assessment: “this council has really taken this seriously.”

Significant

The state auditor's response to the city's first corrective action plan was that every risk area remained pending — “which is not a surprise.” Getting off the list becomes the incoming mayor's stated priority in December, and the fiscal responsibility plan the Council adopts in August 2022 is reported essentially complete by May 2024.

09 Discounts, and a parade captions 451–530

0:36:34important, but fun and factual.

0:36:36Mayor Pro Tem Peter Thank you, Mayor Fidele.

0:36:39I'm i wanted to report.

0:36:40I did mention this and past council meetings

0:36:45but as a member of the executive committee of Green Clean

0:36:49Energy, and I wanted to let our residents

0:36:53and small businesses know that if you are having trouble

0:36:58paying your MCE bill, please know that there are discounts

0:37:03bailable for residents are having difficulties

0:37:07paying their MCE bills.

0:37:10So please look at the MCE website morein clean energy

0:37:17and it will have instructions on how to get those discounts

0:37:23But they do need proof and hopefully you'll

0:37:28be able to get those discounts.

0:37:29So just wanted to make sure that all of our residents

0:37:33know that as a member of Marine clean Energy,

0:37:37we're looking at what we can do to make sure

0:37:40that our residents in need and our small businesses in need

0:37:44get the discounts that are available So,

0:37:47again, thank for that.

0:37:49And I also want to report that I met with the Florida Rotarians

0:37:56and I just wanted to announce that they'll be meeting

0:38:00with the city manager and staff and our subcommittee

0:38:05to look at ways where we can work together

0:38:10to make sure that we have our Fourth

0:38:12of July parade for next year.

0:38:15So this is all the planning stages

0:38:18and I'm great to my fellow l'esprit rotarians who

0:38:21are doing a fantastic job when it

0:38:24comes to helping our community and our community

0:38:28is they've been in charge of of this before And I look forward

0:38:34to working with them and working with city

0:38:39staff and city manager Karen Pickus to make sure

0:38:43that we're get this back.

0:38:44This is our largest and most successful Fourth of July.

0:38:49And we have people coming all over from all over the bay

0:38:53and from out of state and and I'm hoping that we

0:38:56can all work on this together.

0:38:59To make sure that we're able to do this again.

0:39:03And I know our residents have been going

0:39:05stir crazy for not having this.

0:39:07I know there was an informal one last Fourth of July and excited

0:39:12that we'll all be working on this as a community

0:39:16to make sure we get to do this again.

0:39:19So that's my report.

0:39:21Thank you.

0:39:21Mayor Fidele Oh, good.

0:39:23Good news.

0:39:24Other comments and announcements.

0:39:28I just have a couple The Web attack The Western Contra Costa

0:39:33transportation Advisory Committee had another Barch

0:39:37and San Pablo Avenue specific plan, public discussion

0:39:41last week with a long, long powerPoint

0:39:46and discussion with our city staff

0:39:48and BART about what may be happening.

0:39:50And it was very good, open, big discussion and that material

0:39:54is available on our and their website.

0:39:57Also, the environmental quality Committee

0:40:00had another public forum informational forum,

0:40:03an effort on a new food where ordinance

0:40:07that we will be discussing.

0:40:09Hopefully in November.

0:40:10So we can begin ridding our city and other places of plastic

0:40:15and was a good turnout.

0:40:16And I'm looking forward to that.

0:40:17Coming before the council to other than to other Elshamy

0:40:21news breaks Vantz is that the that I thought was interesting.

0:40:25The though I high school football

0:40:28team recently Ignacia Valley Fifty four to nothing

0:40:33So it's kind of a kind of.

0:40:36Yeah.

0:40:36Where we're getting into the commissionaire and then

0:40:39also from elsewhere, you know high,

0:40:41we have a national merit Scholarship semifinalist

0:40:44I want to announce Zachery, a ten congratulations

0:40:48and continue on to the finals.

0:40:50Zachary will be rooting for you And now

0:40:53if we can move on to the public comments,

0:40:57the clerk will announce any written comments

0:41:00received prior to the meeting and confirm

Council communications covered a utility program and the return of an event.

Quinto, from the MCE executive committee: residents and small businesses “having trouble paying your MCE bill” should know “there are discounts available.”

The route: the MCE website, “instructions on how to get those discounts” — though “they do need proof.”

Then the Fourth of July: he had met the local Rotarians, who would meet “with the city manager and staff and our subcommittee to look at ways where we can work together” to bring the parade back.

His description of its scale: “our largest and most successful” event, drawing “people coming from all over the bay and from out of state.”

And why it matters now: “our residents have been going stir crazy for not having this.”

Fadelli added his own reports: a WCCTAC session on BART and the San Pablo Avenue specific plan, and an Environmental Quality Committee forum on a new foodware ordinance expected “hopefully in November,” so the city can “begin ridding our city… of plastic.”

Plus a high school football result and a National Merit semifinalist.

Cross-reference

The foodware ordinance is forecast here for November and arrives on 2 November, having been paused eighteen months for pandemic impacts on restaurants. The Fourth of July returns in 2022, funded privately — the Mayor undertaking to raise the money himself rather than budget for it.

10 PG&E's pole-fire explanation captions 531–665

0:41:03the time per speakers.

0:41:05But to begin with, I wanted to I our council members have been

0:41:09concerned about, especially council member Rubberneck

0:41:12and Mayor Keita have connected with me

0:41:15about the power outages here and else areto and city clerk.

0:41:19I just wanted to make sure that we did, in fact, have Marc

0:41:22and Gordon online here to give us an initial feedback

0:41:27about what's been happening I asked that he come back later,

0:41:31give us a fuller reply Another also presenting tonight

0:41:34Richmond.

0:41:35So they were a little shorthanded,

0:41:37but can we get to Marc Van Gorder It's me

0:41:40and Mike is on the call with us.

0:41:41And I'm I have a mayor and council members.

0:41:47Can you hear me?

0:41:48Yes, we can.

0:41:50All right.

0:41:51Hi, Let me just introduce myself again.

0:41:54My name is Mark Van.

0:41:55Order.

0:41:56I work for Pacific Gas and Electric

0:41:58with government relations representative

0:42:01and as a liaison officer when we open up

0:42:04our local operational emergency center

0:42:08and board I want to thank you for joining tonight.

0:42:14I love this item is not on the agenda.

0:42:16So I'm going to take these comments to the 3

0:42:18minute limit of the council.

0:42:21But I'm happy to work the city staff for a future agenda

0:42:25is meeting and we can have a more detailed report

0:42:29But getting this is just this past weekend,

0:42:32I really appreciate this opportunity to speak

0:42:35to the past two because I've been serving as the government

0:42:37relations liaison working for our that's the operational

0:42:43emergency center.

0:42:44In response to the large and long duration outages in the

0:42:49You are aware that impacted alfredo San Pablo in

0:42:53other communities by the first.

0:42:57I just want to say this, that I and all of acutely

0:43:01recognized the impact and the challenges

0:43:04of these long term outages residents

0:43:07and all of the injured.

0:43:09We have to and we appreciate their patience, your patience,

0:43:15your crews are working to restore power

0:43:18We're working really well, working day and night

0:43:20to get the car back home.

0:43:21Safely.

0:43:22So I'm going to comment briefly, ask or speculate

0:43:26about the cause of the outage and offer a more

0:43:30detailed presentation for.

0:43:35So after a long time without rain

0:43:38if it had during this drought it had a lot of smoke

0:43:41in particular for that matter, any air that dust

0:43:44with their smoke, particulate matter, salt other substances

0:43:48accumulate on the power lines, equipment

0:43:51We have this first light rain and mist that arrives

0:43:56after this long dry spell.

0:43:58It turns that salt dust boils into just A.G. Into substance

0:44:07and muddy type substance.

0:44:09Motsyk enough to conduct electricity.

0:44:12So this happens.

0:44:14This can damage the electric equipment

0:44:17potentially resulting.

0:44:18We call electric flashover or the cracking electricity

0:44:24finding another track or an alternate path instead

0:44:28of the wire and then therefore can damage

0:44:30the electric equipment cross the poles, wires,

0:44:35or other equipment that there is then

0:44:38you have power outages Some folks will

0:44:41see this part of the that that's that's what

0:44:45happens Next question.

0:44:46What did we do about it?

0:44:49We activated the of division is has divisions that has to do

0:44:55with our electric circuitry.

0:44:57We activated the local operational emergency center,

0:45:00the local main office, serving east Bay Area,

0:45:05serving those cities that were impacted

0:45:08is a standard practice during large and long duration

0:45:11outages.

0:45:12And most often we experienced it during the stronger winter

0:45:15storm.

0:45:16Citrus trees on the wires If they're slippery,

0:45:19roads may get car or truck.

0:45:21It's a whole when we activate knowing we'll have a higher

0:45:24than normal higher than normal number of outages

0:45:27and they may go longer periods time

0:45:30been changed a little bit about heat from the wind and whatnot.

0:45:34So the fire the lighting day shifts

0:45:38establish these are the operational emergency center We

0:45:42bring in additional crews We bring in materials

0:45:45and other resource that we need to safely

0:45:47restore power quickly.

0:45:50Our operational emergency center on this scene shortly

0:45:52to see if that's what I mean when I say, OK the command

0:45:56staff section chiefs meet regularly throughout the event

0:46:01to identify the objectives the tactics police force was needed

0:46:04to restore power much like your county office

0:46:08of Emergency Services would open up its emergency

0:46:12operations center or your versity

0:46:14open up for a localized event.

0:46:16What we did the OAC continue to operate and tell the crews

0:46:20and restore power All the customers

0:46:22impacted by the event along a lot of questions that

0:46:25have come up with all so fine.

0:46:27What is it going to do to prevent

0:46:30this from happening again?

0:46:32I understand the sense that this is

0:46:35what is going to happen every weekend

0:46:38or every time there's mist.

0:46:40So i'd like to do and Mayor council members and perhaps

0:46:44Patrick who work with the city manager to schedule a

0:46:47follow up meeting in the coming weeks At that meeting,

0:46:51we would share the council hearing how we regularly,

0:46:54regularly maintain our lines and update

0:46:58electrical infrastructure on a regular basis.

0:47:02And as needed to seek with science

0:47:06mandates And then we'll share any findings.

0:47:09What we dig deeper that may indicate

0:47:13what more Chegeni crews can be doing to further

0:47:16reduce the frequency and duration and the impacts

0:47:20of those outages.

0:47:21And should we find those opportunity

0:47:24I think we'll talk about implementing them in a timely

0:47:27to get that done.

0:47:29So I probably went over my three minutes.

0:47:31I apologize Thank you very much.

0:47:35We can ask questions around because the jeopardizing

0:47:39issues, but we look forward to you coming back and explaining

0:47:43and we look more forward to not having any interruptions

0:47:46at all in energy supply.

0:47:48So thank you, Mark, for calling in and giving us

0:47:52an update We appreciate that.

0:47:57And now I want to turn to the public comments

0:48:00at the members of the public who wish

0:48:03to provide public comments regarding

PG&E appeared without being on the agenda, after councilmembers raised the outages.

Mark Van Gorder, government relations representative and “liaison officer when we open up our local operational emergency center,” was held to the three-minute public comment limit because the item was not agendized.

The outages he was addressing: “large and long duration outages… that impacted El Cerrito, San Pablo” and other communities.

Then the mechanism: “after a long time without rain… during this drought,” with smoke “particulate matter, salt [and] other substances” accumulating “on the power lines [and] equipment.”

What triggers it: “the first light rain and mist that arrives after this long dry spell” turns that accumulation into a “muddy type substance” — “moist enough to conduct electricity.”

The result: “we call [it] electric flashover” — electricity “finding another track or an alternate path instead of the wire,” damaging “the poles, wires or other equipment.”

The response: activating “the local operational emergency center,” standard practice “during large and long duration outages” and normally used for winter storms.

What it does: “command staff [and] section chiefs meet regularly throughout the event to identify the objectives,” much as a county emergency operations center would.

He offered a fuller presentation later and acknowledged the question he could not yet answer: “what is [PG&E] going to do to prevent this from happening again?”

He described what activating that center involves: “we bring in additional crews, we bring in materials and other resource[s] that we need to safely restore power quickly.”

Its normal trigger is weather — “trees on the wires… slippery roads” — activated “knowing we'll have a higher than normal number of outages” that “may go [for] longer periods [of] time.”

Significant

PG&E's pole-fire explanation appears here six weeks before its formal presentation — given in a three-minute public comment slot because the item was not on the agenda. The 2 November presentation adds what this one cannot: that the company forecast normal rainfall, was wrong, and under-washed the insulators as a result.

11 “Chris is also very sick” captions 666–730

0:48:06matters, not on the agenda.

0:48:08Consent items and presentation items should use the race

0:48:11and feature to request to speak City clerk,

0:48:15can we please proceed?

0:48:17Thank you, Mayor.

0:48:18Why we give everyone an opportunity to raise your hand.

0:48:20I will.

0:48:21Just announced that the public comment received by the 4:00

0:48:24p.m. deadline today was posted on our website

0:48:27a supplemental material and provided

0:48:29directly to the council members for items not on the agenda.

0:48:33Tonight, comments were received by mail

0:48:35to succeed a chair for our economic environment

0:48:40equality Committee.

0:48:42Cordeaux handler Robin Mitchell Johnson classic and Teresa

0:48:46Paani Perine, as well as on consent item

0:48:50five from Gary Frost and Sue and Paul duncan.

0:48:54And mayor at this time i see about five hand

0:48:57your questions Can you confirm the 3 minute time limit,

0:49:01please?

0:49:013 minutes please.

0:49:02Thank you.

0:49:03Thank you, sir.

0:49:04I will go to our first speaker tonight,

0:49:06which is with the Elstree, the historical society.

0:49:11You should be able to unmuted begin your time now.

0:49:15Hi.

0:49:16Can you hear me OK?

0:49:17This is Dave Weinstein, President

0:49:18of the Historical Society I'm speaking on behalf

0:49:22of the historical society and as a friend

0:49:24of Chris Chris Tredway Chris is one of the greatest guys

0:49:28that I know.

0:49:29He has been a long time journalist covering Also,

0:49:32we know in tremendous detail with a special focus

0:49:36on the community.

0:49:37So many events and so many people in Saariaho

0:49:40owe him a lot for his deep coverage.

0:49:43He's also a great historian He knows a great deal about town,

0:49:46about the history of our town.

0:49:48He considers the history in kornet

0:49:50for today He does a Facebook page The vice president

0:49:54of the historical Society.

0:49:56Chris is also very sick.

0:49:57He has cancer His prognosis is not particularly positive.

0:50:02We are really hoping for the best and battling cancer.

0:50:07He's written for many years or for a number

0:50:09of years for the chamber of Commerce also.

0:50:11So he's been involved in so many ways for the city.

0:50:15He's been working for quite a few years on a book

0:50:18about our city's gambling past and about how we became

0:50:24a city We went from being a city of gamblers and lowlifes

0:50:27to the city that we are today.

0:50:29It's really a testimony his commitment to the community.

0:50:33Also, the is continuing to work on this really is

0:50:37going to get it done Other members

0:50:39of the society will help him.

0:50:41This is a very good time for people who know Chris

0:50:44to really be thinking about.

0:50:45I'm taking good thoughts and to reach

0:50:47out to thank you very much.

0:50:51Thank you.

0:50:52And speakers individualising indeed,

0:50:55you should be able to begin your time now.

0:50:58Hello all right.

Public comment opened with the historical society's president on a journalist and friend.

Dave Weinstein spoke “on behalf of the historical society and as a friend of Chris Treadway.”

His standing in the city: “a long time journalist covering” El Cerrito “in tremendous detail, with a special focus on the community.”

The debt owed: “so many events and so many people… owe him a lot for his deep coverage.”

He is also “a great historian… he knows a great deal about the history of our town,” and serves as vice president of the society.

Then the reason for speaking: “Chris is also very sick. He has cancer. His prognosis is not particularly positive.”

The unfinished work: “he's been working for quite a few years on a book about our city's gambling past, and about how we became a city — we went from being a city of gamblers and lowlifes to the city that we are today.”

The society would help him finish it.

His ask of anyone listening: “this is a very good time for people who know Chris to really be… taking good thoughts and to reach out.”

Significant

The journalist who covered El Cerrito for years is reported to have cancer with a prognosis “not particularly positive,” and his book on the city's gambling past is unfinished. The Council adjourns in his memory on 16 November 2021, two months later.

12 “Secrecy is the refuge of scoundrels” captions 731–810

0:51:03Thank you.

0:51:06I want to start with sharing I've just been reading

0:51:12a lot about the founding fathers and somebody

0:51:15who I've been reading a lot about is Thomas Paine

0:51:17and just coming across this idea radical common sense like that,

0:51:22common sense is what created this country which

0:51:24like one of the most amazing experiments

0:51:26the world has seen America.

0:51:29Wow.

0:51:29And Thomas Paine, what did you do?

0:51:31Like, he just raised the alarm about common sense and people

0:51:35were like, well, common sense Wow.

0:51:36Like, what are we doing this all the time?

0:51:38Like paying some King and he's not even here.

0:51:40And like, well, I mean, there's a lot of other layers to that.

0:51:43But i still like it was a pamphlet pamphlet

0:51:46that talks about common sense.

0:51:47I started America on.

0:51:49And so with that being said, I also want add a quote that i

0:51:52got from one of the founding fathers that was going down

0:51:55the rabbit hole about common sense and Thomas Paine

0:51:58and was secrecy is the refuge of scoundrels and i don't know,

0:52:06I feel I just want to just bring that thought up, that secrecy

0:52:09is a space for scoundrels.

0:52:11To hide Right.

0:52:13And I'm not saying anybody is I'm not

0:52:15pointing the finger at anybody I think we

0:52:17do have a culture of secrecy.

0:52:19I mean, local government officials

0:52:21our city staff they just they stay in a space of secrecy

0:52:25all the time.

0:52:26And whether it's by choice or not,

0:52:28I think that's that in my I mean i'm learning

0:52:31about Thomas Paine America like that's traitor,

0:52:33that you're being a traitor.

0:52:34To America.

0:52:35Like if you don't listen to the public

0:52:37and you don't clearly talk about what you talk about, what plans

0:52:40you make, what why you choose not to have things,

0:52:43why you choose to have things if you're not

0:52:45having a discussion with the public,

0:52:46you're literally a traitor.

0:52:48Let's the whole idea of the Brown Act,

0:52:49why do you have all these rules was to prevent secrecy

0:52:54And yet i just me being showing this past year,

0:52:58I can't tell you how I have experienced it personally.

0:53:01Secrecy.

0:53:01But I also notice that consistent with these meetings,

0:53:04I mean, i'm not surprised.

0:53:06I'm still sticking around If I didn't meditate, if I didn't

0:53:08if I didn't pray, if I'd have faith

0:53:10if I didn't have all these different things,

0:53:12I had been out of here.

0:53:13I've been like, you guys don't know what you're on.

0:53:14You guys are hiding I don't want you like this.

0:53:17Like, if I did this in any of the companies i've worked in

0:53:20or any of the projects i've ever worked,

0:53:21then we would have failed.

0:53:23And maybe that's why our government's

0:53:24feeling this way, even at a local level, we're failing.

0:53:27I mean, we're represent democracy.

0:53:30And yet we can't figure out the problems in our community

0:53:33I mean, all we have to do is listen to each other and space

0:53:35and have conversations with the people who have needs like

0:53:39and Yeah, I keep meeting people in the community

0:53:41that are literally saying they're not heard.

0:53:43They will show up to city hall meetings

0:53:44anymore because they say literally, we don't get hurt.

0:53:48That's insane.

0:53:50That like, wait, we're we're failing.

0:53:51So in my opinion, I just want to bring that thought up.

0:53:54Secrecy is a refuge of scoundrels

0:53:57Let's try to practice a little bit more transparency.

0:53:59Let's actually talk about why we make decisions and people

0:54:02will trust you and love you.

0:54:03You guys will be honored.

0:54:04I promise you'll be honored.

0:54:05Thank you.

0:54:06Thank you.

0:54:07Our next speaker is Diana Can you read Rena

A Human Relations Commissioner built his comment around a founding-era phrase.

His starting point: reading Thomas Paine and the idea of “radical common sense” — that “common sense is what created this country,” published as “a pamphlet.”

Then the quotation he had found: “secrecy is the refuge of scoundrels” — “a space for scoundrels to hide.”

His care in applying it: “I'm not pointing the finger at anybody. I think we do have a culture of secrecy.”

Who he meant: “local government officials, our city staff — they stay in a space of secrecy all the time. And whether it's by choice or not.”

His strongest formulation: if “you don't clearly talk about… what plans you make, why you choose not to have things… if you're not having a discussion with the public, you're literally a traitor.”

His authority for that: “the whole idea of the Brown Act — why do you have all these rules? [It] was to prevent secrecy.”

And his own experience: “I can't tell you how I have experienced it personally. Secrecy.”

What he thinks it costs: “I keep meeting people in the community that are literally saying they're not heard. They won't show up to city hall meetings anymore.”

His remedy: “let's actually talk about why we make decisions, and people will trust you.”

Significant

A sitting commissioner invokes the Brown Act's purpose, to prevent secrecy, in describing what he calls a culture of secrecy. He makes a related charge at the 19 October meeting, saying he is being discriminated against, and a second commissioner reports her commission's meetings canceled for three months on 16 November.

13 Compensation for a closed café captions 811–905

0:54:12And she should be able to I me in your time now Hi.

0:54:19Can you hear me?

0:54:24Hello.

0:54:25Can you.

0:54:26Yes.

0:54:26OK thank you.

0:54:29So I was very concerned about these outrageous I've

0:54:33been I stopped over at my local one of my local favorite cafes

0:54:39and I'll Cerrado Cafe nine and I was wondering what PG&E

0:54:42is doing to compensate the small businesses

0:54:44for their lost wages.

0:54:46As a result of these power outages and cafe nine

0:54:51is an example of a small family, black owned

0:54:55business that we chair so much.

0:54:58And when I spoke to the owner about it,

0:55:02and there's two outages they've experienced that I know

0:55:04of because I personally showed up to try and get my morning

0:55:07coffee and my breakfast and it was shut down So I

0:55:11when I spoke to the owner about it,

0:55:13she did mention that he has not mentioned anything to her

0:55:16about how they are planning to compensate for business loss

0:55:20from these outages.

0:55:21And I'm just wondering what the plan is

0:55:23to make these businesses whole for those lost

0:55:26wages My other concern is just again, the issue of access

0:55:33to these meetings and inability to see other members

0:55:37of the community feel like, this is not what city

0:55:40hall is supposed to be about.

0:55:42And how it feels have been active in my local government

0:55:45since i was in college.

0:55:48I'm just very, very concerned about the fact

0:55:51that I can't even see who's here.

0:55:53If I'm in a city hall meeting outside of covid,

0:55:55I can look around, I can engage I think that there's

0:55:59a lot of a lot of apathy as that's occurring

0:56:03as a result of this And just wondering what the city

0:56:06council is trying to do to engage more more

0:56:11local community members to show up

0:56:15and also, when we do show up, what the city

0:56:18council is doing to onerous.

0:56:20I remember this like saturday long budget meeting we had with

0:56:23this third party that came in.

0:56:25There were breakout groups We came

0:56:27up with all of these ideas.

0:56:28What's what what was the result of that?

0:56:30Nothing like the city council's like canceling meetings.

0:56:34I mean, it's just pretty ridiculous.

0:56:36I'm know, on the cusp I'm a millennial

0:56:39and i'm also a front line worker and really feeling

0:56:44like I am super disappointed and I expect

0:56:48a lot more from these elected officials

0:56:50and hope that you guys have plans to engage the community

0:56:54to show up spaces where people can talk about issues

0:56:57and actually start creating those opportunities for us.

0:57:04Thank you Thank you.

0:57:06My next speaker, Sherrie Drowner.

0:57:08Sure.

0:57:08You should be able to unmuted and begin

0:57:10your time now Geria with this.

0:57:21I see are needed, but we cannot hear you OK, oK.

0:57:29I'll try and come back to you.

0:57:31I'm going to our next speaker, Linda Kane,

0:57:33than they should be able to meet and begin your time.

0:57:35Now thank you.

0:57:38Can you hear me?

0:57:40Yes, we can.

0:57:41Write.

0:57:42Thank you.

0:57:42I just wanted to say.

0:57:43Well, I do kind of agree with diana Kinta.

0:57:47Raina And then in the last year and a half,

0:57:51it's been hard to participate.

0:57:52And we we obviously are not being

0:57:54seen because you can't see us.

0:57:56But I would like to say that that

0:57:58may be due to the emergency in eighty three.

0:58:01Sixty one But at least now we can see the city council

0:58:04members and the city staff again, which when you guys

0:58:08were in the hybrid format and you were kind of in the room

0:58:10and you were kind of far away from the camera and blurry

0:58:14speaking through masks are not Mudflap blurry,

0:58:17but it's like it was really hard to feel like we can hear

0:58:21what was going on at that time.

0:58:22So this is at least in improvement.

0:58:24And I also wanted to thank Gabriel Kento for speaking

0:58:27positively about someday the future of our El Cerrito

0:58:31fourth of July, which is a wonderful thing.

0:58:33And i think gave us a positive community

0:58:36feeling and a welcome to other people in our area.

0:58:40So hopefully One of these days.

0:58:42And that's all I have to do except My friends

0:58:46and myself have going crazy with all the power outages.

0:58:49So, yeah, we're glad that you guys are working on that

0:58:52and talking to ginny.

0:58:53Thank you.

Diana, a front-line worker, asked what PG&E owes the businesses its outages closed.

The specific case: Cafe Nine, which she described as “a small family, black owned business that we cher[ish] so much.”

Her evidence was direct: “two outages they've experienced that I know of, because I personally showed up to try and get my morning coffee… and it was shut down.”

What the owner told her: PG&E “has not mentioned anything to her about how they are planning to compensate for business loss from these outages.”

Her question: “what the plan is to make these businesses whole for those lost wages.”

Her second subject was the meeting itself: “I can't even see who's here. If I'm in a city hall meeting outside of covid, I can look around, I can engage.”

What she thought that produced: “a lot of apathy.”

And her challenge about follow-through, citing a budget workshop: “there were breakout groups, we came up with all of these ideas. What was the result of that? Nothing.”

Her position: “I'm a millennial and I'm also a front line worker, and really feeling like I am super disappointed. I expect a lot more from these elected officials.”

Linda Kane agreed it had been hard to take part over the past year and a half, but said the all-remote format was at least an improvement on the hybrid meetings, where councilmembers had been distant and masked on camera; she thanked Quinto for working to bring back the Fourth of July.

Significant

The same speaker returns on 19 October to argue the county's masking relaxation repeats a mistake clinicians predicted.

14 Come to my house for lunch captions 906–985

0:58:54In Q And a..

0:58:56Is Miss Pribumi Miss Pierini should be able to meet

0:59:00and begin your time now.

0:59:02Can you hear me now.

0:59:03Yes, we can.

0:59:04OK, good evening.

0:59:05And I appreciate being here.

0:59:08I lived Australia for twenty five plus years

0:59:11and before moving here my husband's family

0:59:14has lived there since the thirties.

0:59:15So the Perrine's and Elstree, the residence

0:59:18for very long time.

0:59:19They both my husband's parents both went straight

0:59:22to high school and so we are long members of this community

0:59:27of untellable Eighteen months ago,

0:59:28it really didn't feel unsafe in my own backyard.

0:59:31Or walking down the Aloni Greenblatt's I

0:59:34understand homelessness is a pretty complex issue.

0:59:38I reached out through emails the last year and a half.

0:59:42I sent soundbytes of my backyard from Eight o'clock

0:59:45in the morning on a Sunday to midnight

0:59:48on a weeknight when I have to get up and go

0:59:50and teach in the morning.

0:59:52I'm a teacher I've called the police I.B.M. the city.

0:59:55I've talked to the maintenance people

0:59:57and the general consensus.

0:59:59I get is everybody's hands are tied.

1:00:01I've got homeless people that live right up

1:00:03against my back fence I got an email from Mr

1:00:06fidele finally, last week in his response

1:00:09was that it's a regional problem and the city has been

1:00:13speaking lexington residents.

1:00:15I have never spoke to Mr Fidele I

1:00:18would like to personally invite you all to my house for lunch

1:00:22in my backyard.

1:00:23When the homeless backs up again.

1:00:25So you can smell the smell.

1:00:27I tried to cut down some flowers and it smelled

1:00:29like urine in my backyard.

1:00:31I don't Your backyard smells like or looks like.

1:00:34I understand homelessness is a really complex issue.

1:00:38But if you least cleaned up the garden once a week,

1:00:42like picking up the trash and the rest of the neighbourhood

1:00:45that would cut some costs I am very

1:00:48emotional about this issue.

1:00:49I have a lot of possible solutions.

1:00:52I emailed the city and I've got little to no response I'd also

1:00:57like for you to consider changing your city

1:01:00office hours for working people that lives

1:01:03in the city of El Cerrito.

1:01:04Instead Monday through Friday, 9:00 to one,

1:01:07I get home in the afternoon You guys

1:01:09are all closed I try to call and I just get a phone tree.

1:01:13I don't get a hold of anybody.

1:01:15There's no like person I don't really

1:01:17know if it's just a ghost in the machine type thing.

1:01:20I'm really upset.

1:01:22I understand homeless people are not criminals,

1:01:25but i also know that I've lived here for a very long time.

1:01:28I raised my children here.

1:01:29I can't go out into my backyard I tried

1:01:31to mow my lawn last weekend and they

1:01:33were banging on my fence to tell me to shut

1:01:36up for mowing my own back yard.

1:01:38And it's very emotional.

1:01:39Mrs Wilson I've seen you dealt through high school

1:01:43You've attended my daughter's band.

1:01:44Concerts.

1:01:45You know you've shown some interest that way.

1:01:48But I've email every single one of you more than once.

1:01:52And I know I sound emotional but this is my home.

1:01:55And because of all of this, I'm considering moving.

1:01:58And I don't know what you people do.

1:02:01I know you have a nice, quiet backyard, Mr madeley.

1:02:04I'd like to personally invite you to my home

1:02:06when the homeless people show Ibaka will be there Thank you.

1:02:13Thank you.

1:02:14I next speaker is definitely stuff

1:02:17you should be able to unmuted.

1:02:18Begin your time now.

The next comment came from a teacher whose garden backs onto the Greenway.

Her standing: her husband's family “has lived [here] since the thirties,” both his parents went to the high school, and she has been here “twenty five plus years.”

What changed: “eighteen months ago it really didn't feel unsafe in my own backyard, or walking down the Ohlone Greenway.”

What she has already tried: emails “the last year and a half,” “soundbytes of my backyard from eight o'clock in the morning on a Sunday to midnight on a weeknight,” calls to the police, to the city, to maintenance staff.

The answer she keeps getting: “everybody's hands are tied.”

The Mayor's eventual reply, received “finally, last week,” was that “it's a regional problem and the city has been speaking [to] Lexington residents” — to which her response was that she had “never spoke to” him.

Her invitation: “I would like to personally invite you all to my house for lunch in my backyard… so you can smell the smell.” Cutting flowers, she said, “it smelled like urine in my backyard.”

She was careful about who she was not blaming: “I understand homeless people are not criminals.” Her modest ask: “if you at least cleaned up the garden once a week… that would cut some costs.”

A second ask, about reaching the city at all: change “your city office hours for working people” — Monday to Friday “9:00 to one,” and after that “I just get a phone tree. There's no… person.”

Her conclusion: “because of all of this, I'm considering moving.”

Significant

A twenty-five-year resident who teaches locally says she is considering leaving, having emailed every councilmember more than once over eighteen months. A later speaker reports that after he emailed the City Manager, the city cleaned up the same area the following week, and that he gets responses from staff “not so much with council level.”

15 A land acknowledgement, and October 11th captions 986–1065

1:02:24Hello.

1:02:24Can you hear me?

1:02:25Yes, we can.

1:02:27I My name is Stani and i just moved

1:02:31to El Cerrito a couple of months ago

1:02:33and Yeah, I just wanted to talk a little bit about the just

1:02:39echoing a lot of sentiments that have been made,

1:02:42just like one recognizing that there seem

1:02:46to be a lot of frustrations within the community

1:02:49and a common thread that I'm noticing

1:02:51is just like the response and like the relationship

1:02:55between you all city council members and the public.

1:02:58Right.

1:02:59People are talking about frustrations,

1:03:00about not being heard, at not being responded to.

1:03:04And so even just like these public comment moments.

1:03:08Right.

1:03:08Like there's no dialogue here.

1:03:11You know, three minutes to speak.

1:03:13And that's great.

1:03:15But like, they're there's no response.

1:03:17And i just feel like these meetings

1:03:20are like two plus hours.

1:03:22And this is a use of of everyone's time.

1:03:25And I feel like it could it would be more

1:03:27of a productive time if there was dialogue

1:03:31between you all and me.

1:03:34You know, the fact that you can't see my face

1:03:36you don't know who I am and i barely know all of you.

1:03:39And so i guess I just challenge you to think

1:03:43about the accessibility and how we can really create

1:03:46like a working relationship between you all

1:03:50is like public governance and us the people

1:03:54that you should be serving on top of that,

1:03:59you know you all are talking about the next the

1:04:03the next Fourth of July meeting.

1:04:04And or a celebration and i guess something

1:04:08to that is just recognizing October 11th

1:04:11is indigenous people's Day.

1:04:13And I'm curious if you all have plans or are

1:04:16interested in recognizing that as a holiday to celebrate

1:04:21and what your intentions are for that in the spaces

1:04:25that I've been in land acknowledgment and recognition

1:04:28of this is colonized and stolen land has been a greater

1:04:32conversation And even at the I don't see anywhere

1:04:36in this agenda any sort of acknowledgment or recognition

1:04:40of the land that we're on.

1:04:42And so maybe that's something that can also be integrated

1:04:44into these like really like an accessible agendas and meeting

1:04:51spaces and maybe even a land acknowledging it

1:04:54would make this space more more inclusive.

1:04:57And so yeah, I hope that you consider

1:05:00that and consider this that.

1:05:03Thank you Hey, do you want to try again?

1:05:09See if your audio is working with us?

1:05:15We're still hearing you, Cherie.

1:05:19And you have one more speaker.

1:05:21We'll go to JT.

1:05:23Parag you should be able to unmuted

1:05:25to begin your time now Hello.

1:05:31Hi.

1:05:31Can you hear me?

1:05:32Yes, we can.

1:05:33Go ahead.

1:05:34OK, Hi.

1:05:35Yeah, I would also just like to reiterate some of the feelings

1:05:41that have already been expressed in that it seems

1:05:45like a great amount of the community myself included,

1:05:47would like these meetings to be in some way more accessible

1:05:53maybe going back to some in-person mobility

1:05:57or in some way just allowing people to to see someone

1:06:02else face to face to discuss things

1:06:04with, because I feel there is a certain level of frustration.

1:06:08You kind of have to cumulate to even want

1:06:10to come to a remote do meeting which a lot of people

1:06:13are doing all day.

1:06:14Already anyway.

1:06:18So, yeah, that's all I'd in EMQQ And it looks like you tried

1:06:24with a different connection.

1:06:26Yeah.

A resident who had moved to the city months earlier named what the agenda does not contain.

Her first observation was about the format: “even just like these public comment moments — there's no dialogue here. Three minutes to speak, and that's great, but there's no response.”

Her conclusion: the meetings “are like two plus hours” and “it would be more of a productive time if there was dialogue.”

The asymmetry she named: “the fact that you can't see my face, you don't know who I am, and I barely know all of you.”

Then the request: “October 11th is Indigenous People's Day,” and she asked “if you all have plans or are interested in recognizing that as a holiday.”

And a second: “I don't see anywhere in this agenda any sort of acknowledgment or recognition of the land that we're on.”

Her proposal: “maybe a land acknowledgement… would make this space more inclusive.”

JT Parag also asked for more accessible meetings, perhaps some return to meeting in person.

A later speaker on the same evening reports that Albany had passed a resolution supporting the Sogorea Te' Land Trust the night before.

Significant

A land acknowledgement on the agenda is asked for here in September 2021. Corrina Gould presents the Sogorea Te' Land Trust to this Council on 16 November, and every speaker that night asks for a shuumi budget line. No later meeting in this archive mentions it.

16 Albany, the night before captions 1066–1130

1:06:26Can you hear me now?

1:06:27Yes, we can Go ahead OK, hold on me Get this going.

1:06:34OK, great.

1:06:37Thank you for taking the time and running

1:06:41down my third attempt.

1:06:43So i wanted to say that I listened to the whole city

1:06:48council meeting yesterday.

1:06:49That was another Whopper that went to eleven thirty

1:06:54But it was really interesting.

1:06:56And I know that all of you received

1:06:58information about the resolution passed by the council

1:07:01last night.

1:07:02And the presentation by Karina Gould

1:07:04of the Security land Trust.

1:07:07I was personally thrilled that the resident and the city

1:07:11of albany demonstrated really unrestrained enthusiasm to take

1:07:15concrete steps to recognize the value,

1:07:18the authority and the important work of confederated Tribes

1:07:22of louisana.

1:07:22Many people the highly historic resolution goes beyond the kind

1:07:28of virtual signaling or feel good actions that are safe,

1:07:32or with little impact The Albany resolution

1:07:35as well as the city of Alameda Actions that were previously

1:07:38taken are both making significant steps

1:07:42to assist the corps de Land Trust in the rehabilitation

1:07:46of the land And by doing so, we not only right

1:07:49a historical wrong of enslaving and occupying

1:07:52the land of the original residents We are acknowledging

1:07:56that cultural practices and knowledge of those who lived

1:07:59here and cared for the land can and should

1:08:01have their home here.

1:08:03Grow their language and our culture

1:08:05to bring back for all of us the new relation to the land Now,

1:08:10I know obviously, people who do not necessarily

1:08:13believe in this reciprocity and in the idea

1:08:16that we are guests to this land And but I really would implore

1:08:21you to invite this green and gold to a Zoom meeting

1:08:25or to your chamber if you're in their chambers

1:08:28to have the opportunity.

1:08:29So that we can I'll think about this more carefully.

1:08:32Now, for those of you who do support the idea,

1:08:35I believe that the discussion of any passing a resolution

1:08:40was really the first step.

1:08:41And it was really an intention.

1:08:43And even though they could have faltered

1:08:46they could have had a million excuses as to why maybe they

1:08:49shouldn't do it right away.

1:08:51They did it Nevertheless, they are sitting attorney.

1:08:55Was there who looked at over and said, yes, you're OK, go ahead.

1:08:59Start moving ahead with it.

1:09:01And not every detail has to be worked out.

1:09:04And it's and it may not happen in two months or in six months.

1:09:08or even a year.

1:09:09Some even take longer for those who are at home with my time.

1:09:18Oh, i have a few more minutes.

1:09:19OK, that's my timer on my stove.

1:09:23I to I started doing so as soon as I learned

1:09:26that I had the opportunity to do style

1:09:29and she needs such a word for a gift.

1:09:31That really is a gift for me. so that I can acknowledge

1:09:34the action support my commitment for social justice I

1:09:37hope that all of you will do that. too.

1:09:39Thanks very much I, absolutely.

1:09:43I next figure is just stajcic.

1:09:46John should be able to unmuted.

A speaker reported what a neighboring council had done twenty-four hours earlier.

She had “listened to the whole city council meeting yesterday” — Albany's — “another whopper that went to eleven thirty.”

What happened there: a resolution passed following “the presentation by Corrina Gould of the” Sogorea Te' “Land Trust.”

Her assessment of Albany's residents: “unrestrained enthusiasm to take concrete steps to recognize the value, the authority and the important work of [the] Confederated” Villages.

And what distinguishes it: the resolution “goes beyond the kind of virtue signaling or feel good actions that are safe, or with little impact.”

Alongside Alameda's earlier action, both make “significant steps to assist the” trust “in the rehabilitation of the land.”

What she argued it achieves: it rights “a historical wrong of enslaving and occupying the land of the original residents,” and acknowledges that their “cultural practices and knowledge… can and should have their home here.”

Her ask: “invite” Gould “to a Zoom meeting or to your chamber.”

Her point about how Albany did it: “they could have had a million excuses as to why maybe they shouldn't do it right away. They did it” — with “their sitting attorney” confirming it was permissible. “Not every detail has to be worked out.”

She pays shuumi herself — “such a word for a gift” — and hoped the Council would too.

Significant

Albany passed its land trust resolution the night before this meeting, and the argument put to El Cerrito is that its neighbor acted without waiting for every detail. Gould is invited and presents on 16 November; the shuumi budget line every speaker then asks for is not mentioned at any later meeting in this archive.

17 One email, one week captions 1131–1194

1:09:47Begin your time out.

1:09:49Yeah.

1:09:50I wasn't going to make any more comment

1:09:53because I submitted a written one,

1:09:54but when city government screws up.

1:09:57I'll say so when city government works

1:10:01I like to call them and give credit where credit is due.

1:10:06I'm listening to the resident on Lexington that

1:10:09had the homeless mess in their back door and believe me,

1:10:12it is an absolute mess back there.

1:10:14I sent an email to a city manager

1:10:18and i got an immediate response and then

1:10:22the response that indicated the city had

1:10:24plans to clean up that mess.

1:10:26The following week.

1:10:27And it was done.

1:10:28And those people are out of there.

1:10:30The for now but they're out of there.

1:10:34For now.

1:10:35So there should be some piece on the 700 block of Lexington

1:10:37Avenue But my point is, i find most of the time

1:10:44when I email City staff or city management, I

1:10:48get a response not so much with council level but, you know,

1:10:55whatever They do their own thing.

1:10:56But I just want to congratulate city staff for responding.

1:11:00Now, you can get busy and go down to a fifteen block

1:11:04of Lexington avenue right across the street from my house

1:11:07and deal with the next mess because that

1:11:10has to be cleaned out, too.

1:11:11And it only gets worse.

1:11:13It doesn't get better And I also recognize

1:11:16really do recognize the difficulty

1:11:18in handling this stuff.

1:11:20Because we have to give notice and we have to put our gloves

1:11:25on, our kid gloves on.

1:11:26And who would you please move to a shelter

1:11:28or something like that?

1:11:29Sometimes it takes some tough love and some boots

1:11:33on the ground, but that's that's that goes

1:11:37that's what the police and the department and our public

1:11:39works.

1:11:40People got to do with getting back to what I started to say.

1:11:44I get response.

1:11:45And I appreciate I really do.

1:11:47And I think the city listens And I think city management

1:11:50and city staff do pay attention.

1:11:53And I appreciate their prompt response That's it.

1:11:58Thank you.

1:11:58Our next speaker is Anna NAHB.

1:12:01Will to you to begin your time now Hello everybody.

1:12:07This is the second city hall meeting that I've attended

1:12:10and i just wanted to say I've been very

1:12:13inspired by the engagement of the people who's spoken

1:12:17and i wanted to just again, reiterate something

1:12:24that everybody has said, which is it would be great to know

1:12:29what happen as a result of our speaking up You

1:12:35know to get some sort of response to it.

1:12:38And for everyone to know what what happened.

1:12:40What effect it had And again, in an ideal world,

1:12:45a dialogue in real time would be great.

1:12:50Or if not in real time, then at some later point That's all

1:12:54I wanted to say.

1:12:55Thank you Thank you, Mayor.

1:12:58That does conclude our request to speak Thanks

A speaker who says he criticizes the city when it fails came to do the opposite.

His framing: “when city government screws up, I'll say so. When city government works, I like to call them and give credit.”

What he had heard: “the resident on Lexington that had the homeless mess in their back door — and believe me, it is an absolute mess back there.”

What he did: “I sent an email to [the] city manager and I got an immediate response… indicat[ing] the city had plans to clean up that mess the following week. And it was done.”

His qualification: “those people are out of there — for now.”

His next request was specific: “the fifteen[-hundred] block of Lexington Avenue, right across the street from my house” — “it only gets worse. It doesn't get better.”

He acknowledged the difficulty: “we have to give notice and we have to put our kid gloves on.”

And his general finding: “I find most of the time when I email city staff or city management, I get a response — not so much with council level.”

A final speaker, attending her second meeting, asked for the same thing several others had: “it would be great to know what happen[ed] as a result of our speaking up… what effect it had.”

Significant

The same encampment that a resident reports emailing about for eighteen months was cleared within a week of one email to the City Manager — both accounts given at the same meeting. Four separate speakers this evening ask for some response to public comment, which the format does not provide.

18 Consent, and a contingency captions 1195–1280

1:13:03for the public input Appreciate that.

1:13:05Tonight, we next move on to our concept.

1:13:09Callendar if there's any item out,

1:13:12a council member would like to take off

1:13:14or have questions comments about, please let me know.

1:13:17I am going to Yes.

1:13:19Council member multicamera I was going to read them first.

1:13:23You want me to read them?

1:13:24Yes.

1:13:24Go, go.

1:13:26So they begin with approval of the minutes The Urban

1:13:30Forest Committee appointment.

1:13:31And that would be Melissa Tuti.

1:13:33Thank you, Melissa.

1:13:35The Economic Development committee

1:13:37appointment, Travis campbell wants

1:13:39to be on economic development.

1:13:41He's a neighbor of mine.

1:13:42Thank you.

1:13:42Travis.

1:13:43Hispanic heritage Proclamation, suicide

1:13:47prevention awareness proclamation The League

1:13:51of California cities.

1:13:52Twenty twenty one annual conference resolutions

1:13:54package coming up this week as we go to Sacramento,

1:13:59the agreement with a plus Tree Inc

1:14:02for Trivium and Fire Hazard reduction work and elsewhere.

1:14:06The hillside Natural Area Yes, council mohtarma.

1:14:11Thank you, Mayor.

1:14:12I would like to have a city staff

1:14:17answer a couple of questions about the eight

1:14:19plus tree agreement.

1:14:21OK, we'll pull that And then Mayor pro Tem fidele,

1:14:26thank you.

1:14:27I wanted to make the correction on EBP

1:14:32and i will be substituting for you

1:14:36and and so I wanted to add my name

1:14:41on there since I will be voting for you as the alternate Yes.

1:14:47I won't be able to attend because I

1:14:49have to go to a memorial service of my dear friend that day.

1:14:53So i will we can just add that we don't need to pull that off.

1:14:56Is that right?

1:14:58Yes, OK, well, as your name to this and then can we move

1:15:02to have a B c, d, E and F, do I hear a motion for those motion

1:15:09to approve council members, those council

1:15:12member Matsuyama seconds and we have a roll call, please.

1:15:16Feneley, I meant for Timochenko.

1:15:19I can't remember Apison I can't remember chamma.

1:15:24I can't remember.

1:15:25I think I motion carries.

1:15:28Thank you.

1:15:29And now a question.

1:15:31Council member altium, the staff Yes.

1:15:34So I had asked staff regarding a question about a contract where

1:15:40there's a contract about a contingency

1:15:43and then it felt like the contract with the AA plus Three

1:15:47did not reflect that contingency amount

1:15:51And so if director Ortiz could respond and let

1:15:55me know if there's any movement on that contract

1:15:58that would be great.

1:16:02You may members do that We will be providing the compensation

1:16:11amount and the draft agreement, and we

1:16:13will be working with the city attorney

1:16:15to finalize that language.

1:16:17And currently the draft agreement

1:16:19provides the full amount of about eighty two thousand

1:16:22dollars But we're going to separate that amount

1:16:25to the base amount of seventy one thousand

1:16:30dollars plus the fifty for a total amount

1:16:34not to exceed the eighty to twenty three.

1:16:38So we will clarify that compensation

1:16:40language training on that.

1:16:44Thank you very much.

1:16:47Does that satisfy your concerns?

1:16:49Council member?

1:16:50Can you would you like to move that

1:16:52then so we can vote on that?

1:16:54OK, i would like to move the agreement with a plus 3

1:16:58for tree removal and fire hazard reduction

1:17:00work in the rural hillside area as amended

1:17:04by staff and city attorney seconded

1:17:07by council member Wilson.

1:17:09Can we have a roll-call and Feneley i Mayor Potemkin

1:17:16I can't remember Wilson.

1:17:18I can't remember Tamma I can't remember Mednick

1:17:23I mentioned Keris Thank you.

The consent calendar carried two appointments and the hillside contract.

The items: minutes, an Urban Forest Committee appointment, an Economic Development Committee appointment, proclamations for Hispanic Heritage and Suicide Prevention Awareness, the League of California Cities resolutions packet, and an agreement with A Plus Tree Inc. for “tree removal and fire hazard reduction work in the… hillside natural area.”

Motoyama pulled the tree contract on a drafting point: the staff report referred to “a contingency” that “the contract with A Plus Tree did not reflect.”

The correction: the draft agreement “provides the full amount of about eighty two thousand dollars,” and staff would “separate that amount to the base amount of seventy one thousand dollars plus the” contingency.

So the total is unchanged but the components become visible.

The item passed as amended.

Quinto, the Mayor Pro Tem, also added his name as alternate on a regional body, substituting for Fadelli, who could not attend because of “a memorial service of my dear friend that day.”

Significant

A councilmember reading the contract found the contingency folded into a single total, and had it split out — so the base price and the contingency can each be tracked. The city is doing this hillside work under contract because the master plan's own vegetation program is gated behind environmental review, as the recreation director explains a month later.

19 Three more properties captions 1281–1380

1:17:27There are no presentations tonight,

1:17:28but we move on to item number Seven public hearings

1:17:32and we're having a fire hazard abatement continuation

1:17:36of that discussion.

1:17:38And a presentation from our staff.

1:17:40Please Good evening our council members, Michael

1:17:44Piccone, your fire chief.

1:17:46I will actually be making the presentation

1:17:49tonight as you know.

1:17:52And I apologize for my for my rough voice.

1:17:55There As you know, we've been ongoing since may

1:18:00with our fire hazard abatement program.

1:18:04Which has taken us through the city

1:18:07with the we have a little over ten thousand parcels

1:18:12since May We have done reinspection on over eleven

1:18:18of those And as you know, back and I believe it was July 20

1:18:23we came to the council I believe,

1:18:26with eleven parcels that had failed by their deadline

1:18:30to declare their properties One of the things I want to make

1:18:36very clear tonight is that what we're what this public hearing

1:18:41tonight is about is three additional properties Once we

1:18:47did this initial group of them,

1:18:50other properties became either through our complaint process

1:18:55or just more properties that we just we

1:18:59found a number of another I believe it was twenty or thirty

1:19:05properties, of which they were noticed

1:19:08and what we're coming to you tonight

1:19:11is with three more properties that after we made

1:19:15the initial notification they have failed

1:19:19to abate the problem on their property

1:19:22for all of these properties.

1:19:26The ones that were that were declared a nuisance in July

1:19:30And these tonight, if these are declared a nuisance

1:19:34by the city council, we will be coming back to you

1:19:37at the end of October.

1:19:39With abatement or with the abatement cost

1:19:43or for you to approve for us to seek

1:19:45reimbursement through property.

1:19:48Lean's on that property as we have done in years.

1:19:53Past.

1:19:53With that can emphasize the important of our residents,

1:19:59of the community I'm taking care of taking care of the way

1:20:04to meet in compliance with it.

1:20:07As you just approved contract the city

1:20:09itself is doing a lot of work within the hillside

1:20:13natural area, removing dead trees, trimming brush.

1:20:18We have done that for a number of years. and will continue.

1:20:22So long as we have a hillside natural area.

1:20:26I think somewhat close to home tonight.

1:20:29You may have seen on the news there was

1:20:31a not a real large fire, but in Petaluma, house, our structure

1:20:38and vegetation fire and in among a number of horse boarding

1:20:44areas, fortunately nobody and no animals were hurt

1:20:48But a very very good example of when you're living in

1:20:52and it is not, you know, there was no windows The red flags,

1:20:58you know, for the most part had been canceled because

1:21:02of the lack of the winds Still, this fire was able to progress

1:21:07very quickly So just like I said,

1:21:10it's a very close example and an and another reason

1:21:14that the importance of a,

1:21:17having our residents comply with this So with that

1:21:22within your package, you'll see the three properties

1:21:25that that we are asking you for declaring

1:21:29the declaring as a nuisance for this for this

1:21:35go around into my report.

1:21:38Be happy to answer any questions I have a question Yes,

1:21:45that's a member.

1:21:45Adilson this is the first time i remember

1:21:48hearing that you were going to take care of one property

1:21:54in terms of this process.

1:21:56And you came upon some other ones said,

1:22:00we have we have I mean, we only get

1:22:04so many done There's always more that show up we

1:22:08have in here last year.

1:22:10I know we came back to the council

1:22:13with additional properties that we found.

1:22:17You know, it's just basic It's a continuation of what we did

1:22:21in July We don't want to i mean, we're doing this

1:22:27with a single with a single fire prevention officer that is

1:22:34going out and working on these ten thousand parcels that's out

1:22:39there We don't want to wait too long before we get

1:22:42that initial group that we bring to the council,

1:22:46because obviously as I stated earlier,

1:22:48our goal is to get these properties cleaned long.

1:22:52You know, I wish it was long before we

1:22:53hit this hot weather especially in this drought year.

1:22:57But every year we have they maybe it's not worded the way I

1:23:01did that These are additional But every year we always

1:23:06have more property that come to us

1:23:09or, you know, through the complaints,

1:23:12sometimes these are, you know, areas that were

1:23:15not visible from the streets.

1:23:17But we've had neighbors allow us into their property

1:23:20to basically look at what they feel is a fire hazard.

1:23:26Thank you.

1:23:28Yeah, I was going to ask Chief if there are

1:23:31complaints after the process You welcome being notified

1:23:35is that correct?

1:23:36Oh, yes.

1:23:37Yeah, no well, even in the heart of winter,

The fire hazard abatement hearing continued the process begun in July.

The scale of the program: “a little over ten thousand parcels,” inspected since May, with reinspections under way (the captions give the number only as “over eleven”).

The July hearing had declared eleven parcels. Tonight's item covers three more.

Where they came from: after the initial round, further properties surfaced “either through our complaint process” or simply found — “another… twenty or thirty properties” noticed since.

Of those, three “have failed to abate the problem on their property” after notification.

What follows if declared: staff return “at the end of October… with the abatement cost” and authority to “seek reimbursement through property liens.”

Abelson asked why additional properties appear after the main round. The answer describes the constraint: “we're doing this with a single fire prevention officer that is going out and working on these ten thousand parcels.”

So the initial group is brought forward early rather than waiting: “our goal is to get these properties cleaned” before “this hot weather, especially in this drought year.”

The Chief also cited a fire in Petaluma days earlier as “a very close example” — a structure and vegetation fire that “was able to progress very quickly” even though “the red flags… had been canceled because of the lack of the winds.”

Significant

One fire prevention officer inspects more than ten thousand parcels, which is why properties surface in batches rather than all at once. By August 2022 the program has escalated to 137 notices and 129 violations, with the hearing canceled because everyone complied.

20 “Make your yard look neat” captions 1381–1464

1:23:41if you know, we have people complaining about trees

1:23:47but grass, whatever you know, as I believe

1:23:50I stated when I made my present station back in July, i look,

1:23:56I am trying to guide this into a process that will.

1:23:59That's not going to be a seasonal.

1:24:01It's not going to be a seasonal deal.

1:24:03It will be a year round process of getting properties,

1:24:09reviewing properties and making sure that residents stay on top

1:24:14of their yard, maintenance I mean,

1:24:17the only real the only real issue that changes

1:24:19between this time of year and, say, spring

1:24:24is whether the annual grasses are dry

1:24:27or if they're drained dry as far as limbs to as far as brush up

1:24:32against homes trees over chimneys, whatever you know,

1:24:37trees that need pruning up that that is a process that needs

1:24:43to be done Like I said, year round

1:24:46the you don't have to wait till we get into the middle

1:24:48of summer to, you know,

1:24:50to do yard work and our fire department

1:24:54would be willing to go out and identify that to the homeowner.

1:24:58Something that might need to be corrected.

1:25:00If there was a complaint in the neighborhood, if say,

1:25:04the homeowner needs help.

1:25:05We are here to help.

1:25:06We have we have made check lists.

1:25:09We have provided diagrams.

1:25:11I mean, we have done we have done a lot of work

1:25:14in the last three or four years.

1:25:162 2 be able to make it very simple for people to understand

1:25:22I mean, one of the easiest ways that I like to tell people,

1:25:26you know, make your yard fire safe

1:25:29is make your yard look neat.

1:25:31You know, if your yard looks nice and trimmed up,

1:25:34more than likely it's going to meet our vegetation standards

1:25:39You know, we've gone to Passell where, again you

1:25:42can't see the house because of the trees, trees down rooftops

1:25:46and we've had residents look at us

1:25:48and go, well, what's the problem here?

1:25:52You know, it's it's not enough.

1:25:54Appreciate it. may take a little bit of work and some cost

1:25:57if you have to get a landscaping company.

1:26:00But once you get your yard and shape

1:26:02it's easier to keep it that way.

1:26:04You know, it's a small cost just to keep things trimmed up

1:26:09Do I have a motion to approve the resolution

1:26:12declaring we identify properties that to approve Yes.

1:26:18Council member rudnick and seconded

1:26:19by council member YAAMA.

1:26:21Can I have a roll call Fidele i nicotinic

1:26:26I can something to Apison.

1:26:29I can't remember Mohtarma.

1:26:32I can't remember budnick.

1:26:34I mentioned Harris.

1:26:36Thank you At this time we're members

1:26:38of the public who wish to provide

1:26:40public comments for this item.

1:26:43Should use the race hands feature

1:26:44to request to speak We've now opened

1:26:47the public hearing I am not seeing any requests to speak.

1:26:54Mayor OK, and Chief you did not receive

1:26:58any request to speak before the council meeting correct?

1:27:02That is correct.

1:27:03OK, can I have a motion to close the public hearing

1:27:08so I mayor Pro Tem kimoto and seconded by Council member son.

1:27:14Let's have a roll call.

1:27:16Please stand Fidele I mean Marmaton

1:27:18can tell I council member Edelsten

1:27:22I can't remember my Chamma.

1:27:25I can't remember anything I mentioned harrys.

1:27:29Thank you So Chief, you have what you need there right

1:27:35That is correct.

1:27:36And I appreciate it.

1:27:37And thank you very much Mayor is a second resolution.

1:27:40It does require action to override directions OK,

1:27:45that's true.

1:27:47Can I get a motion to approve that resolution?

1:27:50Overriding objection Some of so I'm told by Mayor Pro Tem

1:27:55Can you tell seconded by council member Ableton Can

1:27:59I have a vote, please?

1:28:02Fidele I may put Two.

1:28:05I can't remember Avildsen.

1:28:08I can't remember McCalman.

1:28:10I can't remember Reznik i motion carries Now you have

1:28:15what you need Thank you very much.

The Chief set out the direction he wants the program to take.

His aim: “I am trying to guide this into a process that… is not going to be a seasonal deal. It will be a year round process.”

Why that works: the only thing that changes between autumn and spring “is whether the annual grasses are dry.”

Everything else — “limbs… brush up against homes, trees over chimneys… trees that need pruning” — “needs to be done year round.”

So residents “don't have to wait till we get into the middle of summer to do yard work.”

What the department offers: it “would be willing to go out and identify” problems to a homeowner, and has produced “checklists” and “diagrams” over “the last three or four years… to make it very simple for people to understand.”

His simplest formulation: “make your yard fire safe [by making] your yard look neat. If your yard looks nice and trimmed up, more than likely it's going to meet our vegetation standards.”

The resistance he encounters: properties where “you can't see the house because of the trees,” whose owners ask “what's the problem here?”

His answer on cost: “once you get your yard in shape, it's easier to keep it that way.”

Both resolutions passed, with nobody requesting to speak.

Significant

“Make your yard look neat” — the fire chief's plain-language version of the vegetation standards. The shift from a seasonal to a year-round program is what he is building toward, and the May inspection cycle continues through this archive.

21 A simple request that got bigger captions 1465–1610

1:28:19CRPC.

1:28:19So thank you for all you do.

1:28:21We move on a number item number eight policy

1:28:24matters Equity, consideration of equity pollution, workplan.

1:28:28Can we have a staff report please.

1:28:31Denlinger I thank you again.

1:28:33Karen Pink is city manager I'm actually

1:28:36rather excited to bring this item to all of you,

1:28:40but I can't take any credit for it.

1:28:43I have that credit.

1:28:44I need to give to particularly you, Mayor Daley,

1:28:47and other members of the city council.

1:28:49This is an request for the city council

1:28:52to pass a motion that would direct the Human Relations

1:28:55Commission to work with staff to develop an equity inclusion

1:28:58work plan for the community I believe

1:29:02that elsa Rido is one of the places that

1:29:06has done a lot of work.

1:29:07As you all know, for decades as far

1:29:11as making sure that we do what we can

1:29:13to try to be welcoming and inclusive

1:29:16And that has been demonstrated among various actions.

1:29:20I am by no means suggesting that we have that we are perfect.

1:29:24No city is organization is, and certainly

1:29:28with recent racial and social justice issues

1:29:30that are at the forefront of what's happening, particularly

1:29:34over the last 18 months or so.

1:29:37This has been something that I think has shined a very

1:29:40bright light on equity issues.

1:29:42Particularly even in a city like ours

1:29:45where we believe that we're doing the right things.

1:29:48We had adopted our strategic plan back in twenty thirteen

1:29:52and one of our very core values is diversity.

1:29:56Inclusiveness and respect.

1:29:57For diversity.

1:29:59We have one of the oldest MLK events

1:30:05in Contra Costa County, which again is born

1:30:07out of something of a protest.

1:30:09So the city has over the years been responsive to the requests

1:30:15to the needs of our residents.

1:30:17Again not by any stretch of the imagine

1:30:19saying we're perfect, which is part of why we're

1:30:21here tonight asking to make this request is

1:30:24what can we do better?

1:30:25What can we do more How can we identify the issues that remain

1:30:31And again, while we have done a lot of work,

1:30:33and we have a lot of the infrastructure in place,

1:30:35including with our amazing Human Relations Commission this

1:30:39for me all of the work we've done in the past

1:30:42is starting off point for how we can now create our future.

1:30:45And Mayor Fidele himself was one of the folks who sort of led a

1:30:51what may have been what he thought

1:30:53was a simple request, which would be to amend our staff

1:30:57reports to include equity considerations

1:31:00along the other considerations in our staff courts,

1:31:03including legal, financial environmental,

1:31:06and strategic plan, consideration

1:31:09But even in going through that, we

1:31:12realized in talking with the mayor

1:31:14and talking with our staff and talking with even some members

1:31:17of the human relations Commission

1:31:19that there's more to be done.

1:31:20And there's more that we can do, particularly

1:31:22being able to define as a community what that actually

1:31:27means, what equity is that?

1:31:29There's not that that there's a shared language that we

1:31:33all speak from the Human Relations Commission

1:31:36is this is by this is right in their wheelhouse.

1:31:39Not only because this group of people

1:31:41is a dynamic group of people that have the ability

1:31:44to take a look at this.

1:31:46But because of the work that they've been doing.

1:31:48And I speak as a former staff liaison to the Human Relations

1:31:52Commission that again, the MLK Day events that has been going

1:31:57on for 30 plus years, the 11 day event, Pride Month recently,

1:32:03the listenings sessions, working with our student

1:32:05human relations commissioner to paint Black

1:32:08Lives Matter on way.

1:32:09So there's been again, a lot of work that

1:32:11needs to be this is the beginnings of the work that is

1:32:15created So developing an equity and inclusion

1:32:18work plan is actually something that many cities are

1:32:22undertaking.

1:32:23They've been undertaking and in different ways

1:32:25as a very small city, it's difficult for us

1:32:28as far as staff resources.

1:32:29There are cities that some of my colleagues, they are

1:32:33able to hire a diversity and equity and inclusion officer

1:32:36or or a particular staff member that has that is their only job

1:32:41is to ensure these things happen.

1:32:43We don't have that as a small city.

1:32:44But what we do have is an excellent Human Relations

1:32:47Commission that we believe would be the perfect community venue

1:32:51to be able to work with us.

1:32:52So my proposal and speaking with the mayor

1:32:56is that the city council will provide this information

1:32:59to the Human Relations Commission

1:33:01and essentially give them the assignment to as

1:33:05an advisory body to the city council that is absolutely

1:33:08within the city council's purview

1:33:10to be able to do that and be able to help develop

1:33:14a race equity work plan.

1:33:16This would be something that not only would oversee

1:33:19the community but it would also help guide city staff,

1:33:23things like hiring policies.

1:33:25What are the things that are unconscious

1:33:27bias that we're not aware of the systemic racism that

1:33:30has pervaded all of our lives.

1:33:32Even some of the speakers we're talking about this as well.

1:33:36and have in previous meetings that we need to identify.

1:33:40We need to grapple with it.

1:33:43We need to be comfortable with having

1:33:44uncomfortable conversations and again,

1:33:47having the human relations Commission leave.

1:33:49This effort, I think is perfect.

1:33:52Again, we don't have a staff member,

1:33:54but I will be the staff member that

1:33:55will work with the human relations commission.

1:33:57I've spoken to the chair of the Human Relations Commission,

1:34:00Walch Williams who is, I believe,

1:34:02very excited about this as well.

1:34:04There's a lot of enthusiasm out there

1:34:06and I believe that we can take advantage of the community

1:34:09to be able to work together and what that looks like, we're not

1:34:13sure yet but that is something that I believe

1:34:15that our dynamic Human Relations Commission can work

1:34:18together on this as a project.

1:34:21And so, again, our actually proposed

1:34:24would be that the city council passed a motion that would

1:34:27essentially sign this project to the Human Relations Commission

1:34:31But I do want to say that this is not necessarily

1:34:34this particular project to develop a work plan that where

1:34:37we end, I've never viewed equity and inclusion as a task

1:34:40to be checked off the list.

1:34:42It is a value.

1:34:43It is a core belief that we all need

1:34:45to be able to provide in everything

1:34:47we do in our programs, in our projects, in our services,

1:34:50in our budget.

1:34:51And so with that your Honor, I would make that request

1:34:54of the city council Obviously, since this

1:34:56began with your idea, I would love to turn it over to you.

1:35:01Thank you.

1:35:02I'm going to ask for other council comments

1:35:05before we hit see if the public has any concerns

1:35:08US Councilman Warrender Mayor Fidele,

The equity and inclusion work plan came forward, and the City Manager traced its origin to the Mayor.

The ask: a motion directing the Human Relations Commission to “work with staff to develop an equity inclusion work plan for the community.”

Where it started: Fadelli had led “what he thought was a simple request — to amend our staff reports to include equity considerations along [with] the other considerations… including legal, financial, environmental and strategic plan.”

What discussion revealed: “there's more to be done,” particularly “being able to define as a community… what equity is” — because “there's not a shared language that we all speak.”

Her account of the city's record: it had adopted a strategic plan in 2013 with “diversity, inclusiveness and respect” as a core value, and runs “one of the oldest MLK events in Contra Costa County — which again is born out of something of a protest.”

Her qualification: “I am by no means suggesting that we are perfect. No city is.”

Why the Commission: “this is right in their wheelhouse” — the MLK events, Pride Month, listening sessions, and working with the student commissioner “to paint Black Lives Matter” on the street.

And the constraint that shapes the whole approach: other cities “are able to hire a diversity and equity and inclusion officer… whose only job is to ensure these things happen. We don't have that as a small city.”

So the Commission takes the assignment, with the City Manager herself as staff.

Significant

El Cerrito assigns its equity work to a volunteer commission with the City Manager acting as staff, saying that as a small city El Cerrito has no equity officer of the kind other cities hire. The citywide equity plan promised in December 2023 is never produced, and a speaker proposes the original staff-report field again at that same meeting.

22 The five whys captions 1611–1690

1:35:12I've mentioned to city manager in our one on one meetings.

1:35:15But what I would really like to see

1:35:17is at least one staff member join the cohort

1:35:22So GoAir stands for the government

1:35:24alliance on Racial Equity.

1:35:26It's a national program through race forward.

1:35:28And there's a Northern California in the region.

1:35:31And I was fortunate enough to participate

1:35:33in the twenty nineteen cohort.

1:35:34It's a year long COHA of government employees

1:35:39from all different rank and file, all different agencies

1:35:43who are learning this very extensive tool kit

1:35:47and connected to a really large network

1:35:49of folks who are working on their own city's

1:35:51racial equity plan.

1:35:53So that is our city manager herself.

1:35:55Or if there's any other staff members that would be relevant.

1:35:58It's a very small investment with a really significant

1:36:02impact because it will plug in El Cerrito

1:36:05to this network with that gear provides

1:36:08and we can learn a lot of the lessons from our peers

1:36:11on how to do this.

1:36:12Well, because there's really excellent examples

1:36:16of how it's being done.

1:36:19One of the things i think about from that,

1:36:21by working in that cohort is the five whys which is when someone

1:36:26makes a statement you ask why then you ask why, again,

1:36:31why again?

1:36:32And you can get closer to the root of really what are some

1:36:35of the core issues, and having staff that convene basically

1:36:41a learn those tools and of access that toolkit to then

1:36:45bring back to other staff.

1:36:46It's really important.

1:36:47So I really appreciate the comments from city manager

1:36:52Pincus and I i'm not going to make

1:36:55any motions yet because other council

1:36:56members certainly share.

1:36:58But I would ask that we have at least one staff member

1:37:02participate in a year longer cohort and the other questions

1:37:09comments from council member quinton

1:37:14Thank you, Mayor Fidele.

1:37:16Did I this is a something that I can definitely relate

1:37:22to because all year as a board member

1:37:25of the League of California, cities,

1:37:28this is what we've been working on.

1:37:29So so if you if all of you looked at your packet,

1:37:35you saw a lot of the bylaws changes will be voted on.

1:37:40And that is part of the work that i

1:37:44have done along with our board members up and down the state

1:37:48of California.

1:37:49So we are doing this to represent

1:37:53all 482 cities that are part of the local wannna cities.

1:37:58And it's just so appropriate to have my classmate

1:38:02mIDA Wilson of who is working on the town,

1:38:08will work on this Anta, so proud as a former chair of the Human

1:38:14Relations Commission and being part of that board

1:38:18for many, many years.

1:38:20It's so appropriate to have this done with that commission.

1:38:24And then and I'll be presenting a short program at the League

1:38:31of California cities.

1:38:33Why is so unique and why else?

1:38:37Cerita is the forefront when it comes to you know, the LGB

1:38:42community where we do have One of the largest LGBT communities

1:38:47here in the Bay Area according to U.S. Census we were like,

1:38:53no sex in same sex couples.

1:38:55So know that this is dear in my heart

1:38:59as the former chair of like Human Relations Commission

1:39:02and to have people that I personally know

1:39:05and that will be working on this So, Mayor Fidele,

1:39:10thank for starting this This is amazing.

1:39:15I'm just very very proud of our city to be at the forefront

1:39:19and working on this of gap.

1:39:22Thank you.

1:39:23Mayor.

1:39:23Appreciate your councilman Morgiana Thank you, Mayor.

1:39:33Thank.

1:39:33Thank you, Mayor.

1:39:34And I would to really thank you for bringing

1:39:37this work plan forward.

1:39:39It's something that I also brought

Rudnick asked for something concrete beyond the assignment: staff training through a national program.

What she wanted: “at least one staff member join the cohort” of GARE — “the Government Alliance on Racial Equity… a national program through Race Forward,” with a Northern California region.

Her standing to recommend it: “I was fortunate enough to participate in the 2019 cohort.”

What it is: “a year long cohort of government employees from all different rank and file, all different agencies, who are learning this very extensive toolkit.”

And what it connects to: “a really large network of folks who are working on their own city's racial equity plan.”

Her cost-benefit: “a very small investment with a really significant impact, because it will plug El Cerrito into this network.”

One tool she named: “the five whys — when someone makes a statement you ask why, then you ask why again, why again — and you can get closer to the root of… the core issues.”

Her reason for wanting staff trained: “having staff… learn those tools and access that toolkit to then bring back to other staff.”

Quinto spoke as “a former chair of the Human Relations Commission,” noting the city has “one of the largest LGBT communities here in the Bay Area according to U.S. Census.”

Significant

A councilmember who completed the GARE cohort herself asks that a staff member be enrolled — “a very small investment with a really significant impact” that would plug the city into a network of peers. Nothing in this archive reports whether anyone was enrolled.

23 “Because it is the law” captions 1691–1764

1:39:40up this city manager, punkers in our discussions as well.

1:39:45I do want to acknowledge the work

1:39:46that the city manager has done in her iCMP

1:39:51work focusing on equity.

1:39:53And I think this is really important for us

1:39:55that exclusivity is great.

1:39:57But equity is much harder And I think bringing forward

1:40:00a framework where we can a lens through which we can make

1:40:03sure that our actions are equitable is

1:40:05really, really important.

1:40:07To take us to that next level.

1:40:08And I look forward to bringing this to the HRC as the liaison

1:40:12as well.

1:40:14To council member Abels.

1:40:17I'm pretty excited about this because i remember when we set

1:40:22up this set of issue points that were important,

1:40:28we considered important to us that we wanted to make sure

1:40:32that each item was rA evaluated in terms of that

1:40:37And that's part evaluation has continued to this day, really

1:40:43And so this is putting the issue at the forefront

1:40:49with other issues which includes for example,

1:40:53the financial issue I mean,

1:40:56it's so that's to me saying we consider

1:40:59it to be an important point It's not just a thing that we do

1:41:05a report on and then file it on the cabinet something

1:41:09this is saying that it's a living breathing issue that we

1:41:15will continue to be looking at along the way as we do our work

1:41:22And that, I think, is a real important and difference.

1:41:27I do have a question Will this include

1:41:30disability Is because no air in our city government at all.

1:41:38Do we do that?

1:41:40Certainly.

1:41:41I believe that this is something it's

1:41:43not While the focus particularly over the past year

1:41:47has been for racial and social justice,

1:41:50I believe that this council has been very strongly in favor

1:41:54of making sure that all groups any marginalized group

1:41:59would be a part of this.

1:42:01I think of our sanctuary city resolution

1:42:04that the city council passed Five, four, five years go now.

1:42:09We made sure to include as many marginalized groups as

1:42:13possible.

1:42:14It was while while that was sort of about immigration

1:42:18at the same time, this council made sure that we were

1:42:22much more inclusive of that.

1:42:24And so I would believe that that's absolutely I mean,

1:42:27again this would be part of the human relations commission

1:42:31conversation I am certainly happy to make sure that they

1:42:34know that that is a feature that this council

1:42:37would be interested in, in oK, because it

1:42:41is the law Absolutely.

1:42:45Doesn't always happen.

1:42:47Right.

1:42:47But even beyond I think that I mean,

1:42:50Raissa we don't get to the racism

1:42:53is about exact racism or sexism.

1:42:57Those aren't about legalities.

1:42:59It's about something else.

1:43:01It's about inherent bias.

1:43:03It's about that type of thing.

1:43:05And so I agree.

1:43:06Well, there's legal issues.

1:43:08This is not necessarily this is that that's the bare minimum.

1:43:12Right?

1:43:12This is this is beyond that.

1:43:14This is checking system to ensure that equality happens

1:43:17across any particular marginalized group That would

1:43:22be certainly something that I think is important

1:43:26An interesting example It's a disability

1:43:29experience which is what perhaps especially relate to it.

1:43:34But the it was a I think it was a long range

1:43:42study of of public works type jobs

1:43:50and it said basically that these are the priority And then

1:43:57if we have enough money left over that with that then maybe

Motoyama thanked the Mayor and acknowledged the City Manager's equity work through ICMA: “equity is much harder,” and a framework would help ensure the Council's actions are equitable. She would bring the work to the Commission as its liaison.

Abelson welcomed the item and then asked whether it covers her own subject.

Her recollection: when the Council “set up this set of issue points… we wanted to make sure that each item was evaluated in terms of that.”

Why the placement matters: it puts equity “at the forefront with other issues, which includes… the financial issue.”

The distinction she drew: “it's not just a thing that we do a report on and then file it in the cabinet… this is saying that it's a living breathing issue that we will continue to be looking at.”

Then her question: “will this include disability?”

The answer: while the focus had been “racial and social justice,” the Council had been “very strongly in favor of making sure that all groups — any marginalized group — would be a part of this,” citing the sanctuary city resolution which had been written to include “as many marginalized groups as possible.”

Abelson added: “because it is the law.”

The City Manager agreed and distinguished the two: “racism or sexism — those aren't about legalities. It's about inherent bias.” Legal compliance is “the bare minimum. This is beyond that.”

Abelson's example was a capital planning study where accessibility work sat last: “these are the priority, and then if we have enough money left over… maybe we'll look at doing a few disability reforms.”

Which is why she values the analysis being written down: “that way we can't forget about it. It's out in the open.”

Significant

Accessibility work is described as what gets funded with whatever is left over, Abelson's example of why an equity field on staff reports matters. Legal compliance is named as the floor rather than the goal, with bias the thing the analysis is meant to surface.

24 Fitness reports in the Navy captions 1765–1870

1:44:01we'll look at doing a few disability reforms.

1:44:05And that's a good example.

1:44:07I think of a process that is you can put against any limits

1:44:15really This is what we're talking about

1:44:18today in particular. and say, how

1:44:22is it looking at this issue?

1:44:24Is it, including the issue of at hand with the against the

1:44:36how is it going to fare I guess is

1:44:39the word maybe in terms of the work

1:44:42that's done in this particular program?

1:44:45A project that we're trying to do.

1:44:48And that's why I like the system we have for actually putting

1:44:55it on three boards, because that way we can't forget about that.

1:45:00We don't cable.

1:45:02It's out in the open.

1:45:04And that will keep this out in the open when the that.

1:45:11Yeah, I just wanted to respond that that's exactly the point.

1:45:14Once that's on our analysis we get

1:45:17to ask any equity question that we want

1:45:19to ask Stan whatever that is.

1:45:22There's a variety of equity questions

1:45:24we can ask staff should be aware of that

1:45:27before they do an analysis for us.

1:45:29And we will.

1:45:30Appreciate it.

1:45:31Will be a normal process.

1:45:32Like all the other half Right.

1:45:35So disability announced or anything else.

1:45:40But it really kind of gives it an elevated position as well.

1:45:49Deserves OK, thank you for that.

1:45:54Before we go to any public comment, I had one question.

1:45:58First i was wondering why there was no resolution

1:46:01to prove for this and this time at this time passing a motion

1:46:08to give this assignment to the HRC

1:46:12is all that is requested through the HRC

1:46:16and developing a process I again this is all to be determined.

1:46:23But in talking with the chair we envision

1:46:26that this could be there would be

1:46:27a community engagement process.

1:46:29There would be an ability to engage stakeholders

1:46:32So the development of the work plan is still to be determined.

1:46:37So at this time being able to give that

1:46:40to the Human Relations Commission, which can then

1:46:42bring something back to a city council to approve

1:46:45or at least on stages to approve in various in various phases,

1:46:51what that might look like Be there.

1:46:54I just thought there was a requirement

1:46:56that we do have that OK, so I was going to open this up.

1:47:00Now, if there's any members of the public who wish to provide

1:47:04public comments at this time, they should use their race

1:47:06and feature to request to speak in camera

1:47:10and just quickly, we did receive some public comments

1:47:13on this item by the advanced deadline today.

1:47:15This commentary by our Miller Michel

1:47:19du Okimoto and Michael Fisher.

1:47:21And at this time, I have three requests to speak,

1:47:24if you can please confirm the 3 minute

1:47:26time limit us three minutes.

1:47:27Thank you.

1:47:28Que oK, we'll go to our first speaker, who is our Miller.

1:47:34Oh, you should be able to begin your time now.

1:47:37Thank you.

1:47:39I strongly i'm not going to repeat everything that's

1:47:42my written comment, but I just wanted to emphasize how much I

1:47:46support the council directing Human Relations Committee

1:47:51to create an equity and work plan for the community

1:47:55as long as the community includes not only US residents

1:48:00but city staff and our city employees

1:48:05And because of my experience in the Navy

1:48:08is that's what made me suggest that all city department

1:48:11directors in their annual evaluation

1:48:15performance evaluation, be evaluated

1:48:19on their contributions,

1:48:20and how well their models and desired performance

1:48:26in this subject in their day to day work

1:48:31as well as all of their subordinate employees

1:48:38The reason that i think that would be effective

1:48:41is that my service in the Navy covered the years

1:48:46nineteen fifty nine to nineteen eighty five

1:48:49and that's when the Navy developed

1:48:53got involved with the federal equal opportunity program

1:48:57and a couple of years after that require was laid on the Navy

1:49:04by the chief of naval operations the fitness reports of officers

1:49:09that were filled out every year by their commanding officer

1:49:12included a special part how well has this officer performed

1:49:17in meeting opportunity requirements

1:49:22before that was put on the report?

1:49:26When you go to the officers club to talk to your peers, etc.,

1:49:31you never heard any talk about this.

1:49:33But once we all started to be involved with that,

1:49:37then I had ten commanding officers

1:49:39that had to tell me how well or how badly i did in that area.

1:49:45It became a common subject that officers

1:49:50in a ward room on a ship or on shore duty were always

1:49:55talk to each other about trying to figure out what do we have

1:49:58to do to get evaluated Well, on this issue,

1:50:03So I think that it can be a beneficial tool for supervisors

1:50:10evaluating their subordinates by encouraging them or enabling

1:50:16them to understand what a valuable contribution

1:50:20their performance in this issue will make,

1:50:23toward the success of the city.

1:50:27Not with the relationship with their colleagues,

1:50:31but with the city's reputation in relation to the people

1:50:34they're hired to serve.

1:50:36And you're all aware more than I am of which parts of the city

1:50:40really need someone improvement in how

The Mayor asked why there was no resolution. The City Manager said a motion assigning the work was all that was needed now; the Commission would design a community engagement process and bring a work plan back to the Council, possibly in phases.

Al Miller proposed a specific mechanism in public comment, drawn from a career that began in 1959.

The speaker's support was conditional: he backed the work plan “as long as the community includes not only… residents but city staff and our city employees.”

His proposal: that “all city department directors in their annual performance evaluation be evaluated on their contributions” in this area — “as well as all of their subordinate employees.”

His evidence came from the Navy, where he served “nineteen fifty nine to nineteen eighty five,” as it “got involved with the federal equal opportunity program.”

What changed: officers' “fitness reports… filled out every year by their commanding officer” gained “a special part — how well has this officer performed in meeting [equal] opportunity requirements.”

The before: “when you go to the officers club to talk to your peers… you never heard any talk about this.”

The after: “I had ten commanding officers that had to tell me how well or how badly I did in that area,” and it “became a common subject that officers… were always talk[ing] to each other about — trying to figure out what do we have to do to get evaluated well on this issue.”

His conclusion: it can be “a beneficial tool for supervisors evaluating their subordinates by… enabling them to understand what a valuable contribution their performance in this issue will make.”

His closing: “you're all aware more than I am of which parts of the city really need some improvement in how they relate to the community.”

Significant

Putting the measure into annual performance evaluations changed what officers talked about — a mechanism proposed from twenty-six years of Navy service.

25 “Not have it go on for two years” captions 1871–1983

1:50:42they relate to the community.

1:50:43Thank you Thank you.

1:50:46Our next baker's buddy buddy should be able to unmuted

1:50:50Begin your time now.

1:50:56Buddy, are you with us?

1:51:01It will come activity.

1:51:02I'm not getting a response The next request

1:51:05is from Michael Fisher.

1:51:07Michael you should be able to meet and begin your time now.

1:51:11Thank you.

1:51:12You.

1:51:12My name is Michael fisher and I have

1:51:15the privilege and responsibility of being

1:51:18your library commissioner.

1:51:20One of the things I've learned in this position

1:51:23is how much of what we do affects equity Thus,

1:51:29if we are truly to transition our city and our society

1:51:35into one of both inherent and systemic

1:51:40equity we need to have this issue

1:51:43before us in everything we do.

1:51:46And I would note Azpeitia eshley in a time

1:51:50of significant fiscal crisis.

1:51:55That's why I'm thrilled to see this item on the agenda

1:51:59tonight.

1:52:00And I congrats to the mayor and the city council

1:52:03for their vision and bringing it forward I support the proposal

1:52:08and I look forward to seeing the these recommendations come

1:52:13back to this council Thank you.

1:52:16Thank you.

1:52:18You, buddy.

1:52:20One more time.

1:52:21See if we can hear you OK, can you hear me now?

1:52:25Yes, we can.

1:52:26You could go ahead and begin Beautiful.

1:52:28I'm so pleased Initially I had conceived of an event

1:52:34that I was thinking of as a super seminar Mayor Fidele,

1:52:39you've been there before.

1:52:42Must be others in the room who've been there before,

1:52:44but after hearing city manager Pincus

1:52:48Maker present and related to directing the HRC to become

1:52:55more intensely involved I guess I think that's what I think

1:52:59I heard her say I'm a commissioner on the HRC

1:53:03and as such i would like to say i'm

1:53:06planning a super seminar on October

1:53:10the fifteenth 2:00 PM seven twenty one, the Alameda

1:53:15in Berkeley The focus, the topic will be exactly

1:53:20equity inclusion, diversity racial and social justice.

1:53:28So in the context and spirit of what

1:53:30I'm what i think I'm hearing this evening,

1:53:32can I with your help transition the event from a super seminar

1:53:41to a regional conference having to do with all of the issues

1:53:48that I have, just start articulated October fifteenth,

1:53:51a regional conference HRC and the city of El Cerrito,

1:53:56the city council, two PM, seven twenty One, the Alameda

1:53:59in Berkeley, test has been there before or wait,

1:54:02where have you been Jess?

1:54:04Have you been there?

1:54:08So all.

1:54:09That's right.

1:54:09You guys are not supposed to It's not a dialogue.

1:54:12This is a monologue for three minutes.

1:54:14So, OK, I think I've said, what I intend to say Karen,

1:54:20because I celebrate.

1:54:22I appreciate I cherish what you've presented

1:54:27as a commissioner on the hRC with your help

1:54:31I would like to initiate a regional conference equity

1:54:36inclusion diversity, racial and social justice

1:54:43I thank you Thank you.

1:54:46Thank you.

1:54:46That does conclude our request to speak on this item.

1:54:49Thank you.

1:54:49You.

1:54:50Can we bring this back to our council?

1:54:52Are there any further comments, your questions or concerns

1:55:00I just I had one comment to make before we take

1:55:04i maybe can make a motion on this

1:55:06is that I'm very proud we got here.

1:55:09This was what I thought a very easy

1:55:12concept but an important one.

1:55:15Since, as Janet said, we do consider

1:55:17financial, legal environmental.

1:55:19We had to do equity.

1:55:21And I had talked about that in my campaign last year.

1:55:25And enough people came up to me to say,

1:55:27you got to continue thinking about let's

1:55:30pursue that Thank you all for the support that I'm hearing.

1:55:34It makes me feel good to.

1:55:36And it was also, I want to thank the city manager because she

1:55:39said, you know, this is bigger than what

1:55:40you're just talking about.

1:55:42This needs to be about staff needs

1:55:44to be how a city runs, needs to be about me.

1:55:47It's good that you.

1:55:48Council will be considering us on policy issues,

1:55:51but we need to do this.

1:55:52And also Rido.

1:55:53So I thank her for that.

1:55:54That was the right direction.

1:55:56One more caution, because I'm hoping hRC

1:55:59will come up with accessible goals I would love

1:56:04to have this sooner or later.

1:56:06And not have it go on for two years.

1:56:09I would love to see in the middle of next year

1:56:11some concept that we really established

1:56:13this so that we can get to it.

1:56:15And we can start talking and acting about equity,

1:56:18not just having formed about it.

1:56:20So thank you very much.

1:56:22I'd like to move this and I'd like to look for a second.

1:56:26Econet I heard council member Rodney,

1:56:30can we have roll call Fidele, I nepotism can tell Yes.

1:56:37Council member Avildsen I can't remember Madama.

1:56:41I can't remember running I mentioned Keri's Thank you.

Two more commissioners spoke, then the Mayor set a deadline of sorts.

The library commissioner: “one of the things I've learned in this position is how much of what we do affects equity.”

His conclusion: to reach “both inherent and systemic equity, we need to have this issue before us in everything we do.”

And the circumstance he flagged: doing it “in a time of significant fiscal crisis.”

An HRC commissioner proposed converting a seminar he was already planning — 15 October, in Berkeley — into “a regional conference” on “equity, inclusion, diversity, racial and social justice,” co-hosted with the city.

Mid-comment he answered his own question about why nobody replied: “you guys are not supposed to — it's not a dialogue. This is a monologue for three minutes.”

Fadelli closed by crediting the City Manager for enlarging his idea: “this is bigger than what you're just talking about. This needs to be about staff… how a city runs.”

Then his caution: “I'm hoping HRC will come up with accessible goals. I would love to have this sooner or later, and not have it go on for two years.”

What he wanted by the middle of the next year: “some concept that we really established this, so that we can start talking and acting about equity — not just having a forum about it.”

The motion carried unanimously.

Significant

“Not have it go on for two years” — the Mayor asking for accessible goals by mid-2022, and for action rather than a forum. The citywide equity plan is still being promised in December 2023, two years and three months after this motion, and is never produced within this archive.

26 Why the study session exists captions 1984–2110

1:56:46Thank you.

1:56:47Good We move on to policy matters.

1:56:51Eight be to study sessions on boards

1:56:55commissions and committees.

1:56:59And we have a staff report from our city clerk Thank you.

1:57:12A good evening.

1:57:13Mayor and council members My name is Charlotte.

1:57:16I am your city clerk.

1:57:18And night study session boards, commissions and committees.

1:57:22Before you for several reasons.

1:57:24Earlier this year, council requested

1:57:26staff to return with a discussion

1:57:28item on committee rules.

1:57:29Council has also expressed a desire

1:57:31to discuss both the appointment and removal process and staff

1:57:35is also requesting some language cleanup and expansion

1:57:38of enforcement language for some the adopted regulations

1:57:44The focus tonight is to provide a brief overview

1:57:47of committee specific regulations

1:57:49that are currently in place.

1:57:50Remedy some inequities to some some term limits and links

1:57:56for certain committees Discuss potential process modifications

1:58:00and clarification to regulations related to I

1:58:04mean, a removal process And my plan is to provide

1:58:07a brief overview of each area.

1:58:09Then I'll take any questions from the council

1:58:12and then I would recommend we take comments from members

1:58:15of the public and then return for the council

1:58:17to discuss and provide staff with direction Ask the question

1:58:23before you start.

1:58:24There is a member of the title on the last slide

1:58:31was brief review of committee regulations

1:58:34that would limit the conversation to one

1:58:37of our three forms The first section of the overview tonight

1:58:44is just a brief review of committee regulations.

1:58:46But this is a study session on boards,

1:58:48commissions and committees.

1:58:50So really that should say or commissions and committees

1:58:56the first the very first section is reporting back the request

1:59:00of the council to do a brief review

1:59:02of regulation that are specific to committees

1:59:05OK, OK, thank you.

1:59:07I just wanted to see what you were referring to.

1:59:09OK, Nepabunna.

1:59:12So as a brief review the council has adopted

1:59:14several general regulations by ordinance

1:59:17that do apply to all boards and commissions and committees.

1:59:21What I'm going to go over is the rules

1:59:23that are specific to committees is there are

1:59:25some additional rules that the council has also adopted

1:59:28a resolution that does affect the committees that the city

1:59:31council has established So first, in order to establish

1:59:36a committee that that process occurs action

1:59:39of the council passing the resolution, I the committee

1:59:42is comprised of no less in five and no more than 15 members

1:59:46and they meet in no less than monthly resident is required

1:59:51for membership And the one exception to that

1:59:53is economic Development Committee, the membership

1:59:57appointments are for four year terms with a two year

2:00:00term a two term limit per advisory body.

2:00:04And if two exceptions that the council has adopted

2:00:07by resolution are for urban Forest Committee,

2:00:09which recently was increased to three terms

2:00:12and Crime Prevention Committee who has no term limits.

2:00:17The rules for committee quorum is a majority of the members

2:00:20that are currently appointed and a minimum of two members

2:00:24must be present in order for committee work

2:00:26or attend of interested members to take place

2:00:30and a minimum of three committee members

2:00:32must be present in order to in order to take formal action.

2:00:37There is the annual selection of the chair and a vice chair

2:00:40and all committees are required to meet

2:00:42in compliance with the Brown to the appointment process.

2:00:47Four committees is a requirement to attend a minimum of three

2:00:52meetings of the committee and receive a recommendation

2:00:57by the Committee for appointment, which then goes

2:00:59to the City Council to take a vote on appointment

2:01:03and a majority vote is required to appoint an individual.

2:01:06You just appointed two committee members

2:01:08tonight on our consent calendar Removal is much broader.

2:01:13It takes a simple majority vote of the city council

2:01:16in order to remove someone from a city committee work order

2:01:20commission and a member is considered resigned, which

2:01:25essentially is an automatic removal if they no longer meet

2:01:29the residency requirement, or they have excessive absences,

2:01:33which is defined in a few different ways,

2:01:36including missing three consecutive regular meetings,

2:01:40half of the regular meetings in the calendar year

2:01:42or a medical absence that exceeds 120 days So that

2:01:49is a very brief overview of what is currently in place

2:01:53for committees or just pause there

2:01:56briefly to see if there is any questions from another council.

2:01:59Members.

2:01:59Before I move on to the first area of focus for tonight

2:02:06and I Yeah i just want to make a call comment because there

2:02:11is lots of material here.

2:02:12And I'm hoping that when we block this off problem number

2:02:17one, or issue number one.

2:02:19Issue number two and number three,

2:02:22we can really focus on the problems

2:02:25that exist in that area.

2:02:27And and then after public comment

2:02:29we can come back and talk about what our views are about how

2:02:33we might be able to fix that.

2:02:34So we're not memorizing are going to all of these things

2:02:38because i'm sure councillors read through the report

2:02:41and the power points.

2:02:44But there are a lot of things that I

2:02:46just want to say from my mind.

2:02:47I'm going to be looking at this whole this whole exercise to me

2:02:51is about consistency.

2:02:52Which I think is a good thing making sure

2:02:56that our staff can do the job with all

2:02:58the issues that are involved.

2:02:59And that's mainly our Clerc.

2:03:02How do we improve that?

2:03:03And then how do we help our city How does our city get better

2:03:06from the changes that we do?

2:03:07So thank for interrupting, but I just had the put it in.

2:03:12Yeah, council member Ableman Yeah

2:03:15what I am concerned concerned about in saying consistency is

2:03:22uncommitted is their functionality

2:03:26is quite different across the different committees So,

2:03:32so to me, that's what being a committee is all about.

2:03:38As opposed to a commission as opposed to a board

2:03:43So if we say that they all have to be aligned the same, then

2:03:48what is the difference?

The city clerk opened a study session that runs the rest of the meeting.

Three origins: the Council had “requested staff to return with a discussion item on committee rules”; it had “expressed a desire to discuss both the appointment and removal process”; and staff wanted “language cleanup and expansion of enforcement language.”

The aims: review committee-specific regulations, “remedy some inequities” in term limits and lengths, and clarify the removal process.

The existing rules for committees: established by resolution, “no less [than] five and no more than 15 members,” meeting “no less than monthly,” with residency required except for Economic Development.

Terms are four years with a two-term limit — except Urban Forest, recently raised to three, and Crime Prevention, which “has no term limits.”

Removal takes “a simple majority vote,” and a member is “considered resigned” automatically for losing residency or for “excessive absences” — “missing three consecutive regular meetings, half of the regular meetings in the calendar year, or a medical absence that exceeds 120 days.”

Fadelli named his own frame: “this whole exercise to me is about consistency… making sure that our staff can do the job,” which “mainly [is] our clerk.”

Abelson pushed back immediately: committees' “functionality is quite different across the different committees… if we say that they all have to be aligned the same, then what is the difference?”

Her conclusion: “the different functionality is what I think is good about having the three different types.”

Significant

Consistency and difference are set against each other at the outset — a councilmember arguing that if boards, commissions and committees are aligned, there is no reason to have three kinds. Three committees were not following the term rules: two had no term length set, and Crime Prevention, with no term limit, was not being put through its four-year reappointment — the inequity the session sets out to remedy.

27 “They are not elected officials” captions 2111–2260

2:03:49There is no difference between the three I think

2:03:54and the different functionality is

2:04:00what i think is good about having

2:04:04the three different types I'm done

2:04:10Mayor Pro Tem Yes, thank you.

2:04:13Mayor Fanelli.

2:04:15I also wanted to point out on looking at those of i'm

2:04:21just really excited about looking at this

2:04:24because we actually have never dealt with us.

2:04:27So this is a fantastic i also want to have concerns

2:04:33on looking at some of our boards and and I

2:04:40know you did this hallway with some of the commission's

2:04:46doing a course on Brown act and also i recommend definitely

2:04:53ethics training And we see a lot of things

2:04:57that many of our commission are not allowed to do

2:05:01And and this is something where we need to make sure that when

2:05:07it comes to ethics that we do provide ethics

2:05:11training that they should all be taking taking that.

2:05:14So they know the rules about what a commissioner truly

2:05:18does They are not elected officials

2:05:21and we can't we have a few of them that take it to a level

2:05:27where it's just not allowed.

2:05:29They are recommend doing their views to the council and that's

2:05:34outset and they are not there to tell the council what to do.

2:05:39They are there to recommend and we could take it or leave it

2:05:43at I don't like some the bad behavior

2:05:46that I've seen this year and last year This

2:05:50is not acceptable.

2:05:52And you know, so I want to make sure ethics is explained.

2:05:59Maybe we can have of Sydney for the future Yeah.

2:06:04Holly, can we I'm sorry.

2:06:06I was thinking Mayor Fidele, if I may, thank for the comments

2:06:10from the council Holly really does

2:06:12have a presentation It goes through all of this in detail.

2:06:14So I would recommend that she go through that sort Thank you.

2:06:20There certainly will be plenty of opportunity for discussion

2:06:23and if there's other areas that the council would like

2:06:25to discuss at the MS. So looking forward into the first focus

2:06:31tonight is a request to remedy that in some inequities

2:06:35that we have amongst committees, specifically with regard

2:06:38to term limits, in terms so the current regulation is

2:06:42that the council has adopted state that unless otherwise

2:06:45specified by council resolution, all boards, commissions

2:06:49and committees will have a two term limit per advisory body

2:06:53and will have a four year term Some variations as I

2:06:57mentioned to that, that the council has

2:06:59adopted by resolution is three.

2:07:02The new term limit for crime prevention as well as

2:07:06the urban three term limit The inequities come in

2:07:13for specifically Committee on Aging

2:07:16Crime Prevention and Environmental

2:07:18Quality Committee.

2:07:19So because these three committees do not

2:07:23have any special rules adopted by resolution by the council,

2:07:27they should be subject to the key term limit and the four

2:07:30year term However, for both Committee on ageing

2:07:33and Environmental Quality committee,

2:07:35there is currently no term link set,

2:07:38nor the term limits applied for crime prevention

2:07:42While there is a resolution states that there is no term

2:07:46limit, there is also they are subject to the four year term,

2:07:51and subject to the reappointment process.

2:07:53Every four years.

2:07:54However, that part is not being properly

2:07:56implement it for the specific committee So a couple

2:08:01of the options.

2:08:02The something that I have been looking at since I started

2:08:05with cerita in twenty nineteen because the rules that are

2:08:09being applied are not being applied equally

2:08:12amongst all of our committees.

2:08:13So the two options that I would recommend the council

2:08:17consider the first would be to correct the terms, to correctly

2:08:21align with the regulations that are currently in place to do

2:08:26that, I would recommend setting an initial term, which would

2:08:29need to be staggered terms.

2:08:31So that the membership did not turn over all of the same time

2:08:34beginning with our new terms that are coming up in march

2:08:381st, on March 1 of twenty twenty two,

2:08:41I would still recommend giving a shorter

2:08:43initial term to those who have served on those committees.

2:08:45Longer and then those those members that

2:08:48are currently seated.

2:08:50Will still be eligible.

2:08:51Subsequent to that initial term to serve two full year to Four

2:08:56year terms back to back So there is the potential

2:08:59of members serving in excess of eight years

2:09:03even setting this into motion.

2:09:06Now and then for crime prevention.

2:09:08They would just simply be having a term set every four years

2:09:12and would go through that reappointment evaluation

2:09:15process as all of our other committees

2:09:17The other option would be for the council

2:09:19to provide major action to return as resolutions that

2:09:24would outline those committees had different rules to follow

2:09:28just like you have done with crime prevention

2:09:31and urban forest and give me.

2:09:33And that way we would be putting something

2:09:37officially adopted at a council that

2:09:39would state that those three committees

2:09:41operate under different rules than the other committees.

2:09:45So that is the first area.

2:09:48I just paused there to see if there's any question

2:09:52about this specific area.

2:09:53Before I move on to review the second questions Can't see

2:09:59everybody OK i, I do have a question on this

2:10:07and I am going to be asking questions from the standpoint

2:10:09of staffing this, since there is one staff that does all this is

2:10:14there any reason why all of these the ten year

2:10:22can't be the same for all of these committees?

2:10:25Can I actually do it for as kind of a long term

2:10:31having to year for two year terms

2:10:34And if someone wants to stay on, it could be an automatic thing

2:10:39unless there's an objection from liaison

2:10:42or a council to them staying on.

2:10:44Why should crime prevention have no limit

2:10:47Is there a reason for that?

2:10:49That that is that council action?

2:10:50The city council, some time in the past and I believe that one

2:10:54was mid to late two thousand made the decision

2:10:58to the resolution having different standards

2:11:01for that specific committee.

2:11:03So the council could certainly give me

2:11:05direction to draft resolution for whatever rules you would

2:11:08like to put in place for any building the race, if it can be

2:11:12is that the the the particular committee The reason was,

2:11:21as they were looking for experts in the field, of forestry

2:11:31I think, is the right term for it.

2:11:33But crimes for crimes like you said, crime prevention.

2:11:37Yes, why does it have no link as I could never find anybody

2:11:41and then they won't have them leave the people

2:11:45who would do it lead was wrong.

2:11:47That was the reason As simple as that No, I

2:11:53I'm kind of supportive of having the same for all the members

2:11:58having council member.

2:12:01Wilson, you've talked in the past

2:12:03about making three visits in a row for committees.

2:12:07I don't see any reason for getting purposes.

2:12:09We don't do that for commissions.

2:12:10As well as making as consistent as we can and simple as

2:12:15we can so that we can have a system.

2:12:19We know about.

2:12:20And this is rubrics here.

2:12:22I think that is a great idea.

2:12:25I do.

2:12:25There is one exception.

2:12:26I can think up to that.

2:12:28And that is if there aren't enough people

2:12:31on the committee to meet what do you do ad for that?

2:12:38That comment council tables in the city council has adopted

2:12:42provisions for cuarón for committees that with as little

Quinto raised conduct.

His enthusiasm first: “we actually have never dealt with this, so this is fantastic.”

His recommendation: ethics training, because “we see a lot of things that many of our commission[ers] are not allowed to do.”

What he wants it to establish: “the rules about what a commissioner truly does. They are not elected officials.”

His description of the role: advisory bodies “recommend… their views to the council” and “are not there to tell the council what to do… we could take it or leave it.”

And the charge: “we have a few of them that take it to a level where it's just not allowed.”

His verdict on the year: “I don't like some [of] the bad behavior that I've seen this year and last year. This is not acceptable.”

He did not name a body or a person.

That omission is what a longtime committee member objects to during public comment, saying he wished he still reported for the local paper so he could find out which committee was meant.

The Clerk then set out the first area: three committees were not following the term rules — the Committee on Aging and Environmental Quality had no term length set, and Crime Prevention, which has no term limit, was not going through its four-year reappointment. She offered two options: apply the existing rules with staggered initial terms from 1 March 2022, or adopt resolutions giving those committees different rules. A councilmember favored the same rules for all and asked why Crime Prevention had none; the answer recalled that it had been hard to find members.

Significant

A charge of “bad behavior” is made against unnamed committee members, who then have no way to answer it. A twelve-year committee member says in public comment that he wishes he were still a reporter so he could learn which committee was meant — and objects that the session portrays committee members “as more of a problem to the city than a benefit.”

28 A process never formally adopted captions 2261–2407

2:12:47as two members that they can get together and you work

2:12:51of the committee and invite people who are interested

2:12:54in joining the committee that are not yet formally part

2:12:56of the committee to participate And

2:12:58only three members are required in order

2:13:01to take any kind of action.

2:13:02So while the low side of membership is five,

2:13:05they actually can take action with as little as three members

2:13:09present and/or appointed at a time.

2:13:11And this is just committees.

2:13:13It's not the planning commission or anything

2:13:16We're specifically talking about committees right now.

2:13:18That is correct.

2:13:19That choirmaster boards and commissions

2:13:21is a little bit different.

2:13:23And Mayor Fidele actually I can shed a little light on that

2:13:26I've worked in the city since two thousand one,

2:13:29and I think that I'm probably one

2:13:31of the best historians on boards commissions and committees.

2:13:34I remember working with a subcommittee of council member

2:13:37Wilson and council member Potter way back in like two thousand

2:13:41twenty three starting this committees were

2:13:44were even more inconsistent When I got here back then,

2:13:50i believe that as indicated, there

2:13:52had been times that some of the resolutions

2:13:54have been amended over time.

2:13:55But at one point committees weren't even necessarily

2:14:01part of this part of that.

2:14:03We actually amended the ordinance

2:14:05or recommended an amendment to the ordinance

2:14:07to include committees understanding

2:14:10that they were city committees as opposed to out on their own.

2:14:13I believe that the Crime Prevention Committee, once

2:14:15upon a time was kind of their own committee,

2:14:17not necessarily sponsored by the city

2:14:20or they were a group that got together

2:14:22to put something together.

2:14:23And that was embraced by the city.

2:14:25So there was a lot even more inconsistent

2:14:28Some committees weren't necessarily

2:14:30following the Brown Act.

2:14:31So the council of Action, you know many years

2:14:34ago to try to make sure that committees included

2:14:37at least within the governing document,

2:14:40and the ordinances and the resolutions

2:14:41to be inclusive and under the umbrella of the city

2:14:45boards that we're moving in the right direction

2:14:47to make it easier and more consistent.

2:14:49Precisely.

2:14:50I think that's a good concept.

2:14:52And the yes, I can't say anyone on Yes.

2:14:57Council member Rudnik and thank you, sir.

2:15:00At the on to the Crime Prevention committee,

2:15:04I have a statement to question.

2:15:06So the statement is I don't see why this commission should have

2:15:11no term limits when the other ones do It would be

2:15:15great in a spirit of consistency to have consistent policies

2:15:19across board.

2:15:20The question I have directed at Holly

2:15:23is, would it be possible that if we were to create where we were

2:15:27to with where I'm thinking of, like through ordinance

2:15:33or through through a motion, I'm not sorry,

2:15:36my brain's not working right now.

2:15:392 2 uniform.

2:15:42This policy.

2:15:42Would that supersede the older one from the early

2:15:47in order to change the exception that is adopted by legislation

2:15:51for crime prevention?

2:15:52Or for the urban forest I would have to come back

2:15:55with a resolution for you to adopt to change that back,

2:15:59to have then follow the ordinance rule which is kind

2:16:02of the blanket overall rule that applies

2:16:05if there is not a resolution adopted it says otherwise.

2:16:09The council could certainly get that direction

2:16:11And if that was what they wanted to do,

2:16:14and to Moufid the liaison, I would be comfortable with that.

2:16:18And oK, and holly, we're going to get

2:16:24public comment on each one of these or wait until we do.

2:16:27All three suggested a public comment

2:16:30after we review all three items before the council has

2:16:34discussion and provides action.

2:16:35So we can come back to this one and talk about our ideas

2:16:40for consistent Yes, absolutely.

2:16:43Any other comments from council members

2:16:45before we go to number two oK, OK, number two

2:16:52is the appointment process.

2:16:54OK, so the second area is the appointment process

2:16:57and now we're expanding a little bit outside of just committees.

2:17:01We are talking about the appointment process for boards,

2:17:04commissions, and committees.

2:17:06So the current the regulations that are currently

2:17:08in place that have been established by council

2:17:11by ordinance four are boards, commissions and the Citizens

2:17:15Streets Oversight committee.

2:17:17Is that an application is submitted to the city clerk

2:17:20with an interest to serve and the city

2:17:23council holds an interview for all of the candidates.

2:17:27And makes an appointment typically at a special council

2:17:30meeting for committees, which is a process that was set

2:17:34by resolution There's a couple additional steps in there,

2:17:38which include the committee taking a vote to recommend

2:17:42any appointment to the city council

2:17:45as well as the attendees having attended at least

2:17:48three committee meetings prior to being

2:17:51eligible for that recommendation vote to occur by the committee.

2:17:55The one district.

2:17:56I have here that is part of what I am trying to clean up

2:18:00is that the process for attending the three meetings

2:18:04has not been formally adopted So in two thousand five,

2:18:07the council adopted a resolution for the committee vote

2:18:11and requested that the process for appointment

2:18:15be standardized for committees However,

2:18:18that that standardized process was never formally adopted.

2:18:22And it's just kind of articulated over time.

2:18:24And it's currently being applied some committee to committee

2:18:29inconsistently My three consecutive meetings are three

2:18:32meetings, total some three meetings within six a few

2:18:39verité sessions that have been adopted again for the crime

2:18:42prevention committee.

2:18:43The council passed a resolution that required attendance

2:18:48at meetings or events in the past six months prior to being

2:18:52being eligible for appointment as well as a criminal record.

2:18:56Check this particular resolution in itself

2:18:59is also unclear in terms of what regular attendance means.

2:19:04Does that mean all six meetings?

2:19:06Does that mean three meetings within a six month?

2:19:09Period?

2:19:10It's it's not very clear in the language of the resolution

2:19:14And then the only other change or difference in process

2:19:19is with environmental quality committee

2:19:21The committee itself has adopted the process of having

2:19:24a subcommittee of their membership

2:19:26interview, prospective candidates

2:19:28after they have met that three meeting attendance

2:19:31and then they provide a recommendation

2:19:32to the full committee prior to the full committee voting

2:19:36to recommend an appointment or not.

2:19:40So for this area, the proposed action

2:19:43is to have is to provide staff direction with any modification

2:19:47to the current process.

2:19:48If there is a will to change anything.

2:19:51And return with a resolution and that

2:19:53would formally adopt that process meaning

2:19:56that the even if changes are made,

2:19:59I would still want to return with resolutions that clarify

2:20:03the meeting attendance for committees

2:20:05to make sure that we're applying it consistently So

The City Manager, with the city since 2001, recalled that committees had once been even less consistent, some not following the Brown Act, and that Crime Prevention began as an independent group the city embraced. Rudnick said she saw no reason for Crime Prevention to have no term limits.

The Clerk identified a rule the city has been applying without ever having enacted it.

The appointment process for committees adds two steps to the boards process: the committee votes to recommend, and the applicant must have “attended at least three committee meetings.”

The defect: “the process for attending the three meetings has not been formally adopted.”

The history: in 2005 the Council adopted a resolution for the committee vote and “requested that the process for appointment be standardized” — but “that standardized process was never formally adopted.”

The consequence: it “just kind of articulated over time” and is “currently being applied… committee to committee inconsistently.”

The variants in use: “three consecutive meetings [or] three meetings total, some three meetings within six” months.

The Crime Prevention resolution has its own problem: it requires “attendance at meetings or events in the past six months,” but “is also unclear in terms of what regular attendance means. Does that mean all six meetings? Does that mean three meetings within a six month period?”

And Environmental Quality has adopted its own extra step: a subcommittee that interviews candidates before the full committee votes.

Her proposal either way: return with a resolution that “formally adopt[s] that process… to make sure that we're applying it consistently.”

Significant

The standardized appointment process requested in 2005 was never formally adopted, so the three-meeting requirement grew up informally and is applied differently by each committee. The October resolutions fix this, replacing three meetings with two of the last three — and closing out every pending application so everyone is judged by the same rule.

29 Experts and lay citizens captions 2408–2520

2:20:09all the topic of the department process some considerations

2:20:16just for the council, a little bit of food for thought

2:20:19for the council discussion So the first one is expanding

2:20:23meeting attendance requirements So if there was a desire

2:20:27to expand the requirement to attending three meetings prior

2:20:31to being a we need to all boards commissions and committees,

2:20:36there could be considerations for that

2:20:39that could potentially slow down the appointment process.

2:20:42And if there is a low number of appointed individuals,

2:20:46particularly if boards and commissions, then

2:20:48you can run into the problems that council member Eagleson

2:20:51mentioned in terms of having a quorum of members

2:20:54available to meet the that was the way we did.

2:20:59It was the other way around that we would get people

2:21:03on this committee and and they would get appointed

2:21:09but then they would maybe show up

2:21:10once period That was the three.

2:21:16That was the reason for the three meeting attendance thing.

2:21:21So just to consider Jennifer, boards and commissions there

2:21:25is a requirement for went to the ordinance to councillors past

2:21:29that appointment can not be made without first holding

2:21:33interviews.

2:21:34Well without first publicly noticing

2:21:36the vacancy holding an interview and a majority

2:21:40vote The council.

2:21:41So this meeting attendance prior to we

2:21:44could potentially lengthen that process, which

2:21:47is not necessary a bad thing.

2:21:49It's just something for the council

2:21:50to consider If that was the will of the council to do something

2:21:54along those lines there, there's also consideration

2:21:58for potentially doing a quarterly process

2:22:00for interviewing applicants whenever you have

2:22:03unexpected vacancies throughout the year, which would allow

2:22:06a little bit more concrete time for anyone who was

2:22:09interested in applying for those vacancies

2:22:11to have time to attend meetings in that process, there.

2:22:16There are some considerations for application modifications,

2:22:19such as requesting information on the application

2:22:23in terms of meetings that have been previously attended.

2:22:26There could be more detailed questions developed regarding

2:22:29background and experience to the council,

2:22:32more information about the candidate who is applying

2:22:35the council could also request supplemental materials

2:22:37or question be provided for certain advisory bodies,

2:22:42depending on what it is, the role and responsibility

2:22:45of a given advisory body as there may be a need to have

2:22:49more specific information about what that individual could

2:22:51bring by being appointment appointed

2:22:54to that advisory body and some member Mosiello Thank you,

2:23:00Mayor.

2:23:01I have a question about the expertise requirements

2:23:05which are sort of implied here.

2:23:07And I know super Charlotta you mentioned in your memo

2:23:13that the committees are for experts and commissions

2:23:18are for lay citizen but it feels like we are always leaning

2:23:24towards actual professional expertise in a lot of the cases

2:23:30And so it seems like having a committee

2:23:35have an sort of a longer term because there's experts.

2:23:42I feel like you i served on the Planning Commission

2:23:45and I would say that almost every single commissioner had

2:23:48a professional background in planning

2:23:52and so there would be a reason to keep them.

2:23:54But I think that the term limits were helpful in allowing

2:23:57lots of people to bring their energy

2:24:01to volunteering for the city.

2:24:03So i think in this application you know, if we are looking

2:24:09for specific professional experience,

2:24:13i don't think the applications actually reflect that.

2:24:16And we should probably modify things or make that clear.

2:24:21If that's if that is the will of the council

2:24:25I think that the subcommittee or the subcommittee

2:24:30of these committees having kind of a vetting

2:24:34process of their own.

2:24:36I think is really interesting and allow for more involvement.

2:24:40I think we as council have these brief interviews, bye.

2:24:44Think if the committee's are meeting people

2:24:51hearing their opinions getting to work with them,

2:24:53that sounds like a really good part out of the process.

2:24:58And maybe the quarterly meetings will help keep the process

2:25:03moving quickly enough that there aren't big gaps in vacancies

2:25:09But I also was wondering, once committees become

2:25:14formalised with resolutions or practice,

2:25:17it seems like they are kind of perpetual

2:25:20And I was also wondering about the process

2:25:22for adding new committees or taking committees

2:25:25away if the need arises.

2:25:27And I don't see a whole lot of guidance on that

2:25:31and not that I suggesting anything

2:25:34go away but just seems like there things that may come up

2:25:38and it might be great to have committee

2:25:42a group of people that have energy for something.

2:25:44And so the pathway for that is not clear So hopefully

2:25:49that can be included as well.

2:25:52As improved I'm sorry.

2:25:54Go ahead.

2:25:55On that.

2:25:56I was just going to say certainly something councilor

2:25:58could give direction on.

2:25:59These are just some things for the council to think about

2:26:02as they have a conversation about what they want to change,

2:26:05about the appointment process.

2:26:06Based on some research on what some other agencies are doing

2:26:10and some considerations based on statistics

2:26:12variance in managing the membership

2:26:13of our advisory bodies and is quickly, very quickly

2:26:17to respond to the question about forming or disbanding any

2:26:22of the established committees.

2:26:24That is a simple agenda item for discussion for the council

2:26:28and direction And we would bring a resolution

2:26:30to either form the commission, committee or board

2:26:35or disband commission committee or or that

2:26:37is definitely the will of the council aircraft.

Motoyama questioned the distinction the rules rest on.

What the staff memo said: “the committees are for experts and commissions are for lay citizen[s].”

Her objection from experience: “it feels like we are always leaning toward actual professional expertise in a lot of the cases.”

Her evidence: “I served on the Planning Commission, and… almost every single commissioner had a professional background in planning.”

Which cuts both ways: expertise is “a reason to keep them,” but “the term limits were helpful in allowing lots of people to bring their energy to volunteering.”

The practical gap she identified: “if we are looking for specific professional experience, I don't think the applications actually reflect that.”

She liked the Environmental Quality model: “if the committees are meeting people, hearing their opinions, getting to work with them, that sounds like a really good part of the process” — against the Council's own “brief interviews.”

Then a structural question nobody had raised: once committees “become formalised with resolutions or practice, it seems like they are kind of perpetual.”

What she wanted: a pathway for “adding new committees or taking committees away if the need arises” — “I don't see a whole lot of guidance on that.”

The answer: forming or disbanding is “a simple agenda item for discussion… and direction,” followed by a resolution.

Staff had flagged the trade-off: expanding attendance requirements to all bodies “could potentially slow down the appointment process,” and with few applicants “you can run into the problems… in terms of having a quorum of members available to meet.”

Abelson supplied the original reason for the rule: people “would get appointed, but then they would maybe show up once” — “that was the reason for the three meeting attendance thing.”

Other options raised: a quarterly interview cycle for unexpected vacancies, giving applicants “more concrete time… to attend meetings”; application changes asking “meetings that have been previously attended”; and body-specific questions.

Staff recommended option one — applying the two-term limit to all committees — while presenting the appointment-process ideas as considerations “based on some research on what some other agencies are doing.”

Significant

The rules distinguish expert committees from lay commissions, but a councilmember recalls that almost every planning commissioner she served with had a professional planning background — and if the city is looking for such experience, she says, the applications do not reflect it. A councilmember says committees seem “kind of perpetual” and sees little guidance on disbanding them; the Clerk answers that forming or disbanding one is “a simple agenda item” followed by a resolution.

30 “No more preferential treatment” captions 2521–2578

2:26:41And Kato Thank you, Mr Fidele.

2:26:44I agree with my colleague, council member

2:26:47Motty on her statement and definitely

2:26:51support I'm looking at consideration

2:26:54and looking at staff liaison and chair involvement

2:27:00and you know, as Councillor liaison,

2:27:04we were told some years ago that we need to take care.

2:27:10couple of steps back at and not have you know,

2:27:16let them do their work at We should not be you know,

2:27:23telling them what to do and i, I definitely support that still.

2:27:28And I want to make sure that you.

2:27:30And when we are doing our report, we're doing a report

2:27:36And it doesn't have to be every month.

2:27:39I mean, I go every quarter now because this is they don't

2:27:43need to be there every month.

2:27:45But i do remember having colleagues at would take,

2:27:51you know, consider operations and taken an extra step.

2:27:55And in creating get out things that they

2:28:02would personally want to do and i don't want to have that.

2:28:05I want to make sure that they are

2:28:08independent from the council and that we are

2:28:10not dictate their job Job should be given to them ahead of time.

2:28:18There's a chair The chair has a responsibility

2:28:21to set the agenda and that's their job.

2:28:25It's not the council member liaison

2:28:31So i took that advice Sin and and it seems to be working.

2:28:38But there are some committees that

2:28:41are run by the same council member

2:28:43over and over and over again.

2:28:45And they don't realise that what they're doing

2:28:50is not acceptable.

2:28:52And we need to make these changes.

2:28:54And we need to move liaison's around We cannot have the same

2:28:59council member in the same committee,

2:29:02a commission four years because it doesn't work So I want

2:29:06to make sure in the future that we change every year and not

2:29:11keep the same liaison on because you

2:29:14see things years later that should have been done,

2:29:19but never done.

2:29:20Because we've had the same person there as always on

2:29:24and it all catches up later on.

2:29:26And like what we see right now, what we're dealing with.

2:29:30So let's look at that and make sure in the future.

2:29:34This doesn't happen anymore.

2:29:36Prefatory special treatment from different council members,

2:29:39from the city manager in years past.

2:29:42I don't want that seem to be done ever again.

2:29:46The council made that change And I appreciate Greg Limón

2:29:51and Paul Fidele working on that No more preferential treatment

2:29:55We need to spread this around.

2:29:57Each council member needs to have

2:29:59a turn on the different committees and commissions It's

2:30:03not acceptable blackout's things have been going on

2:30:06for twenty years, never again.

2:30:08So I appreciate that.

2:30:09Thank you.

2:30:13Hey, i have a couple of quick comments on this section.

2:30:19Before we move on to the next one else

Quinto turned to the Council's own conduct toward the bodies it appoints.

The guidance he had been given years earlier: liaisons “need to take a couple of steps back… let them do their work” and “should not be telling them what to do.”

How he applies it: he attends “every quarter now, because they don't need [us] to be there every month.”

What he had seen colleagues do instead: “take an extra step” and create “things that they would personally want to do.”

The principle: bodies must be “independent from the council… there's a chair. The chair has a responsibility to set the agenda, and that's their job. It's not the council member liaison['s].”

His proposal: rotate. “We cannot have the same council member in the same committee [or] commission four years, because it doesn't work.”

Why it matters: “you see things years later that should have been done but never done, because we've had the same person there… and it all catches up later on.”

Then the sharpest thing said all evening: “preferential special treatment from different council members, from the city manager in years past — I don't want that to be done ever again.”

He credited two colleagues with changing it: “no more preferential treatment. We need to spread this around.”

His verdict on the past: “things have been going on for twenty years. Never again.”

Significant

Rotating liaisons annually is proposed as a remedy for problems that accumulate unseen when one councilmember holds a committee for years. Preferential treatment by councilmembers and by a former city manager is alleged directly, without specifics. Nothing in this archive reports a rotation rule being adopted.

31 Three meetings, or none captions 2579–2852

2:30:22has comments The appointment process.

2:30:24I never understood why we required

2:30:28three meetings for committee members,

2:30:29but not commission commissioners.

2:30:32Sometimes even a little more important I

2:30:35think that we have a vetting vetting

2:30:37issue with who we put on our committees and commissions.

2:30:41I'm not talking about the Planning Commission or boards,

2:30:45but i think that there should be the same three requirements so

2:30:49that no one can ever claim I don't know what

2:30:52this commission does I like the idea of a quarterly

2:30:56interviewing process.

2:30:58And I think every one that gets on a committee

2:31:01should be required to have an Oriental about how

2:31:04the committee commission works what their requirements are

2:31:09and maybe that orientation can happen at the quarterly

2:31:12meeting.

2:31:12We have interviews.

2:31:13So we have people coming in already exactly

2:31:16what's expected of them.

2:31:18And they can say, I didn't understand

2:31:21my role was in this I also think I like the idea

2:31:25of having i like I like that.

2:31:28All five council members meet with I think

2:31:31that's a way that we get to meet our local residents

2:31:34We get to thank them and learn about them.

2:31:36I think we should be free to ask more independent questions I

2:31:40think the questions that we get in these meetings are pretty

2:31:43duplicative and don't really get to if one of us

2:31:46has a question and a background that we want

2:31:49to play out, let us ask questions

2:31:51and get the real feeling about that.

2:31:54And anyway, that those are my main two things that I think

2:31:58should happen as far as committees

2:32:00and commissions And the Yeah, you get those Holly Yes.

2:32:12And I just if I could just briefly, was just a couple

2:32:14of them I considerations I just wanted to share,

2:32:17you touched on some of them in your comments

2:32:19that the council could consider increasing the involvement

2:32:23of the staff liaisons and the advisory body

2:32:26chairs in the appointment process,

2:32:28particularly staff liaisons.

2:32:29They do have subject matter expertise typically

2:32:32to that leads them to become the liaison for particular border

2:32:37commissioner committee.

2:32:38So they may potentially have good insight

2:32:40in terms of what the needs are of the membership at the time.

2:32:44As well as the chair whose response for those meetings.

2:32:47And then there is also consider if there was a potential parts

2:32:53of the process could be done by subcamp of council members

2:32:57or one example of the city of here

2:32:59that I thought was interesting they have a subcommittee

2:33:02of the council liaison, the staff is on

2:33:05and the commission, the advisory body chair conductor

2:33:08reviews and provide a recommendation to the city

2:33:11council for appointment So just and then we establishing

2:33:14advisory bodies specific interview questions So

2:33:18instead of having that general set of questions

2:33:21for all interviews,

2:33:22having a specific set of questions

2:33:25put together for each advisory body

2:33:27so that the questions are more tailored towards what that body

2:33:31is responsible for which is something

2:33:33that we have done in the past, but not in the recent past.

2:33:37So thank you very much for all of your comments.

2:33:40OK, anybody else Yes.

2:33:43Yes, council member Rodney.

2:33:46Thank you, sir.

2:33:47I do want to be protective of staff time

2:33:50and i am one of the things I just heard with the expanding

2:33:55staff involvement.

2:33:56We have lost ten percent of our staff time staff

2:34:01at our staff workforce.

2:34:02I really want to be mindful of what it is that we're asking

2:34:05our staff liaisons to do, because since i've

2:34:09been in this seat I believe we've maybe only seen

2:34:12two reports or recommendations from our committees

2:34:17or commissions hit our agenda.

2:34:20And so because of that, I'm not.

2:34:23While I'm really glad that these boards and commissions exist I

2:34:28and especially for the commissioners in the committee

2:34:31members who participate I really want to be mindful of our staff

2:34:34because if we're not getting that work here

2:34:36that's work that's being done.

2:34:38That is essentially going to waste Thank you.

2:34:46On the number three that me myself,

2:34:56I think Council member may have had

2:34:58another need to stand up like.

2:35:01Thank you, Holly.

2:35:03I also want to mention dealing with.

2:35:07Yeah, I'm thinking in the long term

2:35:09and I'm thinking about the things

2:35:12we would have to look at closely.

2:35:14And that is our budget and and we looked at the five, ten year

2:35:21picture and it doesn't look great,

2:35:22doesn't look great in law at all.

2:35:24It's difficult, difficult year and the next ten years.

2:35:29And everyone knows this.

2:35:31And I just want to make sure that we are not overworking

2:35:35our staff I do recommend that some

2:35:39of these committees and commissions

2:35:42can have it's difficult to get a quorum.

2:35:44So I truly believe that instead of meeting every month, perhaps

2:35:49every quarter, I think that would be better I think

2:35:52our staff i'm thinking about.

2:35:55Yeah, again, 5, ten years now.

2:35:58The difficult, difficult times of our budget you know,

2:36:02it doesn't look good So we have to make

2:36:06some tough, tough choices And the next few years

2:36:10So we're looking at that and knowing that our staff

2:36:14is overworked already.

2:36:16I want to make sure that we're not

2:36:19going to add lots of overtime.

2:36:23So I want to make sure that, you know,

2:36:26we would not overwork our staff because they

2:36:29have full time daytime hours.

2:36:32And these are the extra things we cannot afford to do.

2:36:35A lot of the extra things in the future.

2:36:38So looking at i'm hoping that we can look at this year by year.

2:36:45And when the times get tougher that we

2:36:48will make changes accordingly.

2:36:51But the changes that I'm looking at now

2:36:54is to make sure that get out many of the committees,

2:36:59that that I have I chaired almost every single One

2:37:02of except the ones that I've been blocked to do Yeah,

2:37:06because some had it for all these years.

2:37:09It's that you know, we can't do this anymore.

2:37:13We just cannot do this.

2:37:15You when we can't even have a quorum it's a waste of time.

2:37:19That's a waste of time.

2:37:20A staff who are working overtime many of them.

2:37:24And we have to look at all of this and outside

2:37:27because a lot of this has been a waste of time with volunteers,

2:37:32not showing up.

2:37:33So you know, I agree with the committees

2:37:38the commissions that we have right now.

2:37:40But let's look at this on a regular basis.

2:37:43And you go on.

2:37:45I'm looking at every quarter for some of the committee

2:37:49that don't need to be there.

2:37:52Every month.

2:37:53And that would save time and that would save costs.

2:37:55Thank you.

2:37:56Their holly, thank.

2:38:01He said, OK, so the third area for discussion

2:38:05is the removal process.

2:38:06And again we're talking about the removal

2:38:09boards commission or committee.

2:38:10So all our advisory body membership

2:38:13the current regulation set by Ordinance of the city Council

2:38:17is very broad and offers.

2:38:19So the rates of removal set by a simple majority

2:38:22vote of the city council This can be achieved

2:38:25in a couple of ways as long as it's in a publicly

2:38:29noticed public meeting there could

2:38:32be an item of consent at a regular meeting

2:38:34or alternatively an agenda item at a special meeting.

2:38:38Consistent with the process the council

2:38:40currently takes our interviews and appointments

2:38:42of advisory body membership.

2:38:44We do have some things that allow for automatic removal

2:38:48which are set by both ordinance and resolution,

2:38:51and that includes the excessive absences

2:38:54that I mentioned earlier.

2:38:55As as no longer meeting the resident requirement

2:39:00And then in addition, we do have one of the city's conflicts

2:39:05of interest code.

2:39:06It does indicate a couple of our advisory bodies

2:39:09who are required to file a form seven.

2:39:11And there is language in that resolution adopted

2:39:14by council that authorizes removal for failure

2:39:18to complete that form.

2:39:20Seven the proposed action in this area

2:39:24is along the same vein of what the council members have been

2:39:28providing comments on in trying to strengthen in our process

2:39:33internally in terms of the management of our membership,

2:39:36which is in excess of 90 or so position

2:39:39amongst all of our boards commissions and committees,

2:39:42is for the council to consider a resolution providing

2:39:45authorisation for automatic removal terms

2:39:49that would expand to cover the failure

2:39:54to meet the applicable training and filing requirements

2:39:57that the council has adopted.

2:39:58This would be things executing the oath of office,

2:40:02completing ethics training for those that have been designated

2:40:06as required to complete the training

2:40:08completed the sexual harassment prevention training

2:40:11as well as completing a conflict of interest statement.

2:40:13If that is required OK, or any comments or questions

2:40:21on the ethics training and the the Laursen which I don't see

2:40:30listed there the sexual harassment

2:40:33prevention harassment.

2:40:35I don't see why, even if it's not

2:40:37somebody else's, require that it should not be our requirement.

2:40:44So all of our commissions in committee members

2:40:47are required to complete sexual harassment from the trading

2:40:51in the implementing that with some new legislation

2:40:54that went into effect earlier this year.

2:40:57We did get an opinion from our legal counsel from Sky Jordan

2:41:01that that would extend to all of our courts,

2:41:04commissions and committees.

2:41:05So we are requiring that currently implementing that

2:41:09and and the council has passed a resolution indicating I think,

2:41:14three or four of our advisory bodies

2:41:16to complete two hours of ethics training every two years.

2:41:20So this is this request is just giving essentially me and i

2:41:25to have my authorisation if we cannot get a member to complete

2:41:31those requirements that the council has indicated that they

2:41:33must complete that we have some recourse

2:41:36to remove that person if they are

2:41:38not meeting those requirements.

2:41:40Currently, there is no repercussion

2:41:42of not completing those training or filing requirements

2:41:44outside of the seven.

2:41:46And it does create a lot of administrative work following

2:41:49up with membership over and over again,

2:41:52trying to get compliance when there's no there's nothing

2:41:55to allow us to enforce that rule.

2:41:58that we have a sub rule that says they have a one

2:42:04or two months whatever the number is,

2:42:07to complete it in the due date.

2:42:11And if they don't they're off the committee

2:42:13just to make automatic So the request

2:42:17would be whatever the current regulation is that have already

2:42:20been adopted by council that I would be able to add

2:42:24an additional step that says it's

2:42:27language consistent with what's in our conflict.

2:42:30Conflict of interest code that after we give it

2:42:32a specific written notice of non-compliance

2:42:35And so whatever the requirement is that if that individual does

2:42:39not complete that requirement within that 30 day period,

2:42:42that they would be removed from membership without having

2:42:47to have specific council action to remove them

2:42:54I think that's a good idea.

2:42:56And Holly, oh, yes, Mr council member Mohtarma oh, thank you,

2:43:05Mayor.

2:43:05I had a question about.

2:43:07I agree with council member Apison about the ethics

2:43:10training should be for everyone I was wondering if you already

2:43:14as not included in ordinance or resolution,

2:43:18but already do Michael Brown at training and orientation

2:43:24through a handbook and setting the expectation

2:43:28that all committee commission and board members

2:43:32abide by the handbook and are those kind

2:43:35of like Given's that have been sort of implied

2:43:37or done already?

2:43:39that are not formalised I just want to get

2:43:41a sense of that from you.

2:43:43So when I came when I came on with the city twenty eighteen,

2:43:47I did a lot of work to try and streamline

2:43:50the process for our own coming incoming membership, our staff

2:43:55liaison participation in terms of all of the meeting

2:44:00materials and things like that and I did

2:44:02create a handbook for members.

2:44:04And I did hold an in-person training that provided

2:44:06round of review as well.

2:44:08As a review of that new handbook and all the materials in it

2:44:11in the twenty eighteen, the plan was

2:44:14to do something similar to that every year with the pandemic,

2:44:18things have taken a little bit of a slower move forward

2:44:22We are planning on implementing the annual training that

2:44:25is going to coincide with the annual term appointments that

2:44:28happened in March.

2:44:29Year, whether it be a refresher or for new membership,

2:44:32that there would be an opportunity

2:44:34for those individual roles to come to that training

2:44:37and get some training.

2:44:38I have also been doing some refreshers

2:44:40for specific advisory bodies throughout the last Six

2:44:43months or so to get Brown.

2:44:45Actress shares in terms of what we are required to abide what

2:44:49they are required to abide by as advisory members and all

2:44:53that information is provided to them upon appointment

2:44:56information is provided, where the resources are available

Fadelli named an inconsistency he had never understood, and the discussion turned to what vetting is for.

His question: “I never understood why we required three meetings for committee members but not commissioners — sometimes even a little more important.”

His diagnosis: “we have a vetting issue with who we put on our committees and commissions.”

What he wanted: “the same three requirements, so that no one can ever claim I don't know what this commission does.”

He also liked “the idea of a quarterly interviewing process.”

Fadelli also wanted an orientation for new members, perhaps at the quarterly interviews, and freer questions in interviews. The Clerk suggested more involvement from staff liaisons and advisory body chairs, a council subcommittee to review candidates, and interview questions tailored to each body.

Rudnick urged care with staff time: the city had lost ten percent of its workforce, and since she took her seat perhaps two reports or recommendations from advisory bodies had reached the agenda. Another councilmember, citing the budget outlook, suggested that bodies struggling to reach a quorum meet quarterly rather than monthly.

On removal, the Clerk proposed a resolution letting her remove members who fail to complete the oath of office, ethics training, sexual harassment prevention training or a conflict-of-interest filing within 30 days of written notice; currently there was no consequence for non-compliance other than for the conflict-of-interest form. She said she had produced a members' handbook and held a training in 2018, with annual training planned to coincide with the March appointments.

Significant

The attendance requirement exists because appointees stopped showing up — and expanding it risks the opposite problem, leaving bodies without a quorum. The city announces thirty-five vacancies a month later.

32 Notify the Council first captions 2853–2943

2:45:00and what filing and training requirement they

2:45:02have as a member Thank you Yes.

2:45:08And Holly, I think we talked today

2:45:10about my one comment on this The and I agree with it.

2:45:15I'm not seeing much that needs to improve from our removal

2:45:18process at the hands council But on the resolution

2:45:25that you will be asking us to approve

2:45:27or you can get rid of someone automatically

2:45:30I do think you should send council notification

2:45:34before that happens.

2:45:36Just so that we know if there some unique.

2:45:39These are people we're invested in a little bit.

2:45:42We've interviewed them.

2:45:43We should know the story before that

2:45:45happens and we can get back to or whatever That makes sense.

2:45:52Yes, absolutely.

2:45:53Yeah.

2:45:54And when you get to that action item

2:45:56i can make a recommendation and we can potentially

2:45:58revise that resolution at the dais

2:46:01to get that information We should know.

2:46:02So who who's going to be let go?

2:46:04And I think we know one of the repercussion it's back to us.

2:46:08If, in fact, something's you know,

2:46:12something's fallen loop there.

2:46:14So, OK, any other comment Yes.

2:46:17Mariquita.

2:46:18Yeah.

2:46:20Fidele also want to point out to that

2:46:23that has happened in different committees through the years.

2:46:25Is that when certain people are good allies, or friends of one

2:46:33of our colleagues on the council and you see particular people

2:46:39getting away with you out, excessive

2:46:43absences, for example, or it?

2:46:45S showing up late or you have bad

2:46:50behaviour and in everyone wanted this particular person out.

2:46:57But we couldn't do anything because that that person

2:47:01had an ally on the council that was totally embarrassing.

2:47:04And I just want let everyone know that I definitely support.

2:47:11Yeah, This proposed action because you we you know,

2:47:16when when you're not looking bad behaviour happens and and we

2:47:21have seen this this year with you know,

2:47:24looking at the bad behaviour of certain committees where

2:47:29there there are attacking our chair

2:47:31They're attacking our staff.

2:47:33They are attacking our city manager You know,

2:47:37to me, that is a rules There are rules.

2:47:40There.

2:47:41And this is a body a body of this body

2:47:46makes recommendations The chair is charged mayor Pro Tem.

2:47:51I just Holick me if I'm wrong, but I was talking

2:47:53about your Urhobo to get rid of someone who hasn't followed

2:47:58through on all the paperwork and all

2:48:01the required That's that we're talking about That is correct.

2:48:05But I can potemkin to this point.

2:48:09I have i do an annual review of attendance

2:48:13and I have been coaching staff liaisons in with those rules.

2:48:17Are there already part of the municipal code that

2:48:19will provide automatic removal for non-compliance?

2:48:23And we are keeping a much closer eye on those regulations.

2:48:26Now on actual attendance.

2:48:27Yes, absolutely.

2:48:29So attendance would be one of the things

2:48:31that you're looking to, of which you could automatically

2:48:35get rid of the council that that the council has

2:48:38already given authority for.

2:48:40And in certain sections answers.

2:48:42But we are monitoring the attendance much more closely.

2:48:45We we do an annual review to see if anyone

2:48:48falls into that crater of excessive absences.

2:48:51We're making sure to give people notice when they're getting

2:48:54close to that threshold, to give them an opportunity

2:48:56to rectify their attendance.

2:48:58OK, and i think before we go to the public

2:49:02I just want to remind everyone that these

2:49:04are volunteer positions and we don't want to make.

2:49:09So onerous that they don't show up We're

2:49:12trying to make it easy on them It's our they're

2:49:16leaving their family there.

2:49:17They're coming on board They're taking on responsibilities

2:49:21So I don't want to be mean, but if they're not

2:49:24going to follow through on some of the requirements,

2:49:27they should be notified.

2:49:29We should be notified of.

2:49:30So OK, can we get to our public comments

2:49:35on all of these things and ideas from our residents?

2:49:46Here with me in managing multiple computers?

2:49:48Tonight's oK.

2:49:52We did not receive any public comment

2:49:54on this item in advance.

2:49:55But if you would like to speak on this item i would be

Fadelli's one substantive change to the removal resolution concerns who knows.

His position on the process generally: “I'm not seeing much that needs to improve from our removal process.”

But on automatic removal: “I do think you should send council notification before that happens.”

His reason: “these are people we're invested in a little bit. We've interviewed them. We should know the story before that happens.”

The Clerk agreed to “revise that resolution at the dais.”

Quinto then described what the automatic mechanism is meant to displace: “when certain people are good allies, or friends of one of our colleagues on the council,” you see “particular people getting away with… excessive absences” or bad behavior.

The result: “everyone wanted this particular person out, but we couldn't do anything, because that person had an ally on the council. That was totally embarrassing.”

He then named who he says is being attacked, without naming who is doing it: committees showing “bad behavior… where they're attacking our chair. They're attacking our staff. They are attacking our city manager.”

His conclusion: “to me, that is a… there are rules.”

The Clerk described what is already happening: “I do an annual review of attendance” and have been “coaching staff liaisons” on rules “already part of the municipal code that… provide automatic removal for non-compliance.”

With notice built in: “making sure to give people notice when they're getting close to that threshold, to give them an opportunity to rectify their attendance.”

Fadelli's closing caution: “these are volunteer positions, and we don't want to make [it] so onerous that they don't show up.”

Significant

Automatic removal for absences is defended as a remedy for members protected by an ally on the Council — an allegation made directly, without names. The Mayor asks that the Council be notified before anyone is removed, and the Clerk agrees to revise the resolution.

Significant

The charge is specifically that committee members are attacking the chair, the staff and the city manager — with no committee and no person named. A twelve-year committee member objects to exactly that later the same evening, saying he wishes he were still a reporter so he could find out which committee was meant.

33 “More of a problem than a benefit” captions 2944–3067

2:49:58the time to raise your hand Mayor, at this time,

2:50:01we have five hands.

2:50:02Can confirm the 3 minute time limit.

2:50:07What time is it?

2:50:08It's nine thirty six.

2:50:11Let's go for 2 and a half just so we can

2:50:13move this along a little bit.

2:50:14Thank you.

2:50:32OK, our first speaker this item is our Miller Ali.

2:50:36You should be able to I'm meeting in your time now.

2:50:44Al, are you there?

2:50:45I am.

2:50:46I was waiting for the clerk to show up.

2:50:48OK, thank you, counsel.

2:50:51For going through this review.

2:50:55I think it's long overdue I have three areas

2:50:58that I suggest you ask the city clerk and a city

2:51:02manager for their opinion on, as you develop

2:51:05your program The first item is how many committees

2:51:11commissions are boards.

2:51:12Can one individual will serve on at the same time The second is

2:51:19are there any committees, commissions

2:51:22or board members that should not serve on more than one?

2:51:26I'm thinking of the Planning Commission the Pham.

2:51:30And the Design Review Board whose meetings often

2:51:34get into such detail and length of time

2:51:38that maybe they are going to be serving on one

2:51:42The other thing is, are there any other committees,

2:51:46commissions or boards that could be permitted

2:51:51to effect staff themselves?

2:51:54To write their own minutes for most of their meetings?

2:51:58And when there are special issues coming up or maybe once

2:52:02or twice a year half staff liaison

2:52:05attend to watch, I think that most of these committees etc.

2:52:11could be depen and done talking with their staff liaison

2:52:17when an issue was coming up and give

2:52:20the liaison the opportunity to say, yeah,

2:52:23i would really like to be there when

2:52:25they are doing last notes then thanks again for this review.

2:52:31Ali, for the effort you've already put

2:52:33into while you've been here.

2:52:35Thank you.

2:52:36Thank you.

2:52:37Thank you.

2:52:38You.

2:52:38Our next speaker is Tildy Goudey, honey,

2:52:40you should be able to I mean, begin your time now.

2:52:44Good evening, Mayor and council members.

2:52:46How do you live in do so?

2:52:48I appreciate the effort to make things more uniform consistent.

2:52:54I think it is important to remember you know,

2:52:58the committees and the boards and commissions

2:53:01are very different.

2:53:02And so consistency within committees and consistency

2:53:06within boards and commissions is more

2:53:08appropriate than consistency with each other to that end,

2:53:12I think, the term limits and the length of the term

2:53:17is appropriate for boards and commissions that have smaller

2:53:22panels and are generally fully you know,

2:53:28a full complement of the smaller number

2:53:31of people usually half of the fifteen

2:53:34or less of the fifteen commission.

2:53:37I'm sorry, committee.

2:53:38So I think you the committees really aren't very well served

2:53:42by having the extra burdens of keeping track of term length

2:53:48and limits and it's actually a staff time

2:53:52burden to administer all that.

2:53:55And most of these are under populated.

2:53:58I mean, they have a small fraction of a total.

2:54:03So we're not really doing ourselves any favors

2:54:06by turning away volunteers just because they served Eight years

2:54:12when we have a small panel.

2:54:14And we have a willing volunteer.

2:54:16So I think the only exception for I advocate

2:54:20for no terminaling it's or length of term for committees

2:54:27with the only exception being if it is a fully populated

2:54:32committee, then if there's an application,

2:54:34I would think it would be good to us.

2:54:38The longest tenure to step down but as far as the 3 minute

2:54:44three meeting requirement it is a little

2:54:47burdensome for for a committee to require that.

2:54:51I think I could be relaxed a little bit

2:54:53maybe one to two meetings over three to six months.

2:54:56And fluting before submitting a application,

2:54:59as long as their name appears in the minutes

2:55:02As a public commenter because, you know,

2:55:06it really is a unnecessarily prolonged process for getting

2:55:11new people involved.

2:55:12So thank you You Our next speaker is Blankstein.

2:55:21Davee should be able to unmuted and begin your time now I

2:55:24I've been a member of the Ekis Environmental Quality Committee

2:55:28since it starts about twelve years,

2:55:30I've served city committees and task

2:55:33forces, which we didn't mention going back to the mid nineties.

2:55:37I really appreciate the work, Holly has done here.

2:55:40It's useful to look at restructuring

2:55:42I do think you see sometimes is a bit more

2:55:45of a talking soci than one that actually

2:55:47tries downhome the issues.

2:55:50I told them that, however, you guys

2:55:52want to go home tomorrow recover and watch this segment

2:55:56because it seems to portray members of the city committees

2:56:01as more of a problem to the city than a benefit.

2:56:03And these are people who spend an awful lot of time doing

2:56:06an awful lot of work And I wish I was still

2:56:09a reporter for the West County so I

2:56:12could figure out what Mayor Pro Tem Quintal which committee.

2:56:16He's talking about.

2:56:17I sure wish I knew so i must say,

2:56:19there's no problems with committees

2:56:21but I agree with howre.

2:56:22Why should there be term limits when you have people like me

2:56:26and other people, many good people who are willing to go

2:56:28and show up and work hard I mean, the council does not have

2:56:32Czernowitz so I have term limits on committees I think that work

2:56:38needs to be done to organise them better

2:56:40and rationalise them But let's not act like they are

2:56:44more of a pain than a benefit Thank

2:56:47you very much for hearing me.

2:56:48Out.

2:56:48And I'm sorry if I seem a little bit

2:56:50annoyed that you are our next speaker is Robin Mitchell.

2:56:55Robin, you should be able to begin your time now.

2:56:59Yeah, thank you.

Public comment came almost entirely from the volunteers the session is about.

The time limit was cut to two and a half minutes with five speakers waiting; it was 9:36 p.m.

The first speaker, Al Miller, asked three practical questions: “how many committees, commissions or boards can one individual serve on at the same time?”; whether some — Planning Commission, Design Review Board — should be limited to one because their meetings “get into such detail and length”; and whether some bodies could “write their own minutes” to save staff time.

Howdy Goudey made the structural argument: “consistency within committees and consistency within boards and commissions is more appropriate than consistency with each other.”

His objection to term limits on committees: most “are under populated… so we're not really doing ourselves any favors by turning away volunteers just because they served eight years when we have a small panel.”

His proposed exception: apply the limit only “if it is a fully populated committee” and someone else has applied.

Then Dave Weinstein, twelve years on the Environmental Quality Committee and on city bodies “going back to the mid nineties,” objected to the tone.

His advice to the Council: “go home tomorrow [and] watch this segment, because it seems to portray members of the city committees as more of a problem to the city than a benefit.”

His defense: “these are people who spend an awful lot of time doing an awful lot of work.”

And on the unnamed charge: “I wish I was still a reporter for the West County so I could figure out what” committee “he's talking about. I sure wish I knew.”

His closing: “let's not act like they are more of a pain than a benefit… I'm sorry if I seem a little bit annoyed.”

Significant

A twelve-year committee member tells the Council its own study session reads as treating volunteers as a problem — and that he cannot identify which body was accused. The city announces thirty-five vacancies a month later, and the argument from the floor is that term limits turn away willing people from under-populated committees.

34 Expertise lost to a term limit captions 3068–3422

2:57:00This is robin Mitchell, and I'm currently

2:57:02served on the Park and Rec Commission for two terms.

2:57:05So eight years.

2:57:05And now I'm on the Urban Forest Committee

2:57:08and I agree with dave and Howdy that I don't believe that there

2:57:12should be term limits on committees

2:57:15And I was the one that advocate for the three term

2:57:18limit for urban forests instead of two, because you know,

2:57:21the expertise that's needed there.

2:57:23We lost some really good expertise

2:57:25because the term limit expirations

2:57:27and it's a real shame that that happens.

2:57:30And I think that's true of a lot of the committees

2:57:33that, you know, you have expertise

2:57:36that you don't want to lose.

2:57:38And, Dave comment.

2:57:39I mean, I do think it's a little bit insulting

2:57:42the way you were talking about the committees

2:57:44that these are volunteers.

2:57:45They are citizens that are volunteering their time

2:57:49and you know, I'm sorry that it's a burden to the city

2:57:54but I think it's important to have them

2:57:56and i just think turning away volunteers because

2:58:01of term limits is crazy.

2:58:03The second thing I was going to say

2:58:05is the what how he was alluding to the meeting attendance.

2:58:08So we just went through this on the Urban Forest Committee.

2:58:10It takes an incredibly long time to get

2:58:12somebody on the committee.

2:58:13And we're such a small committee.

2:58:15You we only have like four or five people on.

2:58:18And we would love to have the energy of this person.

2:58:21But it took almost six months to get her on our committee.

2:58:24And she's not there yet.

2:58:26It's three months of meetings that they have to attend.

2:58:29They might not even be consecutive In her case.

2:58:31There were they were then the fourth month the fourth meeting

2:58:35of the urban forest committee.

2:58:37We actually make the recommendation to city council.

2:58:41Well, depending on what the schedule of the city council

2:58:44may or may not fall in that same month.

2:58:46It could fall in the next month.

2:58:47And then we're five months out for getting

2:58:50somebody on our committee, which I just think is ridiculous.

2:58:54And I think it would be very nice if that could be

2:58:57streamlined and again, I just think

2:59:00that having term limits where you're turning away volunteers

2:59:03on committees that are under-represent

2:59:05don't have a full composite is just not very wise.

2:59:11Thanks.

2:59:11That's all I have to say.

2:59:14Thank you.

2:59:15Our next speaker is he should be able to meet

2:59:18and begin your time now.

2:59:24It's try that again.

2:59:26The can you you know there you go.

2:59:30Can hear me.

2:59:31Yep.

2:59:34Yes, please go Whoa, whoa, whoa.

2:59:38Hold on, hold on.

2:59:41Yeah.

2:59:44OK, there we go.

2:59:45All right.

2:59:46You should go hear me now.

2:59:50Yes, I can Here you go.

2:59:52Yeah, I just want to say really quickly that i was wondering,

2:59:57like, what can we maybe possibly honor committee and commission

3:00:00members like, when there's a new one that's brought in,

3:00:04maybe maybe this incentivized the more

3:00:06people in the community to want to serve in spaces.

3:00:10If we honor those who joined a committee or commission

3:00:13board so that also the rest of the commission or committee

3:00:15or whatever.

3:00:16And actually know who's coming to the table, what are they're

3:00:19bringing to the table and how we can

3:00:22work and collaborate together.

3:00:23I'm actually a commissioner for the Human Relations

3:00:26I think it's super ironic that we

3:00:27were just talking about an equity program

3:00:29that we want to do.

3:00:30But then my question to that is like,

3:00:33how do we create equity And this is volunteer number one.

3:00:36Number two, we don't really honor

3:00:38those who joined these things.

3:00:39And those who are committed and passionate about being

3:00:42involved.

3:00:42In fact, sometimes i've even noticed in my own commission

3:00:45how we honor those who actually are overwhelmed.

3:00:48You know, rather than honoring those

3:00:49who are excited to do the work and excited to make

3:00:52changes in our community.

3:00:54So that being said, I have a question for you guys.

3:00:56Quite important in relation to this.

3:00:59What if the staff and the council

3:01:01is discriminating against a commissioner or a committee

3:01:05member or a board member?

3:01:06Like what if how do we reconcile with that?

3:01:08What i'm learning through my own process dealing with the city

3:01:12staff and the commission and the council

3:01:14is when any discriminated incline goes down,

3:01:17it ends up at the table of the city staff.

3:01:20So it's like, wait, that doesn't make sense.

3:01:22It's like you want to give a lighter to an arsonist,

3:01:24you know, but it seems like we don't have any checks

3:01:27or balances on the city staff or the council,

3:01:30but they can decide things on the commission

3:01:32and the committee and board.

3:01:33I mean, mind you, they can decide on volunteers

3:01:36but the people who are electing and there's no accountability

3:01:39going to reverse direction, especially

3:01:42if are discrimination, especially if there is bias,

3:01:44especially if there's overt retaliation for somebody

3:01:47wanting to do something in the community and assumptions

3:01:51and projections becoming a block and secrecy kind of going.

3:01:55You can be moving throughout the commission.

3:01:57I mean, the staff And so really, I'm curious about that.

3:02:01Like, how do we create equity for commissioners

3:02:04and committee members?

3:02:05On board members if the staff is discriminating in Cumia,

3:02:13that does conclude requests to speak on this item.

3:02:17OK and can we bring it back to section number one and then

3:02:25maybe, Holly, if you can if you have a list, both lists

3:02:29of things that you would like us to comment on i mean,

3:02:33I guess go down the line of where we should go.

3:02:36I think we got some good feedback from our residents

3:02:41right there.

3:02:42I have a few issues and suggestions

3:02:44and section number one.

3:02:46But are there any other council members

3:02:48that would like to kick it off?

3:02:51And this is about term limits and and any length and term

3:03:00limits?

3:03:00Yeah, any other council member rubberneck?

3:03:03Yes.

3:03:04Mayor Fidele, I like your suggestion

3:03:06about two year limits are preferred to your terms.

3:03:10Pardon me.

3:03:11And also, I really did hear feedback

3:03:14from the public about how it is that we can really expand

3:03:17membership because the reality is, is while we have ninety

3:03:21seats available ninety seats currently, but so many

3:03:25of our committees at least don't have enough members

3:03:28I've heard anecdotally from the community

3:03:31that there's folks who wanted to join the economic development

3:03:35Committee, but because that committee wasn't reaching

3:03:38quorum, there would be people who would show

3:03:41up for their three meetings.

3:03:42And then not to honor those three meetings of attendance.

3:03:46But the meetings were being held because we had reached quorum

3:03:49And I'm really trying to think to myself,

3:03:52especially the youngest member on council who's really

3:03:58my peers in the community are the folks

3:04:01who would love to participate.

3:04:03But often have young children.

3:04:05And these things are hard And what

3:04:06is it that we can make it accessible

3:04:08for us to get a broader and more diverse

3:04:11represent haitian in these groups?

3:04:13And I think that offering shorter term that folks are

3:04:18committing to would be really helpful a way

3:04:21to attract more people.

3:04:23But I also really want to honor what it is that we're hearing

3:04:26from the community because we shouldn't have

3:04:28a prescribed amount of user eight to eight to year terms

3:04:34however it is.

3:04:34And then you have to go if there's no if there's seats

3:04:40that are available for other folks

3:04:42to join the committee shouldn't bounce folks off

3:04:45or that can respond to that.

3:04:47Because I think Rogell we're gelling with an idea and people

3:04:51just keeping an open mind here.

3:04:54Because I liked what Rob and how they said about keeping

3:04:58good people on But I like what Tessa

3:05:01and I have mentioned about we might

3:05:03attract more just two years.

3:05:06Why don't we have two year terms where a renewal is automatic

3:05:11unless that and they get to stay on if they want

3:05:15to unless there's an issue and there are no limits to how long

3:05:19they can serve, then every two years.

3:05:22They know that well I've had my two years.

3:05:24I'm going i've got two more years.

3:05:26I think Four years is a big chunk to attract people

3:05:30and i think two years and then to take away

3:05:33some of the staff issues that Holly has where we

3:05:36have to reinterview everybody.

3:05:39If if they could stay on automats likely and give

3:05:42us notice that they want to stay on,

3:05:45then staff and council can say, well let's

3:05:48welcome him or her back to this committee again.

3:05:51To me, that team streamline So I just

3:05:53wanted to get your feedback from others Eric Cantor, thank you.

3:05:59Mayor Fidele I'm listening to folks

3:06:04at that spoke at comment period And and knowing

3:06:11who these people are.

3:06:12And I got to know these people in the last yea, many of them.

3:06:18I know for more than ten years and as a commissioner,

3:06:21as a volunteer here, as chair of One of the commissions and

3:06:25and seeing many of them in our Hall of Fame

3:06:29And this shows you that great work

3:06:32that our commissioner is in, committee members

3:06:34have done over the years.

3:06:36And and many of them are speaking right now

3:06:39like Al Miller and and like Dave Winston So I hear what they say

3:06:46and I completely agree with them.

3:06:49Dan, but I also agree with council member rudbeck as well.

3:06:54And on to win that the two year terms and that will say and do

3:07:01this automatically because we do.

3:07:05And I'm thinking about the future again.

3:07:08And and so we can have less meetings because our staff

3:07:13are they're overworked already.

3:07:15And and to have this every week we're not going to be

3:07:21able to do that in the future.

3:07:23So it's a small to everyone know that that difficult times.

3:07:28We're still dealing with austerity and a budget

3:07:31that we still need to work on.

3:07:34So, you know, I agree with Tessa the two year period

3:07:40in doing that automatic So we don't

3:07:42have to meet time and time and time again

3:07:45in an interviewing people that.

3:07:48Yes, they're included.

3:07:49Yes.

3:07:50We want them.

3:07:51And because they're doing great work.

3:07:55But there are some bad apples that

3:07:58have been on committees there are no longer

3:08:01and those committees.

3:08:03But I'm telling you know, they're out

3:08:07and for some reason, they get in because

3:08:10of preferential treatment And I just

3:08:12want to make sure that this doesn't happen in the future.

3:08:15Because I've seen this happen and this

3:08:17is the ugly side of boards and commissions

3:08:20that i have personally seen.

3:08:21I'm a complete turned off by that and by by.

3:08:26Yeah, just because they're they're

3:08:28just friends with the council member, that is not acceptable.

3:08:32And we need to change that.

3:08:33So thank you Council member Rudnic

3:08:36We have a motion on a term limit issue

3:08:38that we can might vote I'm happy to make motion that I want

3:08:43to clarify with some of boards.

3:08:45Financial advisory board, planning commission

3:08:50Right that we're talking about the committee's

3:08:53committee upwards of fifteen that are allowed.

3:08:56But when it comes to these groups, especially

3:08:58when there's only five members, how it is that we address that?

3:09:02Because having an automatic renewal for something that even

3:09:07our quasi judiciary boards in another note that was made

3:09:14by Al Miller is, are there any specific boards or commissions

3:09:20where there might be a conflict interest if they serve on hold

3:09:23and we need to codify that because i think that the system

3:09:28we have now for the Planning Commission

3:09:30the Design Review Board is just fine.

3:09:34They may suspect special boards and they meet with all the

3:09:40the council members And it's for whatever

3:09:43it was, two to four year lengths So we

3:09:49take those out of the mix.

3:09:50And then all the others, except maybe the could be that way.

3:09:53Yes.

3:09:54Council member Matsuyama thank you.

3:09:59Yes.

3:09:59I do want to make sure that we're talking

3:10:01about the committee only i think particularly for Design Review

3:10:06and Planning Commission They are a ministerial organization

3:10:10that they do file seven things are much more formal

3:10:13and there's reasons for that because they make certain kinds

3:10:15of decisions So I just want to make sure that those

3:10:18are actually separate.

3:10:19I do want to address Mr. Wystan and I appreciate cranky

3:10:26and we are talking about volunteers

3:10:28and I just want to make sure that I have a appreciate

3:10:31the volunteer efforts.

3:10:33I've been on a as a commissioner do so.

3:10:36I mean it's really important that we do honor all

3:10:40of our volunteer but I think it's really important also

3:10:43to honor our staff and make easy to manage

3:10:46And I think One of the things that I heard from Mr. Miller

3:10:53about staff itself I think that that's probably

3:10:58harder to do than it sounds.

3:10:59But maybe some of the committees can also

3:11:02decide to meet less frequently and have longer meetings

3:11:07or include more people at times that work for them that are

3:11:10separate from having to worry about having a monthly meeting

3:11:13at a set time.

3:11:15So maybe there's more flexibility that we

3:11:18can build in to make it work.

3:11:19Better for people as well.

3:11:21So just a home for the kind of the once the committee

3:11:26members are together to be able to to work on some of that I

3:11:32think the two year terms make sense for committees,

3:11:35and I think that will allow flexibility I think being

3:11:40an older older city council member I do

3:11:43think that it is helping a younger person

3:11:46with younger children being on committees

3:11:49and commissions and boards.

3:11:51I also want to reach out to any one that's passed that

3:11:55and say maybe it's time that you serve on a committee

3:11:58or commission and board because you have time because your kids

3:12:00are older or they've moved out of the house

3:12:03So there's room for everybody.

3:12:04And room for all kinds of energy and expertise.

3:12:06And so I just want to make sure that that if there are people

3:12:10listening, thinking, oh, they just want young people that we

3:12:12want everybody to have one So think Holly can

3:12:17I ask what your what your view is

3:12:19about the automatic continuing on if you want to, after two?

3:12:24Is that problematic?

3:12:26Or does that make things easier for you?

3:12:28Staff to the council has adopted a policy

3:12:31that would not be an automatic reappointment process.

3:12:35Of boards, commissions and committees.

3:12:37So we do for term limits We do in advance

3:12:43that March first term end date, because all of our terms

3:12:47are set.

3:12:48Now to end on alternating years.

3:12:50But on the same date.

3:12:52So we're already reaching out to the entire membership.

3:12:54So if the council wanted to do this for committees

3:12:57the correspondence the committee members use

3:12:59terms would be expiring, would be a simple

3:13:01are you interested in content?

3:13:03Could be are you interested in continuing membership?

3:13:06For another two years?

3:13:07And if they are, we could just pass

3:13:08that information along to the council

3:13:10by way of informing you.

3:13:12And if they wanted to resign that

3:13:13would be the opportunity for them

3:13:15to tell us so that we could advertise

3:13:16that as an upcoming vacancy.

3:13:18So we could build it into to the process

3:13:21that we already have OK, OK, you have something

3:13:26to add to that I certainly did.

3:13:29Again, being a bit of a historian here,

3:13:32the city council again was clear that automatic appointments

3:13:36should not be done And this is, again, this has what year was

3:13:41revolution over time when the city council has discussed this

3:13:45certainly in the past twenty years, automatic at one point,

3:13:50once upon a time, I think there was actually

3:13:52some automatic renewal when someone ended a term

3:13:54or there wasn't necessarily a council

3:13:57interview for a second term.

3:14:00And then there were some people that may have been appointed

3:14:03or that are automatically renewed that the council was

3:14:07feeling that they didn't necessarily

3:14:08want them to continue or that didn't allow.

3:14:11I mean, the whole reason behind term limits that was discussed

3:14:13by the council in the past was to allow new people

3:14:17to be able to get on boards, commissions and committees

3:14:21and incorporating the committees in that as well.

3:14:23So totally not trying to disrespect people who

3:14:26have served long term But if that is, again, that is

3:14:30something that the council discussed many years ago

3:14:33about why term limits were necessary They just have been

3:14:36inconsistently applied to all of the committee I do

A second committee member gave the concrete case against term limits.

Robin Mitchell had served “on the Park and Rec Commission for two terms — so eight years” and now sits on the Urban Forest Committee.

Her position matched the previous speakers: “I don't believe that there should be term limits on committees.”

And she had standing on the specific change: “I was the one that advocate[d] for the three term limit for urban forest instead of two, because… the expertise that's needed there.”

Her evidence: “we lost some really good expertise because [of] the term limit expirations — and it's a real shame that that happens.” She called the way committees had been discussed “a little bit insulting,” and said it had taken almost six months to seat a new Urban Forest member.

Her generalization: “I think that's true of a lot of the committees.”

A Human Relations commissioner asked how the city could honor new members, and what recourse a commissioner has if staff or the Council discriminate against them, since such complaints end up with city staff.

Later the City Manager gave the argument for turnover: that term limits exist “to allow new people to be able to get on boards, commissions and committees.”

In discussion, the Mayor proposed two-year committee terms renewing automatically with no limit; Rudnick and Quinto favored shorter terms, Quinto again citing “preferential treatment”; Motoyama asked that the Planning Commission and Design Review Board be kept separate. The Clerk said the Council's policy had been not to reappoint automatically.

Significant

The Urban Forest Committee's three-term limit was itself won by a member arguing that expertise was being lost — and she now argues limits should go entirely. The October resolution extends every committee to three terms, twelve years.

35 What reappointment costs captions 3423–3573

3:14:40want to point out, Holly is probably being very reasonable

3:14:44about this, but I can't as a city manager,

3:14:47I do want to point out that any additional

3:14:50if you shorten a term that is going to create additional work

3:14:53for Holly and her team.

3:14:54So having to just go even input letters

3:14:56out for people who do two years that that is a concern of mine.

3:15:01Any automatic renewal again, that was

3:15:04that was an issue in the past.

3:15:05But if there could be an automatic renewal then

3:15:08if there's someone that is serving

3:15:10and the council doesn't have the opportunity maybe

3:15:12to let them and their term.

3:15:14And then maybe not reappoint them,

3:15:16as opposed to having to go through maybe removing them

3:15:18if they're not happy.

3:15:19So there are pros and cons to automatic

3:15:23So you just gave the argument for just staying the same,

3:15:27right.

3:15:28I mean, we're a new.

3:15:29We're a new council.

3:15:31I don't know what what year.

3:15:32The other council.

3:15:33What year was that?

3:15:34No, I'm just trying to I'm just trying to share the history

3:15:37behind why it got here.

3:15:39And what the concerns of the council at the time are.

3:15:41This is totally the will of the council.

3:15:43Yeah.

3:15:43My main concern would be adding staff work

3:15:47And I was wondering why.

3:15:48And automatic would if someone just continues

3:15:50on that adds staff work.

3:15:53If the terms were shorter, that would add staff

3:15:56without because instead of having to renew work

3:16:00with commissioners every four years,

3:16:02our committee members every four years that would

3:16:04have to be every two years.

3:16:05It would add to the process.

3:16:07It would be more for Holly to she runs

3:16:10a database with all of these.

3:16:11So these are these are all I mean, all of these things

3:16:14are I'm just confused as to what additional

3:16:18they should be doing if the same person simply continued on

3:16:23for update years I don't know.

3:16:26I thought that would take away work,

3:16:29would be a similar process to what we do now.

3:16:31Would be more frequently.

3:16:32So would be a higher volume of the individuals.

3:16:35We would have to connect with because it would

3:16:38be a shorter period of time.

3:16:40But we would have to interview them.

3:16:41We wouldn't have to interview them right.

3:16:44Yet at all that would go away already.

3:16:49That's OK.

3:16:50I was just going to go had council member,

3:16:52I think i can't see Merete mind Sorry about that.

3:16:57No, go ahead.

3:16:57I can't see because we're scrolling up.

3:17:00All right.

3:17:02But for our committees, we don't have form seven Hunder heds.

3:17:08We don't have some of the other administrative participation.

3:17:13So in this point we approve membership by consent calendar

3:17:19So it would just give with potentially that process change

3:17:25because it's if the council gave this direction

3:17:29to change the process.

3:17:30Yes.

3:17:31But currently, there is a process in which the individual

3:17:34has to reapply every think.

3:17:39Mayor Fidele is stepped away I can't see everyone either

3:17:44I'm sorry.

3:17:46My battery's running low, so I'm trying to find something

3:17:48to boost it up a little bit.

3:17:50But I can hear you.

3:17:51OK, so the the process reappoint a committee member currently

3:17:56does require the individual to reapply.

3:17:59It requires a committee to vote to recommend reappointment

3:18:03to that individual.

3:18:04And then the council votes on that on consent.

3:18:07We you have there is filing applications

3:18:10with every new term So an oath of office, for example

3:18:14is have to be executed at the beginning of each term.

3:18:17There is data checking to make sure

3:18:19that we have all of the information up to date

3:18:21for what the current terms are when they are set to expire.

3:18:24So a lot of the current work that we already do

3:18:27would stay in place.

3:18:28Someone be replaced by the volume

3:18:30if the council were to reduce what was required

3:18:33in order to reappoint those five, those five bodies

3:18:37or for the committee specifically, the i'm not sure

3:18:47if the mayor is back or not, but I'm going to plug a new place.

3:18:51Yes, OK council member Eagleson had

3:18:55her Did you have a question?

3:19:01Council member, Apison Not a question, but a comment.

3:19:04About that comment.

3:19:10Sorry.

3:19:10Go ahead and do it.

3:19:11Yeah, go ahead, please.

3:19:13OK, the comment that I would make

3:19:16is that in this reappointment, goes on.

3:19:21It doesn't always happen.

3:19:23Sometimes it is It happens.

3:19:27And sometimes it's somebody else's selected

3:19:35So I don't know how you want to deal with that.

3:19:38The reasons that I can think of that sometimes doesn't happen.

3:19:43Is that the person who's being considered is, well, I'm sorry.

3:19:54I agree with the policy direction of the council.

3:20:03Doesn't happen often, but it does happen a few times.

3:20:09Often You mean often you can say it more than once

3:20:12a year, for example so we would not

3:20:20have the ability to do that.

3:20:24And people would kind of own their seat

3:20:28on board or commissioner committee

3:20:32if that were the way we went.

3:20:35So i would prefer that the council sort of sign off on it

3:20:41to not just some, not just the applicant So the applicant

3:20:46would say they Watari and then the council would select them

3:20:53to be in that seat if that makes sense,

3:20:58regardless of how many years.

3:21:00It is And the other comments on this So Holly,

3:21:13is there any changes that you see that we talked

3:21:15about that are productive to help reduce

3:21:19staffing concerns right now?

3:21:24I think my biggest concern in this area

3:21:26is that we're not being sustained in terms of having

3:21:30rules in place that match up with how the committees are

3:21:34being treated.

3:21:34So i think if the council, if it's the will, the council

3:21:38to change the term length and or limit that, they certainly

3:21:43could give me that direction.

3:21:45But what is already in place.

3:21:47There is already a system established

3:21:50for what is in place.

3:21:52It's it would be a request to rightside those few committees

3:21:56who are not currently following the rules that the council has

3:21:59previously adopted.

3:22:01That would certainly be the last time consuming option for staff

3:22:07because we already have those processes established.

3:22:09But certainly the will of the council.

3:22:13So you'd like to just correct the ones that are different

3:22:17and bring them in to make them like the other ones

3:22:20that we already have Correct.

3:22:22My preference would be to take the three committees that

3:22:25are not currently follow the rules that are adopted

3:22:29and write correct to them to properly

3:22:32apply those rules to them, just as we

3:22:34are to the other committees.

3:22:36So that still with an eight year limited, is that correct?

3:22:40Correct.

3:22:43Well, that's kind of easy to do it.

The Council worked through whether removing term limits would save staff work or create it.

Rudnick's assumption: if “the same person simply continued on… I thought that would take away work.”

The Clerk's answer is that reappointment is not automatic: “the process to reappoint a committee member currently does require the individual to reapply.”

Then “a committee to vote to recommend reappointment,” and “the council votes on that on consent.”

Plus the administrative layer: “an oath of office… has to be executed at the beginning of each term,” and “data checking to make sure that we have all of the information up to date for what the current terms are.”

So shorter terms mean “a higher volume of the individuals we would have to connect with.”

Abelson raised the case that makes the reapplication matter: “it doesn't always happen… sometimes somebody else is selected.”

Her concern if that step went: “people would kind of own their seat.”

Her preference: “the council sort of sign off on it — not just the applicant” — so the applicant asks and “the council would select them to be in that seat… regardless of how many years.”

The Clerk's own view of the problem: “we're not being sustained in terms of having rules in place that match up with how the committees are being treated.”

Her least burdensome option: “take the three committees that are not currently follow[ing] the rules that are adopted and… properly apply those rules to them.”

Significant

Reappointment already requires reapplying, a committee vote and a Council vote — the City Manager adds that shorter terms would add staff work. A councilmember's objection is that without the reapplication step “people would kind of own their seat”.

36 A limit that applies only when full captions 3574–3665

3:22:46What are the other.

3:22:47Yeah, that was a lot of discussions

3:22:49were a small change.

3:22:51There.

3:22:52Any other members?

3:22:53I think that's a good idea to move forward with Mayor, if I

3:22:56may go ahead I wan idea that I just had is would it

3:23:03be possible to have a stipulation

3:23:05So it sounds like stack work would be

3:23:07impacted if due to your limits?

3:23:09I think would attract more membership

3:23:11if we had to your limits.

3:23:12But I'm OK with it being four remaining for four year term

3:23:16limits could we have some sort of stipulation

3:23:19if committee is membership full, then it's a two term limit.

3:23:27But if there is vacancies, there are more than

3:23:29welcome to continue and reapply every four years

3:23:36as one would on a committee.

3:23:38So we're not losing members if there's vacancy.

3:23:42But if there's a situation where all fifteen seats are taken

3:23:46and you've had your two terms, then you

3:23:48wouldn't be able to have a third term that it would then

3:23:52that seat would become vacant.

3:23:55Does that make sense?

3:23:58It does.

3:23:58I, I would I would just mention that that would

3:24:03be a bit of a challenge to track in terms of knowing

3:24:07whether someone was eligible to serve

3:24:10on a certain advisory body if there were term limits.

3:24:14But there was an exception that allowed them to continue

3:24:16to serve, perhaps i lost.

3:24:22I was going to make a suggestion and I lost it Do

3:24:26you have any thoughts on that?

3:24:27Why try and get rid?

3:24:32I, I agree.

3:24:33I think that that would be Administrator

3:24:35difficult because then who gets to stay and who doesn't.

3:24:40I think that yeah, I don't know.

3:24:45I think that something, again, I'm

3:24:47just speaking from a historical perspective here.

3:24:49I think that the idea behind.

3:24:52I think what council over Ableman

3:24:54said, having people who have seats forever is something

3:24:58that we're trying to figure out how to deal with,

3:25:01because there are some folks that have been on committees

3:25:03for Litoral decades and others who have to adhere to a term

3:25:08limit and that is inclusive of committee

3:25:10I understand that boards and commissions are

3:25:12a little bit different there.

3:25:13That's been a lot more you know, that's been a lot more

3:25:17formalized This is different.

3:25:19And so the question really is with the council if you.

3:25:22And if you don't want to have term limits, then tell holly

3:25:26and we'll make we'll we'll put that into place.

3:25:29If you want to have term limits.

3:25:31I think that just trying to be mindful of the consistency

3:25:34issue again, if we're that is, as Holly pointed out,

3:25:39there's a bit of an inequity there,

3:25:40some people who may have been recently appointed

3:25:42versus people who have been on for decades They're not they're

3:25:46not necessarily treated the same way.

3:25:47Right.

3:25:48So that's what we're really trying to correct,

3:25:52is And this would also be prospective So

3:25:57if this was something that the city council decided to do,

3:26:00and put the two term limit in place or three term limits

3:26:05or what have you, whatever that means that it would go forward

3:26:09so that people who have been serving

3:26:12would be able to then be eligible for those next two

3:26:14terms.

3:26:15It's not going to be retroactive So if you put this in place,

3:26:18you're going to kick all these people off instantly.

3:26:20That would not be the case.

3:26:21That's not what is suggesting.

3:26:23We would be suggesting that going forward, essentially

3:26:27people would now that are that don't adhere to term limits

3:26:31right now would be going for with complying

3:26:34and then that would be consistent

3:26:36with everything Again, that's the easiest thing to do.

3:26:39But, you know, again, absolutely.

3:26:41I totally respect the people who have been working here

3:26:44for a really long time and doing some really great stuff that

3:26:47is up to the council to decide if they want them to remain

3:26:51or not.

3:26:52And then the last thing I would say

3:26:53is committees sometimes full, sometimes or not.

3:26:56And that also can depend on the time and the place of the year.

3:26:59So that's you know, I think that would

3:27:02be the difficult challenge for us to be able to administer

3:27:05that council member.

3:27:10Avildsen Yeah to start, I have question, which

3:27:16is which I think I just lost, because I

Rudnick proposed a conditional rule, and staff explained why it would not work.

Her idea: “if committee membership [is] full, then it's a two term limit. But if there [are] vacancies, [members] are more than welcome to continue and reapply every four years.”

The aim: “so we're not losing members if there's [a] vacancy” — but if “all fifteen seats are taken and you've had your two terms, then… that seat would become vacant.”

The Clerk's objection was administrative: it would be “a bit of a challenge to track in terms of knowing whether someone was eligible to serve… if there were term limits but there was an exception.”

The City Manager's addition: “who gets to stay and who doesn't?” And committees are “sometimes full, sometimes not — and that also can depend on the time… of the year.”

She restated the underlying inequity: “there are some folks that have been on committees for literal[ly] decades, and others who have to adhere to a term limit.”

And gave a reassurance: any change “would also be prospective… it's not going to be retroactive. So if you put this in place, you're going to kick all these people off instantly — that would not be the case.”

Her framing of the choice: “if you don't want to have term limits, then tell Holly and we'll put that into place.”

Her own respect for the incumbents: “I totally respect the people who have been working here for a really long time and doing some really great stuff.”

The City Manager set the committees against the boards and commissions, which are “a lot more formalized.”

Significant

A term limit that applies only when a committee is full was proposed, and staff warned it would be “a bit of a challenge to track” — eligibility would change with the vacancy count. Any change is confirmed prospective, so nobody serving is removed, which is the assurance the October grandfathering provision delivers.

37 Five committees captions 3666–3961

3:27:19had my hand up quite well.

3:27:22The Oh, how many committees are there?

3:27:27We currently have five committees.

3:27:29And that's not including uS Citizens

3:27:31Street Oversight Committee that's

3:27:32attached to a prior measure.

3:27:35They have different rules, but that I

3:27:38wouldn't put that with That's to me, it's it is its own thing.

3:27:45The so there's so most of the committees

3:27:51operate in the same way.

3:27:53It's the two that are different, not

3:27:55the three So why are in making the three like the two

3:28:00rather than two.

3:28:01Like the three zero reason the the current regulations

3:28:08the city council has adopted the reason that they're

3:28:11being treated the way they are However,

3:28:14some have not properly The rules apply to them.

3:28:18So because the ordinance that the council says that these are

3:28:23the rules that will be followed unless the resolution has

3:28:26been adopted, I don't want to say otherwise.

3:28:29Those three committees that I mentioned earlier

3:28:32should be adhering to that general

3:28:35because the council has not adopted a resolution that

3:28:37says otherwise To two of them.

3:28:49I believe when they were at one point

3:28:54had a had something to back up what they were

3:28:58doing because we went through a long time

3:29:02ago making that happen.

3:29:05And so i'm a little confused about that.

3:29:10But the so i'm just thinking about a lot of different ideas

3:29:22all over the place.

3:29:23And my view is maybe we're coming from this

3:29:25on a different maybe Holly used to come up with exactly

3:29:29a program that would help you cut through the baloney

3:29:33and presented to us.

3:29:34So we can comment on it.

3:29:36We already know it might save you time.

3:29:38And then we can add things that we might think at that time.

3:29:42Our additions to what you would improve

3:29:44your work rather than just coming up with things

3:29:48that aren't accepted.

3:29:50Mayor I would say that that is exactly what we are presenting,

3:29:54an action.

3:29:54We would prefer that option one is

3:29:57that all of the terms, the two term

3:30:00limit with the exception of the force committee,

3:30:02because that's an a separate resolution,

3:30:05the two term limit apply to all the committees

3:30:07that Holly is able to implement That that is our recommendation

3:30:12And if if the council.

3:30:13So chooses to give us that recommendation,

3:30:16we would bring that back to you in a resolution form

3:30:18And this could be discussed further at that time.

3:30:20But that is exactly what is two four year terms Yes.

3:30:27Because, again, the ordinance, the ordinance

3:30:29is states that all boards and commissions are two year

3:30:33terms or two four year terms.

3:30:38And the the ordinance further states that unless separately

3:30:42decided by resolution committees need

3:30:45to conform to that ordinance, that is

3:30:48not what's happening in Jordan.

3:30:52Correct.

3:30:52Me if I'm wrong, if the council were to give me direction to do

3:30:56that, I'm not even sure it would require resolution as it's

3:30:59already been established that that is the rules that council

3:31:03once applied We just simply it has not been

3:31:06correctly applied for decades.

3:31:07And I did not feel comfortable changing at this point in time

3:31:12because it has been done differently for so long

3:31:14without counsel.

3:31:15At a minimum, giving emotion, directing

3:31:18you to make that correction it's got to be because we did

3:31:24not to do that, because as long as I've been around,

3:31:29for example, the Committee on Aging has been the same

3:31:33So the Committee on Aging predated

3:31:37I bet that Resler it did.

3:31:42But once the ordinance was amended

3:31:44that should have been applied to the the Committee on Aging

3:31:47and all the committees and if it wasn't and I remember

3:31:52it specific specifically not being because there

3:31:55were some real interesting people

3:31:58on that committee at the time.

3:32:02And by interesting, I mean, people

3:32:04you'd want to have on the committee who are these are

3:32:09people who are no longer alive, but they I mean,

3:32:17a out of it, thinking about people who contribute in the

3:32:21contributed in the very meaningful ways that they did

3:32:26And you wouldn't want to have them limited

3:32:33So when was that ordinance that we're talking about past?

3:32:36What how how old is that last updated is the right word

3:32:44Last updated I'm just I'm just we're

3:32:52trying to abide by an old ordinance

3:32:55from a previous council and we do have we could

3:32:59it says or provide direction on alternative rules here.

3:33:02So I'm just confused if we're supposed to give new ideas

3:33:08or just conform to old.

3:33:11It appears that the last time this was amended

3:33:14was in twenty thirteen.

3:33:17It was amended in nineteen ninety to two thousand seven

3:33:20twenty thirteen and twenty twenty Yes,

3:33:25we would have said we would have to do further research as

3:33:27to the particular the particular part of the statement

3:33:32that says committee shall be governed by the same criteria

3:33:35as boards and commissions unless otherwise prescribed

3:33:38by council resolution.

3:33:40I do not know when that was added we would need to I could

3:33:44tell you that I did get back as far as nineteen ninety two

3:33:47in that clause was still in the ordinance.

3:33:49So it's been there for quite some time.

3:33:54Council Member Retin-A. I've How about if we

3:33:59were to go with option one.

3:34:00They have every committee have three term limits.

3:34:04So we are aligning ourselves with the urban forest

3:34:07Committee and the motion that we made earlier this year.

3:34:10So that it's twelve years of service four year term.

3:34:13That's three term limits or three term limits.

3:34:19Think 3 2 four year, three or four year twelve total.

3:34:24If you're on a committee I'd be happy to make that motion.

3:34:29If that that includes Committee on aging.

3:34:32Yes, OK.

3:34:35All of them And now part now what we're saying

3:34:43are not recommending that that would start

3:34:46with the March 1st terms that are

3:34:49coming up in twenty twenty two.

3:34:50So if that was the action of the council,

3:34:53I would bring a resolution back so that because it would be

3:34:56required to modify the current rules

3:34:58and then we would implement that with our term upcoming terms

3:35:02in March of twenty, twenty two So

3:35:04would the people who were you got on This

3:35:11applies to all groups, right?

3:35:12Not just boards It would be Bords

3:35:16that this would be for the five committees,

3:35:18I believe is what council would do, suggesting that it would be

3:35:21for the five committees as well as

3:35:23the Crime Prevention Committee.

3:35:24So all of them would be any member that's applying

3:35:27to renew started March.

3:35:30That is one of the five right So it's

3:35:35a uniform policy that if any committee there's

3:35:40three three, four year terms.

3:35:42And so for our members who have been serving for decades, when

3:35:46is renewed, then it should start that that clock So we're

3:35:52kicking off our expertise.

3:35:54We are retaining the.

3:35:55But then it's going to be a twelve year limit

3:35:59three or four now, correct?

3:36:03I think that's fair.

3:36:04And I'd be happy to make that motion I'd be happy to.

3:36:07Second it's been moved by rudnick

3:36:14and seconded by Agapito Can we have a roll call Fidele?

3:36:21I may put something.

3:36:23So I council member, Apison I can't remember.

3:36:28I can remember.

3:36:29I think I mentioned carries Is there

3:36:33anything else in this section?

3:36:34Hollerith you want to review and get some feedback on Mr. That.

3:36:40That gives me the direction I need.

3:36:42I will return to the council with a resolution

3:36:44to implement that change.

3:36:46And in that I will be very specific in terms of doing

3:36:49an initial term for those members who don't currently

3:36:52have a four year term window so that we

3:36:55can stagger those terms.

3:36:57And then implement the three terms from there Appointments

3:37:03and the ideas, concepts and the two bullets

3:37:07to be considered So for this one,

3:37:13I would just remind, since it's a lot of content we've gone

3:37:16over tonight, the one thing one specific thing I am requesting

3:37:20is clarification.

3:37:21At a minimum, of what the three meeting rule is for committee.

3:37:25So that we can properly document what that

3:37:27is 3 consecutive meetings, three meetings

3:37:30within six months of application whatever

3:37:34is the world, the council.

3:37:35But that is my one request just to clarify that.

3:37:37So we can formally adopt that process at the very least i'm

3:37:41I'm hearing that there was a lot concern about delay getting

3:37:45people on board with a 3.

3:37:47I like a consistency.

3:37:49I'd like to suggest that they be required to come to two

3:37:53meetings, both committees and commission

3:37:57is the only support for that.

3:37:58So that they understand the workings

3:38:00of the committee or the commission's

3:38:03and what they want to be on.

3:38:04And that I support it.

3:38:06Great A second that.

3:38:07OK, a move by council member Avildsen and seconded

3:38:11by council member Rodney may, if I may,

3:38:14I would still need just a little bit of clarification

3:38:16So would this apply to boards, commissions and commissions

3:38:23As I said committees and commissions

3:38:25to each committees you went down limit and I apologize.

3:38:32Can you clarify if that should be Kimi consecutive?

3:38:36Twenty within a period of time?

3:38:38So that they can properly apply it consistently across all,

3:38:43let's say, to consecutive, let's say, to consecutive,

3:38:47if possible within the last six months

3:38:52Councilman I just can we.

3:38:55I do.

3:38:55Would like to clarify this for everyone

3:38:58Every advisory body committees and yes.

3:39:03Boards, because we have to boards the design review board

3:39:06in the financial Advisory Board who those reports and I, I,

3:39:14I'm not sure why i would recommend

3:39:17that they be consistent across all boards,

3:39:19commissions and committees.

3:39:20OK, I would like this.

3:39:21I would like to conclude that for consistency.

3:39:25I think that there's where they should not be included.

3:39:28Good deal better.

3:39:29There is there's maybe one exception that I can think of.

3:39:33And the Planning Commission and sometimes we've

3:39:36we have a need for the there kind of a different kind

3:39:40of a commission than the others They have certain

3:39:49I would call them legal functions And what happens

3:39:53sometimes is that we people are termed out

3:39:57out because of our term limits.

3:40:00And then there's we can't get them replaced very fast.

3:40:06And we've got a project waiting We're

3:40:08going through the approval process like a big project.

3:40:13It could be for example, needs to get

3:40:16to the planning committee and the planning committee

3:40:19is not fully populated.

3:40:22Council member, Avildsen, don't you

3:40:24think that someone who wanted to be on it's important they

3:40:27commission as a planning commission

3:40:29should have at least attended two meetings

3:40:31to see how it operates?

3:40:34I think that would be a good idea.

3:40:36However in putting barriers in front of out,

3:40:40I think well, we have this thing we i have a motion for all

3:40:47of the boards and commissions now with, as Karen mentioned,

3:40:51and we have a second.

3:40:53Can we have a roll call, please?

3:40:55I apologize.

3:40:56Minford you made the motion.

3:40:57Is that correct?

3:40:59Yes.

3:41:00And I thought, Janet, May 2nd but I'm not

3:41:02sure she wants to make it now.

3:41:03I think.

3:41:04But whisper to Yes, To two visits to the commissioner.

3:41:10Yeah.

3:41:11OK, Olaf So let last three months That's fine.

3:41:19OK, ok.

3:41:20So to clarify for the record, the motion

3:41:23is for all boards, commissions, and committees

3:41:27to have attended two meetings within three

3:41:30months of applying for a position on that advisory body.

3:41:35Is that correct?

3:41:36Yes.

3:41:36Move by the mayor and seconded by council member able son,

3:41:40can we have a roll call vote council member?

3:41:44Was that incorrect?

3:41:46What, three months is a little bit aggressive?

3:41:49I would be more comfortable.

3:41:51If it was attending to meetings within six months.

3:41:55Because there are a especially with some of these meetings

3:41:58that don't necessarily reach quorum

3:42:01that it would be very challenging for folks

3:42:03to abide by that So I want to be able to give a little bit

3:42:07more flexible to the public.

3:42:10So i have a question about vacation.

3:42:15Yes.

3:42:15Council member I would just like to go back

3:42:18to what city clerk has said that it's three

3:42:21months within application.

3:42:23So if you know you're going to apply that,

3:42:26you would try to get to the meetings within three months.

3:42:30And so that's regarding of when you get appointed.

3:42:34But it's when you apply your application would

3:42:37be valid for a certain period.

3:42:39Of time.

3:42:39Pollies that I understanding.

3:42:42Is that correct?

3:42:43There's not currently anything it says when an application

3:42:46file would expire.

3:42:47I would i would be very supportive of having something

3:42:51that says that an application on file is good for, for example,

3:42:55a period of one year.

3:42:56It does make it much easier to do that process.

3:42:59Especially for people who are attending meetings that

3:43:03haven't yet met that threshold, because right now people do

3:43:07apply.

3:43:07And then they attend meetings for committees

3:43:10Then they go on the committee agenda for appointment

3:43:15If we extend this to boards and commissions,

3:43:18they would have to attend those meetings prior to being

3:43:20scheduled for an interview.

3:43:21I think with the city council So I

3:43:23do think if you did a period of time

3:43:26around when they submitted application.

3:43:29It could be within three months before or after

3:43:32they apply it Really what the council wants to do.

Abelson asked for the basic number, and the answer frames everything else.

The count: “we currently have five committees” — not counting the Citizens Street Oversight Committee, which is “attached to a prior measure.”

So the term limit debate concerns a handful of bodies, of which three were operating outside the adopted rules.

The distinction matters for what the Council can reasonably standardize: commissions were created by ordinance with defined processes, committees by resolution with rules that accumulated.

The discussion turned to the application itself — whether to ask for meetings attended, more detailed background, or supplemental questions for particular bodies.

The Clerk explained that the ordinance has long said committees follow the same terms as boards and commissions unless a resolution provides otherwise, but that had not been applied for decades. Rudnick moved that every committee, including the Committee on Aging and the Crime Prevention Committee, have up to three four-year terms, twelve years in all, starting with the March 2022 appointments; it carried. Abelson then moved that applicants to every board, commission and committee attend two meetings, within the preceding three months, before appointment.

Significant

Five committees, three of them operating outside the rules the Council had adopted — the scale of the problem the session set out to fix. Commissions were created by ordinance and committees by resolution, which is why one set is formalized and the other accumulated its practice.

38 Questions for the interview captions 3962–4138

3:43:36But I think it should be specific so that it's clear

3:43:38for us, the staff in terms of how to implement

3:43:41those requirements consistently But the point

3:43:48of having them go to the meetings ahead of time

3:43:52is to understand how the board commissioner committed works

3:43:57before they fly and we're considering them

3:44:03So it could be somebody could have it would mean

3:44:07the person would have to apply for the plan The commission

3:44:11say, when they don't have a clue what that means the plant

3:44:14And that's why we want them to go look at it

3:44:17and then we're hoping they'll having gone

3:44:20to a meeting they'll realize that it's what they want

3:44:24or it's not what they want.

3:44:26Before doing the application and taking our time and your time

3:44:34would be easier to administer if the meeting

3:44:36attendance requirements had been met prior to them

3:44:39applying that way.

3:44:40Once they apply and and I've received that information then

3:44:44I can simply move forward with the interview process,

3:44:47because that meeting requirement would have already been met I

3:44:51think you're with me right Yes.

3:44:53I think that Mr. Soldier has something

3:44:58to add I don't we haven't.

3:45:03We had something on the table for three months.

3:45:05Can we move to a vote on that?

3:45:08Can your unmuted.

3:45:10I'm sorry, mayor Fidele.

3:45:12I've just been i've just received an email from one

3:45:15our civil service commissioners who reminded me that the Civil

3:45:17Service Commission only needs a call, which in twenty years

3:45:22has been twice.

3:45:24So I would also request that this exempt the civil service

3:45:29deal Thank you.

3:45:31Thank you, Michael.

3:45:34And thank you, Michael.

3:45:37OK, and I handling the major committee correctly

3:45:47that is that is established by a completely separate ordinance

3:45:50that was part of the ballot measures

3:45:51that is not included within this perfect So, number two,

3:45:58we have we have a motion.

3:45:59Now, Holly, correct If I'm wrong,

3:46:01that is the applicant must have gotten

3:46:08must have gone with those exceptions.

3:46:10Listed to two meetings within a three month period.

3:46:15Before the application occurs to to be reviewed.

3:46:20Interviewed for that committee permission

3:46:25that that is the motion that was on the table.

3:46:28If there was not an amendment for a six month period,

3:46:34council member rejected.

3:46:35You want to do a friendly amendment for six months

3:46:38or I favored the three month.

3:46:40And I would friendly amendment for six month OK,

3:46:45can we have a roll-call vote So what are we voting on?

3:46:51I don't get it.

3:46:53You said, OK, you said, OK, so and they Efendi Amendment would

3:46:58require the person who made the motion in the second

3:47:00to agree to amendment.

3:47:01Otherwise, it would be a substitute motion.

3:47:04We would vote on the substitute motion first and if that fails,

3:47:07then we would proceed to vote on the first motion

3:47:14So what we're voting on now.

3:47:16So I mistakenly accepted the friendly amendment.

3:47:19I would have council member rubberneck make our own motion.

3:47:25Then I make a motion for before submitting an application

3:47:32motion to attend to the board's commission or committee

3:47:36meetings in a six month period Do I have a second

3:47:47OK, OK, we're back in a second.

3:47:52Hearing.

3:47:52No second.

3:47:53We're back to the original motion

3:47:56which is about over a three month period Correct.

3:48:01So you need an attendant attendance

3:48:04within six months of application for commissions and committees

3:48:08with the exception of the Civil Service Commission.

3:48:10And the Station Street Oversight Committee to treat three months

3:48:15with three krp in three months.

3:48:17Correct.

3:48:18Six I apologize within three months

3:48:23is what we are voting on now.

3:48:26OK, Fairford Mayor Fidele motioned and a second

3:48:30by council member Abels and so Mayor Fidele,

3:48:33I council member Apison Oh, my apologies.

3:48:38Potemkin till I council member Apison I can't remember much.

3:48:43I Councilman bramnick, I motion carries.

3:48:47Thank you.

3:48:48You Holly.

3:48:51Anything else that section that you need some input on.

3:48:57I have the minimal reaction that I was requesting So if there is

3:49:02anything else that the council is interested in discussing,

3:49:05they could give me that direction

3:49:07But otherwise, this does this does meet the clean that I was

3:49:10hoping to get from this area.

3:49:13And we don't have to get into any paul policy

3:49:18about personal questions and what is

3:49:20asked in the interview process.

3:49:21Is that correct?

3:49:22That's the that's only if the council is

3:49:25interested in pursuing any of that.

3:49:31What?

3:49:33Oh, I'm sorry.

3:49:35I mean i only if we want to do it, should we do it?

3:49:39Because that will say so instead of the prepared questions

3:49:43that we have, we have to give direction on that specif

3:49:47A point at this juncture It would be helpful just

3:49:52to give consensus if that was the will of the council

3:49:56to develop questions that were specific to the different like

3:50:02bodies.

3:50:03I liked your idea about specific questions

3:50:05and for allowing the council to get

3:50:07more personalized with their questioning

3:50:10for vetting purposes.

3:50:12And then carrying in developing, we would

3:50:16we want a council to develop those questions

3:50:18and work with staff to develop those questions?

3:50:20Why do you think we should we would

3:50:22be able to do that for them?

3:50:25Well yeah, if previously staff did develop the questions

3:50:30for council to look at, I don't know that there was

3:50:33ever a formal approval process.

3:50:36I this is something i believe that maybe perhaps we could

3:50:41work with the staff liaisons with each commission

3:50:43or commission and committee and maybe provide

3:50:46some ideas to the council I don't think that if there were

3:50:49if there were to be changing any questions that that necessarily

3:50:52requires council action And I also agree with you,

3:50:56Mayor Fidele I think the idea of being able to have follow up

3:50:59questions and kind of the same way

3:51:01we would do a job interview for someone spacy

3:51:04would be certainly, I think the council could

3:51:08implement that rather easily.

3:51:11Does anyone oppose council member?

3:51:14Anderson, I don't oppose that.

3:51:16But I have a comment or question on the

3:51:19if I look at the questions that we have now,

3:51:22the word equitable is i've gotten where I can pretty

3:51:27much pronounce it in flowing sentence,

3:51:30but it's a hard sentence to go over

3:51:34and i notice the applicants have the same problem

3:51:38and so I think it would be helpful if the at minimum, the

3:51:49the council worked with the commission or committee staff

3:51:55to do the questions If we can tailor them to each board

3:52:00commission or committee can motion to that extent

3:52:09I made the budget that I wouldn't say a motion

3:52:12would be needed.

3:52:12I think that gives me directions.

3:52:14I can move it on developing this it

3:52:17questions for the different advisory bodies.

3:52:19We we can work through that process without a formal motion

3:52:23OK and yes, Mohtarma thank you very

3:52:33I do have a question about your appointments process.

3:52:36I think you pointed out that a lot of the different committees

3:52:39are all doing different things like subcommittees or chair

3:52:42or recommendations to us and did you want any direction from us

3:52:48to streamline any of that?

3:52:50Are we as council OK with each committee handling it,

3:52:54their particular way?

3:52:57I don't want to let that slide by without giving you the input

3:53:01you might would like from us.

3:53:04So as as you move forward and making

3:53:05all these processes better I do appreciate the question.

3:53:09Council mohtarma the appointment process.

3:53:12Aside from the meeting attended it's,

3:53:15I would say, fairly consistent amongst our boards, commissions

3:53:18and committees They each type of advisory body

3:53:22does follow the same process.

3:53:24The one exception really is the environmental quality

3:53:29Committee.

3:53:29That's a very active committee of 15 members of our membership

3:53:33is typically full and very engaged

3:53:35and so them having adopted a process of doing

3:53:39kind of a subcommittee for interviews,

3:53:41I think it's perfectly fine.

3:53:42I don't think that it needs to that level of consistency

3:53:47is not necessarily need to occur amongst the committees,

3:53:49but the the process itself is fairly fairly similar.

3:53:55So I appreciate it, but I think I have the direction that I

3:53:58would request at this time.

The attendance motion was restated as the Mayor's, seconded by Abelson: two meetings within three months before applying, with the Civil Service Commission and Citizens Street Oversight Committee exempt. Rudnick's six-month alternative found no second, and the Mayor's motion carried.

The Council settled how applicants would be questioned, and did it without a formal vote.

Fadelli's interest: “specific questions… allowing the council to get more personalized with their questioning for vetting purposes.”

Who writes them: previously “staff did develop the questions for council to look at,” though “I don't know that there was ever a formal approval process.”

The proposal: work “with the staff liaisons [for] each commission and committee” to develop body-specific questions.

And the comparison offered: follow-up questions “the same way we would do a job interview.”

Abelson raised a practical point about the existing form: “the word equitable… it's a hard sentence to go over, and I notice the applicants have the same problem.”

Her request: tailor the questions “to each board, commission or committee.”

The Clerk confirmed no motion was needed: “that gives me direction. I can move on developing… questions for the different advisory bodies.”

Motoyama then asked whether the varying appointment practices should be streamlined. The answer: apart from meeting attendance it is “fairly consistent,” with Environmental Quality the one exception — “a very active committee of 15 members… typically full and very engaged,” whose subcommittee interviews she considered “perfectly fine.”

Significant

A question on the existing application is hard enough to parse that applicants struggle with it — noticed by the councilmember reading their answers. Environmental Quality is the one committee described as typically full, and it is also the one that interviews its own candidates before recommending them.

39 Authority to remove captions 4139–4199

3:54:01OK, thank you OK, and they are the first for the comments

3:54:08on Section No to oK, oK, so then just

3:54:18to recap for section number three

3:54:21the resolution the draft resolution in the packet

3:54:26is providing me authorization to go

3:54:29through the process of providing a specific written

3:54:33notice of non-compliance for our oath of office ethics,

3:54:37sexual harassment prevention training and conflict

3:54:39of interest to our members.

3:54:41So that once we have essentially a process

3:54:45when they're appointed they're provided

3:54:47information of what their requirements are

3:54:48and what those dates are.

3:54:50And then if they don't complete it by the due date,

3:54:53we're following up with them trying

3:54:55to get them to comply with the regulations

3:54:57that council has put into place.

3:54:59However, there's no way to enforce that This resolution

3:55:03would give me authorizing action to give them kind

3:55:05of a final notice, giving them thirty days to comply

3:55:08or they would be removed from the appointment that they they

3:55:12had been appointed to by council And as Mayor, Fidele mentioned,

3:55:16that resolution can be amended to include that notification

3:55:20of non-compliance to go both to the advisory body member

3:55:23as well as the members of city council

3:55:25so that they know that that person is not complying

3:55:28with the filing requirement and then

3:55:30it would allow me to do the process of removing

3:55:32that individual without having to come

3:55:34before council for formal action to remove that individual I

3:55:40hear a motion.

3:55:42I have yes, because my relative First question

3:55:47it's a question I would like to make a change to the resolution

3:55:51I think the ethics portion on the resolution

3:55:56only applies to certain advisory bodies.

3:55:59And I was wondering if we could possibly make the ethics reform

3:56:03apply to all advisory bodies I would request that it

3:56:09instead of a revision to this.

3:56:11I would that would actually be a motion directing me to return

3:56:15with a revision to the resolution that identifies only

3:56:19certain advisory bodies to be modified

3:56:22if the will of the council is to have all advisory body

3:56:25members adhere to that filing requirement,

3:56:27then that would come back to the separate resolution amending

3:56:30what's currently in place.

3:56:32OK and that would go a number for Hollier

3:56:37additional direction.

3:56:39Yes, that is correct.

3:56:41OK, submitted by Mohtarma further I

3:56:46was also wondering if we could include that the sunshine

3:56:49and hanbok orientation training is

3:56:51a mandatory training as well.

3:56:54So I think maybe we can I would move approve the resolution

3:56:58currently before us.

3:56:59And then ask staff to bring back an additional resolution

3:57:04amend and add the ethics requirement

3:57:06as well as the sunshine and and have very good.

3:57:14And I would I would support two latter things.

3:57:16You mentioned Do we have a motion comes.

3:57:19Remember how much you move that motion is a second.

3:57:23I seconded Oh, oh, I'm sorry.

The third section produced the one resolution the study session adopted outright, alongside motions directing staff to return with others.

What the draft does: give the Clerk “authorization to go through the process of providing a specific written notice of non-compliance for… oath of office, ethics, sexual harassment prevention training and conflict of interest” filings.

The gap it fills: members are told their requirements on appointment and chased if they miss the date — “however, there's no way to enforce that.”

The mechanism: a final notice “giving them thirty days to comply, or they would be removed.”

With Fadelli's amendment, that notice goes “both to the advisory body member as well as the members of city council.”

The effect: the Clerk can remove someone “without having to come before council for formal action.”

Motoyama then asked for two extensions. First, ethics: the requirement “only applies to certain advisory bodies,” and she asked “if we could possibly make the ethics” requirement “apply to all advisory bodies.”

That needs a separate resolution, since the current one “identifies only certain advisory bodies.”

Second: that “the sunshine and handbook orientation training” become “a mandatory training as well.”

Her motion: approve the resolution before them, then “ask staff to bring back an additional resolution” adding both. It carried.

Significant

The ethics training requirement covering all thirteen advisory bodies originates in a councilmember's motion here, and returns as one of the three October resolutions. Until then the requirement reached only about four bodies, and there was no enforcement mechanism other than for the conflict-of-interest form.

40 Whatever it likes captions 4200–4505

3:57:26I can't see gabe because it's down the bottom

3:57:30And Mayor kento seconded the motion.

3:57:33Can we have a roll-call vote on me?

3:57:36Or Feneley?

3:57:37I can tell.

3:57:39I can't remember Avildsen I can't remember Chamma.

3:57:45I can't remember.

3:57:46I think I mentioned carries and is there,

3:57:52are there any other removal policies

3:57:55that we want to discuss or change or make right now.

3:57:59It's in the hands of the El Cerrito City Council

3:58:02We can do it at any time.

3:58:04Does that pose any problem or any other question?

3:58:08Yes, council member, I can't figure out how

3:58:11to get my hand on the screen.

3:58:13The question i have, if the council

3:58:19wants to remove somebody or let's

3:58:22say that somebody on the committee

3:58:25has requested the the council do it,

3:58:30We have any structure for that When I take entity

3:58:36with me or at this point, the city council has the ability

3:58:40to do whatever it likes.

3:58:42That is in the ordinance The Council as we noted

3:58:46in the staff report could, for example, consider a removal

3:58:51of a board commissioner or committee member

3:58:55at a special meeting in the same way you consider

3:58:58interviews and appointments.

3:58:59So it could be at a special meeting

3:59:01or it could be on a consent calendar.

3:59:03At a regular council meeting, or it could be a policy

3:59:05item in a city council meeting.

3:59:07I believe that the current language in the ordinance

3:59:11is good for the council to determine on a case

3:59:14by case basis.

3:59:15What they all prefer, what you all prefer to do,

3:59:18should that happen In my twenty years here,

3:59:20that has not happened.

3:59:21So it is an incredibly rare process.

3:59:25And so being super prescriptive about exactly how it should be

3:59:31done i think is not necessary.

3:59:33Since you already have that authority

3:59:34to make that decision.

3:59:36So what I would recommend is if that comes up,

3:59:39that the city council at the time

3:59:42will actually would be in the same way any other agenda

3:59:45item is determined where a council

3:59:47member would work with the mayor to determine an agenda item.

3:59:51And what that would be.

3:59:52In the same way, if there is a commissioner

3:59:54that has come again through a council member feeling

3:59:58that they need to be removed or a committee

4:00:01has requested the council that a member be removed

4:00:05that the mayor at the time is able to work with that person

4:00:11or that the requester to determine

4:00:15what would be the best move for that specific member

4:00:19in question.

4:00:20OK so no action I'm hearing from this council Can scroll here.

4:00:30OK no we do have a number for here for additional direction

4:00:39And Councilman remotely.

4:00:41You had two items Do you want to reiterate this time?

4:00:47Sure.

4:00:48Thank you, Mayor.

4:00:49I would like our city clerk to come back

4:00:53with amending resolution to make the required

4:00:58payment for ethics training for all advisory body

4:01:02members as well as sunshine.

4:01:04And the handbook orientation Ostreicher

4:01:13It was moved by council member Mohtarma seconded by a council

4:01:17member Avildsen can we have a roll-call vote

4:01:24Fidele, I Napranum Kantele.

4:01:27I can't remember Avildsen I can't remember moltmann I

4:01:32council member Budnick motion carries a anyone

4:01:38else have any other additional directional concepts

4:01:43for our staff.

4:01:45We did have some good comments from L.M. About how many people

4:01:50how many committees could anyone serve on an you know,

4:01:55I don't, I I think, two or three is enough.

4:02:00There are some that I have four or five seats

4:02:02that may be a bit too many.

4:02:05Is they wouldn't have any feelings about that.

4:02:10There are some people on thighed Well, maybe for now,

4:02:19that's OK with everybody.

4:02:22OK, I respect the volunteer some of those people,

4:02:26but i wanted to get this question out there

4:02:31and we in some other body.

4:02:33Yes, yes.

4:02:34I mean, I do have a question about are there committees

4:02:38where you shouldn't be on something else.

4:02:41If you're on That was ls second question.

4:02:45This one to make sure it is from Stass perspective,

4:02:50if there are conflicts that way, or if you are for example,

4:02:54serving on in a minister commission that maybe shouldn't

4:02:58be on a whole bunch of other stuff

4:02:59because it might cause conflict of interest or other things.

4:03:04So maybe on the Planning Commission and the design

4:03:08board, those to need to be unique unique positions

4:03:13Aren't those by the attorney No, but they are reviewed.

4:03:20I mean, or for appointments to boards and commissions.

4:03:24The City Council does review every single one of those

4:03:27still at the time that the council

4:03:29is interviewing that person.

4:03:31That would be certainly the time for council member

4:03:33to bring that up if they had a concern,

4:03:35I would have to look in the zoning code

4:03:37to see whether there may already be a provision in there.

4:03:41The Derby that you can't serve on the planning

4:03:44commission in the Derby.

4:03:45I do not know that.

4:03:47I mean, what I remember is the one with we started have doing

4:03:53such things as you know, I don't some point along the way

4:04:00the the city attorney did rule on all the questions

4:04:07that would come up.

4:04:09And it was primarily well, I think that i think the planning

4:04:16and design to do is you can't be on both.

4:04:22And we do have requirements for Form seven hundreds for those

4:04:26for particular commissions or boards

4:04:29that deal with either quasi judicial issues

4:04:33or in the case of the arts and culture, Commission,

4:04:35that they oversee the public art fund I believe

4:04:38in the case of the Fab because they are reviewing city

4:04:42financial information and budget So those conflict of interests

4:04:49rules already apply.

4:04:50But at the end of the day, it's up to the city council

4:04:53to ensure that as they're reviewing the interview,

4:04:56people the people that they're interviewing and reviewing all

4:05:00the boards and commissions that they have responsibility for,

4:05:03that that would be something that would be taken

4:05:06into account for someone who's pointed about Mittie Committees

4:05:12are different because the council doesn't interview them,

4:05:16but they do have the council does have veto power

4:05:18So if there was a concern again in my time here,

4:05:21I don't remember this ever happening But

4:05:22if there was a concern about a potential appointment

4:05:26of a committee member.

4:05:27The city council does have the ability to pull that

4:05:29off consent and discuss it and vote for or against a person

4:05:34So that, again, i don't remember that ever happening.

4:05:37But the council has that to do that right now.

4:05:40Conversations about can you be on this one On that one?

4:05:47And it was always referred to the city attorney

4:05:51because it's basically a legal question Yes, I can share

4:05:55a little bit of information.

4:05:56So we do i believe it's in our municipal code.

4:05:58But we do have a restriction of no more in two members serving

4:06:02on a design review board that also serve

4:06:05on the planning commission.

4:06:06And we have received, as council member Eagleson

4:06:09mentioned we have gotten some advice

4:06:11from the attorney in the past.

4:06:14The they have looked at whether a person could

4:06:17serve on the planning commission and

4:06:18the financial advisory board.

4:06:20And there was bound to be the short answer is that there was

4:06:23no conflict because that is an advisory body

4:06:26only if there's policy or sorry, it does not make policy.

4:06:32And it does not have final decision making authority

4:06:35that the Planning Commission So what the advisory body is

4:06:40responsible for is a big a big indicator as to whether or not

4:06:44it would be a conflict for them serving other advisory bodies

4:06:48But other than those few the restrictions for planning

4:06:52and Yerby and restrictions for members who live

4:06:56in the same household, serving on the same advisory body,

4:06:59I do not believe there are any further restrictions in terms

4:07:02of serving on multiple advisory bodies Perhaps

4:07:07what might be a good way to address

4:07:09this is that when an applicant when someone applies,

4:07:13that this would be part of the city clerk's

4:07:17putting together the application process

4:07:20and making sure that the council is alerted if they are already

4:07:23on a committee or if they're if their spouse or someone

4:07:26in the same household.

4:07:28So that would be part of the information

4:07:29that is provided to all of the council members upon interview.

4:07:34I believe that's probably already being done,

4:07:36but it is that is something that again, that is for the council

4:07:41to consider as they're making the appointments they

4:07:44need to have all of that information.

4:07:47So that they can make an informed decision making

4:07:53I think what being alluded to by council member

4:07:55Wilson as the prohibition on holding to public offices

4:07:59And so in cases where someone is applying for a position on more

4:08:04than one board, we would work with the city

4:08:07clerk and the staff liaison to get the information,

4:08:10to do an analysis as to whether there's

4:08:12a prohibition on holding those two offices,

4:08:14whether because there's conflicting duties or one

4:08:18has supervisory authority over the other.

4:08:20But if those issues were to arise we would work and do

4:08:23an analysis to make sure that there isn't

4:08:26an issue with a person holding multiple boards and commission

4:08:30positions Anyone any other issues mayor

4:08:45Pro Tem do you have any other comments on this?

4:08:48I don't want to lose track of your comment about staff

4:08:53and how many meetings do we have I didn't know if you have

4:08:56any further comments on like I like to direct

4:09:00our staff on that and to have Karen Pincus look at that,

4:09:05because we are looking at the future and then

4:09:10and things don't look good.

4:09:11And we're looking at a long time, short term.

4:09:14We look fine.

4:09:15But looking at the five year and after five years so let's

4:09:23look at that non-preferential choice is to look at that

4:09:27and and plan ahead.

4:09:29You know, right now we can do it, but you know,

4:09:34we have other things that we'd like to have staff do and and

4:09:39such as the studies that we requested

4:09:42and you know, I don't want to overwork

4:09:45our staff and right now, with the cuts

4:09:49that we made they are overworked.

4:09:51So and you know, and looking at the five, ten year you know,

4:09:59forecasts we would have to make more cuts.

4:10:03So I just want everyone to know that.

4:10:06So i truly believe that we should definitely look at,

4:10:11you know, let's face it, many of these committees

4:10:15are not able to have a quorum over and over and over again.

4:10:19And that's that's how it's been in my seven years

4:10:23on the council Yeah, I've been.

4:10:26And I know many of see the same things in the same committee

4:10:30when we are the lazy So that's been very frustrating.

4:10:35To show up and not have a quorum So I

4:10:40would agree that I think our staff

4:10:42and Karan Pinkas should look at this.

4:10:45I if there's a staff issue which is the mayor pro tem,

4:10:49as mentioned it's real, then we need to we

4:10:51need to deal with that.

4:10:52But let's get realistic appraisal of that.

4:10:57I believe that these committees and commissions are just

4:10:59the basis of our democracy in the city and bringing people in

4:11:04is something we need to protect at all costs.

4:11:08Unless staff can get the work done then if, in fact we

4:11:11move in that direction, I would really be for a time limit

4:11:14just to see, like in one year.

4:11:16How goes what happens.

4:11:17But I look forward to some feedback

4:11:20from the city manager on that Any other comments

4:11:28we Holly, anything right now, whatever we're

4:11:33going to get back from you.

4:11:34Maybe this gives us a little time to think about.

4:11:36And the other tweak or any other thing

4:11:39that we might want to add right That's the one thing that I

4:11:44thought of after council made the motion regarding

4:11:48the application the meeting attendance

4:11:51would the council be open to me, adding

4:11:55a clause in that resolution for the application once

4:11:58submitted to be kept on file for like a period of one year.

4:12:05And then if someone was interested,

4:12:06they would have to reapply?

4:12:08I would support if that helps you.

4:12:11And that's a good process.

4:12:12Ms. Support that.

4:12:15I'll work that into the resolution then.

4:12:17I do have a comment on that.

4:12:18That doesn't mean they're automatically next in line,

4:12:22though, so they shouldn't be told that maybe we didn't

4:12:29select them because we didn't think they were

4:12:32appropriate for the Yes, I I also

4:12:38and it would be helpful for people to submit an application

4:12:42when there's not a vacancy.

4:12:44If we hold an application and then a vacancy doesn't come up

4:12:47and in a situation where someone is potentially interviewed

4:12:51and not appointed, that would give the application

4:12:54an end date that would require the person to show

4:12:57continued interest to reapply.

4:13:01Otherwise, I have some sometimes applications that are

4:13:03on file for two or three years.

4:13:05And there's no activity, not a lot of communication

4:13:07from the individual.

4:13:08It's really hard to gather whether that person is still

4:13:12interested or not that it may also be that we're

4:13:15not interested Right.

4:13:17So then that that would help with having an expiration

4:13:21of that application on file That person

4:13:23could reapply for two years and so I've seen many times

4:13:30where we're being shown an application Your Honor,

4:13:34we your honor, we need a motion to extend the meeting.

4:13:37I move that we extend the meeting for fifteen minutes

4:13:42then weaponry to a second run.

4:13:50It should be short after this or right at the very end.

4:13:53Let's have a roll.

4:13:53Call me if only I may have Potemkin

4:13:57till I can't remember Ibbitson.

4:13:59I can't remember my yama I can't remember now case.

4:14:06OK janet, if you have your questions

4:14:10answered on that I think so.

4:14:14So it's clear that they're going up

4:14:17at because we have annual term exploration's once a year.

4:14:23That's why I would suggest a period of one year that way,

4:14:26if someone submits an application during the year.

4:14:29And there's no vacancies, they still

4:14:31would The people on the council might not even be the same.

4:14:36So it's like we need to reinterview

4:14:40anybody Maybe sometimes anyway.

4:14:44So it's confusing when these people that we rejected stay

4:14:49on the list so to speak, of this would

4:14:54give an opportunity for that application on file,

4:14:57then to expire Right.

4:14:58It could be maybe six months if that's the well,

4:15:04the council certainly could be right here in motion.

4:15:13I make a motion for six months Our second OK position is all

4:15:24if there's nothing else We're at the point where we

4:15:27can get to the city council and local regional liaison

4:15:33assignments.

4:15:34Holly, are we fine?

4:15:35Can you go off produce a beautiful document for us?

4:15:40Will?

4:15:40I will be returning with several documents for you now.

The last exchange establishes what the Council's removal power actually is.

Abelson's question: if the Council wants to remove someone, or “somebody on the committee has requested the council do it — [do] we have any structure for that?”

The answer: “at this point, the city council has the ability to do whatever it likes.”

Removal takes a simple majority and no stated cause.

Fadelli had framed further changes to removal policy the same way: “it's in the hands of the El Cerrito City Council. We can do it at any time.”

The City Manager added that in her twenty years a removal had not happened, so a prescriptive process was unnecessary. On serving on several bodies, staff said the code allows no more than two Design Review Board members to also sit on the Planning Commission, with other conflicts analyzed case by case. Quinto asked the City Manager to review how often bodies meet given staff workload.

The direction given this evening returns as three resolutions on 19 October: term limits raised to three terms, an attendance requirement for applicants, and ethics training extended to every body.

Liaison assignments followed, and the meeting adjourned after four hours.

Significant

The Council can remove any advisory body member at any time by simple majority, with no stated cause. All three resolutions return on 19 October, alongside the announcement of thirty-five vacancies.

41 An outgoing division president captions 4506–4549

4:15:43Oh, no.

4:15:44Yes.

4:15:45No, Mr. Couple.

4:15:46OK, I'm back to back work on.

4:15:50OK are there any commissionership

4:15:54i do Thank you.

4:16:00Thank you.

4:16:01Mayor Fidele I just want to say this is I'll

4:16:05be the outgoing ePA division president.

4:16:09And I'm looking forward to welcoming our new

4:16:13incoming president on Thursday.

4:16:15Day at the League of California Cities

4:16:17And it was an honor to be represent the East Bay

4:16:22And thank you to my colleagues here

4:16:25on the council and staff and city manager

4:16:28Karen Pinkus for all your help.

4:16:31And in assisting and everything that

4:16:34you do for Cal City's of grateful to our council

4:16:40here and glad to and thank for supporting that resolution.

4:16:47And I worked really hard on that And and I'll

4:16:50be voting on that for Paul.

4:16:52So thank you, Paul, for all your work

4:16:55and and supporting the resolution.

4:16:58And there's a committee that we met for months

4:17:04to get all the work done.

4:17:05And we truly are creating a more inclusive

4:17:12and and we're looking at equity and we're going to our board

4:17:18in the future will look like the state of California,

4:17:20some very, very proud of the work that was accomplished

4:17:24by the the president, which is the council

4:17:29member and the city of El Centro.

4:17:31And I look forward to welcoming Contra Costa.

4:17:34Second president Maria Allegri who was the first.

4:17:38And we're going to have Cindy Silva as president from Contra

4:17:42Costa County from Walnut Creek and Welcome to welcome her

4:17:46thursday at our East Division.

4:17:49And Friday on the vote So thank again Any other council

4:17:56communications now.

4:18:00Thank you all very much.

4:18:02Busy I think we got some stuff done

4:18:05And let's all go to Sacramento and learn lots of things

4:18:07to be better.

4:18:08City council and city managers all meeting

4:18:12is adjourned at eleven three.

Liaison reports closed the meeting, and Quinto's was a handover.

His position: “I'll be the outgoing” East Bay “division president,” welcoming “our new incoming president on Thursday… at the League of California Cities.”

His thanks went to colleagues, staff and the City Manager “for all your help… [with] everything that you do for Cal Cities.”

And to Fadelli for the resolution going to the League's annual conference that week: “I worked really hard on that… and I'll be voting on that for Paul.”

The work behind it: “there's a committee that we met [with] for months to get all the work done.”

Its subject was the League's own governance: “we truly are creating a more inclusive” organization — the bylaws changes he had described earlier in the evening.

The meeting adjourned after four hours.

Significant

The city's representative on a statewide body of 482 cities had spent months on its own inclusion bylaws — the same subject the Council assigned to its Human Relations Commission the same evening. His regional and statewide board seats are named in December as his distinguishing contribution.