Regular City Council Meeting May 19, 2020

Remote, via teleconference · 4 hours 22 minutes · 4476 caption units

Council: Greg Lyman, Mayor · Paul Fadelli, Mayor Pro Tem · Janet Abelson · Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto · Gabe Quinto

Staff: Karen Pinkos, City Manager · Mark Rasiah, Finance Director · Alexander Grams, Assistant City Manager · Sky Woodruff, City Attorney

Presenting: John Gioia, County Supervisor · Craig Hill, NHA Advisors · Nancy Hetrick, Management Partners

Two residents write in alleging that a councilmember has repeatedly attacked constituents on Facebook — “there is now a pattern.” Neither names him. The Council then adopts two labor agreements and the management compensation resolution, and works through the scoring framework that becomes the fiscal response plan.

These summaries are written with AI. An AI model (Claude, by Anthropic) drafted the summaries, titles and notes from each meeting’s closed captions, and they were checked against those captions. They can still be wrong, leave out something that matters, or weigh things differently than you would.

  • Captions are automatic and unedited. Names and words are often misspelled or misheard, and quotations carry those errors.
  • Who is speaking is often unclear. The captions rarely say, so a speaker’s name can be missing or wrong.
  • Not the official record. This is an independent site, not the City’s. For what was decided, rely on the adopted minutes.

Check anything that matters against the captions beside each summary, or the City’s recording. How these pages are made

SSignificantXCross-referenceNNote

Contents

22 sections
  1. 01Drive-by celebrationsN
  2. 02The cost of renting on San PabloN
  3. 03“Denigrate one of our fine citizens”S
  4. 04“There is now a pattern”SS
  5. 05The first shelter order in the countryS
  6. 06A hundred and thirty million from reservesS
  7. 07“As in years past”
  8. 08Not a solution for structural deficitsS
  9. 09The rating, and what it costsX
  10. 10A driveway for two housesN
  11. 11A pine, and the lots next door
  12. 12The finding runs backwardsS
  13. 13The applicant's caseS
  14. 14Received and approvedS
  15. 15Forty-five full time, thirty-eight part timeS
  16. 16“Risking their lives”S
  17. 17Thirty-three, plus twoS
  18. 18Everything on the tableS
  19. 19A framework, before the numbersS
  20. 20Mandated, and by whomS
  21. 21Zero to fourS
  22. 22The bottom line of the spreadsheetS

01 Drive-by celebrations captions 1–172

0:20:47Ackerman just give me a second.

0:20:49Just trying to figure it out.

0:21:34Looks like we're ready to start.

0:21:35Is that true.

0:21:37Yes ma'am.

0:21:38We are ready to start when you are excellent.

0:21:41The says may 5th.

0:21:47But I know it's May 19th today May 19th.

0:21:51Regular Meeting of the LC Radio City Council

0:21:53is called order at 7 0 9.

0:21:56Will the City Clerk please call roll me a lineman.

0:22:00I'm here May I pretend that Ellie

0:22:05may pretend finale present council member Wilson here.

0:22:11Council member Patty Wilkie meadow resident council member

0:22:16to present.

0:22:17We have a caller excellent before we begin tonight I

0:22:21will report out from our special city council meeting that was

0:22:24held tonight starting at 5:00.

0:22:27Public comments that were made were

0:22:30received regarding that special item prior to the meeting

0:22:33begin.

0:22:34There were no reportable.

0:22:37There were no other comments.

0:22:40We had two items that we dealt with.

0:22:43One was negotiations with our labor negotiators

0:22:47and we gave direction to our labor negotiator

0:22:51The other was potential litigation

0:22:54and there's no reportable at this time.

0:22:58That brings us to item number one telecom

0:23:00conference and public comment.

0:23:02Instructions Thank you Mayor.

0:23:05First City Council members and staff that

0:23:07are participating directly through

0:23:09the teleconferencing platform.

0:23:11Please remember to keep your microphones muted

0:23:13whenever you are not speaking.

0:23:14Any web cameras that are enabled will

0:23:16be visible on the public livestream

0:23:19except for direct chat to me as the host for technical issues

0:23:22the chat feature has been disabled.

0:23:24If you wish to speak please use the rain

0:23:26raise hand feature by hovering over

0:23:28your name on the participant list

0:23:30or you can wave on your camera for the mayor

0:23:32to see that you would like to speak for those calling in

0:23:35via phone you will not have these features available to you

0:23:38but you can verbally request the mayor for permission

0:23:40to speak for members of the public participating from home.

0:23:44The period for submitting public comments

0:23:45will remain open until announced prior to the City Council

0:23:49taking action on an applicable item

0:23:51submitted comments will be read into the record comments

0:23:55for items not on the agenda.

0:23:56The consent calendar and presentation items

0:23:59will be heard during agenda item number three communications

0:24:02from the public.

0:24:04All other comments will be heard at the time

0:24:06the agenda item is discussed.

0:24:09Comments can ways the email to city clerk at c i dot E L

0:24:15that should Rito got C a dot U S or by voicemail 2 5 1

0:24:200 3 0 6 2 5 5 8.

0:24:24When submitting comments please be sure they are identified

0:24:27in the subject line or stated in the voicemail

0:24:29as public comments not on the agenda or public comments

0:24:33followed by the agenda item number

0:24:35please include your name and city of residence

0:24:37for the record.

0:24:38Please note that all information provided in public comment

0:24:41including phone number called with email

0:24:43address and any other personal information written or stated

0:24:47is subject to disclosure on the broadcast

0:24:49of the teleconference meeting following the meeting.

0:24:52All comments read into the record

0:24:54will be posted online with supplemental materials

0:24:56and will have personal information redacted.

0:24:59This concludes my instructions.

0:25:01Mayor Lyman we're ready to move on to the next item great.

0:25:09That concludes.

0:25:10Item number one teleconference and public comment

0:25:12instructions.

0:25:13Item 2.

0:25:14Council staff communications are there any staff communications.

0:25:19Yes.

0:25:21You very much.

0:25:23Karen pink is city manager.

0:25:24Just wanted to give a quick report out on the latest goings

0:25:28on with the public order.

0:25:31As many of you probably know that county health worker has

0:25:34recently been modified a couple of different ways

0:25:38including some some provisions to allow

0:25:42for drive by celebrations.

0:25:45For those of you who have also read

0:25:46Hi seniors please stand by their plans that are going

0:25:50to be made in that regard.

0:25:54And also some alleviation of some

0:25:57of the recreational opportunities as I

0:26:01had indicated.

0:26:02My city manager update of last couple of weeks.

0:26:06Right now the health order is still meant

0:26:09to go through May 30 first.

0:26:10All of our facilities remain closed

0:26:13but we are indeed looking to prepare for and for reopening

0:26:17both from a staff perspective and organizational perspective

0:26:21how we're going to protect our employees

0:26:23as well as how we're going to be serving the public where again.

0:26:27I've mentioned this before looking at some phased

0:26:30approaches to how this all goes depending on how the county

0:26:34health order is modified.

0:26:36We do expect that there will be some modifications

0:26:39that air from the county.

0:26:41Oh hello supervisor Jaya that's next.

0:26:45Eek.

0:26:46So or this week so we're looking forward to that we're

0:26:49planning for that.

0:26:51The biggest brightest news that I think a lot of our residents

0:26:54were very excited about is that we have reopened the recycling

0:26:59center on a modified schedule.

0:27:01It's going to be open or it is open now from Tuesday

0:27:04through Saturday tend to 4:00.

0:27:07We had a soft opening last week and without even saying a word

0:27:11we had an awful lot happy recyclers show up.

0:27:14So I think a lot of you who have been doing a lot of home

0:27:20improvements and wanting to get rid of your household

0:27:22has space.

0:27:23We're very eager for it for that to happen so we're

0:27:26pretty excited about that.

0:27:28Again please stay tuned.

0:27:29We have our Web site l e l dash Serino dot

0:27:33org slash of nineteen We will continue to update

0:27:37that on on any additional openings

0:27:40any additional provision of city services again

0:27:43city staff is still working for the most part

0:27:45so please feel free to call an email if you

0:27:48have some services available speaking

0:27:50of some of our amazing snap.

0:27:52I just want to point out that May 17th through to be

0:27:54third National Public Works.

0:27:57Public works is you know a lot of people

0:27:59talk about our first responders being police and fire

0:28:02but you can't discount public works on how they come in

0:28:05and they are able to do a lot of the same work

0:28:07in particularly in this emergency.

0:28:10They have been amazing.

0:28:11And so I just want to publicly say thank you

0:28:13to our public works staff each and every one of you have been

0:28:16a wonderful asset to our community

0:28:20and we just really thank you for your dedication.

0:28:22So if you see a public work pepper out

0:28:25as you're all walking about exercising appropriate

0:28:28you could wear masks give away to the public waves

0:28:32the Public Works staff they're doing a great job

0:28:34and with that.

0:28:35Thank you.

0:28:36Your Honor concludes my report Great.

0:28:40Any reports from council members I'm seeing shakes from two.

0:28:47Paul has his hand Paul.

0:28:50Yes.

0:28:51Just briefly I participated say affordable housing Week

0:28:55celebrations kick off and Dan Kalb the city councilman

0:28:59from Oakland was honored.

0:29:02So That was good news.

0:29:04Thank you.

0:29:05All right.

0:29:05I will do the standard announcements

0:29:07that I've made for the last couple of meetings.

0:29:09Don't forget to participate in the census.

0:29:10It's very critical for funding both at the county and the city

0:29:14level.

0:29:15So please do so and tackle the city manager's remarks.

0:29:20Please acknowledge our staff as both the frontline safety

0:29:25workers as well as our frontline desk

0:29:28and Frontline the kind of workers.

Before that, the Mayor reported on a closed session held at 5 p.m. The Council had given direction to its labor negotiator and had discussed potential litigation, with nothing to report.

The City Manager reported changes to the county health order.

What had been permitted: “some provisions to allow for drive by celebrations,” with plans being made for seniors, and “some alleviation of some of the recreational opportunities.”

The order still ran “through May 31st,” with “all of our facilities remain[ing] closed.”

What the city was preparing: reopening “both from a staff perspective and organizational perspective — how we're going to protect our employees as well as how we're going to be serving the public.”

Her method: “phased approaches to how this all goes.”

The recycling center had reopened on a modified schedule, Tuesday to Saturday. The City Manager also thanked public works staff for National Public Works Week. Fadelli reported on the Affordable Housing Week kickoff.

The meeting ran four hours, from 7:09 to 11:09 p.m.

Note

City facilities remain closed while a phased reopening is planned. In June 2021 the reopening of City Hall is still being talked about for after 4 July (1 Jun 2021).

02 The cost of renting on San Pablo captions 173–299

0:29:30Thank them whenever you can.

0:29:33That concludes item 2.

0:29:34Council staff communications will move on

0:29:36to account to Item 3 communications

0:29:39from the public remarks are typically

0:29:41limited to three minutes.

0:29:42I've been using two and a half minutes which we've

0:29:45been able to successfully get all comments in

0:29:47or most comments in within two and a half minutes

0:29:50So I'm announcing that at this time the public.

0:29:54The period for submitting public comments or item three which

0:29:57is comments from the public on items that

0:30:00are either on the consent calendar

0:30:02or not on the agenda at this time is closed.

0:30:07City clerk are there public comments Thank you ma'am.

0:30:13We do have a few.

0:30:16Please remind us who submitted their comments

0:30:18in advance as well.

0:30:19Yes.

0:30:20And so we wouldn't be doing Cordell any favors if we didn't

0:30:24at least touch a clinic whose items are worth mentioning

0:30:28so if you would you scroll down to his comments people at home

0:30:31can see them real quick.

0:30:32Great.

0:30:32Certainly.

0:30:34And Mr. Is the only one who submitted

0:30:37items in advance of the twelve o'clock deadline

0:30:41and he did ask for.

0:30:44He wanted to share the cost of renting a business based

0:30:46in El Sarita is tremendous.

0:30:48I've spoken with the owner over Atlas liquors

0:30:50and he has told me that he pays fifteen thousand dollars

0:30:53a month which is an acceptable And 2 he

0:30:55requested that Andy Katz would return back to the city council

0:30:58with an update on the needs of a hospital in West County.

0:31:01Great thank you.

0:31:02Are there any additional public comments We do

0:31:05have just three tonight.

0:31:06Great.

0:31:07Let's go ahead with two and a half minutes.

0:31:08Kim OK.

0:31:18OK we'll begin with IV first submission for items

0:31:22not on the agenda starting the time now regarding

0:31:27disaster preparedness.

0:31:28This certainly run andI advantageous utilization of

0:31:32volunteerism and just briefly.

0:31:37Everyone OK.

0:31:40I mean I'm going to start the time over.

0:31:42I trust the city council and city manager have updated Elsa

0:31:45Reno's response plans to disasters such as earthquakes

0:31:49urban wild wild land fires pandemics

0:31:52flooding landslide etc..

0:31:55As there was talk at the last city council

0:31:57meeting about abandoning the city program as a cost cutting

0:32:00measure I caution against it as it occurred to management

0:32:03to reduce the costs of the CERT training program

0:32:06by taking the training online such as in the form

0:32:10of a managed Resume program or similar.

0:32:12Instead of paying overtime to for a 24 hour CERT

0:32:17training program please consider utilizing trained volunteer

0:32:20presenters such as Berkeley Albany

0:32:22and Richmond already use online search.

0:32:25Training is especially relevant do

0:32:27the during due to the FIP as well as reductions

0:32:31to financial costs.

0:32:33The hands on part can be done in one

0:32:34final in person after training utilizing

0:32:38social distancing etc..

0:32:40Additionally has management updated

0:32:42its outdated disaster plan.

0:32:44Where can a resident find a current copy.

0:32:47Does it involve the utilization of Volunteer

0:32:49Resource resources such as Sir.

0:32:52What is the status of Elsa Trudeau's wild land

0:32:55urban interface fire evacuation plan.

0:32:58Where would the evacuation centers be located

0:33:00and how will they be stopped.

0:33:02Are there shelters identified and are there trained

0:33:05shelter managers available.

0:33:07What is our modified earthquake disaster plan.

0:33:09Given Nicole midnight team situation today

0:33:13I took a webinar earthquake county alliance Bay Area

0:33:17regarding address address addressed the impact

0:33:21of covered 19 friend disasters What if an earthquake

0:33:25occurred during a pandemic.

0:33:26The program included presenting sessions on emergency

0:33:29management during coping 19 pandemic by Mary Ellen Carroll

0:33:34executive director of the San Francisco Department

0:33:36of Emergency Management over 19 as a teachable moment

0:33:40for inclusion communities by Roxanne Crawford of FEMA.

0:33:45Presenters were also from earthquake county

0:33:51Country Alliance Bay Area is El Serino planning

0:33:54for such an occurrence.

0:33:56Have you addressed disaster planning in light of a pandemic

0:33:59or do you plan to do so well.

0:34:00Eldorado take advantage of the tremendous amount of quality

0:34:04volunteer human resources in our neighborhoods

0:34:07by establishing an El Serino Volunteer Resource mission

0:34:11with an embedded Disaster Service subcommittee

0:34:13in case submitted by Donald Simon L.

0:34:16Street our resident next comments are

0:34:20submitted by Kathy handbills starting her timer now

0:34:24as canceling staff.

0:34:25No I have been fairly involved in this use

0:34:28local groups since 2016.

0:34:31I have met with several of you over time

0:34:33to discuss various projects.

0:34:35I feel like that with those that have been receptive to meetings

0:34:38because some council members ignore such requests.

0:34:41We have disagreements but always in general

0:34:44been either able to work through them

0:34:46or to keep things from being personal

0:34:48as much as I have criticized council and staff.

0:34:50I have tried very hard to avoid any personal attacks as I do

0:34:54believe that most council members love their city

0:34:56and are doing the best that they can.

0:34:58Even if I disagree with what that may look like as city

0:35:02representatives I believe council members should hold

0:35:04themselves to the highest level of professionalism

0:35:07and tried to listen to constructive feedback

0:35:09and see if there is anything in the feedback

0:35:12that perhaps could be true.

0:35:14I have seen several council members ask questions

0:35:16in meetings that I know were raised to them by the public

0:35:19and I have appreciated those efforts.

0:35:21That is a positive.

0:35:23Now for the negative at the last meeting

Public comment opened with a resident relaying what a business owner had told him.

The subject: “the cost of renting a business [space] in El Cerrito is tremendous.”

His source: “I've spoken with the owner” of Atlas Liquors, who “pays fifteen thousand dollars a month.” He also asked for an update on the needs of a hospital in West County.

The Mayor had cut comment to two and a half minutes, which he noted had been getting everyone in.

Written comments submitted by the noon deadline were displayed on screen.

The clerk then read the remaining comments into the record.

The first comment read aloud warned against dropping the CERT program to cut costs. It suggested online training with volunteer presenters, as Berkeley, Albany and Richmond use. It asked whether the disaster plan had been updated, where the wildland-urban interface evacuation plan stood, and how the city would handle an earthquake during a pandemic. It proposed a volunteer resource commission with a disaster service subcommittee.

Note

A resident relays that a local liquor store pays $15,000 a month in rent. Another comment asks the city to keep CERT training going online with volunteer presenters rather than cut it.

03 “Denigrate one of our fine citizens” captions 300–409

0:35:25there were several statements by council members that felt

0:35:28attack attacking of the public.

0:35:30You may not agree with what we are

0:35:31saying but I think overall an active public is

0:35:34a positive thing.

0:35:36I understand you feeling that you need to protect your city's

0:35:39bat but perhaps you could make some state make statements

0:35:42to that effect without taking talking down

0:35:45to the public many of whom have spent

0:35:47substantial time researching some of these issues.

0:35:50Last week one council person took it upon himself

0:35:53to denigrate one of our fine citizens

0:35:55and a group that has advocated for progressive causes.

0:35:58In a comment on a Facebook post I was appalled

0:36:01when I read his comments.

0:36:03This comments to blame a group for the financial mismanagement

0:36:07of the city is appalling.

0:36:09To call out where someone used to work

0:36:11and use that as a weapon against them is awful.

0:36:14This is not the first time this council

0:36:16member has attacked a member of this group in public.

0:36:19None of this would be personal and I would expect council

0:36:22members to hold themselves to a higher standard instead

0:36:25of behaving in the same bullying manner

0:36:27that we see daily from the president.

0:36:29If there is not an ethical violation

0:36:31there seems to be no recourse to this behavior

0:36:34except to make a public it and vote accordingly

0:36:36in the next election and I hope that those council members that

0:36:40do hold themselves to higher standards

0:36:42could encourage their colleagues to do the same.

0:36:44Submitted Kathy Handel Serino comments received from a ailing

0:36:51banks starting in the time now City council members and city

0:36:55manager I have been following this city council and city

0:36:58manager's actions in response to the auditor's report that came

0:37:01out in October It has been seven months

0:37:04and we have seen no concrete action taken.

0:37:07The biggest step we have taken so far

0:37:09is eliminating the Fourth of July festival

0:37:12which we would likely have done anyway due to cope at 19

0:37:15as well as cutting library hours.

0:37:17These are both relatively small cuts that negatively impact

0:37:21Elsa readers taxpayers but do not

0:37:23make much of a dent in the budget deficit

0:37:26The city has agreed not to increase some salaries

0:37:29but have not worked hard to do decrease them.

0:37:32I've also listened to several city council meetings

0:37:34where there seems to be a lot of confusion

0:37:37and no clear understanding of where we

0:37:39actually stand with the budget.

0:37:41This concerns me residents one transparent city.

0:37:45We want to take part in the decision making process make

0:37:48the decision making about cuts.

0:37:51We deserve a virtual town hall where

0:37:53we can give citizen input on what we value and want

0:37:56to keep going.

0:37:57We deserve to receive clear information

0:37:59on what work the staff has done not

0:38:02just what they are planning to do to address

0:38:05the financial crisis.

0:38:06There is not enough outreach to residents

0:38:08to let us know where we stand.

0:38:10Fiscally we should not have to be breathing over this city

0:38:14council and city manager shoulders

0:38:16to make sure that they are informed.

0:38:22We do have a few additional submissions

0:38:36and this next submission is from Marlene George starting

0:38:40her time now I was disappointed to read a recent email

0:38:46by the fire chief suggesting the vegetation management program

0:38:49would not be fully enforced during the current fiscal year

0:38:52vegetation management particularly reducing the fuel

0:38:55ladders climbing up the huge forest

0:38:57sized trees presents a real fired up fire hazard

0:39:01to the homes and Elsa veto.

0:39:03Several months ago Mike L. Serino FISA

0:39:05presented a resolution to this City Council

0:39:08requesting wildfire prevention be declared

0:39:11a top priority for this city.

0:39:13We were told to hold off until the results

0:39:15of the strategic planning process

0:39:17were completed and tabulated.

0:39:19This process was undertaken and completed

0:39:21but no report with finding and solid data

0:39:24was published in data that underlines the priorities are

0:39:28important and will help guide resources education schools was

0:39:34listed as a top priority and used to restore as many library

0:39:38hours as possible.

0:39:39No one knows what the public has to say

0:39:41about wildfire prevention.

0:39:43Many community members in terms of library hours

0:39:46wanted salaries cut and not services

0:39:49full enforcement of the vegetation management program

0:39:52in 2019 as in my opinion.

0:39:54Help to achieve a culture change in El Sarita.

0:39:57As my husband and I walk the hills of El Serino

0:40:00we see many residents clearing their properties

0:40:02of dry meets dead trees and flammable foliage.

0:40:06This is not a time to pull back It would send

0:40:08a bad message to the community.

0:40:10The council needs to come up with the funds

0:40:12to fully enforce the vegetation management program just

0:40:15like they did for the library hours

0:40:18Those of us who live in a high high fire hazard severity zone

0:40:22pay property taxes that are not directly invested

0:40:25in our neighborhoods our property and sales tax pay

0:40:29for the general welfare of Elsa Rita such as the library

0:40:33recreation and other services.

0:40:35If there is a wildfire and Elsa veto the budget reduction

0:40:39under reductions undertaken in the last few months

0:40:42will be an exercise in futility.

The first of two written complaints alleged a councilmember had attacked a resident on Facebook.

The general objection first: at the previous meeting “there were several statements by council members that felt… attacking of the public.”

Her position on that: “you may not agree with what we are saying, but I think overall an active public is a positive thing.”

And her concession: “I understand you feeling that you need to protect your city staff, but perhaps you could make statements to that effect without talking down to the public — many of whom have spent substantial time researching some of these issues.”

Then the specific allegation: “last week one council person took it upon himself to denigrate one of our fine citizens and a group that has advocated for progressive causes, in a comment on a Facebook post.”

Her reaction: “I was appalled when I read his comments.”

Two particulars. First, “to blame a group for the financial mismanagement of the city is appalling.”

Second, and more personal: “to call out where someone used to work and use that as a weapon against them is awful.”

And the pattern claim: “this is not the first time this council member has attacked a member of this group in public.”

A second comment said that, seven months after the auditor's October report, no concrete action had been taken. The biggest steps were canceling the Fourth of July festival and cutting library hours. It asked for a virtual town hall and clearer information.

A third comment objected to a fire chief email suggesting that the vegetation management program would not be fully enforced that year. It said wildfire prevention deserved the funding the library hours had received, and that after a wildfire the recent budget reductions “will be an exercise in futility.”

Significant

A councilmember is alleged to have denigrated a resident and a local political group in a Facebook comment, including by pointing to where the person used to work. The writer objects to the attack being personal. It is the first of two such letters read that evening.

04 “There is now a pattern” captions 410–501

0:40:45There will not be an Serino.

0:40:46No one saw the pandemic.

0:40:48I mean did they submitted by marveling George Elsa read

0:40:51our resident I believe this is the final one we

0:41:05have at this point.

0:41:07Submitted by Sherry dropper starting her time now.

0:41:13City council members have spent many hours trying

0:41:16to craft a letter that in many ways

0:41:18I should shouldn't have to write.

0:41:20I shouldn't have to tell you that elected officials should

0:41:22try to listen to their constituents

0:41:24not attack them on social media.

0:41:26So why do I have to write this letter.

0:41:28I'm writing this because there is now a pattern that

0:41:31has emerged three individuals who are also members

0:41:34of Elsa RINO progressives.

0:41:36I've been repeatedly disparaged by one councilmen in the latest

0:41:40incident a member simply offered objective information that

0:41:45countered an assertion being made.

0:41:47This person was met with an aggressive subjective attack

0:41:50by the council member.

0:41:51I am also reminded that at the last council meeting

0:41:54other members of the community appeared to be publicly

0:41:57disparaged because their criticism of staff and council

0:42:00actions on the budget.

0:42:02Whatever happened to the word public and public policy.

0:42:06This city council should not run like an exclusive club.

0:42:09It should be an elected body with an energetic community

0:42:12that is willing to engage and discuss

0:42:15but to be able to do so.

0:42:16All parties have to have access to information and information

0:42:20needs to be accessible.

0:42:22The managerial class needs to manage not escape.

0:42:28The public needs to be informed not chastised.

0:42:30The city council needs to listen and not lecture

0:42:33and most of all city officials should understand

0:42:36that although we may have at the highest levels of government

0:42:40vindictive or bullying behavior this

0:42:42is not what we expect from our city

0:42:43council members and Elsa rito.

0:42:45We are in the middle of a pandemic.

0:42:47The fact that I had to write this letter

0:42:49as I said at the start is quite embarrassing.

0:42:51Among everyone.

0:42:52Let's take the gloves off put on some creative hats.

0:42:55Open up our minds.

0:42:57Let down the defenses and get real with the numbers.

0:42:59That's all we're asking.

0:43:00Get real please.

0:43:02Submitted by Sherry Grosvenor one last check.

0:43:07That does conclude the public comments

0:43:09that we have at this time May your line in your new

0:43:29did and here you hear you speaking again.

0:43:38I think you have to be a newbie okay.

0:43:41Are good.

0:43:41Now I can hear you.

0:43:43Oh it still shows muted at my end.

0:43:45There we go.

0:43:47I want to thank the public members of the public

0:43:49for singing those comments.

0:43:51We should take all comments from the public.

0:43:55With as well-meant and well submitted

0:43:59an does several of them had good suggestions for us.

0:44:03That concludes item 3 communications from the public.

0:44:05We'll move on to item for adoption

0:44:08of the consent calendar.

0:44:09We have one item on the consent calendar

0:44:12which is item 4 A which is the fiscal year 19 20.

0:44:17Third quarter cash investment which

0:44:21I'm going to see if I can pull up

0:44:23real quick because believe it says that we have quite

0:44:28a bit of money in the bank.

0:44:30We have a ten point one million dollars in the bank so

0:44:35that is worth pointing out.

0:44:38Item for a any questions or is there a motion to adopt

0:44:45the consent calendar Go ahead.

0:44:52Are you moving.

0:44:53I'm nothing.

0:44:54Excellent.

0:44:54Under the adoption consent calendar item for a fiscal year

0:44:581920 3rd quarter cash and investment record second

0:45:04I think Rochelle got their first game so motion

0:45:06by Olsen seconded by part Okamoto Can

0:45:08we have a roll call please.

0:45:10Beer Lyman.

0:45:11Yes Ken some bad beer infidelity.

0:45:17Name Freedom fidelity I think you.

0:45:22Council member Wilson I can't remember part locomotive right.

0:45:27Council member Quito rushing carries freight.

0:45:31That concludes item for a adoption

0:45:34of the consent calendar.

0:45:35That brings us to item five which is presentations.

The second letter made the same charge more formally.

Its opening: the writer had spent “many hours trying to craft a letter” that she felt she should not have had to write.

The standard she says should not need stating: “I shouldn't have to tell you that elected officials should try to listen to their constituents, not attack them on social media.”

Then the claim: “there is now a pattern that has emerged. Three individuals who are also members of El Cerrito Progressives… have been repeatedly disparaged by one councilman.”

In “the latest incident a member simply offered objective information that countered an assertion being made,” and “was met with an aggressive subjective attack by the council member.”

The first writer had named the difficulty: “if there is not an ethical violation, there seems to be no recourse to this behavio[r].”

A process for admonishing a councilmember is proposed that December (1 Dec 2020).

Both letters compare the conduct to national politics — the first to “the same bullying manner that we see daily from the president,” the second to “vindictive or bullying behavior” at “the highest levels of government.”

Neither letter names the councilmember. Nothing elsewhere in this meeting identifies him.

The second letter closed with a set of paired obligations.

Her recollection of the previous meeting: “other members of the community appeared to be publicly disparaged because [of] their criticism of staff and council actions on the budget.”

Her question: “whatever happened to the word public in public policy?”

Her image of the failure: “this city council should not run like an exclusive club. It should be an elected body with an energetic community that is willing to engage and discuss.”

The precondition she names: “all parties have to have access to information, and information needs to be accessible.”

Then three pairs:

“The managerial class needs to manage, not escape. The public needs to be informed, not chastised. The city council needs to listen and not lecture.”

And her closing: “let's take the gloves off, put on some creative hats… let down the defenses and get real with the numbers. That's all we're asking. Get real, please.”

The consent calendar, which held the third-quarter cash and investment report, was then adopted unanimously. The Mayor pointed out that the city had “ten point one million dollars in the bank.”

Significant

“There is now a pattern… three individuals who are also members of El Cerrito Progressives have been repeatedly disparaged by one councilman.” Neither of the two letters names him, and the first notes that absent an ethics violation “there seems to be no recourse.” A councilmember admonishment process is proposed to the Council that December. A third, separate complaint is read on 21 July.

Significant

“The managerial class needs to manage, not escape. The public needs to be informed, not chastised. The city council needs to listen and not lecture.” The precondition she names is access to information.

05 The first shelter order in the country captions 502–678

0:45:38We have two presentations tonight.

0:45:42Our first is from Mars deemed county representative

0:45:45Supervisor John Joya.

0:45:48Mr. Joya welcome.

0:45:50Thank you.

0:45:50How are you.

0:45:51I'm doing well.

0:45:52We're not letting the fact that we

0:45:54can't get together personally get in the way

0:45:56of our communication.

0:45:57So I appreciate the chance to give you a brief update

0:46:00of the community wide response to the pandemic

0:46:04and answer any questions and I will try to keep this brief

0:46:08and and meaningful and I just want to thank all of you I know

0:46:13for your leadership at the city there's a lot going on

0:46:16in cities and at the county and I know all of you

0:46:19are working hard as well.

0:46:21So let me just go through it seems like it was just

0:46:24yesterday but it was March 16th when the health officers of six

0:46:29Bay Area counties including Contra Costa

0:46:32issued the order to shelter at home

0:46:35and that was the very first shelter at home.

0:46:38Order issued in the United States

0:46:40and and we believe that the early action and the success

0:46:46of residents to really follow those orders has been

0:46:49responsible for us having not overwhelmed our hospitals

0:46:55and save lives.

0:46:56So and I know council member Pardue

0:46:58Okamoto understands this.

0:47:00Working at a hospital herself in Berkeley

0:47:02and sees firsthand what this all means.

0:47:06As you know there's been some recent easing up of the

0:47:11of the orders and that's because we

0:47:13have seen a decrease in hospitalized Asians

0:47:16and a flattening in the number of new cases

0:47:19despite increased testing so.

0:47:22So what's happened and where are we going.

0:47:24So when this sheltered home order was issued

0:47:29it was after the county declared a state of emergency

0:47:31and a lot of folks don't know the authority that county

0:47:35health officers have.

0:47:36They have this power to to set these conditions understate

0:47:40law.

0:47:41And what's happened is the health officers of six counties

0:47:45in the Bay Area Marin San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara

0:47:50Alameda and Contra Costa have generally been working together

0:47:54to come up with a common set of orders knowing

0:47:57that we're region and what happens in one county

0:48:00affects another.

0:48:01The virus doesn't respect county lines so today in Contra Costa

0:48:07we have tested collectively both the county and the private

0:48:11providers just under 24000 individuals twenty three

0:48:15thousand six hundred eighty five of that one thousand one

0:48:20hundred and ninety two have tested positive And there have

0:48:25been 33 deaths El Serino has ten of those eleven hundred

0:48:30and ninety two cases so it's a it's actually even smaller than

0:48:35population and probably the best piece of information is that we

0:48:41went from a peak of forty four hospitalisations culvert 19

0:48:47related hospitalizations about a month ago to now 16 which

0:48:52in the number of hospitalizations

0:48:53really is a good marker for who is seriously ill and that is

0:48:58really what's allowed the health officer

0:49:02to look at starting to ease the restrictions The

0:49:06what the county has been focusing on

0:49:08is it is is several items.

0:49:11The first step was really increasing hospital capacity

0:49:15It's it set up and we'll be staffing a 250 bed

0:49:20medical facility at the crane way at the Ford Building

0:49:23in Richmond.

0:49:24Fortunately it has not needed to be used

0:49:27and it looks like we're going to get through this this way

0:49:31without having to use it.

0:49:32But the county's intention now is to hold onto it

0:49:35and keep it set up not knowing what

0:49:37may happen during the fall.

0:49:41Some health experts believe that there is a possibility

0:49:45of another surge in the fall associated with flu season

0:49:50and it is important to be prudent

0:49:51and to really think about that.

0:49:54The focus has also been to work with local hospitals

0:49:57to increase hospital capacity so there around 700 hospital beds

0:50:01total in the county and working with local hospitals

0:50:06that amount has pretty much doubled

0:50:08and that's set up to tens or extra beds that

0:50:12are not normally in a room.

0:50:14So the bottom line there is more hospital

0:50:17temporary hospital capacity.

0:50:19The good news is that none of that has been used not even

0:50:22the existing 100 hundred bed capacity

0:50:26The the other focus now has been on dramatically

0:50:29increasing testing.

0:50:31Now there are nine test sites that the state and county run

0:50:35the county runs six of those.

0:50:37The state runs three And then of course one

0:50:40can get tested at any at your private provider like Kaiser

0:50:44for example.

0:50:46And so we've gone up to around eight hundred tests a day

0:50:51it's been up and down.

0:50:53The goal is to get up to about two thousand

0:50:55four hundred tests today.

0:50:57The health officer believes that you

0:51:00need that level of testing in order

0:51:02to keep track of the virus.

0:51:04If we're going to continue to open up more businesses

0:51:07contact tracing capacity is increased the county's goals

0:51:10to have 250 people doing contact tracing

0:51:15and and again this is part of the strategy of opening

0:51:20the community as you know there's been

0:51:23some easing of restrictions.

0:51:24Two weeks ago when construction was open all construction was

0:51:29opened up the health officer looked

0:51:32at the data over the last two weeks

0:51:34the 14 day cycle of that virus incubation period

0:51:38and and so forth and saw that hospitalization

0:51:42numbers were still going down.

0:51:44And and that's why the new order came out yesterday

0:51:46effective today to open up all retail to curbside pickup

0:51:51and also to have a drive in gatherings of two hundred cars.

0:51:55In fact I spoke to the superintendent the other day

0:51:58and they are going to shift given the new health

0:52:00order they're going to shift.

0:52:02It sounds like to do graduate instead of virtually

0:52:05but to do them by Drive in CAR where

0:52:08people stay in their cars.

0:52:09So there's a method you can have worship services that way

0:52:12as well.

0:52:14And so that in two more weeks I think

0:52:16the health officer will look at the data for the in two weeks.

0:52:20And if the trend continues will most likely open up more

0:52:25we sort of are running one to two weeks behind the state

0:52:29Governor Newsome has provided a lot of leadership

0:52:32and I think really done a great job

0:52:34and you know he's provided flexibility

0:52:37Some counties are going faster some are going slower

0:52:40but we tend to be about one to two weeks behind the state

0:52:44in terms of when things open up what does it mean

0:52:47in terms of mass gatherings.

0:52:49I think it is likely during the summer

0:52:51health officers believe they're going to continue to be

0:52:53restrictions on mass gatherings in fact the best advice

0:52:59that the health officer gives is that if we're gonna get back

0:53:02to work and open up more businesses safely

0:53:05it has to be done incrementally.

0:53:08Looking at the data science over politics right.

0:53:11And to look at the data and and the trends and the indicators

0:53:16continue and there's a number of indicators

0:53:19they're looking at then to continue

0:53:21to incrementally open up.

0:53:23But even with that incrementalism that really

0:53:26it's been the public that's been responsible for getting

0:53:29us to where we're at.

0:53:30The public has really followed to the most for the most part

0:53:34these should stay at home orders and social distancing.

0:53:37But the four things that the health officer said are really

0:53:39important to do going forward is continue the hygiene

0:53:43washing our hands frequently.

0:53:44Right.

0:53:46Second is to maintain the 6 foot of social distancing

0:53:49when we go out third to really make sure you are wearing

0:53:53a face covering when you're going out

0:53:56and forth to monitor your own symptoms don't go out if you

0:54:00have symptoms get tested.

0:54:02So although we have made testing available now at a county site

0:54:07in San Pablo for anybody whether they have symptoms or not.

0:54:11So we're trying to to increase the testing so people can now

0:54:15get tested without symptoms and is free if you have

0:54:21health insurance they are Bill.

0:54:22But otherwise it is free and the focus also as I say

0:54:28has been on on the on contact tracing.

0:54:31In addition we've focused a lot on the homeless population

0:54:35We have actually rented over 550 hotel rooms

0:54:39and two of those hotels are in West Contra Costa County

0:54:43and We have relocated residents the homeless residents of each

0:54:49of the three largest shelters in the county to those hotel rooms

0:54:53where they are getting meals and care.

0:54:55In fact this has made us look at at a new model what do

0:55:00we do when this pandemic ends.

The county supervisor gave the pandemic update, beginning with a fact about precedence.

The date: “March 16th when the health officers of six Bay Area counties including Contra Costa issued the order to shelter at home.”

Its standing: “that was the very first shelter at home order issued in the United States.”

What he credits it with: “the early action and the success of residents to really follow those orders has been responsible for us having not overwhelmed our hospitals and saved lives.”

His acknowledgement of a councilmember's own position: “I know council member Pardue-Okimoto understands this, working at a hospital herself in Berkeley and sees firsthand” what it meant.

A new order that day opened all retail to curbside pickup and allowed drive-in gatherings of up to two hundred cars, so graduations could be held by car. The county had rented over 550 hotel rooms to move residents out of its three largest homeless shelters.

The county figures: just under 24,000 people tested, 1,192 positive, 33 deaths, and 10 cases in El Cerrito. COVID hospitalizations had fallen from a peak of 44 to 16. A 250-bed facility at the Craneway in Richmond stood ready but unused. Testing was about 800 a day against a goal of 2,400, with 250 contact tracers planned.

His framing of the format: “we're not letting the fact that we can't get together personally get in the way of our communication.”

His thanks: “I know all of you are working hard as well.”

Significant

The Bay Area's 16 March shelter order was the first issued anywhere in the United States, and the supervisor credits it with keeping hospitals from being overwhelmed. Hospitalizations have fallen from 44 to 16, and retail reopens to curbside pickup.

06 A hundred and thirty million from reserves captions 679–919

0:55:02Do we really want to send these homeless individuals back

0:55:04to shelters or preference would be

0:55:06not to do that but to look to try to keep them in hotels

0:55:12and maybe acquire hotels and keep them there until they

0:55:16get permanent housing.

0:55:18That that is a better situation than going

0:55:20back to the shelters.

0:55:20That's something we'll be considering as well as also you

0:55:24know our outreach teams are going and checking with those

0:55:27who are live in encampments and if provided every city is asked

0:55:31for any types of portable toilets

0:55:34or handwashing stations various encampments those are provided

0:55:38in fact some have been provided down on right and road

0:55:41near Point Isabel I know that's in Richmond

0:55:43but sort of nearby So the focus a lot has been on on homeless

0:55:50as well.

0:55:51So why don't I stop there and really take your questions

0:55:55I will say that we have seen a major increase

0:55:58in in social service demand food stamps

0:56:03and other social assistance programs at the county.

0:56:07It all said between March and July

0:56:11the county will have spent about one hundred and thirty

0:56:13million dollars out of our reserves to address and prepare

0:56:18both you know these activities I talked about and more

0:56:23and I know we're seeing issues of revenue I did see

0:56:26that the state has granted the county

0:56:30assessor an extension until early August

0:56:33to get final values and rolls.

0:56:37You know normally the county assessor

0:56:39sets the rolls at the property values by June 30th.

0:56:46That's been extended to August 10th.

0:56:48So presumably we won't know the impact on our budgets

0:56:52until after July 1 unless the assessor

0:56:55does come out before before that time granted an extension.

0:56:59So that's an important thing for all of us

0:57:00to consider The Treasurer did extend the time period

0:57:04for paying that April 10th installment without penalty

0:57:09for those who are financially impacted to June 30th

0:57:13and the governor issued an executive order which extends

0:57:16that until May of next year.

0:57:19Presumably that may apply to the next payment but at this point

0:57:23we've gotten over 96 percent of our property tax payments

0:57:26from April 10th.

0:57:28It's I think even higher than that now.

0:57:31But so there is an opportunity people have until May if they

0:57:34have financial hardship til next May to make payment

0:57:38on their property taxes.

0:57:40And as you know I think you did as well we passed a county

0:57:45wide EVICTION PROTECTION ordinance that included a rent

0:57:48freeze and we're going to be considering it our meeting

0:57:53next week extending it does apply to commercial properties

0:57:56as well we may grow that to just small business tenants

0:58:00as opposed to all commercial tenants

0:58:02but it would still apply to residential

0:58:04and then we provide a grace period to repay.

0:58:07I think you may have a longer break period so the more

0:58:11stringent provisions would apply so to the extent your ordinance

0:58:15provides greater protection then that provision

0:58:17in your ordinance would apply.

0:58:19So with that and I and I want to thank all

0:58:22of the workers the front line workers

0:58:25but also just all the the the public employees

0:58:28I know who really at your level at the city at the county

0:58:32I know a hard not only or health department folks are working

0:58:35but in social services and public works who are working

0:58:39to respond to all of this as well and

0:58:42and really helping protect all of us.

0:58:45So with that thanks and any questions

0:58:48you have and and I know I view our county administrator

0:58:52as set up a call with all the city managers and our health

0:58:56officer on Thursday the city managers and Della

0:59:00and I know I've tried to keep I've tried to keep all of you

0:59:06to your city manager of cases sent emails So

0:59:10any any information you need.

0:59:12Pete please feel free to let me know right.

0:59:14Paul Yes thank you.

0:59:18First thank you John for all that you

0:59:19do especially with the crane way that was

0:59:23really quite a quite an effort.

0:59:26Just a f why I think the governor may revise

0:59:30took away a lot of the homeless funding

0:59:32that we hope we would be able to spend but what has remained

0:59:37has been the buyouts for the hotels I think so I'm hoping

0:59:41that's something that we can continue

0:59:43to move forward on and work with the state on that issue.

0:59:46JOHN Right.

0:59:48My question to you is there've been a couple editorials

0:59:51in our East Bay Times about the Bay Area counties working

0:59:56together and because of all kind of on different time

0:59:59lines now including San Mateo.

1:00:01That that could cause chaos.

1:00:03Yeah.

1:00:04What are your opinions about this

1:00:05and what does that mean for Comcast.

1:00:07So thanks Paul for the question.

1:00:09So originally was six counties that stuck together

1:00:14and then sort of what happened last week some of the counties

1:00:17started making independent announcements

1:00:19and our health officer has said he thinks they maybe

1:00:23didn't didn't align their messaging as

1:00:26good as it could have been.

1:00:27So the five of the six have basically issued

1:00:31a joint statement yesterday.

1:00:33San Mateo has gone a bit further by opening offices

1:00:37so that so that's the difference.

1:00:39And I did make a comment about that saying

1:00:42hope it to the extent we all stick together that's better.

1:00:45Now Napa Sonoma and Solano have actually

1:00:48moved a little on their own because they feel they want to.

1:00:52That's their right.

1:00:54But as I say San Mateo is gone a little further by their order

1:01:00just opened offices.

1:01:02I think that's probably the next thing that

1:01:04will happen likelier two weeks.

1:01:06I think the health officers of the five other counties

1:01:08have just been more cautious in wanting to look at the data.

1:01:12And in San Mateo had seen some more cases

1:01:15and so that was their decision.

1:01:18But at least five of them five are sticking together

1:01:21and JAMA Teo may or may not be part of that next time

1:01:24but I think the five are all working together

1:01:27San Francisco may do a couple things differently

1:01:31because there are more dense city

1:01:32and so there may be some nuances in their order

1:01:35that are more restrictive.

1:01:37But essentially right now that most of the counties

1:01:40are sticking together Janet.

1:01:44I think I sell your hand you didn't see my hand

1:01:48but I'd be happy to talk right now.

1:01:50First of all John I want to really thank you

1:01:53for all of the work that you personally have done

1:01:55and that the county has done.

1:01:57It is I think really made a difference

1:02:01in the reduction of cases.

1:02:03I I sincerely do and so I appreciate that.

1:02:07And from what I can tell people here and elsewhere

1:02:10Serino are really behind that effort

1:02:14and are trying really hard to observe

1:02:18the 6 foot guideline and other aspects of staying in place.

1:02:24What we've had more trouble with and I'm not

1:02:28pointing at the county and saying

1:02:29this is the financial aspect of this

1:02:32so many businesses have closed so many people have been either

1:02:37furloughed or their positions have been eliminated

1:02:42and it's really hard for them to get through the various levels

1:02:51of government to get things fixed to get payments

1:02:57you know digit to just try to get by you know going to pay

1:03:00the rent to buy food and I hope that there will be more

1:03:06attention paid to that because I don't

1:03:10get the sense that that's going to end

1:03:12in each that aspect of it.

1:03:14I don't get the sense that it's really

1:03:15going to end anytime soon.

1:03:18Yeah.

1:03:19And so anyway anything you could do would be much appreciated.

1:03:23I do think that you know what.

1:03:25Help officers believe is that people are going to be more

1:03:28apt to go out when they feel safe

1:03:31and I think that they're trying to also Linus.

1:03:34So it is safe and I mean I think even when restaurants reopen

1:03:39to a dining People aren't going to go out to them

1:03:43and frequent them right and less safe

1:03:45and we know there are there are there

1:03:51are you know a lot of folks who are being impacted right now.

1:03:56We do.

1:03:56We do know that.

1:03:57And so that's why we are advocating for more

1:04:00federal assistance and and federal help because we can't

1:04:03do it alone at the local level.

1:04:05Thank you.

1:04:07And I just have to get a few minutes to get over

1:04:09to panels since that we've been trying to schedule these so

1:04:13but go ahead.

1:04:14Yeah we appreciate that you're here tonight.

1:04:16John I see Michelle you have a question.

1:04:19Yes.

1:04:20One thing I don't feel like I've heard you talk about much

1:04:23and I'm very curious as to how it went to go

1:04:26see members of your family.

1:04:29So was that like meetings a group of 10 people or more.

1:04:32How is how is that going to hurt.

1:04:34I think I think I think Rochelle that's coming pretty soon.

1:04:40I think in June we're going to start to see more things

1:04:42like that in small groups.

1:04:44Right now the only sort of gatherings

1:04:46are you can have a funeral with under 10 people.

1:04:49Right.

1:04:50And I think that's the next thing.

1:04:54Course right now there's now the auto

1:04:55people can drive their cars.

1:04:58Places like the movie theater company

1:05:00drive in movie theater coming back.

1:05:02So I think after the two weeks that's

1:05:04the next sort of that's the next the

1:05:07next opening things like that.

1:05:09So I expect June to see some changes like that Great.

1:05:17Just two quick stats I heard today

1:05:19John that the number of deaths in the Bay Area

1:05:22was zero for the last two days.

1:05:23Do you know about today's numbers.

1:05:26I know that Contra Costa as of twelve thirty

1:05:28did not have any today so that's good I mean I think we're going

1:05:33to see more positive cases just because you

1:05:36know there's more testing.

1:05:38But the nice thing is even with the big increase

1:05:40in testing it's been pretty flat about it's

1:05:44been pretty flat in terms of the number of cases

1:05:47excellent the other one.

1:05:47I want to ask you about contract tracers

1:05:49and contact tracing you said you were increasing the capability.

1:05:54Any reports of threats to contact

1:05:57tracers like we've seen in other parts of the nation

1:05:59and heard that.

1:05:59No we have not heard that.

1:06:01And they're just starting so but I have not heard that yet.

1:06:04Great thank you.

1:06:06Gabe and I probably have just a couple of minutes

1:06:11unfortunately because I know we need good.

1:06:14So I wanted to find out.

1:06:16Will the county be testing for antibodies right.

1:06:22Good question.

1:06:24The health officer believes that the technology is not there

1:06:26and the test is very inaccurate and there's a high error rate

1:06:30and they're only in the research stage there.

1:06:32You've heard some communities that are doing that testing so

1:06:36but it's pretty much at the research stage right now.

1:06:39OK.

1:06:40Thank you so much thank you for posting things

1:06:42on social network including the yes

1:06:47panel up and down the Steve in California

1:06:49I appreciate you sir.

1:06:49Thank Thank you John.

1:06:51John Paul has one last thing he wants to ask.

1:06:54Here it is waving goodbye.

1:06:56He's got.

1:06:56Oh good thank you.

1:06:58You all right.

1:07:01And that concludes.

1:07:02Item five.

1:07:03A presentation of from our coded update with supervisor John

1:07:08Joya and it will now move on to item five

The county's own financial position was given, along with a timing problem that affects every city.

The spending: the county “will have spent about one hundred and thirty million dollars out of our reserves” on the response.

Then the timing: the state had “granted the county assessor an extension until early August to get final values and rolls,” where “normally the county assessor sets the rolls… by June 30th.”

The consequence for cities: “presumably we won't know the impact on our budgets until after July 1” — after the budget must be adopted.

On collection: the treasurer extended the April installment “without penalty for those who are financially impacted to June 30th,” and a governor's order extended it “until May of next year.”

But the money largely arrived anyway: “we've gotten over 96 percent of our property tax payments from April 10th.”

The county's eviction protection ordinance, with a rent freeze, would be considered for extension the next week. Where a city ordinance is stronger, the stronger one applies.

In questions, Fadelli asked about counties moving at different speeds. The supervisor said five of the six counties had issued a joint statement, and San Mateo had gone further by opening offices. Abelson urged help for people stuck getting payments from government. Pardue-Okimoto asked about family gatherings, which he expected to see in June. On antibody tests, the health officer considered them still inaccurate and at the research stage.

Significant

Over 96 percent of April property tax was paid despite a penalty waiver that runs to May 2021. The assessor's roll is delayed to August, so cities may not know the impact on their budgets until after 1 July. The county expects to spend $130 million from reserves between March and July.

07 “As in years past” captions 920–1144

1:07:12B which is an update on the tax revenue

1:07:14anticipation notes or trends.

1:07:17We're going to receive a presentation

1:07:19from our financial advisors man.

1:07:25Council members Marco Saya finance director.

1:07:29I'd like to introduce Craig here who is not new to us.

1:07:33He's been living in J4.

1:07:35He's the principal in energy and as in years

1:07:37past at this time of year.

1:07:38City staff works without financial inboxes

1:07:41to drum up a trend to take out bibs and flows of cash

1:07:45for like many other big cities and small cities.

1:07:48We are currently working with energy

1:07:50to come up with the trend for this whole process.

1:07:53Craig will present the and process to you.

1:07:57I'll be back at the following meeting in June

1:08:00at the first meeting in June seeking

1:08:01authorization to do the train.

1:08:04And Craig will outline for us the process from here.

1:08:07And with that I conclude my remarks

1:08:10and hand it over to Craig to make his presentation.

1:08:14Thank you.

1:08:18Good evening.

1:08:18Careful this Craig Hill with NHL advisors I made it

1:08:22to a quick screen share here let the media make sure I

1:08:27get the right one up All right.

1:08:34Everybody can see the presentation

1:08:47I guess we can see it.

1:08:48Okay great.

1:08:49All right.

1:08:50All right.

1:08:52To start as it kind of from an education

1:08:54perspective cities can borrow money for a couple

1:08:57of different reasons.

1:08:58They can borrow it for capital projects facilities.

1:09:02They can also borrow it for short term borrowing.

1:09:04It's very clear in the law what abilities the cities have

1:09:09in real quickly.

1:09:11Everybody's familiar with general obligation bonds that's

1:09:13where you go to ask your community to support

1:09:16a bond to build a facility.

1:09:19It's paid for by property taxes that are collected over a fixed

1:09:23period of time cities also have the ability to do what we call

1:09:27lease or Certificate of Participation city bus Rito

1:09:29has done that in the past and that is a structure whereby

1:09:34your borrowing money long term you're building a facility

1:09:37and then you're budgeting inside of your general fund

1:09:40or your annual budget process a repayment debt service payment

1:09:44think of it like a mortgage.

1:09:46It also requires collateral which usually the property

1:09:49that you're actually improving.

1:09:51And finally the other financing tool

1:09:53which we're going to talk about tonight

1:09:55is really the train attacks and revenue

1:09:57anticipation and the way that the trains

1:10:00work as they are a short term.

1:10:01Think of it almost like a line of credit

1:10:04they're intended not to solve the deficit

1:10:07but to solve cashflow shortfalls that you have

1:10:10with the inconsistencies when revenues are coming in compared

1:10:14to what our fairly routine or monthly

1:10:17expenditures such as payroll.

1:10:19So we'll go into a little bit more detail on what a trend is.

1:10:23By law they're limited to inside the fiscal year

1:10:27but payable within 15 months.

1:10:30The idea being as you know you have revenues that come

1:10:33in in the fourth quarter call it March through June

1:10:37but maybe aren't actually received until July or August.

1:10:40So typically we have the maturity of any particular note

1:10:46occur in July of the following year

1:10:49but it's paid from the prior fiscal year

1:10:52if that makes sense.

1:10:53There's also a legal limit to how much you can borrow.

1:10:56You and your finance director has developed extensive cash

1:11:02flows for projections on you know based on history

1:11:07and what's going forward.

1:11:08We work with staff to Devitt to create a cash

1:11:11flow from that the tax attorneys with your bond counsel

1:11:16will validate exactly how much you can borrow.

1:11:19Generally speaking it is your maximum deficit that typically

1:11:24occurs October November December just

1:11:26prior to when you get your first property tax payment.

1:11:30And we look at how how big that deficit is

1:11:34and that becomes kind of the basis for the amount

1:11:37you can borrow.

1:11:38There are you'll hear the term a note

1:11:41and there's really four different times.

1:11:43I mean there's there's the training that we're talking

1:11:45about now there's a bond anticipation no

1:11:48do you expect to issue something later on in the future grant

1:11:51anticipate notes.

1:11:53We do these a lot around FEMA grants where you know spend

1:11:57the money today for the emergency

1:11:58but you're going to get reimbursed from FEMA

1:12:00at some point the future and then

1:12:02you just have straight revenue anticipation notes where

1:12:04there's a lag and when you're going to receive tobacco

1:12:08settlement things like that that are often often what

1:12:12the notary is for who issues trends in California school

1:12:17districts counties and cities.

1:12:19It's a pretty routine tool that is

1:12:21used to basically manage your manage your cash flow position.

1:12:28Over the last four years there's been almost 12 billion dollars

1:12:31issued on average about three point eight billion a year.

1:12:36There are approximately 88 public agencies that have

1:12:39issued on a consistent basis.

1:12:42So there's been a total of one hundred eighty eighty six

1:12:44that have been issued over the last four years.

1:12:48The average size right about eight

1:12:50point four or five million or eight million four hundred

1:12:52fifty thousand.

1:12:54The city itself.

1:12:55You may consider yourself a small CITY BUT

1:12:59YOU ARE A you actually have a cash flow that looks

1:13:02to be about the average size.

1:13:04So you're right with everybody else when it comes

1:13:06to how much you might need to borrow trends go as

1:13:10small as a half a million all the way up

1:13:12to a city of L.A. city of San Francisco.

1:13:15Some of the counties will issue one point six billion.

1:13:19So the number can get clearly very

1:13:21large What I'd like to do from there really just educational.

1:13:26I'm going to flip between the slide

1:13:27the next slide because I want to make sure

1:13:29that the your community and the City Council

1:13:32understand why you even need a tram it doesn't have anything

1:13:36to do with whether you have a deficit a budget or a surplus

1:13:40budget has everything to do which is matching

1:13:42revenues to expenditures.

1:13:44So what you have in this graph is

1:13:47this would be a typical scenario for the city

1:13:50if it did not have a tram and you

1:13:52would see from the the gray bars those represent kind of what

1:13:56your cash position is on any month starting in the beginning

1:13:59of the fiscal year in July and you can see

1:14:02that in this example your expenditures the orange line

1:14:07represents payroll you know all of your monthly expenses

1:14:11that are going out the door and they're pretty consistent

1:14:14but you can see from the blue line

1:14:15that you really have these spikes

1:14:17and those spikes are because who else burrito is

1:14:21and how your your revenues come in.

1:14:23The majority revenues are coming in as these two

1:14:25big installments and property taxes.

1:14:28And so you see the spike in December

1:14:30and you see the spike in April.

1:14:32So those are great those two months you

1:14:34have far more revenue than you do expenditures.

1:14:38So that helps to replenish the bank

1:14:39and you'll see that the gray lines kind of keep stepping

1:14:42down through November where they're actually

1:14:45negative in this case about five million dollars

1:14:48but then jump up to a positive 4 million in December

1:14:52when you get that property tax payment you burn them down

1:14:55again to march they go negative and then you bring it

1:14:58back up to April May and June.

1:15:00So flipping forward to what a trend

1:15:04would do to your cash flow.

1:15:07Looking at this slide you'll see that those are just

1:15:09the revenues and the expenditures

1:15:10are exactly the same The blue and the Orange Line

1:15:13have not changed but you have an infusion of a tramp proceeds.

1:15:17That's the green.

1:15:19And then you have the repayment at the end of the year.

1:15:21Again these are not intended to be a multi-year solution.

1:15:24This is simply solving cash flow during a current fiscal year.

1:15:29And if you'll notice that at the beginning of the year

1:15:33you're showing in this example approximately four

1:15:36and a half or five million dollars in the bank.

1:15:39And when you get to the end of the year

1:15:42it's the same number approximately four

1:15:44and a half to five million dollars

1:15:46because you're paying back again.

1:15:47The red is the repayment of the note or the train.

1:15:52And it just puts you back in the same spot.

1:15:54So you're not kicking the can down the road

1:15:56you're not spending money this year that you don't have.

1:16:00This is intended purely to just deal with the cash flow

1:16:03and you'll see from this example and again this

1:16:07is assuming six point one million dollars compared

1:16:11to this cash flow that your cash balance never gets below zero

1:16:15in fact even in November it's staying slightly

1:16:18positive at a million and a half dollars

1:16:22and then it grows back up over 10 am and it comes back down.

1:16:26But at the end of the day you're still

1:16:28where you would have been.

1:16:29Looking back to this slide here if if you could defer

1:16:33these expenses here and also in March you

1:16:37would realize that you're getting to the same place

1:16:39at the beginning of the year and the end of the year.

1:16:42So the trend is intended purely just as a interim cash kind

1:16:48of like an overdraft on your checking account

1:16:50if you want to think about it that though historically

1:16:54the city has issued a trend to manage its cash flow.

1:16:58Cash flow isn't any different any in any particular year

1:17:01and those battlers those note amounts have have average

1:17:05between 5 million all the way up till last year

1:17:08where it was nine million dollars

1:17:10and that's all a function again of as your budget has grown

1:17:14revenues or grown expenditures grown it's just kind

1:17:16of expanded that cash flow and injustice that happens

1:17:21in October and November.

1:17:24These are short term financing they're

1:17:26you know they just had a year.

1:17:28So your financing rates have been

1:17:30anywhere between one and a half in a little over 2 percent.

1:17:33So relatively low cost of borrowing.

1:17:37You also have historically approved them

1:17:41as part of your budget process in June we would typically

1:17:45issue the trend in July and it would read to be repaid

1:17:49that following July again from proceeds of the ore of revenues

1:17:53from the the current fiscal year So

1:17:58what is the process that you need to go

1:18:00through to even issue a trend.

1:18:04The most important thing is to have a budget that is balanced

1:18:10for the year that you're going to borrow the trend you need

1:18:13to make sure that you will have funds

1:18:16available at the end of the year to pay back the note

1:18:19and in whatever amount it is.

1:18:21So working on that cash flow and working on the budget

1:18:25the two critical pieces that are done before you can really get

1:18:29any get the process started.

1:18:31Right now based on the work that we've done with the city staff

1:18:36we're estimating that this year's

1:18:37trend will be approximately eight half million.

Staff had been working with the advisers “as in years past at this time of year.”

The finance director would return “at the following meeting in June… seeking authorization.”

He does, on 2 June, when the authorization is set at not more than $8.9 million (2 Jun 2020).

The city's own notes had ranged from about $5 million up to last year's $9 million, at rates between 1.5 and a little over 2 percent. They had historically been approved with the June budget and issued in July. This year's was estimated at about $8.5 million. Statewide, about 186 notes had been issued over four years, averaging about $8.45 million.

The city's adviser set out the ways a city can borrow — general obligation bonds, lease financing paid like a mortgage from the budget, and the tax and revenue anticipation note, a short-term tool, “almost like a line of credit,” meant for cash-flow gaps rather than deficits. A note must be issued within the fiscal year and repaid within 15 months, and its size is capped by the maximum cash deficit, which typically falls in October to December, just before the first property tax payment.

08 Not a solution for structural deficits captions 1145–1171

1:18:41That's going to be subject to the the budget process

1:18:44that you all will go through tonight with management

1:18:47partners and going into the June budget process approval process

1:18:54This does not again address long term budget deficits

1:18:58we're obviously in uncharted territory with Cogan 19

1:19:02and we are working with a number of other public agencies

1:19:04to try to figure out long term solutions.

1:19:07The trend is not a solution for long term

1:19:10structural deficits it's purely intended for just

1:19:13the current fiscal year.

1:19:15So it's important to have some form of balanced budget

1:19:18during the 2021 process the credit approval process

1:19:22obviously you need to go out and talk to either banks

1:19:25or underwriters or other investors bond investors

1:19:30and what they'll wanted to see is

1:19:31a preliminary official statement or an official statement.

1:19:34Most of you would know it as an offering memorandum

1:19:37or disclosure document.

1:19:38This will show and provide all of the information on the city

1:19:43both historical up through the current financial position.

1:19:47Investors are only going to be looking

1:19:48at the current fiscal year 20 21 year as they're their credit.

1:19:54So they want to see as much information in that book

1:19:57as they can.

1:19:59We'll also take that document to a rating agency

1:20:02Standard and Poor's Moody's Fitch or the names you're

1:20:05probably familiar with and they will evaluate kind of grade

The borrowing was previewed two weeks before the authorization, and the adviser drew a line under what it does.

The finance director had described the purpose as smoothing the ebbs and flows of cash, as many big and small cities do.

Then the limit, stated plainly: “the” note “is not a solution for long term structural deficits. It's purely intended for just the current fiscal year.”

And the precondition: “it's important to have some form of balanced budget during the 2021 process.”

A note can only be issued against a balanced budget, which is why the June adoption and the borrowing are linked.

The credit process: approach “banks or underwriters or… bond investors,” who want “a preliminary official statement… most of you would know it as an offering memorandum or disclosure document.”

What it contains: “all of the information on the city, both historical up through the current financial position.”

And the investors' focus: “only going to be looking at the current fiscal year… as their credit.”

The document then goes to a rating agency for a short-term rating, which is “completely diff[erent]” from the city's long-term one.

Significant

A revenue anticipation note “is not a solution for long term structural deficits” and depends on a balanced budget, which links the June adoption to the borrowing. The short-term rating is separate from the city's long-term one.

09 The rating, and what it costs captions 1172–1432

1:20:10if you will the city's credit.

1:20:12The city does maintain a long term rating

1:20:15but this would be a short term rate.

1:20:18So there you know they're completely

1:20:19different in the sense of the financial sustainability

1:20:23of the city long term versus what

1:20:25is it going to look like during the current fiscal year.

1:20:30And then once we've gone through the rating process

1:20:32we get that rating.

1:20:33We will work through the underwriter

1:20:37and who will go out and talk to a number of different investors

1:20:41whether that is a Charles Schwab Fidelity Franklin money market

1:20:46fund type institution or a bank and or individual investors who

1:20:52might be interested in going through the public offering

1:20:55process we're looking at as many different investors

1:21:00as possible This will bring the lowest cost and the lowest

1:21:04interest rate to the city so we want to put as broad a net

1:21:09out there as we can to see who is going to be interested.

1:21:14The positive as any of you who are in watching the stock

1:21:18market and watching the volatility that's

1:21:20out there a lot of folks when they talk

1:21:22about cash on the sidelines This is where cash on the sidelines

1:21:26likes to go.

1:21:27How about I just park it for one year

1:21:30a buy a tax exempt no municipal note or trend

1:21:35and I'm just going to wait to sing out

1:21:37And in the summer of 20 21 I'll be ready to invest in a stock

1:21:42or go back into the equity market.

1:21:43So there are there is a lot of cash looking to park itself

1:21:47short term in something like the city's train

1:21:53With that I will take any questions anybody has Yeah

1:22:04I see.

1:22:05Paul is that your hand waving.

1:22:08Go ahead.

1:22:10Yes.

1:22:11So you said several times that this is obviously

1:22:14not a long term fix or tool for cities

1:22:18and we get that we're going to be

1:22:20talking about some long term restructuring and priority

1:22:24later tonight.

1:22:25I think that we should need it for short term

1:22:28here and also read on and we would

1:22:29love to have that I think we're ready just to pay our bills

1:22:33and then move on to our long term planning Can you answer me

1:22:36just a general question on the interest rates

1:22:41and the eight point five million what

1:22:43the real dollars what that mean.

1:22:45What's the cost of that to Reno so the I think

1:22:54you're asking two questions.

1:22:55Yeah.

1:22:56And it can happen on a cash flow perspective.

1:22:59You know the calculation of how much you can borrow

1:23:02will be determined by the what the budget is that you're going

1:23:06to approve in June and or what the cash flow

1:23:10that that budget's going to look like the monthly cash flow

1:23:12that staff will generate based on whatever

1:23:15your revenue projections are and your expenditure

1:23:18projections are right.

1:23:19So in an example if there were severe cuts obviously

1:23:23your expenditures are going to come down.

1:23:25And so that's going to reduce the amount of negative cash

1:23:30flow that you have right.

1:23:31So that would reduce the trend size the trans only going

1:23:34to be as big as it's allowed to be

1:23:36based on the projected deficit.

1:23:38So we're sort of asking for an eight point five million tramp.

1:23:44Now is that correct.

1:23:46So preliminary cash flow estimates

1:23:48that we've been working with staff on right

1:23:50now we're showing about a half.

1:23:52So based on the interest rates that

1:23:54are out there and in the range that there would

1:23:57be how much more are we paying for that interest rate

1:24:01to all of that money.

1:24:03Well we haven't gone to market yet.

1:24:06There has only been one trend that has been done so far

1:24:10and that was for the Long Beach Harbor

1:24:12and it was dial right around one and a quarter percent.

1:24:15So we know that the short term market right

1:24:18now is still really low Yeah.

1:24:21I mean we're doing this is a good time for the interest

1:24:24rates correct Yes absolutely.

1:24:27Okay.

1:24:28Oh we got one good thing I guess it's the one good thing that's

1:24:31come out of what Cove it is I think our short term rates are

1:24:34pretty darn well up now.

1:24:36Okay.

1:24:37Okay.

1:24:37Thank you.

1:24:42Rochelle yes.

1:24:45And council member fidelity cash define what I was interested in

1:24:49and that was interest rates I I just would really

1:24:55like to say that I think the council members would agree

1:24:59with me on this that we really want to make sure that we shop

1:25:02around and get the best interest rate available

1:25:05even though they're low.

1:25:07I think it's important to save that money for all

1:25:11of our citizens and make sure that we get the best

1:25:14interest rate possible.

1:25:15So thank wrote for working on that for us

1:25:19to Any other questions at this time.

1:25:23I have some.

1:25:24OK.

1:25:26Can you see the general timing from your slide

1:25:30I believe is it's not it's not quite as transparent I'd

1:25:35love to see but if I recall we're going

1:25:37to set our budget somewhat.

1:25:38We hope to set our budget sometime

1:25:40in the middle of July June.

1:25:42We're setting up meetings in order to try and accomplish

1:25:44that which would allow you to think on your slide here

1:25:49it said that you were going to do Tran

1:25:52the Tran sale the interest rate set

1:25:54in mid-June with the intent of pulling the executing

1:25:58the funding and in July.

1:26:01Is that Is that still accurate at that timing.

1:26:05Yes what's it there.

1:26:07It's going to be a little bit of a parallel dance

1:26:10with your budget approval process

1:26:13we expect that you will have that staff will be proposing

1:26:17a budget in early June for council's consideration

1:26:21although it may not be formally approved until late June.

1:26:24We will be working off of that preliminary

1:26:27or the proposed budget to go through the entire process

1:26:32with the idea that it would be sold about the time

1:26:37or the interest rate would be set about the time

1:26:40you were approving your budget.

1:26:42We're hoping that the timing would work great that you'll

1:26:46actually improve your budget or adopt your budget

1:26:48and then we will lock in the interest rate right

1:26:51afterwards because we we don't want to risk thinking that we

1:26:56have a budget then all of a sudden

1:26:57is approved in some other form afterwards.

1:27:01But the idea is to actually have the interest rate set

1:27:04and have this funded as early in July as possible Right

1:27:09now we're targeting July 2nd right

1:27:12at the beginning of your next fiscal year

1:27:14And I just reiterated it.

1:27:16This is predicated on having a balanced budget

1:27:18or in our case we actually want to tighten

1:27:21our belt enough so that we're actually working

1:27:23towards a positive reserve.

1:27:26I think we have talked about the fact

1:27:28that we're we're going to be struggling with our reserves

1:27:33for this year but we hope to set a budget that would actually

1:27:37have surplus that can go towards our reserves

1:27:40and building our reserves.

1:27:41And I'm assuming that that would be beneficial for the purposes

1:27:44of this that That's correct.

1:27:47Well actually I talked about the rating process

1:27:51and going through and getting a grade

1:27:53and having the ability to say actually

1:27:57under current circumstances we're still really working

1:28:00to have a strong budget that is improving

1:28:04or increasing reserves will be a credit positive.

1:28:09You talked about the fact that this opportunity has attract

1:28:14more investors and different types

1:28:16of investors that might have cash that they're waiting

1:28:19to put into a tax exempt bond for their various reasons

1:28:25can private individuals invest it elsewhere to Yes.

1:28:30So there will be a single underwriter who will be

1:28:33in charge of offering the note.

1:28:36These notes are typically sold in denominations

1:28:39of five thousand dollars.

1:28:40So you know think about it as you divide a half million

1:28:44by five thousand dollars and you'll

1:28:46know how many little notes there are some of them

1:28:49will be bought up in big blocks of a million dollars.

1:28:52Money market funds will typically

1:28:53do that but there would be an option

1:28:56or there would be potentially an option for individuals

1:29:00to contact the underwriter and say I'm

1:29:03interested in buying a block of twenty five thousand or five

1:29:06thousand and if the interest rates work and the demand works

1:29:10then they would be available right.

1:29:12Thank you.

1:29:13Any other questions at this time We

1:29:18looked like we had one public comment on this matter

1:29:23or were they.

1:29:24Well we did have submission on this one

1:29:26if you would like it to be heard I could do that now.

1:29:28If we could take public comment on this matter at this time

1:29:44do you want to stay with the two and a half minute time limit.

1:29:46I think you will be if you will far from finished before

1:29:50that half Peter and I will.

1:29:53Okay.

1:29:54So comments submitted by Sherry Grosvenor.

1:29:58Based on what you said a trend shouldn't be used to address

1:30:01real deficit at the last meeting it

1:30:03appeared that the trend would be used to have money in the bank

1:30:06so the city could say it was closing the budget

1:30:08year with a balanced budget.

1:30:10Have the projections to feel confident

1:30:12that you will have the revenues to repay the trend.

1:30:15We know that we actually have a minimum four million

1:30:17in lost revenues and working to make cuts.

1:30:20What if there is an additional 4 million in lost revenues.

1:30:23What will happen What if the city cannot secure a trend.

1:30:27I mentioned dollars do we spend for this so-called credit

1:30:29line increase emitted from by Sherry Dubner great.

1:30:36That is the only one we have at this time.

1:30:38So it is good.

1:30:40Craig you probably have never seen it.

1:30:41Maybe if you've been at a meeting

1:30:43before but I'm going to pull out my trusty calculator

1:30:45and do that one point five percent So is this three times

1:30:50point zero one five.

1:30:53We're looking at one hundred and twenty seven thousand dollars

1:30:55roughly something less than two hundred thousand dollars

1:30:59would be a good bet to get this 8 million dollar line of credit

1:31:02is that sound like my math is close.

1:31:04Yes.

1:31:05And then I think I made it clear before we

1:31:10we definitely need to have a balanced budget.

1:31:14And I think my comments two weeks ago

1:31:17and I'll echo echo them again tonight.

1:31:21You know we need to have in place mechanisms

1:31:24to monitor our cash flow and our revenue in this uncertain time.

1:31:32If we don't create the tools and and monitor our cash flow

1:31:36and expenditures very closely over the next 12 months

1:31:41it shame on us.

1:31:42We need to make sure that we're putting in place the tools

1:31:47and monitoring systems so that we can make adjustments

1:31:50as during the year so that we we continue to have

1:31:54a balanced budget all year long so

1:31:59that we don't get into a situation at some point

1:32:02where we are making massive cuts just just to pay this bill

1:32:08at next June slash July.

1:32:10Is that a fair assessment.

1:32:13Yes.

1:32:14Yeah well it would be very important to have

1:32:18close monitoring of your cash position

1:32:22as you go through next year to see if revenues really are

1:32:26in line with what was projected for that particular month as

1:32:29well as the expenditure side you know

1:32:32in terms of a prioritization the trend will be doing

1:32:37payable in July of 2021 And so it will be important to know

1:32:46by December as an example whether additional cuts would

1:32:49need to be made in order to maintain the cash balances

1:32:52that you'll need as of June 30.

1:32:55Correct.

1:32:55And for all the good investors that

1:32:57are watching that is consistent with the comments

1:32:59that this council made two weeks ago four weeks ago

1:33:02we've been consistently saying that we will be monitoring

1:33:06this our cash flows so that we can stay on top of this

1:33:10and come out of the fiscal year balanced with enough proceeds

1:33:15to pay off all our debt.

1:33:16So that is our commitment and we're

1:33:18going forward with that Any other questions at this time.

1:33:23Let me go over to my script so I know what I think

1:33:28we are announcing we're requesting presentation

1:33:30We're going to public comments.

1:33:32There is no action requested.

1:33:34So this was an informational item for us tonight.

1:33:38Thank you for the presentation and good luck

1:33:41preparing the official statement policy

1:33:46of which the P O S stands for women every official statement.

1:33:50Excellent.

1:33:50Good luck preparing that and we look forward to hearing

1:33:53the results go during the month of June.

The presentation continued through the mechanics of getting to market.

The sequence: preliminary official statement, credit review, rating, then sale.

A short-term rating looks at the current fiscal year, while the long-term rating concerns the city's financial sustainability.

Asked what the roughly $8.5 million note would cost, the adviser said its size would follow the cash flow of the budget adopted in June — severe cuts would shrink it — and that the only note sold so far that season, for the Port of Long Beach, priced around 1.25%. A councilmember asked staff to shop for the best rate. The sale was to be timed with budget adoption, with funding targeted for 2 July; a budget that rebuilds reserves would count as a credit positive. Notes are sold in $5,000 denominations through a single underwriter, and investors parking cash through the market volatility were a favorable sign.

One resident's comment asked whether the projections justified confidence in repaying the note. It also asked what would happen if another $4 million in revenue were lost or the city could not get a note at all. The Mayor estimated the cost at about $127,000, “something less than two hundred thousand dollars.” He said the Council would monitor cash flow closely to stay balanced through the year. The item was informational, with no action.

Cross-reference

The note is sized to the cash flow of the June budget, so deeper cuts would shrink it. The Mayor puts its cost at under $200,000. The authorization returns on 2 June (2 Jun 2020).

10 A driveway for two houses captions 1433–1758

1:33:55Thank you.

1:33:56That concludes Item 5 be at this time.

1:33:59We'll move on to item 6 A which is a public hearing It's

1:34:03a tentative partial map and an exception to Title 18

1:34:06for two lots at 9 5 6 C View Drive.

1:34:11We will be conducting a public hearing

1:34:13and upon conclusion adopt a resolution approving

1:34:16the tentative personal map or a two lot subdivision

1:34:19and an exception to Title 18 of the city's municipal code

1:34:22for a minor subdivision proposed at a lot

1:34:25without minimum frontage on public street at 9 5 6 C

1:34:29you drive and I'm busy.

1:34:33I'm announcing the item and now I

1:34:36need to announce to ensure your comments are

1:34:39received before the close of the public hearing.

1:34:42It is recommended that they be submitted at this time period

1:34:46for submitting public comments is open

1:34:48until the public hearing is closed

1:34:51so take advantage of this time to submit your comments.

1:34:57And with that it says here that Mr.

1:35:00Valentine you will be doing the presentation That's correct.

1:35:06Excellent.

1:35:07Gave me city council members can you see my presentation here

1:35:11in your screen.

1:35:12Yes.

1:35:13Okay great Just now Time senior planner with the city.

1:35:17This application for tonight is 4 9 5 6.

1:35:20You drive for a tentative partial map

1:35:23to subdivide the light into 2 light

1:35:25as well as for an exception to tell 18 of the city's

1:35:28municipal code due to minimum frontage on a public sheet

1:35:32not being provided for one passes Downstairs.

1:35:37There we go.

1:35:39So the project's safe look looking on TV

1:35:41drives slightly southeast of where

1:35:43you drive intersects Mosher Lane and it's in the IRS

1:35:46dash 5 done Dunning district.

1:35:49In addition to frontage on TV drive

1:35:51it also has a small strip of the site that connects

1:35:53familiar land the parcel is twenty thousand four

1:35:56hundred and fifty four square feet

1:35:58and flat slopes upward towards the east with an average slope

1:36:02of about nineteen point seven percent Here you see

1:36:06the frontage front seat you drive and here

1:36:11is the frontage from Mosher lane so the existing parcel

1:36:18is shown in blue and the proposed light split

1:36:21is shown with the red line proposed pass the one here

1:36:25on the left is vacant and would be six thousand

1:36:28nine hundred and six square feet.

1:36:30The Post Parcel 2 is also vacant and would

1:36:32be thirteen thousand five hundred

1:36:34forty eight square feet.

1:36:37The accepted exceptions Subdivision Ordinance is

1:36:39required because parcel 2 would only

1:36:41have about 20 feet of frontage on Mosher lane

1:36:44and it does not provide the minimum 50 feet of frontage

1:36:47on a public street and then the dashed lines

1:36:50parcels show the set required set back by this image

1:36:58is a bit visible.

1:36:58What it's showing is a preliminary proposed state

1:37:01development plan showing potential locations

1:37:04Green of where a house could be located

1:37:06on each proposed parcel with corresponding driveways

1:37:09for each house.

1:37:14And this is a section showing potential development

1:37:17could occur on each lot with proposed parcel

1:37:19one for the left and propose partial to to the right

1:37:23as the green line shows here the existing grid

1:37:26is quite steep for parcel one.

1:37:29However development of personal one

1:37:31would be feasible with significant grading

1:37:34as well as with the use of retaining

1:37:35walls on the northern side and propose

1:37:38Eastern where property lines.

1:37:40So let's see if those retaining walls in the back

1:37:44here is the existing grade and here's where they have

1:37:47to do significant grading TV drag frontage improvements

1:37:55the applicant would be required to install curb better

1:37:58and sidewalk on both front edges along the project

1:38:02in conjunction with frontage improvements 4 9 6 6 have you

1:38:05drive as well as 77 50 and 70 760

1:38:09Mosher Lane completion frontage improvements for 98 64 drive

1:38:14would then result in continuous curve and sidewalk along CV

1:38:16drive on this block as well for a significant portion of Mosher

1:38:20lane on this block as well.

1:38:23The applicant would be required to restrengthen median

1:38:25on Mosher lane in front of the project's date to allow two way

1:38:29lecture in lane to accommodate turn

1:38:31traffic to and from the site.

1:38:37As you may have seen in your packet

1:38:39there were a few public comments provided

1:38:42here's a summary of some of those concerns

1:38:44with regards to view impacts the city's municipal code does not

1:38:48have a view protection ordinance and does

1:38:50not protect such a thing in terms

1:38:53of a landslide hazard area.

1:38:55Geo technical report was prepared in 2004 and updated

1:38:58in 2017 for the site and that's included in your packet

1:39:02as well so the project site is located the historic

1:39:05and potentially active landslide area

1:39:07however any future development must comply with requirements

1:39:10in this project just like the full report including a two

1:39:13foot thick reinforced concrete mat to be utilized

1:39:16for the foundation they just want to point out that you know

1:39:18significant areas of the city are located in a landslide area

1:39:22and they've largely been developed.

1:39:23Single family houses that required

1:39:24perform similar analysis limitation measures.

1:39:28Projects is actually not in earthquake fault zone

1:39:32the site is in a fire hazard zone.

1:39:35However roughly half of the city isn't a fire hazard zone

1:39:37in any future construction would be required to comply

1:39:40with wildland urban interface requirements such as roofing

1:39:43and building material vegetation management

1:39:45as well as fire sprinklers.

1:39:47And lastly for the lock configuration

1:39:51the parcel map will change the eastern portion of the site

1:39:54from a rear setback of 15 feet to a side setback of five feet.

1:39:59However this configuration is consistent

1:40:01with the configuration of the two recently created lights

1:40:05at 77 50 and 70 760 Mosher and so

1:40:09that's what I'm showing here in blue lines.

1:40:12These two lots were created in the last couple of years.

1:40:15This is 70 some 50 and 70 760 closure.

1:40:19Currently there a single family house

1:40:21being constructed on these white space and Mosher Lane

1:40:24and so with the proposed parcel to hear this parcel

1:40:27also this Beaujolais and lastly on April

1:40:3415th the Planning Commission recommended City Council

1:40:37approval of this application.

1:40:39There are specific required findings providing the staff

1:40:42adequate resolution for an exception

1:40:44to the subdivision These include the existing parcel is larger

1:40:48than the majority of the surrounding parcels

1:40:50and post parcel sizes are consistent with surrounding

1:40:53parcels and consistent with the RSA is the only district

1:40:56in those parcels are relatively rectangular and consistent

1:40:59with many of the surrounding rectangular parcels.

1:41:02In addition there are numerous plots

1:41:04about the minimum required frontage on a public street

1:41:06in the vicinity the project site and these

1:41:08are all shown with yellow stars on this image here.

1:41:12But the project's shown with a red star.

1:41:15This concludes my presentation.

1:41:17I'm available for questions and the applicant Andrew

1:41:20Lucas and Tobin Kendrick but they

1:41:21provide a presentation as well.

1:41:23I also want to mention that Andrew Lucas is a planning

1:41:25commissioner and she recused herself from the Planning

1:41:27Commission meeting on April 15th and only

1:41:29participated in that meeting as the applicant for this project.

1:41:32Thank you very.

1:41:34Thank you.

1:41:36So I am.

1:41:39I think Andrea you're up next.

1:41:43Before we go to the applicant I want

1:41:45to make sure that one of the benefits of living

1:41:47in a small town is that we have the opportunity

1:41:49to know the people who live in the town

1:41:53in in many different ways many different capacities.

1:41:56And so Andrea and Tobin and I know them

1:42:00through a mutual friend and but I however I want to make sure

1:42:04it's clear.

1:42:05And Andrea may not like me for this.

1:42:08I'm going to make my decision based

1:42:09on the record and questions and the testimony we get tonight.

1:42:12So if you can count on me to be as hard a judge on this

1:42:18project as any of us.

1:42:19So thank you And so I don't know if this is the time

1:42:23that the applicant wants to me and I mean we were actually

1:42:28going to wait until we officially

1:42:29open the public hearing to have the applicant give

1:42:31her presentation.

1:42:32So there was an there's an opportunity for us

1:42:35to have questions to Mr. Ballantine

1:42:37do any questions to Mr. Valentine Oh I see.

1:42:43OK.

1:42:44Paul since Gabe first then Paul Jeff my question looking

1:42:52up at the block and the grade.

1:42:55You know I grew up close by there

1:42:57I have a relative that lives a block away.

1:43:01That block that steep block houses were put in 1964.

1:43:08And that's when that one block between Galvin and that corner

1:43:16went up and that what they were able to grade that

1:43:18and they were able to driveways there and sidewalks.

1:43:22So looking at that and looking at all this

1:43:26went through planning already and seeing the lots

1:43:31and the buildings that are already in the process being

1:43:34built. I appreciate your your thoroughness

1:43:37in showing everyone the maps of this or the projected site.

1:43:43Know that folks that I grew up with live in that area

1:43:47as well And we see the work that has been done over the years

1:43:54so I know this was looked at thoroughly

1:43:56and I very much appreciate your help in that sense

1:43:59and letting residents and neighbors

1:44:01know that you know about this particular odd shaped lot

1:44:08looking at the driveways that are being put

1:44:11in that the two houses below.

1:44:14This is doable.

1:44:16It was doable back in 1963 and 1964.

1:44:20So well this is doable and 2020.

1:44:24So I appreciate your presentation

1:44:25on this Any questions in there.

1:44:30Mr. Mr. Campbell no questions.

1:44:32OK I'm glad you guys got small me.

1:44:36Is anybody else have questions for Mr. Ballantine.

1:44:39I think with the lender shell and then you get Janet.

1:44:42Go ahead.

1:44:43Go ahead.

1:44:44OK.

1:44:44It was Paul.

1:44:44It was Paul and then we'll go Janet and then Michele.

1:44:48Yeah.

1:44:49Thank you.

1:44:50So that being off Mosher that lot is pretty a lot of interest

1:44:58to a lot of people in El Sarita we pass it a lot.

1:45:02We'd look at what's going on there.

1:45:05It's always of interest and as we come down the hill

1:45:08it's it's across from our shoddy exhibit at 10.

1:45:12It's pretty important lot.

1:45:14So my I only have three short questions.

1:45:17But by the landslide issue did concern

1:45:20me and I wanted to ask Jack before the vote

1:45:23on the planning commission.

1:45:24That was unanimous and did they deal with the landslide.

1:45:31They were not particularly concerned with the landslide

1:45:33issue I can say on another personal map we recently

1:45:37approved it was actually in an act of landslide

1:45:41cutting between the two and that was even more challenging

1:45:43And this one's actually not technically identified

1:45:47as an act of landslide nearby them.

1:45:49And so there's a very thorough geotechnical report

1:45:52that was including your attachment with those measures.

1:45:57They feel that this is this is going to be a safe asset

1:46:00development with a two map development

1:46:03as well as with a number of the measures

1:46:07Ray has given those gave that the technology

1:46:10is available to deal with this issue on this scale.

1:46:12OK.

1:46:14Absolutely.

1:46:15Oh also noticing over the last year

1:46:19you know trees and fire is important

1:46:21and also we know obviously in big eucalyptus

1:46:25trees most of them gone but not all of them gone.

1:46:29Is there any indication that some of the big tree trunk that

1:46:34are still left there will be removed as well the the owner

1:46:38be addressing that in her testimony.

1:46:41You know the owner can talk about this to my knowledge.

1:46:46Actually none of the trees are technically on their property.

1:46:51You can see here there's just they're strip just comes right

1:46:54through right adjacent to the fencing

1:46:58so there's a number of eucalyptus trees on either side

1:47:00to the right and to the left but their property is

1:47:02actually quite clear of trees.

1:47:05So there will be that the trees that are left there belong

1:47:07to someone else correct and there there's currently

1:47:12These are the two houses that 70 some 50 and 70 760

1:47:15and so I think a number of these will need to be removed

1:47:17as well of both houses and finally

1:47:23some people have complained about the driveway way.

1:47:26I you're not going up the hill but down the hill can

1:47:30you reiterate what will be happening because my family

1:47:35goes down that hill three four or five times a day a probably

1:47:40and was there any consideration of not having a left turn go

1:47:46down the hill on Mosher right.

1:47:49So basically the the the transportation study

1:47:52that was prepared for this project

1:47:55indicated that the current you see them the median Lane here

1:47:58on the aerial view that's currently wide

1:48:00enough for left hand trembling.

1:48:01So all they really need to do is just

1:48:03reach it to to shoot some arrows in there

1:48:06and to include some broken lines.

1:48:10So in terms of that impact is that it's actually

1:48:12not necessarily the function of the street

1:48:14it's just going to allow them to turn left

1:48:16to and from their site So there there's

1:48:20going to be a separate left turn lane You're saying right if you

1:48:25can see that the aerial that sharing with you right now

1:48:29there's the there's the right lane in the left lane the lane

1:48:33going up and then going down in the middle

1:48:34there's just this median and so they would repaint

1:48:38a portion of that median to allow for the left

1:48:40turns from the side.

1:48:42So with an arrow on the pavement turning left.

1:48:47That's correct.

1:48:49OK OK.

1:48:50Thank you Janet.

1:48:53Then ROCHELLE Oh OK.

1:48:54I had a question again about the trees.

1:48:57You said there were no trees on the property

1:49:00that I could swear that when I looked at that last slide

1:49:04I think it was the last line.

1:49:07There's one word that that one is

1:49:11the where is the prop this property

1:49:16that we're considering.

1:49:17Right Looks like there's a tree in the middle of it.

1:49:22Right.

1:49:22And Andrea And so Ben can correct me if I'm wrong

1:49:25but they're strip of property is 25 foot strip running right

1:49:29through right next to this fencing and so I'm not sure

1:49:33but I don't see on until you know

1:49:38I mean on the upper side it looks

1:49:42I see a tree in the middle.

1:49:44I see trees of the whole there whereas this tree right here.

1:49:50Yeah I believe that tree is on the property.

1:49:54Yeah.

1:49:54Oh so it takes a severe turn.

1:49:57Yeah.

1:49:57ANDREA Hold on.

1:49:58Here you show it being straight right.

1:50:03So to my knowledge that tree is this tree

1:50:05right here just just to the east of the state

1:50:10does that make sense.

1:50:16Well I hear what you're saying just

1:50:18looking at it in the pictures it doesn't

1:50:20look that way that maybe it's just that the picture isn't

1:50:25to scale.

1:50:26You know I can't really this I'm not seeing it in person right.

1:50:31I do apologize There are actually

1:50:33some trees shown on the planet and it looks

1:50:35like it's bordering right.

1:50:37The partial line goes essentially

1:50:39right through that tree so will that be coming down

1:50:46I would defer to the applicants on that one.

1:50:50So I should ask the question again

A subdivision hearing on a hillside lot occupied more than an hour.

The application: a tentative parcel map for “a two lot subdivision” and an exception to the municipal code, at an address on Seaview Drive.

The exception sought: to allow a lot “without minimum frontage on [a] public street” — twenty-five feet where fifty is required.

The Mayor disclosed that he knew the applicants through a mutual friend and said he would decide on the record. Quinto, who grew up nearby, said the steep block had been graded for houses in 1964: “it was doable back in 1963 and 1964.”

Staff described the site: 20,454 square feet with an average slope of about 19.7 percent, to be split into parcels of 6,906 and 13,548 square feet. A geotechnical report prepared in 2004 and updated in 2017 required a two-foot reinforced concrete mat foundation in a historic landslide area. The site is in a fire hazard zone, so wildland-urban interface rules and sprinklers would apply. The Planning Commission had recommended approval on 15 April. The applicant, a planning commissioner, had recused herself from that hearing.

One practical question concerned turning movements: the existing median is “wide enough for left hand t[urns],” so the work needed is “just to… shoot some arrows in there and… include some broken lines” — repainting rather than rebuilding.

So the traffic impact is “not necessarily the function of the street — it's just going to allow them to turn left to and from their site.”

A councilmember pressed on trees she thought she had seen on a slide, having been told there were none on the property.

Note

A two-lot split on a 19.7 percent slope, in a historic landslide area and a fire hazard zone, needs a frontage exception for the upper parcel. The traffic change is repainting a median, not rebuilding the street.

11 A pine, and the lots next door captions 1759–1847

1:50:53you know once the application see that the applicant presents

1:50:56yes I know I know that certainly on the drawings

1:51:00it said there were no trees on the lot that were to be removed

1:51:04but certainly on this graph Jeff that you have up there the very

1:51:10large pine tree does look like it's within the five foot

1:51:15setback along the eastern side.

1:51:18ROCHELLE Your turn There we go.

1:51:24OK.

1:51:25I just wanted to clarify did you say there were going to be more

1:51:29properties around the area that would also have

1:51:32driveways going warden over.

1:51:37That's correct.

1:51:39And this is this is their personal line.

1:51:42This was approved in the last few years

1:51:44and they're actually already have building permits

1:51:46that were issued and I believe they're

1:51:48in construction right now OK.

1:51:52That was my only question.

1:51:53Thank you.

1:51:55Yes.

1:51:57Has.

1:51:58So with this slide up this is a great thing.

1:52:01All four of these parcels shown in

1:52:04and if the subdivision occurs five

1:52:08all came from the same original parcel

1:52:12is that correct so to my knowledge I could pull it up

1:52:17there used to be three parcels all going long skinny parcels

1:52:26I could probably track it down but yes there

1:52:30used to be three skinny parcels this large parcel

1:52:34here So this large parcel here used

1:52:39to be two parcels going this way similar to the project

1:52:43that if that makes sense.

1:52:44At one point there was a lot Lane adjustment approved

1:52:47in 2007 that have provided this access to much

1:52:50more length of this parcel.

1:52:52And the purpose of that access was

1:52:54because the vertical difference between Schedule C view

1:52:58and the upper portion of the lot.

1:53:00It made sense to provide that create this flagship lot so

1:53:04that the driveway could come in relatively level

1:53:08to the upper portion of the lot.

1:53:11That's correct.

1:53:11That's my understanding and it Sean or tragic

1:53:14might provide more information.

1:53:16My understanding is that it is because more

1:53:18feasible to develop on this personal A.

1:53:20So that would provide them access to measure

1:53:22that type on this map.

1:53:24Can you show us where 937 Shevlin is I believe

1:53:28that is this parcel right here.

1:53:31And is that parcel developed now or is that the parcel

1:53:34vacant Vale vacant.

1:53:38OK.

1:53:39And if it was to get access it would become a flag part shaped

1:53:45parcel is that correct because it certainly doesn't look

1:53:47like it would be able to get 50 foot of frontage on any parcel

1:53:53correct.

1:53:53But to my knowledge these three parcels Shevlin

1:53:57are all owned by the same person so if ever they

1:53:59wanted to develop this parcel they

1:54:01could just create an easement through one

1:54:02of these these two parcels.

1:54:04Correct.

1:54:04But at that point I wouldn't have

1:54:0650 feet of frontage on a road it would

1:54:08it would need a waiver as well.

1:54:12Well that's a little bit different

1:54:14since the land already exists but that

1:54:17is an interesting question that I have not come up against

1:54:19but since the lot already exists they

1:54:21wouldn't require an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance.

1:54:25So I don't think they would be okay as long as they created

1:54:27an easement or some form of access that was acceptable

1:54:30but that's something I would actually need to talk

1:54:32with a few colleagues about.

1:54:33Sure 944 SHOVELAN which you say is owned by the same owner

1:54:38that made comment.

1:54:39Can you point.

1:54:39Can you outline that 944 SHOVELAN Yeah.

1:54:45It's the long one.

1:54:46It's the it's the long one next to the PG&E right away.

1:54:50Okay.

1:54:50There you go.

1:54:51Thanks 944 Shevlin is is very large

1:54:58and could easily be subdivided but it would then

1:55:01have access problems of its own it is it would be feasible

1:55:07that PG&E would give access through their property

1:55:10to 940 for SHOVELAN that I don't have a good answer to that.

1:55:15I have 944 shotgun was developed wouldn't wouldn't it be logical

Council questions covered a large pine that appears to sit within the eastern setback (deferred to the applicant); neighboring flag lots with similar driveways, approved in recent years and under construction; and the history: the land was once long, skinny parcels, and a 2007 lot line adjustment created the flag lot so a driveway could reach the upper portion at a gentle grade. Asked whether a vacant parcel on Shevlin would need a similar exception, staff thought not, because the lot already exists, but wanted to check with colleagues.

12 The finding runs backwards captions 1848–2084

1:55:19that that house would face Mosher Lane I guess I don't

1:55:27fully understand why why wouldn't they

1:55:28be able to go to Chevron they might

1:55:31be able to but given the great change in that area

1:55:34I would think that it might be easier for them to go to Mosher

1:55:37that's all the reason I'm speaking to this

1:55:41is that it if PG&E wasn't grant them an access they potentially

1:55:47would want to work with trying to get use this same 17 foot

1:55:54have did we lose you for good I'm still here OK

1:55:59we just lost your screen that's all.

1:56:02OK.

1:56:02So I was trying to shed another part that's OK.

1:56:08So to my knowledge those property owners

1:56:10have not requested anything of that nature.

1:56:12OK.

1:56:13The great change is actually not as deep for their properties

1:56:18as it is for the project's site.

1:56:21So in terms of feasibility of connecting to Chevron

1:56:23I don't see any reason why that wouldn't if possible.

1:56:26But yeah.

1:56:29The reason part of part of the reason I'm asking

1:56:31is that the comments were that the orientation

1:56:35of the structure and parcel to is something

1:56:39that we should be questioning and and potentially

1:56:44addressing that orientation.

1:56:47And so I just wanted to have one of the staff

1:56:50comments in the planning commission testimony

1:56:52is that the homes at 770 50 and seven 760

1:56:58are are oriented towards Mosher and and there

1:57:01was some discussion that as a result

1:57:04the the orientation on this parcels

1:57:06should be oriented towards Mosher which in your testimony

1:57:09tonight resulted in a five foot offset

1:57:11to the east as opposed to 15.

1:57:14If it was 15.

1:57:16Can you speak to us of what that would do to the structure

1:57:18and the garage So here's their schematic of what

1:57:29potential development to look like if he required a 15 foot

1:57:34back that would force them to push the whole house further

1:57:38down which is it does get a bit more steep down

1:57:42towards the west on the project site.

1:57:44Sorry.

1:57:45Can you show us what the the the green

1:57:49line is the footprint of the house.

1:57:53Correct.

1:57:53Correct with the garage that's different than the.

1:57:57That's different than this.

1:57:58So.

1:57:59So that's with an attached garage is what you're saying.

1:58:03That's correct.

1:58:05Got it.

1:58:05If the garage was detached with the garage

1:58:08to move away from the rear light line no garages that do not

1:58:13require a set back requirement.

1:58:15They would just need to be 60 separated

1:58:17from the primary house if it's detached grudge.

1:58:20So conceivably the the the portion that is

1:58:25the true residential component which has the F F 1 and f f 2

1:58:33inside that L shape if that was six feet away from the garage

1:58:39the garage would not necessarily have to move but the house

1:58:43when it's moved to the west and had

1:58:45sex six feet of separation from the garage

1:58:49that is that's something that could happen.

1:58:52But if they're if they're attached

1:58:54the 15 foot would force both the garage and the house away.

1:58:58Is that and I understand that correctly.

1:59:02Theoretically yes.

1:59:03However probably be good to discuss this

1:59:05with the applicants as well.

1:59:07Tobin is an architect who has put quite a bit

1:59:09thought into these designs.

1:59:11So that may raise other issues as well correct.

1:59:15I understand and we and I will be

1:59:17certain to ask the applicant.

1:59:19However it if if the building was separated you're saying

1:59:26to me the garage could actually go up against the Lott line

1:59:29even even if there was a 15 foot requirement That's

1:59:34correct garages do not require rear or side back if they're

1:59:39detached detached garages.

1:59:41Correct.

1:59:42So so if we were to require a 15 foot set back

1:59:49the House would only need to move one foot to the west

1:59:53and the garage would need to move six

1:59:55five feet to the east right.

2:00:01If you can figure out some way for there to be 60 separation

2:00:04That's correct.

2:00:04Right.

2:00:05The garage would move five feet to the east

2:00:07and the House would move one foot to the west.

2:00:09You'd have the six feet separation.

2:00:11The House would have to move at least

2:00:12one foot to the to the west.

2:00:14So that that discussion in the planning commission

2:00:19about the orientation of the lot and having the lot be

2:00:25considered fronting Mosher and therefore the five foot side

2:00:30setback is is the whole reason for that

2:00:33was the five foot setback.

2:00:34But if the garage became detached good is a great image.

2:00:38If the garage became detached the house would only

2:00:40have to move one foot to the left

2:00:43while the garage moved five feet to the right

2:00:47is what it is what it sounded like from your testimony.

2:00:52Can we in you keeping this image up for a minute.

2:00:57Can we regulate the roof elevation on partial to is.

2:01:01Is that something that's within our purview so that gets an I

2:01:06a little tricky territory we would want to hear from Sky

2:01:10City attorney before going too far down that road it could

2:01:14raise legal concerns in terms of potentially taking in terms

2:01:19of taking away potential property rights

2:01:22because again keeping in mind even if we the city council

2:01:25did not approve the tenant pass on that they could still build

2:01:29a structure on this portion of the site

2:01:31as long as they met the rear setbacks

2:01:33and that the building overlooks the theoretically

2:01:35be taking away something they could

2:01:37already be doing right now.

2:01:38So I would prefer to hear guys input if the City Council

2:01:42wishes this or that at least love get be informed if we have

2:01:48that capability because that certainly seems to be one

2:01:52of the comments that we're getting

2:01:54is that the finding number three which is no harm to others

2:02:00would there would be harm to 937 Although nine thirty

2:02:05seven and a vacant lot at the moment there would be

2:02:09potential harm to their future view their future development

2:02:13rights I'm just curious what if we have that capability

2:02:18So this is a guy dressed city attorney.

2:02:21So just to build on what Jeff just said.

2:02:26So I think it's important for the city council

2:02:28to keep in mind tonight that what's in front of you

2:02:33is a tentative map.

2:02:36So basically the approve the primary approval

2:02:39that you're being asked for is to split this piece of property

2:02:43with that they're asking for an exception

2:02:46to the frontage requirement that is also part

2:02:50of the subdivision ordinance for park for what

2:02:52is proposed to be partial to.

2:02:54So I just I say that part of the context for keeping in mind

2:02:58that what's in front of you is largely a subdivision

2:03:01question not an approval of the development project as a whole.

2:03:07And so at the height of buildings

2:03:10is regulated by the zoning ordinance.

2:03:13And as Jeff pointed out if they if the applicants were not

2:03:18in front of you tonight they would

2:03:20be able to build a house on this lot

2:03:23up to the maximum height that's allowed under the zoning

2:03:27ordinance which could be as high as what is being proposed

2:03:31for the house that's on Castle 2 with regard

2:03:34to finding the third finding that you

2:03:38referred to marry Lyman.

2:03:40I do want to be on.

2:03:42I want to emphasize the council.

2:03:44The specific wording of that finding which is that the city

2:03:49council to find that is the exception

2:03:51that's being asked for is not injurious to other property.

2:03:57So just to unpack a couple of pieces of that one is that it's

2:04:02not the project is it it's not a finding

2:04:04that the project as a whole is not

2:04:06injurious to other property.

2:04:07Is that the exception is not injurious to their property.

2:04:11And the exception that you're being asked for

2:04:13is one to allow less than 50 feet of frontage

2:04:16for the for lot two on a street.

2:04:20So what you So what what the sort of state

2:04:25the finding in reverse you would have

2:04:27to be able to find that there is evidence in the record

2:04:30that allowing less than 50 feet of frontage for proposed parcel

2:04:33to would actually cause injury to another property which you

2:04:38may well find in the course of the hearing

2:04:40that there is evidence to support that.

2:04:41But I do but I want the council to understand that that is

2:04:44actually the finding that you would have to make

2:04:48And just to restate it in the way

2:04:49that the finding is actually written not the reverse

2:04:52that I just phrase and I'm sorry.

2:04:53That's probably confusing.

2:04:54But the finding that you have to make

2:04:56is that the twenty five foot frontage

2:04:59for the proposed parcel to is not injurious to other property

2:05:04not the project as a whole And I also just want

2:05:07to put it in the council's mind that the definition

2:05:10that that injury property does have

2:05:12a meaning in California law.

2:05:13And it actually means damage to a structure

2:05:17or the physical land of another of another property.

2:05:22And so the.

2:05:24So in addition So so now taking both pieces of that

2:05:28and putting them back together the finding you have to make

2:05:31is that the twenty five foot frontage exception that you're

2:05:35being asked for won't result in physical damage

2:05:38to either an adjacent structure or the adjacent physical land.

2:05:42So I hope that I realize that's a sort

2:05:44of a long way from the height of the of the proposed House.

2:05:47But I do want to I do want to point out

2:05:49that that sort of at all and all interrelated the way

2:05:53that you asked the question.

2:05:54Right.

2:05:54Thank you.

2:05:55And so then I will carry my two two other two

2:06:01follow your line of.

2:06:03Is the setback requirement on the eastern part

2:06:07property parcel to part of the exceptions

2:06:09that we have to pass tonight no part of the exception so no

2:06:18the exception is not necessarily related to the configuration

2:06:23of the lot.

2:06:24It's just be with the driveway.

2:06:27Great.

2:06:28And then now if you could bring up the view the plan view it

2:06:33has the big grey tree on it there is a note that well this

2:06:39will do actually go the one you had in between the two

2:06:41the complicated the busy one on the to the south

2:06:47of the big tree about 40 feet there seems

2:06:52to be three linear segments.

2:06:56Is that a retaining wall correct And what

2:07:03is the what is the relationship of that retaining

2:07:06wall to the property.

2:07:08It's both properties because I see

2:07:09the corner line the corner lot line is right in that segment.

2:07:14What is the.

2:07:15Is that law is that there to protect the properties

2:07:19next door so building on Mr. Woodruff's comment

2:07:22about injuring the properties next door.

2:07:24It is is that retaining wall there to protect

2:07:27those properties It looks like it's

2:07:31adjacent surrounding a tree.

2:07:33However I would like to hear from the applicants on this

2:07:37on the wall and whether an end to staying with the concept of

2:07:43is the exception going to cause harm to the adjacent property.

2:07:47If we were to require that big tree the one that Council

2:07:50Member Ables pointed out which is

2:07:53their circle about 40 feet north of the wall should be removed.

2:07:58What is there any sense that the root structure would cause harm

2:08:02to the property next door I can't see why although I am not

2:08:10sure I have definitive information I can't see why

2:08:12that would happen why that would be OK so that all of those

2:08:17questions speak to the fact of whether the twenty five foot

2:08:19frontage along Mosher would end in their corresponding

2:08:23an access route would cause harm to nine forty four and nine

The Mayor asked about setbacks, the roof height and the neighbors' views. The city attorney then explained the finding the Council had to make.

On height, the city attorney said building height is set by the zoning ordinance. Even without the split, the owners could build to the maximum height allowed.

The finding required: that the exception “is not injurious to other property.”

His first clarification narrows it: “it's not a finding that the project as a whole is not injurious to other property — [it] is that the exception is not injurious.”

So the Council judges the twenty-five-foot frontage, not the houses.

Then the reversal: to deny, “you would have to be able to find that there is evidence in the record that allowing less than 50 feet of frontage for proposed parcel two would actually cause injury to another property.”

His acknowledgement of the difficulty: “that's probably confusing.”

And what injury means: in California law it is “damage to a structure or the physical land of another” property. So the finding is that the 25-foot frontage “won't result in physical damage” to an adjacent structure or land.

Significant

The finding concerns the exception, not the houses: that a 25-foot frontage is not injurious to other property. Injury in California law means physical damage to another structure or land. Stated in reverse, a denial would need evidence in the record of such injury. The city attorney concedes “that's probably confusing.”

13 The applicant's case captions 2085–2357

2:08:27thirty seven Shevlin Is is this development coordinated with

2:08:35those the ones that you said are under construction at seven

2:08:38seventy seven 50 and 70 760 Mosher How do you

2:08:43meet I mean I'm assuming that there's There's a sewer

2:08:51line that's

2:08:52being shown on here.

2:08:54On this one associated with those

2:08:56you don't know where the sewer line for Castle 2

2:08:58would be for example is it going to coordinate

2:09:01with those the sewer line that's going

2:09:03into that castle Just curious.

2:09:06Oh yes good question.

2:09:08So the public works department one of the conditions

2:09:10is for a more detailed offsite public improvements plan.

2:09:15Yeah.

2:09:15Particularly with things like connecting making

2:09:17sure the sidewalk improvements are connected appropriately

2:09:21and and utilities so that is conditional

2:09:23approval will need to be addressed prior to issuance

2:09:26of building permit but they have started

2:09:28to show to show those utilities and these plants.

2:09:31Great With that I guess the next thing to do

2:09:35would be open the public hearing to make sure that that

2:09:39is what I'm supposed to do now.

2:09:42Any other questions from the Council All right.

2:09:46Seeing none.

2:09:47I will open the public hearing.

2:09:50And at this point I'll invite the applicant to provide here

2:09:53brief remarks I have want to turn

2:10:00So we ever going to indicate you have a PowerPoint presentation.

2:10:03Andrea have taken you off his meter you're ready to provide

2:10:06your presentation yes.

2:10:10Hey if you were in a building you are on

2:10:14and we can't see you.

2:10:15Hi.

2:10:16Thank you very much for hearing our project.

2:10:20This this evening and we'd like to make a short presentation

2:10:28about the about this subdivision and we can

2:10:31answer some of your questions.

2:10:33Well we are in the presentation We are not currently

2:10:41seeing your screen share.

2:10:43Oh.

2:10:43Let me make sure that that is screen share with okay WebEx

2:10:55and share screen is right there there at the screen

2:11:041 or the Microsoft PowerPoint There you go.

2:11:09Stand by All right go.

2:11:16OK And we are successful.

2:11:18Thank you So in two thousand eight

2:11:28Towbin and I purchased this lot and with it came the approved

2:11:35an improved House plan which is pictured in the right hand

2:11:39side of the slide.

2:11:42The garage is approximately where we are showing a proposed

2:11:45garage and also reminding the council

2:11:48that our drawings our tentative potential development drawings

2:11:55So this house was approved I think Sean Moss was the planner

2:12:00that worked with the prior owner and the prior owner

2:12:04secured a dry lot line change to get the driveway over to Mosher

2:12:17unfortunately because of the recession

2:12:20we were not able to build on the site.

2:12:21So after two years the permitting for the driveway

2:12:25and building expired This is the resolution that is recorded

2:12:31with the county that just demonstrates

2:12:36that records that lot line adjustment

2:12:39and it treats that as a driveway.

2:12:43I think the fire department and the other divisions of the city

2:12:49reviewed it and placed conditions

2:12:51upon using this as a driveway.

2:12:53So it already had to gone through and been approved

2:12:56as a driveway for this is just a small example

2:13:02from the fire department.

2:13:03So if it is developed on Mosher Lane

2:13:06is the access point it shall be constructed

2:13:08all weather surface suitable to hold thirty thousand pounds.

2:13:11There were other comments from the Fire Department

2:13:14and from traffic engine from Public Works about the turn

2:13:20lane on Mosher and even comments about building fireproof

2:13:27materials building with fireproof materials

2:13:32And so we want to split the launch sites because this will

2:13:39make it feasible for us to finance and build

2:13:42two houses regardless of the House to lots

2:13:45or not we can build two houses on it.

2:13:48It's big enough However it's not feasible financially

2:13:53for us and we feel a better opportunity for us

2:13:56and it would add additional housing to the city

2:13:59if we can divide this into two lots.

2:14:02And again they will both have foundations

2:14:04that Jefferson spoke about they'll be sprinklers.

2:14:07The exterior will be all fire resistant

2:14:09and will conform to the regulations

2:14:12that the city requires to us to do

2:14:18this is a screenshot similar to Jeff's

2:14:20shot with the yellow stars.

2:14:22But this shows flag lots that are around the neighborhood

2:14:27and the one with the dot is.

2:14:31It's kind of to the Middle That's our lot.

2:14:35You can see there are over 30 flag lots there.

2:14:39So we feel that creating a flag a lot

2:14:41is not unusual We feel that developing

2:14:51these two lots will be an asset as Jeff pointed out.

2:14:55There'll be sidewalks and gutters curbing gutters created

2:14:59in the public right of way.

2:15:01Each lot when it's built we'll be landscape maintained which

2:15:05now it's you know it's just fire control eucalyptus where

2:15:09we're both as several council members discussed proposed

2:15:15houses will add families to the neighborhood which provides

2:15:20more areas long closure CV drive and I think he might since you

2:15:28may be familiar with the problems in there in the past

2:15:32before the toys purchased and subdivided There are lots

2:15:36but there were there was a drug house there on the corner

2:15:38if you drive We also had the arsonist lighting fires we

2:15:45trash and trespassers We know that these lots in compliance

2:15:55by size our size and the development

2:15:59of the neighborhood would be very

2:16:02compatible with the existing

2:16:03residential use.

2:16:06The consultants we hired traffic engineer Our geotechnical

2:16:09engineer our civil engineer certifier they all

2:16:13show that we can come by as they all provide

2:16:16recommendations and requirements for development which

2:16:19we will follow.

2:16:22We've also worked with the planning staff

2:16:24of the public works martial and they've

2:16:28started to place conditions on the project

2:16:31when the project is developed those conditions would

2:16:34come into play.

2:16:36We've spoken to PG&E east bay mud utilities

2:16:44and so they're tentatively printable project complies

2:16:51with the general plan of this.

2:16:53I think this was outlined in your package.

2:16:55It's a compatible use and then in the neighborhood

2:16:58we could provide suitable housing

2:17:00and as an extra house and a lot enhances

2:17:03the neighborhood character.

2:17:06So we feel that that is a clear compliance

2:17:09with the general plan.

2:17:12So in summary it's a residential zone

2:17:17it's residential on all sides House and drive drive

2:17:21commercial work previously approved and the lap is

2:17:26recorded including conditions The current studies reinforce

2:17:33usability There are eight similar lots in the immediate

2:17:35neighborhood and 30 nearby.

2:17:38We can meet and exceed the development requirements

2:17:42and we want wanted to address a couple of minutes

2:17:45from the council which is the big eucalyptus

2:17:49trees that is on our property We're tentatively

2:17:56thinking removing it.

2:17:58But we know that the nuclear industry or fire hazard

2:18:04in Alaska we prefer to have negative trees

2:18:08our and the retaining wall segment you know that's

2:18:15a curve ball.

2:18:16And that is in vicinity of the tree that's just

2:18:20over the property line on 940 for I

2:18:24think for nine thirty seven.

2:18:27Jacqueline and that's two a lot of the grading

2:18:34the work of the driveway.

2:18:35It's basically a lump there where I've been

2:18:38in the neighboring tree is.

2:18:40So we need to lower the grade With so that's that's it.

2:18:53We feel that as designers we've assembled a really good team

2:18:57and that we need a high quality project that

2:19:00will be of value neighborhood thank you

2:19:05and we're open for questions.

2:19:09What are the latest sort of with weather

2:19:14it looks like you're on media.

2:19:15Do you have questions.

2:19:16Yeah I do First of all I want to confirm what you're saying

2:19:20about the tree that is on your property and the status

2:19:25of whether or not you would be removing

2:19:27it Hello I'm trying to get rid of the planning point.

2:19:36Oh I'm sorry.

2:19:37Yes.

2:19:38Yes we would We are we are seriously

2:19:41considering removing it.

2:19:44Well I could say we we want to remove it.

2:19:46We haven't gotten the price yet.

2:19:48We definitely want to remove I don't

2:19:51know how to condition us to remove

2:19:53this in that form statement.

2:19:57If you did want to remove it it it

2:19:58would be I mean if you were going

2:20:00to remove it would be one thing if you

2:20:02were not gonna remove it.

2:20:03That would be another thing.

2:20:05So if you want to is kind of nowhere.

2:20:08Go ahead Indra.

2:20:09If you condition us to remove it.

2:20:11Well we haven't.

2:20:13OK that answers my question on that.

2:20:18So did I also hear that you would be probably developing

2:20:22these two houses at separate times

2:20:25from an I would say we'd rather we would we would definitely

2:20:30be building one all up to one we would

2:20:35be looking to work with somebody to develop it with us.

2:20:42So sound Marcel Proust I did it at approximately

2:20:46the same time or time.

2:20:49I know I couldn't say development.

2:20:54OK OK.

2:20:55Thank you.

2:20:56That was all I had.

2:20:58Any other council members have questions

2:20:59for the applicant I do use we have a ancillary dwelling

2:21:09unit ordinance in town.

2:21:11Have you considered auxiliary dwelling units

2:21:14in either one of these parcels I think certainly it's possible

2:21:21and it's something to consider.

2:21:24But this time we we haven't drawn up

2:21:27any plans for doing that kind of looking

2:21:31at the tentative conceptual plan that you put out there

2:21:35and looking at the grades that you're proposing for the

2:21:38for the slab and the House it does

2:21:41look like you are doing some fill

2:21:45on the south side of the mat and because

2:21:48of the where it's located.

2:21:50Have you thought about moving the House further down the hill

2:21:55to potentially minimize some of the fill

2:21:58that you would have to do what it would.

2:22:01It would start protecting the house

2:22:04right away is up in the air.

2:22:07You can see the house is actually designed to step

2:22:10back what are the grades.

2:22:11That was part of the tenants so that the lower

2:22:16level of the house is pretty much

2:22:17close to the existing grade.

2:22:20If we push it further out then we would be probably

2:22:24any kind of backyard decks anything like that

2:22:27at that level would actually be projecting up in the air

2:22:31We're partial to it.

2:22:33Great.

2:22:33We're talking about partial we're

2:22:35talking about partial to right track personnel to at the top.

2:22:39Yeah.

2:22:40So it's.

2:22:42So there is some fill at the south end of the garage

2:22:46but on the north end it's it's not it's it's cut down

2:22:51so the actual only fill area that only avoid basically

2:22:55underneath having a slab is about the north half

2:23:01of the garage to the rest of the building is either honourable

2:23:04grade and in the your neighbor to the East nine thirty seven

2:23:10submitted a suggestion that we restrict the development

2:23:14to the north portion of the development Portland

2:23:18developable area which is the more of a flat plot timber

2:23:23the higher plateau you obviously think the city attorney said it

2:23:29well tonight we're not actually looking at the development

2:23:31plan we're looking at a parcel

2:23:33subdivide however as part of this parcel

2:23:35subdivide we can make conditions and I was just curious

2:23:39if you've evaluated the relocation of the House

2:23:44to the location of the house that might have a a more

2:23:50optimistic or better view line for your neighbor

2:23:55to the east Sure.

2:23:59I'd like to address that.

2:24:02We'd look at having a five foot side

2:24:06yards on each side of the lot.

2:24:10And then we looked at having a 15 foot backyard

2:24:14on the south side of the lot and there there's another house

2:24:17next door to 937 Shevonne on that is also concerned

2:24:22about the view although she did not write that talk to us

2:24:26personally about it and we felt that if we could draw the House

2:24:3115 feet away from that property line a helpful

2:24:38for both 937 Shetland and for this neighborhood

2:24:42to have a view through there.

2:24:44There was discussion planning commission meeting

2:24:47of making those only five foot side yard set perhaps that

2:24:50would block the view much more But again potential

2:25:00because this is potential development

2:25:02it's not set in stone.

2:25:06To put the property in half I think

2:25:10would make it unfeasible because it would end up

2:25:13being cantilevered cantilevered levered way out

2:25:15over a grade like a shoe box pointing

2:25:19west with a narrow cantilever.

2:25:24All right.

2:25:26Any other any questions Hopkins at this time.

The applicant presented, and the argument was about what the site can physically hold.

The applicants had bought the lot in 2008 with an approved house plan and a 2007 lot line adjustment that gave the driveway access to Mosher Lane. The recession stopped the building, and the permits expired. Splitting the lot would make two houses financeable. They counted over 30 flag lots nearby and eight similar lots in the immediate neighborhood, and recalled past trouble on the vacant site. They wanted to remove the large eucalyptus on their property.

On conditions already attached: sidewalk improvements must be “connected appropriately” and utilities addressed “prior to issuance of building permit.”

On siting, the applicant explained the house “is actually designed to step back” so the lower level sits “close to the existing grade” — pushing it further out would leave decks “projecting up in the air.”

A neighbor had submitted “a suggestion that we restrict the development to the north portion of the” developable area, “the more… flat” and “higher plateau.”

On the shape of the lot, and why an even split would not work: “to put the property in half I think would make it unfeasible, because it would end up being cantilevered… way out over a grade, like a shoe box pointing west with a narrow cantilever.”

The applicant said the plan already keeps a 15-foot rear yard on the south side to leave a view for the neighbors to the east.

The public hearing was opened after Council questions.

Significant

The applicants say a split makes two houses financeable on a lot that already had an approved house and driveway. The house steps down with the grade, and an even split would leave a house cantilevered “like a shoe box pointing west.”

14 Received and approved captions 2358–2617

2:25:28MR. Mr. FDLE I just want to make clear

2:25:32and I wasn't sure if Janet was going

2:25:34to move toward a condition but the tree I want to make

2:25:41sure we're talking about the same tree

2:25:43the big huge eucalyptus tree trunk that looks like a ghost

2:25:49or without any leaves on it that that's on your property.

2:25:53No that's that's on the ones without leaves the ones that

2:25:58leaves that that's the other property I'm sorry their name

2:26:01is Troy the Troy property.

2:26:03One on my small right along motor.

2:26:06Yeah yeah that's that's slowly being cut down.

2:26:09The one that we're talking about is about maybe 20 or 30 feet

2:26:15back from Mosher and it just is just

2:26:18inside our property line on about halfway on that panel

2:26:22I believe it's a pine.

2:26:24It's a big it's a big you.

2:26:26Yes it's Yeah it's quite big.

2:26:30I was going to be some sort of a view really considering it

2:26:34but you're seeing the one on Mosher eucalyptus.

2:26:37Is it gonna be cut down the trunk.

2:26:40Yeah that's the choice I can't speak to the neighbor but they

2:26:45they've been in the process having this.

2:26:47OK.

2:26:48Yeah it's been in the process for a while.

2:26:50So I thought the back.

2:26:52Yeah.

2:26:52Ok then I'll I'll pass it to Janet if she wants to make

2:26:56a condition on the other two.

2:26:57Yeah certainly.

2:26:58I think I think there was consensus of conditioning

2:27:00the removal of the eucalyptus that we're

2:27:02not in a point in the meeting.

2:27:04We're not that right now yet.

2:27:07Any other questions.

2:27:10OK.

2:27:10Seeing none.

2:27:11I'll ask the clerk to proceed with public comment

2:27:13so I know there's at least one ma'am.

2:27:19Just to recap we did receive two public comments emissions

2:27:22in advance of our twelve o'clock deadline today on this item

2:27:26is received from Sue and Paul Duncan as well as net change.

2:27:30And then we did receive one additional item can you please

2:27:33confirm you want me to continue with two

2:27:34and a half minute yes please.

2:27:37I will proceed now I'm in submitted by Will Scott

2:27:40there Mr. Lyman and counsel my husband Matt

2:27:43and I bought our home on shelving drive in 2018

2:27:47after spending over a year exploring properties

2:27:50in the East Bay hills having moved to San Francisco in 2006

2:27:54from the East Coast one of the things that drew

2:27:56us to the region was the history of ecologically

2:27:59logical advocacy.

2:28:01We were thrilled when we discovered El Serino

2:28:03a place that seems to ex exude our values living peacefully

2:28:07and gently on the earth living in harmony with one's

2:28:10surroundings and neighbors.

2:28:12The proposed subdivision of the existing lot and 956 Seaview

2:28:16would significantly diminish the tranquility

2:28:18of our neighborhood.

2:28:19Increased congestion block picturesque views

2:28:23and scarred the landscape.

2:28:25We urge you to reject this proposal

2:28:26and encourage owners of large parcels

2:28:29to honor the unique responsibility

2:28:31they hold in stewarding the land for the common good.

2:28:34May they choose to commit the providing

2:28:37to providing ample open spaces not cluttering the hillside

2:28:40with numerous buildings and respecting

2:28:42neighbors you access dearly.

2:28:44Will Scott and then I would just reconfirm we do

2:28:49have one additional comment.

2:28:51Receive now I will start now.

2:29:03The members of the city council I would like to see the project

2:29:06approved with three conditions.

2:29:07One the fence along motor is is repair

2:29:10or replaced with a nice looking neighborhood fence.

2:29:13The current fence is an eyesore to all eucalypt eucalypt

2:29:17oak trees are removed on the property

2:29:19prior to subdividing 3.

2:29:21All tree trunks are removed and this stems ground

2:29:23in case submitted by Denise which think will confirm

2:29:29and that is the conclusion of comments

2:29:31submitted on this item Great.

2:29:36Can I get a motion to close the public hearing.

2:29:41Some of get bug Quito and sector by party Okamoto roll call

2:29:47please.

2:29:48May or Lyman.

2:29:49Yes.

2:29:50May I pretend that Ellie yes.

2:29:53Council member.

2:29:54Wilson.

2:29:54Yes.

2:29:55Council member Part 2 Okamoto yes council member King 2 Yes.

2:30:00Motion carries All right that would

2:30:02mean we move on to comments.

2:30:04So Mr. Wilson you start us off with comments.

2:30:08So I want to get back to the trees at this point

2:30:11the I. I'm particularly interested in trees

2:30:14I have to say now.

2:30:15Because in my own neighborhood we had a cat.

2:30:20I guess you could call it a house casualty of a tree

2:30:24falling over in one of the big wind storms

2:30:27and it fell from one property onto the next property

2:30:30behind me damaging that house so these things may look OK

2:30:37but they don't end up being OK.

2:30:40I guess you could save and so I'm very concerned

2:30:45about about the trees that the tree ordnance

2:30:49that we propose at least.

2:30:51I think that was the document It was then talked about trees

2:30:54that should not be planted so it would seem to me

2:30:58and in opening up a new property that it presents

2:31:05an opportunity if nothing else to ask

2:31:10that those trees be removed.

2:31:14And so I would hope that we would do that That's

2:31:22a if there's a motion made you're requesting

2:31:25that there's a well placed.

2:31:27There's one motion made through this whole item right.

2:31:29Everything inside that correct there is one resolution.

2:31:33The resolution is it's a resolution granting the parcel

2:31:39subdivision and it's got the four uses

2:31:45and it's got a planning division has

2:31:49conditions Public Works has conditions we

2:31:52could put a condition on that.

2:31:53Requires the tree to be removed immediately

2:31:58these that are defined as trees that should not be planted

2:32:06in El Serino at the end if any trees in those categories

2:32:09be removed.

2:32:11Pursuant to our urban forest criminals

2:32:17list oh no city council action that I'm referring to the Yeah

2:32:23I believe right now we have that our action the action of two

2:32:28thousand six or five or whenever it was done

2:32:31is establish a list of trees that are allowed

2:32:34or not a lot of not allowed.

2:32:36Right And that list is updated or has been updated.

2:32:40I thought okay if it's been updated that's fine whatever

2:32:43the current list is of trees that cannot be planted in El

2:32:48Serino that that this property that this owner

2:32:54remove all of those trees.

2:32:56It sounds like there's one at least one yes.

2:33:02And I'm looking at the city attorney.

2:33:03That sounds like that would be a 20 to e

2:33:06or would we make our own set of condition or Owens condition

2:33:13I think that if you just if you just make sure

2:33:15that the condition is added to the motion

2:33:18we will make we will find the right place for it

2:33:20in the resolution.

2:33:21Excellent.

2:33:22That's fine comments.

2:33:25I see Mr. Patel you're on muted I'm sorry I I would second that

2:33:31if it needs the one I'm not yet not yet because I want to go

2:33:37back to the do no harm to the property next to you

2:33:41and the retaining wall that is protecting the tree

2:33:45at the corner of nine forty four nine thirty seven I want

2:33:51to make sure that the applicants are understand that that

2:33:55retaining wall it's that's being proposed needs to protect that

2:33:59tree and I don't know if that's something we can also requires

2:34:03a condition that there is an arborist that assists

2:34:07in the design of that wall I'm not sure there's a can

2:34:14I think that it would

2:34:15be fine to include that as a condition that they consult

2:34:18follow the direction of an urban forest treated expert

2:34:24in designing the retaining wall around the tree on the driveway

2:34:29which is not the best phrase condition but I think we can

2:34:33we can work on that but I'm not and to be a second condition I

2:34:40would a tree related condition because I believe that tree

2:34:44if I saw the pictures correctly I believe that trees

2:34:46and my might be a native tree so fall in eucalyptus

2:34:53it's also a eucalyptus correct.

2:34:56The one on the one that that they're building retaining wall

2:35:00to protect is a eucalyptus.

2:35:02That's correct OK.

2:35:05Well do no harm to the property next to you that's too bad.

2:35:10Maybe maybe I'll take back my my proposal maybe

2:35:13they should take it put a retaining

2:35:15wall in there that doesn't do the root system any good.

2:35:20The other the other thing that could happen is that if you

2:35:24look at the dispute resolution process it was created within

2:35:29the tree Tree Committee tree not Tree Committee create it

2:35:33created the current three committee now known

2:35:36as the rainforest forestry committee the anyway it said

2:35:41there's a process in the first step in the process basically

2:35:44is talk to your neighbor so maybe if talking if they talk

2:35:49to their neighbor they could work out a compatible process

2:35:52but maybe the neighbor wants it removed for example or maybe

2:35:56you know if they didn't have to pay for it they would be happy

2:35:59if it was removed you know I don't know

2:36:01what that might turn out

2:36:03to be but that's a much simpler process than you know

2:36:11a requirement or you know somebody has to do it

2:36:14or whatever they they just talk to each other and are

2:36:17compatible with would agree that I would agree that

2:36:21if if the if the applicant removes the tree

2:36:26that's probably a better outcome for the city Mayor I wanted

2:36:30a reminder that our our our attorney Skye Woodruff already

2:36:36spoke to the applicant Sunday Ah they said they would put

2:36:41the trees down so I think we're going on the weeds to this

2:36:44and the only thing we're supposed to approve is that

2:36:49road and splitting of the law is that correct

2:36:57Council member I believe we can

2:36:58put a condition on that the trees

2:36:59need to be removed they will establish a green eucalyptus

2:37:02we've established there's a eucalyptus tree on the property

2:37:05we're now discussing the protection

2:37:06of the adjacent property which is finding number

2:37:09three of our resolution if this if the retaining wall does

2:37:14damage to the adjacent property then we can't make finding

2:37:17three and therefore we shouldn't be passing the resolution

2:37:21so we're not in the weeds we're in the eucalyptus that was

2:37:26a joke if it does make us it because I

2:37:30certainly understand the council's desire

2:37:32to see that tree removed.

2:37:35I'll just say it based on my experience

2:37:37it's extremely difficult to craft conditions

2:37:40to get neighbors to talk to each other

2:37:42about the best outcome for trees or other things

2:37:45that are on property lines.

2:37:47Think the applicants have proposed a solution to protect

2:37:50the property next door.

2:37:53Maybe they can have as they move closer to actually

2:37:56getting built something.

2:37:57Bill if if the council approves this

2:37:59they'll be able to work something

2:38:00out with the neighbors and eliminate the need for that.

2:38:02But trying to craft a condition around that's

2:38:05going to be extremely impractical

2:38:08and may create a roadblock to actually moving

2:38:11forward with the project.

2:38:12If the council approves it I'll agree to conduct their two

2:38:15conditions that we're here we're considering as one remove

2:38:18the eucalyptus tree on their property

2:38:20and to is consultant arborist to protect the property next door.

2:38:24If that tree remains right the tree is not there then

2:38:27they don't have to consult an arborist so that that's

2:38:30certainly a way out of it.

2:38:32Those are the two conditions I'm hearing the Council consider.

2:38:35Is there any other any conditions

2:38:38the council is considering to go over to my script

2:38:43to have a motion to move the resolution

2:38:46with those two conditions A maximum of I

2:38:52believe Gabe beat you to it.

2:38:54Janet you'll be the second OK.

2:38:56All right.

2:38:57So motion by Kato seconded by Abel send Can

2:39:00we have a roll companies.

2:39:02What's the motion.

2:39:04The motion is to approve the resolution with the two

2:39:06conditions added and I mean.

2:39:11Yes ma'am.

2:39:12Freedom finale.

2:39:16You pretend finale.

2:39:18Yes.

2:39:19Can member Abel.

2:39:21Yes and council member tried to keep Komodo.

2:39:23Yes.

2:39:24And some breaking talk.

2:39:26Yes.

2:39:27Motion carries.

2:39:31All right.

2:39:32That brings us.

2:39:33That concludes items a which was a public hearing

The hearing closed and the resolution was adopted unanimously with two conditions. The applicants must remove the eucalyptus on their property. If the neighboring tree remains, they must consult an arborist on the retaining wall that protects it.

A neighbor's suggestion — restricting development to the flatter northern plateau — was not imposed as a condition.

Fadelli checked which tree they meant: “the big huge eucalyptus tree trunk that looks like a ghost”. The applicant said that one was on the neighboring property, and that the tree inside their line was a large pine.

Abelson, recalling a tree in her neighborhood that fell onto a house, wanted any trees on the city's do-not-plant list removed. The Mayor raised the tree at the property corner. The city attorney warned that conditions requiring neighbors to agree on trees are very hard to write.

Two written comments were read. One urged rejection, saying the split would diminish the neighborhood's tranquility, block views and scar the hillside. The other supported approval on three conditions: replace the fence along Mosher, remove the eucalyptus, and grind out the stumps.

The Council then moved to compensation, with a separate resolution for each group.

Significant

The split is approved on condition that the applicants remove their eucalyptus and consult an arborist if the neighbor's tree stays. A neighbor's suggestion to restrict building to the northern plateau is not imposed.

15 Forty-five full time, thirty-eight part time captions 2618–2769

2:39:38on a tentative personal map brings us

2:39:41to policy matters item seven.

2:39:43We have four policy matters this evening items seven a will can

2:39:50take up this time which is adoption

2:39:52of a Memorandum of Understanding between adults

2:39:54Rito and the Service Employees International Union Local

2:39:5710 to 1 the period for submitting public comments

2:40:03on this item is now closed.

2:40:05Comments will be heard before council takes action.

2:40:10Is there a staff report.

2:40:12Yes.

2:40:12Good evening mayor and members of the city council.

2:40:15My name is Alexander Arlo guess I'm

2:40:18the assistant city manager and acting human resources manager.

2:40:22I have for you this evening a resolution adopting

2:40:26an agreement to the city and the Service Employees International

2:40:30Union Local twelve ten twenty one to modify salaries

2:40:35and to create a new M.O. SEIU is recognized as the majority

2:40:41bargaining for both full time and part time representing

2:40:45General Employees in total there are

2:40:47forty five full time and thirty eight

2:40:50part time SEIU representatives employees and the city

2:40:54also it out as you remember the City

2:40:57Council approved a two year agreement

2:40:59with CSU back in November 2017.

2:41:03And this what this emoji was effective July 1st

2:41:062017 through June 30th 2020.

2:41:11So like other bargaining units SEIU

2:41:13has clearly recognized the city's current fiscal condition

2:41:17and has offered to forego any cost of living adjustment

2:41:21or otherwise known as a club for 20

2:41:2420 the highlights of the M.O. You before you are as follows.

2:41:31So first effective July 2020 there will be a zero percent

2:41:36loss meaning no salary increase for all members represented

2:41:41by SEIU and in July 2021 there will be a 3 percent COLA

2:41:48In addition there was language added

2:41:51that reflected the current union management advisory team.

2:41:55That's what's called a U mat.

2:41:57That means periodically I am actually a member of that you

2:42:01bat in addition to other management staff

2:42:04and also union stop This language codifies

2:42:10the current practice that has happening

2:42:13and the total cost savings to the city by SEIU foregoing a 3

2:42:18percent COLA in July 20 20 is approximately one hundred

2:42:23and fourteen thousand dollars.

2:42:25This savings will be realized in the first year of fiscal year

2:42:292020 2020 twenty two.

2:42:33The total cost for the city for 3 percent increase for SEIU

2:42:38in July 2021 is the same amount and would be realized

2:42:43in the second year from of the forthcoming biannual time So

2:42:49in closing.

2:42:50On behalf of the city I would like to personally thank SEIU

2:42:53local 2021 for their collaboration

2:42:56during this really complex time and really appreciate

2:43:00the leadership that this bargaining unit

2:43:02has shown through this process.

2:43:06As you know SEIU employees are some

2:43:08of us us some of the hardest working rank and file employees

2:43:13who provide many of the direct services

2:43:15that our residents benefit from on a day to day basis SEIU

2:43:22use leadership not only has been evident during the bargaining

2:43:27concessions conversations that I've been engaging them

2:43:30with for this particular M.O. You before you

2:43:33but their leadership has also been apparent in the current me

2:43:37and confer process that we are currently participating

2:43:40Regarding the proposed furloughs for full time SEIU employees

2:43:44and also we had just some discussions

2:43:47about the already implemented furloughs for the part time

2:43:51SEIU staff that were implemented in late March.

2:43:55So with that said I thank them again for continuing to be

2:43:58partners in this with the city.

2:44:01With that said This concludes my report

2:44:03and I'm available for questions.

2:44:05Great.

2:44:07I see Mr. Kato Mr. Wilson you have your mural

2:44:10offered either one of you have questions this time.

2:44:12No Anybody have questions at this time.

2:44:18At this point we then go to Right.

2:44:26Yes we will proceed to public comment for this item.

2:44:31We do not have any public comment separate estimate

2:44:34for this item All right.

2:44:37Seeing no comments.

2:44:38We will have back to council for comments of any comments

2:44:47Mr. fidelity than Kato I just want a second.

2:44:51Alex said as far as hardworking employees

2:44:54here and elsewhere that they work hard.

2:44:58It's a difficult time that we're living

2:45:00And I just want to reassure them that going forward equity

2:45:04will be something that we care about dealing

2:45:07with SEIU in the future.

2:45:08We don't know what next year holds for us.

2:45:12We don't know what next month holds for us economics

2:45:15but we want to make sure that they're dealt with fairly

2:45:18and we know that that's a footnote guys

2:45:21that we need to follow up on.

2:45:22Thank you very much Mr. Kato.

2:45:25Thank you.

2:45:26I echo what our council member Vice Mayor Pulford

2:45:30Clay mentioned SEIU ten twenty one has always yes since I've

2:45:37been on the council since 2014 has always worked with us

2:45:40and I very much appreciate working with all of them.

2:45:45They are partners and know that during this difficult period

2:45:52when when things change I'm hoping that

2:45:55with the economy getting better after covered

2:45:58and after the next couple of years that the sum of the part

2:46:02time employees can return and we can

2:46:06work on making sure that benefits and everything else

2:46:13will move.

2:46:14We'll discuss again.

2:46:16So again thank you to SEIU 10 21 our partners

2:46:21and our co-workers for your support in this difficult time.

2:46:25October 19 Janet I just wanted to agree

2:46:29and I want to let the members of SEIU

2:46:32know in particular that I really appreciate all that they're

2:46:35doing on behalf of the city.

2:46:37They do a lot on half of the city on a day to day basis.

2:46:41They do a lot to make the quality of our lives better.

2:46:46And and I miss the presence of those

2:46:51who were on furlough right now.

2:46:55And look forward to the day when that will be over

2:46:59and we can work together in a positive way

2:47:05to make Elsa Rito a better place and to give

2:47:08SEIU campaign one the quality of life they deserve.

2:47:13Thank you.

2:47:15Rochelle Oh I also think SEIU network is appreciate it.

2:47:22Particularly for teachers out there

2:47:25that are helping out delivering for seven years.

2:47:28Call it as I know a lot now.

2:47:33And it's really saddens me that we're in this position

2:47:37right now where we have to ask so many of our valued employees

2:47:42to give back to the city It's definitely necessary

2:47:47so that in the future we can do right by you guys

2:47:53and do what we can in the future to you.

2:47:57The financial position that you deserve to be in.

2:48:00And I just really appreciate the personal sacrifices

2:48:05of the ones making Yeah I know.

2:48:09Look everyone's saying you with our train

2:48:13our tax anticipation notes that we were talking about earlier

2:48:17tonight and this we're exercising fiscal prudence

2:48:21to defer and delay increased cost

2:48:26and we're looking at the uncertainty of revenue

2:48:30in the near future.

2:48:31We don't know what it is.

2:48:33We hope to be able to honor this contract because things turn

2:48:38out better than we thought.

2:48:40However we are.

2:48:43We realized we hope that our staff recognize

2:48:47that the council will have tough decisions to make

2:48:50at some point in the future and we're in all partners in this

2:48:53together.

2:48:54And we really appreciate you and I

2:48:56think this contract is our best example of how

The Council took two labor agreements and the management resolution, starting with the general employees.

The unit: SEIU Local 1021, “recognized as the majority bargaining” unit “for both full time and part time” general employees.

Its size: “forty five full time and thirty eight part time.”

The terms: no cost-of-living increase in July 2020, then 3 percent in July 2021, each worth about $114,000. New language codified the union-management advisory team. Furloughs for part-time staff had begun in late March, and furloughs for full-time staff were in meet-and-confer.

The previous agreement was “a two year agreement… back in November 2017.”

The presenter was the assistant city manager, also serving as “acting human resources manager.”

Councilmembers thanked the union. Fadelli said future dealings should be equitable, and Quinto hoped part-time staff could return as the economy recovered.

Adopted unanimously.

Significant

The general employees' union forgoes its July 2020 cost-of-living increase, about $114,000, and takes 3 percent in July 2021. Part-time staff have been on furlough since late March, and full-time furloughs are under negotiation.

16 “Risking their lives” captions 2770–2971

2:49:02we want to work with you.

2:49:04And we look forward to continuing

2:49:06our relationship together.

2:49:09So that's that would be the reason we are considering this

2:49:14this contract tonight we are a we need to be a viable employer

2:49:19we need to be able to to to attract employees to do

2:49:24certain positions and in order to attract employees

2:49:27to certain positions we do need to have contracts

2:49:31in place that provide that.

2:49:33And so you'll hear me make these comments again.

2:49:36But the whole goal is that we recognize

2:49:40that we are not in a position to make a salary changes now.

2:49:44And so we are not doing that.

2:49:47And that's what this contract reflects.

2:49:51That concludes our comments which

2:49:53would now take us to a motion.

2:49:57The second.

2:49:59So Janice hand go up first.

2:50:01Jay Rochelle Pardue Okamoto motion

2:50:03with Ables and seconding and we have a roll call

2:50:06please and I mean yes definitely.

2:50:13Yes and some member Wilson.

2:50:15Yes council member.

2:50:16I do.

2:50:17Q Mr. Yes council member can.

2:50:20Yes.

2:50:21Motion carries That concludes.

2:50:23Item seven.

2:50:25A which was adoption of a m o u between the city of El

2:50:28Reno and local ten twenty one.

2:50:31We'll now move on to item seven B which is adoption

2:50:34of a Memorandum of Understanding between the city of El

2:50:36Speedo and the retail police Employees Association is

2:50:43to request to adopt a resolution approving

2:50:46an agreement between the city of El Serino

2:50:49and Alice Rideau police Employees Association otherwise

2:50:53known as the PTA to modify salary and create a new M O U.

2:50:58The P I represents police officer corporals sergeants

2:51:03and non sworn employees I do want to note

2:51:06that this group does not include the positions of Captain

2:51:10and lieutenants which are actually represented by the LS

2:51:13retired police management Association

2:51:16and the police management unit.

2:51:19In total there are forty five employees currently represented

2:51:23by the key City Council approved a two

2:51:27year agreement with the P.A..

2:51:29Back in April 2018 that was effective

2:51:31January 1st 2018 through December 30 first 2019.

2:51:36Like SEIU and like other bargaining units

2:51:39the EPA has obviously recognized the city's

2:51:42current financial condition and has offered

2:51:45to forego any cola for 2020.

2:51:50The highlights of the M.O. You before you

2:51:52are as follows effective January 2020

2:51:55there'll be a zero percent COLA meaning no salary

2:51:59increase for all members represented by the Kia

2:52:03in January 2021 there will be a three percent COLA

2:52:07and in January 2022 there will be a three percent COLA

2:52:12In addition there was also language

2:52:15changed regarding key A's career incentive program.

2:52:20This is where we provide certain sworn employees

2:52:24with additional pay in recognition

2:52:28for the educational achievements of the obtained

2:52:32so sworn employees who have a bachelor's degree

2:52:35will receive a differential increase of a half a percent.

2:52:40This is from 4 percent to 4.5 percent.

2:52:43Sworn employees that have a master's degree

2:52:46will receive a differential increase of a half a percent

2:52:50from 4.5 to 5 percent but I do want

2:52:53to note that sworn employees can only receive

2:52:56one of these incentives.

2:52:58They are not compounded or put together

2:53:02so the total cost savings to the city by Kia foregoing the 3

2:53:07percent COLA in January 2020 is approximately two hundred

2:53:12and thirteen thousand dollars.

2:53:14And that savings will be realized

2:53:16in the current fiscal year budget 1920.

2:53:20The total cost to the city for 3 percent COLA

2:53:23increase to the PTA in January.

2:53:26Jerry in January 2021 is the same amount and that

2:53:31would be realized that twenty twenty two twenty twenty one

2:53:34budget the total costs for the city for a 3 percent

2:53:40increase for PBA for January 2022

2:53:44is two hundred and twenty thousand

2:53:46and that costs would be realized in the fiscal year 2021

2:53:512022 budget.

2:53:53The increased educational incentives

2:53:56would approximately cost twenty thousand dollars annually.

2:54:00So with that said I want to personally

2:54:02recognize the PTA for their leadership

2:54:04during this complex time.

2:54:06As you know the city had been bargaining with PTA

2:54:09for quite some time before Cove 19.

2:54:12And once this global pandemic actually began to take effect

2:54:17this caused the city to dramatically

2:54:19have to change the direction of the ongoing negotiations.

2:54:23I really appreciate the PTA recognizing

2:54:27the difficult situation that the city is facing financially

2:54:30and be well and being willing to talk with us about concessions

2:54:34to the city as a whole and myself and Karen.

2:54:38We really appreciate all the work

2:54:40that this morning non sworn members do each and every day

2:54:45to keep our residents safe.

2:54:47With that This concludes my report

2:54:49and I'm here for any questions you may have.

2:54:51Thank you very much I will first close the public comment period

2:54:57so if you knew we were closing.

2:54:59Hopefully your comments will be heard after our questions

2:55:03so public comment period is closed.

2:55:06Council questions seeing none.

2:55:11I will go to public comment.

2:55:15We have no public comment on this item.

2:55:18I'll bring it back to council for comments.

2:55:23Mr. Quito Thank you Mayor.

2:55:25I'd like to thank the PTA for working

2:55:29with the city to making sure that during this difficult

2:55:35time.

2:55:36You've worked with us and I just want to say thank you for that.

2:55:39I also want to let our residents know regarding the many emails

2:55:45that we received.

2:55:47What about our police and about our fire

2:55:50and know that these people risked their lives every day.

2:55:54And I just want to say that there is a shortage

2:55:58of police officers right now.

2:56:01And and we need to keep our police officers.

2:56:06I can't tell you all the other cities around us.

2:56:08The city of Richmond has more than 30 openings

2:56:13and there are more police over there that are retiring.

2:56:16Same goes in Berkeley.

2:56:17It's difficult to fill these openings some know that you

2:56:24know to be competitive but also to work with them

2:56:28and to let them know that we are grateful to them

2:56:31for risking their lives and working

2:56:32with management here at this difficult time of coping.

2:56:37And during these difficult times we see a spike in crime

2:56:42and we saw that during the last recession.

2:56:46No that's more important than ever

2:56:49during these difficult times to have public safety.

2:56:53Therefore so I appreciate our public safety officers.

2:56:56Thank you.

2:56:57All right thank you I think of Mr. Findlay

2:56:59you took yourself off mute.

2:57:01You have comments Yes I just want to reiterate thank Gabriel

2:57:08Quinto also mentioned couple of 19

2:57:12has changed the way our police have to function in a lot

2:57:16of ways a lot not good ways.

2:57:19They're always out there always changing

2:57:23But it also has changed the way our city has to finance itself

2:57:27In addition to previous economic issues we've been dealing with.

2:57:31So you're on that journey with us.

2:57:33We thank you very much.

2:57:34We don't know as I said before what

2:57:36the next month in the next year will be

2:57:39and we may need to change you are flexible enough

2:57:42to change with us.

2:57:43We're a part of our community and we

2:57:45love that we're a competitive community

2:57:48and offer good salaries and good and efforts to you and let's

2:57:55just move together going forward all together again.

2:57:58Thank you so much I'm looking at you Janet.

2:58:03Are you good.

2:58:04Yeah.

2:58:05I also want to thank the police officers employee association

2:58:11for being part of the solution for the difficult situation

2:58:16we're in now.

2:58:19And it really does make a difference

2:58:23I think when everyone's working together

2:58:27through a difficult time and so I really

2:58:29do want to thank the police officers for that

2:58:33and I also want to thank them for the work

2:58:35that they do and I know that they're part

2:58:38of that team of first responders and I know this really

2:58:42difficult time with the virus being such an issue

2:58:49that they can be exposed to the two people who have the virus

2:58:55and I appreciate their being there

2:59:01for us because they are literally

2:59:03putting their lives at stake.

2:59:06Thank you.

2:59:07Thank you.

2:59:08Michelle I will also point with the other councilmen

2:59:13versus state I really appreciate all of our police officers

2:59:20I know that you are meeting your life on the line

2:59:24and stepping up day in day out during this time

2:59:29and all those times before.

2:59:31And I appreciate the giving back to our community.

2:59:36There are some things afloat in a good way

2:59:41so that we can all move forward together

2:59:43and we will remember the sacrifices that you've made

2:59:47and we thank you very much.

2:59:51And I will echo everyone's comments

2:59:53about thanks to the PBA for helping us

2:59:56during this fiscal time in helping us exercise

3:00:00fiscal prudence by deferring a 3 percent COLA for this this year

3:00:06this calendar year As council member

3:00:10Quito said the police officers.

3:00:12It's a very competitive market out there.

3:00:14We need to remain a viable employer

3:00:16for hiring police officers.

3:00:18We do have vacancies that are holding open.

3:00:23But in the last two or three years

3:00:24we've had vacancies as a result of people leaving

3:00:27and we've had difficulty filling them

The police agreement drew remarks about the year rather than the terms.

The unit's composition: the association “represents police officer[s], corporals, sergeants and non sworn employees” — “forty five employees.”

What it excludes: “the positions of captain and lieutenants, which are… represented by the” police management association.

The terms: no cost-of-living increase in January 2020, about $213,000 saved, then 3 percent in January 2021 and in January 2022. The education incentive rises half a percent, from 4 to 4.5 percent for a bachelor's degree and from 4.5 to 5 percent for a master's, at about $20,000 a year.

Quinto's framing: the aim is “to be competitive, but also to work with them and to let them know that we are grateful to them for risking their lives and working with management here at this difficult time.”

He pointed to a shortage of officers, with Richmond having more than 30 openings.

His argument for the timing: “during these difficult times we see a spike in crime, and we saw that during the last recession. So that's more important than ever.”

Fadelli added that covid “has changed the way our police have to function in a lot of ways — a lot not good ways.”

The Mayor defended the $20,000 education incentive as rewarding better-educated officers, in a year when the Council had spent a Saturday trying to save a similar sum on library hours. Adopted unanimously.

Significant

The police association forgoes its January 2020 increase, about $213,000, and takes 3 percent in each of the next two Januaries. The education incentive rises half a percent at about $20,000 a year, which the Mayor defends against the library-hours comparison.

17 Thirty-three, plus two captions 2972–3125

3:00:29with our current structure.

3:00:31So we really do appreciate P.A. deferring their

3:00:35they're their race for this year to specifically

3:00:40to the education incentive.

3:00:42Twenty thousand dollar increase in cost.

3:00:45I want to speak to that because for those that are questioning

3:00:49that increasing cost for this year

3:00:51I want you to know that actually that's

3:00:54we're rewarding the type of smart intelligent officers

3:00:58that we're trying to attract and that is the precisely

3:01:02the type of person you want responding to the people

3:01:07in your neighborhood.

3:01:08They are better educated they're better informed

3:01:11and they're going to actually treat you

3:01:13in a in a more informed way.

3:01:17And so you're going to reap the benefits

3:01:19from our officers being more educated

3:01:22as a result of this incentive.

3:01:24So yes.

3:01:26Did you know we spent quite a bit of time on a Saturday

3:01:30a couple of weeks back trying to figure out how to save

3:01:32twenty thousand dollars.

3:01:35Associated with the library hours and others but this

3:01:38is like that we are polluting our value in education.

3:01:43And so I just want to speak to those that are potentially

3:01:46looking at the fact that we are having a slide

3:01:49uptick in cost as a result of the changes

3:01:51in the education incentive.

3:01:53So with that I am looking for a motion of move

3:02:02by Quito seconded by Ableton.

3:02:04All those roll call please I'm in.

3:02:08Yes ma'am.

3:02:10FDLE.

3:02:11Yes.

3:02:12Council member Wilson.

3:02:13Yes.

3:02:14Council member I do Komodo.

3:02:16Yes council member Quito.

3:02:18Yes.

3:02:19Motion carries.

3:02:20Great.

3:02:21That concludes item seven B. Adoption of the Nemo

3:02:25you with the polices Employees Association

3:02:29will now move on to item C management

3:02:32and confidential employees resolution

3:02:35and we have a staff report.

3:02:39I'm going to go ahead and announce

3:02:40that the public comment period is now closed.

3:02:45Comments will be heard before council takes action.

3:02:49Thank you Mayor.

3:02:51So my last request of this evening

3:02:53is for you to a doctor resolution

3:02:56to modify the salaries benefits and conditions of employment

3:03:00employment for the city's management

3:03:03and confidential employees.

3:03:06There are currently thirty three management

3:03:08and confidential employees in the city of El Serino.

3:03:12In addition to that number two full time

3:03:15unrepresented employees of the city

3:03:17that mirror what is the management

3:03:19and confidential employees Resolution 1

3:03:22being the city manager.

3:03:24An update to the management confidential resolution

3:03:28is approved by the City Council annually

3:03:31and the last time the city council had approved

3:03:34this resolution was back in June 20

3:03:3619 The summary of the changes to this resolution are as follows.

3:03:43So effective July 2020 there will be no salary increase

3:03:48meaning a zero percent COLA for all management

3:03:51and confidential employees.

3:03:53Effective July 20 20 there will not be any salary adjustments

3:03:57or merit increases unless explicitly

3:04:01approved by the city manager.

3:04:04In addition similar to local twelve thirties M.O. you

3:04:09the cash benefit that's provided to management

3:04:13and confidential employees that have medical coverage

3:04:16through another health plan will be adjusted to three hundred

3:04:20and fifty dollars per month for employees hired after July 1st

3:04:252020.

3:04:27I'm going to pause right here because I

3:04:28do want to acknowledge that the original resolution that was

3:04:32in your pocket last week actually

3:04:34had the date of December thirty first twenty twenty

3:04:38and that was an error on my part.

3:04:40It should have said July 1st 2020 and that

3:04:43is seen in the in the resolution in the supplemental resolution

3:04:50that was provided this afternoon.

3:04:55And also in addition to the adjustment of three hundred

3:05:00and fifty dollars per month as of July 1st

3:05:04for those who are hired after July 1st

3:05:07it will also apply to existing employees

3:05:10who discontinue the city's medical coverage

3:05:13at a later date.

3:05:16So those who currently receive a cash flu benefit

3:05:20will be capped at the current contribution rate which

3:05:24is the Kaiser single rate of seven hundred

3:05:27and ninety three dollars 18 cents per month.

3:05:31So in addition this resolution before

3:05:33you suspends auto allowance.

3:05:36The city actually already it a lot

3:05:39auto allowance through a memo from our city manager

3:05:42was effective April 5th 2020.

3:05:46And effective July 1st 2020 a minimum of 13

3:05:51non paid furlough days will be required

3:05:55for all management incompetence Charles staff and they are.

3:06:00And and this and also this doesn't include the additional

3:06:05three non paid furlough days that these employees are

3:06:08required to take beginning this Friday May 22nd through June 30

3:06:14and twenty twenty is enough this fiscal year So I want to I want

3:06:18to acknowledge also another change the resolution that was

3:06:22out that was added to the supplemental materials this

3:06:25afternoon in Chapter 2 titled salary and benefits under

3:06:30section two point one the word monthly was added back

3:06:35to the resolution when referring to control points the total

3:06:40cost savings to the city by the management and confidential

3:06:44group forgoing a assumed 3 percent COLA in July

3:06:482020 is approximately one hundred

3:06:51and eighty one thousand dollars

3:06:53and that figure includes the city manager.

3:06:56The total cost savings to the city by management confidential

3:07:00taking 13 days 13 non paid furlough days starting July

3:07:041st through December thirty first

3:07:07is approximately three hundred and forty six thousand dollars.

3:07:12This number also includes the city manager.

3:07:15The foregoing of the whole and the 13 furlough days

3:07:20will be realized in the fiscal 20 20 20 21 budget.

3:07:26With respect to the extra three furlough days

3:07:28I just reference that will be taken in this fiscal year

3:07:31that cost savings will be approximately eighty thousand

3:07:35dollars for this fiscal year with respect

3:07:39to the city's proposal and requiring management

3:07:42confidential employees to pay an additional 1 percent

3:07:46contribution into the required employer calipers contribution

3:07:51and in regards to the city manager paying an additional 3

3:07:55percent I have concluded the necessary conversations

3:07:59with calipers and we'll be bringing back legislation

3:08:02for the city council to consider at its meeting

3:08:04on June 2nd I'd like to think the management

3:08:08and confidential employees for their resilience

3:08:11and for stepping up and showing great leadership during

3:08:14this really difficult time.

3:08:16I just want to say that they're leaders

3:08:17of this city who are trying to navigate

3:08:20during these unprecedented times.

3:08:22I know many of them have been working countless hours

3:08:25to the nights and the weekends ensuring employees ability

3:08:28to provide services for the city in a variety of locations

3:08:32and circumstances safely.

3:08:34I know this because I get out I get emails and communications

3:08:38from from management and confidential staff at all hours

3:08:41and days of the week.

3:08:43So with that said This concludes my report

3:08:46and I'm happy to answer any questions

3:08:47you may have Thank you Alex.

The third resolution covered the group whose terms the Council sets directly.

The count: “thirty three management and confidential employees in the city of El Cerrito.”

Plus “two full time unrepresented employees… that mirror” the resolution — “one being the city manager.”

So thirty-five people sit outside collective bargaining, their terms set by resolution rather than agreement.

The cycle: it “is approved by the City Council annually,” last done “back in June 2019.”

The change: “effective July 2020 there will be no sal[ary increase].”

The terms: no merit increases unless the City Manager approves them, the auto allowance suspended (it had been suspended since 5 April), and cash in lieu of medical coverage set at $350 a month for new hires. There would be at least 13 unpaid furlough days from 1 July, plus three more between 22 May and 30 June. The savings were about $181,000 from the forgone increase, $346,000 from the furloughs, and $80,000 this fiscal year.

The additional 1 percent pension contribution, and 3 percent for the City Manager, would come back separately on 2 June (2 Jun 2020).

In April 2021 the cumulative effect on this group is put at 10 percent (10 Apr 2021).

Significant

Thirty-three management and confidential employees plus two unrepresented, including the City Manager. Their terms are set by resolution rather than agreement. From July 2020 they take no increase and at least 13 unpaid furlough days, with three more before 30 June. The extra pension contribution follows on 2 June.

18 Everything on the table captions 3126–3398

3:08:50I've got one question slash request you made.

3:08:54Thank you for acknowledged that the changes came through

3:08:58on the resolution in our supplemental materials

3:09:04in paragraph two point to the word

3:09:07monthly should also be inserted there as well.

3:09:10So when with the motions made if we

3:09:12could please insert the word monthly

3:09:15into paragraph two point two.

3:09:17Also I would appreciate that.

3:09:19Got it any questions.

3:09:23Rochelle you were first Paul second Yes.

3:09:28Right now going through everything with that frame

3:09:32from now on savings one of the things

3:09:36that stood out in looking at contract

3:09:41and it's just something it's not just the management but all

3:09:49of the contracts but since your your contract was spelled out

3:09:52in greater detail I'm going to have to take

3:09:55on you guys a little bit.

3:09:57But what are the things I I was noticing or that I thought

3:10:00about was in the last year as we were rounding up all

3:10:06our pennies and some of the savings that we thought from

3:10:09measure of funds it ended up kind of going away without us

3:10:14really anticipating it was a payout for a news vacation time

3:10:20and maybe sick time as well and what I was thinking as I was

3:10:25looking through the contract is you know how is it that they

3:10:28can save up so much vacation time or or simply prime

3:10:35and then it seemed to me that the contract was actually quite

3:10:38generous when it came to the hours of vacation

3:10:41particularly considering that

3:10:43the that the offices are closed every other Friday

3:10:48and now they're going to be closed every Friday that Bank

3:10:51of times seems like we'll really build up for various employees.

3:10:58I notice there's administrative leave which I think you're

3:11:02often probably used in vacation time and people

3:11:07save their vacation time.

3:11:08There was very generous hours of vacation time

3:11:12and in addition to that I saw holidays

3:11:15that I know at the hospital you don't celebrate such as the day

3:11:19after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve New Year's Eve things like

3:11:25that so I was just wondering if all of those things

3:11:29are being costed out not just this contract

3:11:34that there are other contracts as well Yes

3:11:39I mean those are all things that we are looking at now.

3:11:44And as Karen has said in the past many times

3:11:48that everything is on the table obviously

3:11:50with the other bargaining units those are subject to meeting

3:11:53far and other types of rules and with management things

3:12:00like administrative leave are put in there because management

3:12:04staff or FLSA exam are not represented

3:12:07exempt from civil service pretty much

3:12:09they're expected to work as many hours

3:12:12as it's needed to do the job.

3:12:13It's not just five or whatever.

3:12:16And and actually quite frankly a lot of these people

3:12:20even though they're going to be taking furloughs

3:12:21they're actually going to be working

3:12:23during furlough all honesty but definitely

3:12:27everything is on the table.

3:12:29And you know I appreciate you for bringing that up

3:12:33and I can also just add council member that vacation

3:12:36time has been capped.

3:12:38They're not allowed to earn more than twice

3:12:41their approval rate They can't they can't earn more than that.

3:12:45So the vacation time is capped and as Alex indicated

3:12:48administrative leave is essentially a two week leave

3:12:52but it's two weeks worth of one pay period worth of leave

3:12:56however it is it is in lieu of again

3:12:59the management confident management staff

3:13:02is not eligible for overtime.

3:13:04So but all of the other and the holidays

3:13:07are meant to mirror what all of the other bargaining units

3:13:09had deep bargain I'd like to see a comparison of what it looks

3:13:18like maybe in some other city that comes to this topic Peter

3:13:27if you look your muted sorry my computer for us

3:13:37live I can definitely do that as somebody who's worked in two

3:13:40other cities I can tell you that all of this is pretty standard

3:13:45but I can definitely provide that Thank you Paul.

3:13:52I think it was you.

3:13:53And then I don't know if Janet or Gabe

3:13:55if you've put your hands up yet but I

3:13:57know Paul put his hand up next.

3:14:00Thank you.

3:14:01So I'm really glad to see these management choices

3:14:04and decisions here before us.

3:14:07It really does mean that everything is on the table

3:14:11and will be on the table.

3:14:15And I. This is just the beginning of a long process.

3:14:19I think we're dealing immediately with the short term

3:14:22things we can do with and we're going

3:14:24to be have to do some structural changes which I think we'll be

3:14:28giving into later when we talk about our priorities

3:14:31and how do we restructure how the city functions

3:14:35and how we pay for things.

3:14:38I wanted to ask about two things.

3:14:40So Alex that will in this in this agenda Bill there

3:14:44is no calipers we will not be voting.

3:14:48You're going to come back to us on the campus percentage then.

3:14:51Yes And the reason for that is you

3:14:55just need the details from Cal for race

3:14:58and how to deal with that.

3:14:59And so actually the reason for that

3:15:02is is that when this document went to print this resolution I

3:15:07actually had a meeting with calipers that day

3:15:11It was the soonest and we had been

3:15:12in communications prior to that but that was the time

3:15:17in which I was able to.

3:15:18With one of my colleagues spend hour with them

3:15:21going through all options.

3:15:24So that's why that it was not in this resolution

3:15:28it had intended to be in the resolution.

3:15:30But I really wanted to have that conversation first.

3:15:34And I'm glad I did so.

3:15:36So it will be coming separately on my I

3:15:39don't want to see it go away.

3:15:41I just don't see that go away some way it will not go away.

3:15:44I Karen will definitely ensure that I'm still alive

3:15:50And finally the thing that's kind of a mystery to me

3:15:53is this auto allowance.

3:15:57Can you tell me who the management has an auto

3:15:59allowance and we don't ever have the money amount here

3:16:03or what that cost the city.

3:16:05What are we talking about this Yeah so.

3:16:09So the auto allowance is provided

3:16:12to management employees that have to travel for their line

3:16:19of business and so it's it's in lieu of having to submit

3:16:25reimburse it's every month and get the IRS reimbursement

3:16:29level every month And so in order to prevent that

3:16:34and for the city each time having

3:16:36to do that we we have a auto allowance of it's

3:16:41about I believe it cost the city about one

3:16:44hundred thousand dollars a year.

3:16:47And so I know Karen had suspended that auto allowance

3:16:52in April and it will be continued on being

3:16:56suspended until the near term.

3:16:58How many people I mean we're dog is it really

3:17:01that much more less than giving for mileage for people

3:17:08like everybody else does.

3:17:10Well I mean it's the amount of money

3:17:12what's the amount of money that we're talking about.

3:17:14I never see that listed well so so.

3:17:19So we give this monthly amount to folks

3:17:22and so that we don't actually track mileage

3:17:25in which these folks travel we would actually have to do

3:17:28that in order to understand what would be cheaper

3:17:31and that's something that we've even talked about amongst

3:17:35us is that maybe we get rid of it permanently

3:17:38and don't have you know everything stabilize you now.

3:17:43Okay.

3:17:44It just doesn't look like we've made it cost comparison yet

3:17:48because it sounds kind of general it's kind of costly

3:17:51but everybody else does you know except this is for traveling

3:17:55and if it's less money to do that let's go there.

3:17:58I mean I I just think this is something that

3:18:01needs to be on the table or reported back to us

3:18:03because in these days this is the time

3:18:06to put a red flag on something that really shouldn't be

3:18:10in the city and I'm just not No I don't know how many people

3:18:13in our city get that do you it's about saying

3:18:1810 to 15 yeah twelve she said I was gonna say 10 to 15

3:18:22I got this there's about twenty five

3:18:24people who received it who have been

3:18:26receiving the auto allowance.

3:18:28And again as Alex said it was in lieu

3:18:30of having to do the all of the particular expenses

3:18:35we will be able to see that.

3:18:36But one of that we just get a comparison

3:18:38someday and really see what comes out it will depend.

3:18:41Considering that we aren't doing any travel right now

3:18:44we're probably not going to be doing a lot of travel

3:18:46next year.

3:18:46So regardless of whether or not this

3:18:49an auto allowance would be cheaper at this point I'm doing

3:18:53cost cost recovery only as opposed to this analysis

3:18:57have to do that when we're not too for since we're

3:19:01not doing travel receipts would be

3:19:04cheaper than when they mileage.

3:19:06We also we also have city vehicles

3:19:08available for people's use.

3:19:10OK.

3:19:11I just think I just think this and all the other stuff that

3:19:15needs to be on the table we need to lift

3:19:17that out for the public.

3:19:18I think you did a good one page document Erin for a handy thing

3:19:24for the public and all of us to look at I just think we need

3:19:28the options and I think we're gonna be talking

3:19:30about those options coming up those need to be on the table

3:19:33too and this is one of those items that

3:19:36kind of is questionable to me.

3:19:38So thank you for that.

3:19:44Thank if we will.

3:19:53Let me go back my script Let's see.

3:20:00And Are there public comments on this item.

3:20:04We do not have any public comments

3:20:05on this item I'll bring it back for comments by the council

3:20:09members Gabe Thank you Mr. You know I wanted to thank

3:20:21the executive staff and also to the city manager in working

3:20:28with the city council to make some changes that that should

3:20:35have been a long time ago.

3:20:36But knowing this and knowing it the difficulties

3:20:39that we're having right now.

3:20:42Karen thank you for saying no to the car.

3:20:45Again I remember that when we met with the city manager

3:20:52we provided a car for the last city manager and no OK so

3:20:58but know that you know Karen is not we're not giving Karen

3:21:05a car she said no to that.

3:21:07So also with the what allowance from executive staff

3:21:12to not have that any longer.

3:21:15You know that helps and that all adds up.

3:21:17So I want to say thank you to the executive staff on that

3:21:20and thank you to Karen to comments I will make my one

3:21:28then I want to thank the executive staff

3:21:31for understanding the tough financial times

3:21:35we're in and helping us be financially prudent and making

3:21:38the choices as Mr. Fidelity said making the choices that reflect

3:21:42our our new sensibility around fiscal prudence and taking this

3:21:49action so that we can reduce our costs as it has been stated two

3:21:55weeks ago 13 furlough days is just a start and we as we go

3:22:00through the fiscal year and we make or don't make

3:22:03our fiscal targets for revenue as that

3:22:06is the uncertainty becomes more

3:22:08certain over the next months we may need to activate what

3:22:14we stock talked about two weeks ago which

3:22:15is an additional 13 furlough days so that that's not it's

3:22:21not hidden.

3:22:23We are acknowledging that we do have some of these other tasks

3:22:28up our opportunities for cost cutting available to us

3:22:34and we may need to take those if necessary

3:22:37as we monitor our revenue Janet I can give you now.

3:22:47OK.

3:22:48I'd like to join in with what you said

3:22:50and add that I really appreciate the fact

3:22:53that you are not only figuring out what the cuts ought to be.

3:22:57You're also including yourselves and those impacted by them.

3:23:02And that's a particularly difficult job

3:23:04I think because you sort of maybe

3:23:08you need something at home that you're

3:23:11going to have to forgo because you made the right decision

3:23:16for the city.

3:23:17So I'd just like to thank everybody for all the hard work

3:23:21in working on through this terrible period in our history

3:23:27and I look forward to working with you to solve the problems.

3:23:32Thank you Rochelle.

3:23:36I'd also like to thank the management

3:23:38or And then stepping up forward with the first that's

3:23:45to help balance the budget.

3:23:48You know that it's difficult for everyone and I think great.

3:23:54With that can I get a motion to approve the revised the one

3:23:57that came out today in the supplemental packet

3:24:01the revised ordinance with the addition of the word

3:24:04monthly in paragraph to point to some I heard Paul first

3:24:12and Jan is waving her hand to second it.

3:24:15All right.

3:24:16So fidelity Fidelity's most depreciation

3:24:18is a seconded to approve the revised

3:24:22resolution with the word monthly added

3:24:25to paragraph two point two.

3:24:27Can we have a roll call please and Lyman.

3:24:30Yes ma'am.

3:24:31Could infidelity.

3:24:32Yes council member.

3:24:34Wilson.

3:24:34Yes.

3:24:35Council member to Kimura.

3:24:38Yes.

3:24:39Council member came to Yes.

3:24:41Motion carries.

3:24:43Great.

3:24:43So that concludes.

3:24:44Items 78 management and confidential employee

3:24:48resolution At this time it is twelve minutes after 10:00 what

3:24:54I'd like to do is ask for a motion to extend

3:24:59and I will ask the city manager do

3:25:03anything all the way to 11:00.

Council questions on the management resolution covered leave, the pension contribution and the auto allowance.

Pardue-Okimoto noted that vacation payouts had absorbed savings the year before, and called the vacation, administrative leave and holidays generous. Staff said vacation accrual is capped at twice the annual rate, that administrative leave stands in for overtime because managers are exempt, and that holidays mirror the other units. She asked for a comparison with other cities.

The assistant city manager, “as somebody who's worked in two other cities,” confirmed “all of this is pretty standard” and offered to provide the comparison.

Fadelli's reaction: “I'm really glad to see these management choices and decisions here before us. It really does mean that everything is on the table and will be on the table.”

His framing of the scale: “this is just the beginning of a long process… we're dealing immediately with the short term things we can do, and we're going to have to do some structural changes.”

He asked about the auto allowance. About twenty-five people had received it, at a cost of about $100,000 a year, and it had been suspended in April. With no travel happening, staff said “receipts would be cheaper than… mileage,” and “we also have city vehicles available for people's use.”

His wider point: “this and all the other stuff that needs to be on the table — we need to lift that out for the public… I think we need the options.”

He credited a “one page document” as “a handy thing for the public and all of us to look at.”

Councilmembers thanked the executive staff for including themselves in the cuts: the City Manager had declined a city car, and executive car allowances were ended. The thirteen furlough days, the Mayor said, were “just a start,” with thirteen more possible if revenue targets were missed. The revised resolution, with “monthly” added to paragraph 2.2, carried unanimously, and the meeting was extended toward 11 p.m.

Significant

“We need to lift that out for the public… I think we need the options” — Fadelli asks for the cost-saving options to be published, crediting a one-page summary as the format. The management resolution passes unanimously.

19 A framework, before the numbers captions 3399–3787

3:25:05Probably if you if you go to 11:00

3:25:09and we finish faster than we can.

3:25:12All right.

3:25:12We have an incentive to go to finish before 11:00.

3:25:16Jana that motion to extend the meeting to eleven eleven.

3:25:20Yeah.

3:25:21Can I get a second that Gabe's nodding his head.

3:25:24I'll take that as a second.

3:25:26So motion by Abel since seconded by Kito me and I'm in yes.

3:25:32May I predominantly as Ken and some member Wilson.

3:25:36Yes.

3:25:37Council member Pardue Okamoto yes.

3:25:40Council member King 2 Yes.

3:25:42Motion carries.

3:25:43Great thanks.

3:25:44I will now introduce Item 7 D. Fiscal Year 2020.

3:25:492020 1 budget priorities and strategies.

3:25:52Item we're going to do a study session to discuss actions

3:25:56and consider budget priorities and strategies

3:25:58for further cost reductions.

3:26:00And at this point I will turn it over look first.

3:26:05This is the opportunity for you to submit your public comments

3:26:08so please do so now.

3:26:10We are closing the comment period

3:26:15and so if you could please submit your comments.

3:26:17They'd be great And with that I will turn it over to Karen.

3:26:22Thank you Your Honor again.

3:26:23I'm Karen Pink City Manager.

3:26:25And very briefly.

3:26:26No pressure Nancy You have to ask you

3:26:29Have you can take care of this.

3:26:31But This is a study session to discuss as before you

3:26:36on the screen securing the long term financial health

3:26:38city as you know the city has been working with management

3:26:41partners originally to develop a strategic plan or an update

3:26:46to our current strategic plan as as the sands have shifted

3:26:50and now we have all of this public health crisis

3:26:54and the economic impacts whereas we have shifted that into more

3:26:58of a fiscal response plan which we will

3:27:00be beginning to discuss some of the framework

3:27:03about that tonight.

3:27:04And we will also continue just pundits

3:27:06make an announcement right now.

3:27:08We will put this out more broadly tomorrow.

3:27:12But the City Council this evening has confirmed decided

3:27:15that we would like to have a special meeting to discuss

3:27:21the results of what will come out of after the seat after

3:27:24tonight's present mission on June 9th which is

3:27:29Tuesday June 9th at 1:00 p.m..

3:27:32It will be a special meeting for the City Council

3:27:35to discuss further this budget and fiscal response

3:27:39for next year.

3:27:40So I just wanted to make that announcement tonight.

3:27:42We'll go further into that later on.

3:27:44But at this time I'd like to introduce Nancy Hetrick

3:27:47from management partners who is going

3:27:49to lead us through this conversation tonight.

3:27:52Thank you Nancy.

3:28:03If you're talking you're muted so Nancy you are not muted.

3:28:18But we cannot hear you and see if you can't get your audio

3:28:44working you can also use his cell phone to call

3:28:46in and use that for audio Karen Are

3:29:06you able to text Dale to your.

3:29:10Maybe he is calling in on her cell phone.

3:29:13I just said I just sent her the number.

3:29:16Thank you your yes Nancy.

3:30:07You need to mute the sound on your computers

3:30:10so that you don't hear the feedback.

3:30:13OK.

3:30:13The second yes.

3:30:15You are good.

3:30:16We can hear you.

3:30:17Oh thank God.

3:30:17Sorry about that puts you on speaker on my phone

3:30:19here so I can try to do it this way it will simply be back

3:30:24does this work OK.

3:30:27Yes you can be clear that we are doing so well too.

3:30:31And I apologize for my voice which seems to be losing.

3:30:35So let's just start to hear more.

3:30:37I just want to acknowledge that this is not an easy time

3:30:43and I respect any great deal that all this city is doing

3:30:48to mediate and mitigate that short term problems we're going

3:30:52to talk tonight about a framework and a plan

3:30:56for developing a long term plan for securing the long term

3:30:59financial health of the city as you might recall in April.

3:31:05My colleague and I Steve Toller were with you

3:31:08to initially intention to present the results

3:31:12of the street strategic plan we did share with you what we

3:31:17learned through all of our engagement activities

3:31:19priorities that emerged through that.

3:31:22But given that we had already shifted

3:31:25into a period of the covered pandemic

3:31:29we use that time to share with you although we had learned

3:31:33both about the city of 0 3 those financial condition pre copied

3:31:37and the early impacts we were imagining and seeing

3:31:41emerge across the state.

3:31:43And so we had presentation and at that same meetings was city

3:31:49presented the first set of two million dollars worth of cuts

3:31:53and so the city was already looking to shore up

3:31:57the short term challenges facing facing the budget that covered

3:32:02pandemic has not been any that is

3:32:04any favors across the across the state or across the country

3:32:10but taking action and being forthright

3:32:12is the approach to do.

3:32:14I was just look more over and come

3:32:16in that is that Steve Towler who you met in April

3:32:21had planned to accompany me this evening he has decades

3:32:25of financial public management experience

3:32:29and he is working closely with me

3:32:31along with my colleague regional vice president Andy Belknap

3:32:35to develop budget strategies for the city to read out

3:32:38and to do the deep dive analysis necessary to uncover

3:32:42what's going to make a difference in your budget

3:32:45Unfortunately he was unable to join me this evening

3:32:47due to a death in the family.

3:32:49I will do my best to be told this evening

3:32:52and take us through this presentation All right.

3:32:56Let's see if we can move this forward.

3:32:58So so let's see how we do I have.

3:33:00There we go.

3:33:01OK.

3:33:02So here's what we're going to walk through.

3:33:05First of all we want to just kind of pause

3:33:07and reflect on what is the problem we're trying to solve

3:33:11the short term problem is something that has been

3:33:14captured reported you heard earlier

3:33:16from your finance director on the cash

3:33:17flow analysis of what's known.

3:33:20There's plenty that is unknown and will remain unknown

3:33:23as we look into the future.

3:33:25We'll talk a little bit about the strategy approach

3:33:27for addressing and mitigating that.

3:33:30But the council's direction to adopt a budget that

3:33:33is whole in the black for the coming year

3:33:36with the understanding revisit and a revised

3:33:38once more is known later in the fall

3:33:42will give us some time to develop strategies

3:33:45that you can incorporate into your budget

3:33:48and to implement over time.

3:33:50So we talked about the problem then

3:33:52we're going to review a framework for evaluating

3:33:56budget strategies.

3:33:57We think that it's really important to identify

3:34:00some based criteria that you can apply in that analysis

3:34:04of the array of strategies everything

3:34:06is on the table of effort several times this evening

3:34:10and so using some objective criteria

3:34:13to help evaluate what the best choices for the council

3:34:17and the community will be.

3:34:19We're going to walk through that then I'll

3:34:21give a few examples of budget strategies

3:34:24that are and have been considered

3:34:26in other cities historically coming Great Recession

3:34:30and currently as many cities are facing deep cuts

3:34:34deep losses in revenue resulting from pokies.

3:34:37And then we'll wrap up just with next OK.

3:34:41So from from the strategic plan to financial plan

3:34:44just kind of where we've been.

3:34:46Recap I think it's helpful we did a lot of outreach

3:34:50and engagement at the very first part of this year

3:34:52actually began by meeting with council members and department

3:34:55heads at the end 2019 to understand

3:35:00what are the top priorities facing the city.

3:35:02This was part of our strategic planning effort

3:35:04to develop that plan even then it was quite clear from all

3:35:08of the engagement activities that we participated in

3:35:12that there was a recognition that procuring

3:35:15the financial help the long term sustainability of the city

3:35:18had to be the top priority in this current year.

3:35:21This is all pre and this was in light of the lack of reserves

3:35:25and the need to rebuild those in case of emergency

3:35:28and also the state auditor's findings which pointed

3:35:32to those reserves as a big problem

3:35:35And so through the meeting on that we had in early April

3:35:40we had recommend this is a top goal and we should

3:35:44we shifted and we spent a lot of time talking

3:35:46about what that means and what that looks

3:35:48like to the city about burrito.

3:35:50So that was in January to March timeframe.

3:35:53Now come to March April May and it has really taken hold.

3:35:58Revenues have plummeted.

3:35:59This is not unique to El Cerrito by any stretch

3:36:02of the imagination however the lack

3:36:04of reserves to counterbalance that loss of revenue

3:36:08makes it particularly challenging and painful

3:36:11for the City of Toronto.

3:36:13So as the budget gap expands additional reductions

3:36:16have been planned.

3:36:17So I mentioned the reductions that

3:36:20were proposed or introduced rather

3:36:23in early April in the amounts of approximately 2

3:36:26million dollars.

3:36:26Well subsequent to that with new information

3:36:29and ongoing monitoring you've heard this evening

3:36:33additional recommended changes to your expenditures.

3:36:37And this is a reflection of what is known so shifting now

3:36:42from the strategic plan but building on all

3:36:44that we learned through engagement activities

3:36:47Management Partners is now prepared to help

3:36:49create a fiscal response plan.

3:36:52So we are going to abandon or let go of the priorities

3:36:55the goals that we heard during the strategic planning efforts.

3:36:59But we want to help use them to prioritize

3:37:03the near-term and the longer term budget priorities

3:37:06for the city.

3:37:08That's kind of the historic where we are.

3:37:11So what problem are we trying to solve.

3:37:12So we said of a fair amount of time what you have tonight.

3:37:16But previous meetings as well discussing the short term

3:37:20problems and so understanding it and mitigating

3:37:24that is essential to have a budget in the black

3:37:28and you heard an earlier presentation

3:37:30from your financial advisors about the importance of having

3:37:33a budget that is solid and that mediations and the changes that

3:37:37are hard but that are have been approved

3:37:41are going to have that effect.

3:37:43They are short term and they are also temporary in nature

3:37:47to really correct the structural imbalance of the the city's

3:37:53budget and rebuild reserves which is essential really

3:37:57requires a long term strategy and plan

3:37:59and that's what our work will be focused So let me just kind

3:38:03of a quick overview on the short term strategies

3:38:06that will address the short term revenue loss.

3:38:10Cash King as Steve Paul would say I'm

3:38:12playing on my Steve Toller hat.

3:38:14Cash is king and so addressing the short term

3:38:17or implementing a short term budget strategy helps to remain

3:38:21solvent as the city moves to the new budget

3:38:25and getting the general fund back in black.

3:38:28Deferring a decision and delaying costs

3:38:31as you were talking about earlier all

3:38:32fits within this sphere So how does that differ then

3:38:36from a long term budget strategy long term strategies

3:38:40are intended and will.

3:38:43Earlier we had a conversation I had a conversation with a peer

3:38:47talking about the problems the financial problems

3:38:51and at the end of the day it's hard it's painful

3:38:54but it's arithmetic.

3:38:56And so we can get through this and we're here

3:38:57to support that as we move forward

3:39:00and make sure the city is solid billing

3:39:02forward through this process.

3:39:05So building reserves right sizing services and that's

3:39:09not going to be easy or fun but understanding

3:39:12What are your real revenues and what can you afford as you

3:39:15build back your reserves.

3:39:18Unfortunately this includes a layer of covered on top making

3:39:21it all the more challenging.

3:39:24I love you I love.

3:39:25We're going to help you with this.

3:39:27And so what we're going to proposed

3:39:28is introducing the concept of priority

3:39:31based budgeting to help inform this conversation.

3:39:34It's really a combination of what are your priorities

3:39:37that you want to fund.

3:39:38But then evaluating within the financial context around sort

3:39:42of the critical budget elements of the programs

3:39:45that you offer All right.

3:39:50So you might recall seeing the slide if you can fast forward

3:39:52in time about six weeks ago when we were before you and Steve

3:39:57introduced this idea of fiscal sustainability

3:40:00planning this was the top strategy within Our first goal

3:40:03the strategic plan that we then formally adopt.

3:40:07Yet here we are.

3:40:09And so financial sustainability plan is really

3:40:13the comprehensive set of choices and actions

3:40:16that you take really that permit the city to move forward

3:40:21without threat of insolvency or default

3:40:23on promised expenditures and liabilities that includes

3:40:27making payroll and delivering the services to your community

3:40:31a good fiscal sustainability plan is custom to the community

3:40:36to the city of Toronto here and reflects your priorities

3:40:39and you'll see how we bring that and incorporate that.

3:40:42It also requires really thorough and in-depth analysis

3:40:46to understand what is the real cost savings.

3:40:49Sometimes there are our hidden assets

3:40:52that if you just look the straight cost

3:40:55you're not going to see that.

3:40:56So doing that analysis done to show what's

3:40:58the real fiscal impact of saving various choices

3:41:02and also looking at the feasibility you the feasibility

3:41:04and the timing what can be done easily

3:41:07what's going to be more complicated

3:41:08make more maybe take more time in order

3:41:11to be able to plan accordingly.

3:41:13So in the graphic in the lower right hand corner

3:41:16you'll see we have what we kind of

3:41:18think of in our construct for different categories

3:41:20of strategies.

3:41:22The first three on the left are really

3:41:25about trying to maintain service level

3:41:27but using perhaps the different methods of delivery.

3:41:30So using expenditure control control the cost shift.

3:41:34So when you are for example asking some employees to pay

3:41:40a portion of their their cost or their retirement cost

3:41:43that's a cost shift to the employee from the organization

3:41:47there are a variety of different examples within that service

3:41:50delivery alternative.

3:41:51This is where we start to be creative you know are there

3:41:53other providers in the community or other neighboring agencies

3:41:56that can help.

3:41:57So you can partner with to ensure that you can still

3:42:01provide the services to the community

3:42:03maybe just not at the full expense you're currently

3:42:06realizing by providing it through the city

3:42:10revenue enhancement is another strategy.

3:42:12In normal monthly times we'd like to look there

3:42:17for opportunities because it helps to maintain services

3:42:20we're challenged in that right now because we have

3:42:22extraordinary unemployment and there's a lot

3:42:25of challenges in the community.

3:42:27So we'll have to think creatively doesn't mean

3:42:29we don't want to look at that area

3:42:30but we're probably going to be limited in our choices.

3:42:33And then lastly service reduction cuts and this

3:42:37is where we'll have to take a look at programs and services

3:42:41that the city currently provides.

3:42:43And look at opportunities for adjusting service levels

3:42:47perhaps or even evaluating whether or not programs should

3:42:50be provided by the city So there's going

3:42:53to be tough choices and tough conversations in the future

3:42:55but this will give a construct and balanced approach

3:42:58for having this evaluation All right.

3:43:02So next slide Neal Hey you saw also in April

3:43:07and this are these are kind of the steps if you will

3:43:11that will walk through getting a grip on the problem is

3:43:16is critical.

3:43:18And as I mentioned at the at the outset of this presentation

3:43:21there are a whole host of unknowns.

3:43:23We don't know if the recession is the result of this coming

3:43:27pandemic is going to be I wouldn't

3:43:30there is a short and sweet cause I don't think it's going to be.

3:43:32But if it's going to be narrow and deep

3:43:35or if it's going to extend we just don't know.

3:43:38And so we have to be attentive we have to monitor what things

3:43:42are what things are looking like what trends are occurring

3:43:46and have options in place.

3:43:48You know a lot of this planning really

3:43:51depends upon the array of options that we can identify.

3:43:55So if it is a short term problem we can all hope then maybe

3:44:00you only have to go so far.

3:44:01But if it turns out that it's a much deeper recession

3:44:05there may be other options you'll

3:44:06have to point to the table.

3:44:08We're getting a grip on that problem.

3:44:09I will pause here also just to mention I think we introduced

3:44:13a little bit in our session in April and that is that we are

3:44:18we will be creating a map model that we will bring with us when

3:44:22we present the preliminary budget strategies for you that

3:44:25will show different scenarios if we are facing we use this

3:44:31scenario and the option of a severe dip in revenues perhaps

3:44:37in the first part of 2021 but then it starts to uptick what

3:44:41does that number look like maybe it's severe and that it kind

3:44:45of gets mild and so look running some scenarios and knowing what

3:44:49what the problem might look like will inform

3:44:51the conversation about the

3:44:53changes to your budget you'll want to make next setting

3:44:56priorities for service delivery Again

3:44:59we're going to look at you've got to really not rely

3:45:03on the input that we had for the strategic planning

3:45:06engagement activities.

3:45:07And so what thing is that we heard our top priorities

3:45:09for your community.

3:45:11And so we have a variety of resources to lean on.

3:45:14We'll look at that.

3:45:15So that work has been done but we'll be applying that

3:45:17to the budget strategies and determining

3:45:21appropriate spending levels what's the appropriate service

3:45:24level these sorts of things will factor in

3:45:26and then ultimately implementing that plan over time.

3:45:31Right.

3:45:31So applying a budget based budgeting priority are priority

3:45:36based budgeting for the long term

3:45:38now priority based budgeting is a concept that can be used

3:45:41in good times and bad times.

3:45:42I wish I could say we we're introducing this in good time

3:45:45when we had your first with resources to figure out what

3:45:49the priorities are although it seems there's often more

3:45:53conversation in the other direction

3:45:54and that's what we're looking today.

3:45:56So priority based budgeting just there we go.

3:46:01Okay that's fine but allows us to evaluate

3:46:06in a in a thoughtful kind of logic model approach

3:46:10and then you'll see when we go through the tools

3:46:14that it really is a tool for you the key city

3:46:18council to evaluate potential strategies.

3:46:22We're looking at them in a short term

3:46:23and we're looking at the long term

3:46:26and the approach considers two primary factors 1 the priority

The budget study session introduced the approach that becomes the fiscal response plan.

Its origin: the city had been working with the consultants “originally to develop… an update to our current strategic plan” — then “the sands have shifted” with the health crisis.

So a strategic planning engagement became a fiscal one.

The categories of strategy offered: expenditure control; cost shifts, such as employees paying part of their retirement cost; and partnering — so “you can still provide the services to the community, maybe just not at the full expense you're currently realizing by providing it through the city.”

Revenue enhancement, with a caveat: “in normal times we'd like to look there… because it helps to maintain services. We're challenged in that right now because we have extraordinary unemployment.”

So “we'll have to think creatively… but we're probably going to be limited in our choices.”

And service reduction: looking at “opportunities for adjusting service levels, perhaps, or even evaluating whether or not programs should be provided by the city.”

Her summary: “there's going to be tough choices and tough conversations in the future, but this will give a construct and balanced approach.”

The City Manager announced a special meeting on Tuesday 9 June to discuss what came out of the session, and handed to Nancy Hetrick of Management Partners, who acknowledged how hard the moment was for the city.

The method proposed was priority-based budgeting, with a model to run revenue scenarios. The aim was a budget in the black for the coming year, revisited in the fall once more was known. She noted that the state auditor's findings had pointed to the lack of reserves.

Significant

A strategic planning engagement becomes a fiscal one. In March 2021 the city is still working to its 2013 strategic plan (16 Mar 2021). Revenue enhancement is not ruled out, but with extraordinary unemployment the choices there are expected to be limited.

20 Mandated, and by whom captions 3788–3986

3:46:29the city wide priorities and secondarily

3:46:32and importantly that the basic program attributes.

3:46:35And I actually want to begin with the second of those two

3:46:39the basic program attributes.

3:46:41This is where we start to evaluate each option

3:46:45and I should say the options don't come out of the air.

3:46:49We have spent time already meeting with departments

3:46:53to identify and listen for options within their program

3:46:58so we're also looking at background materials

3:47:00that we know from all of our work in other jurisdictions

3:47:04with many types of budget options that are available

3:47:09and strategy We're using those and pulling all of the stops

3:47:13to ask direct questions.

3:47:14So once we've identified those array of options

3:47:17we apply these criteria.

3:47:19First is that is the program or service mandated.

3:47:23That means that it is required by the city

3:47:26to provide that service.

3:47:29Whether it's by federal state county law maybe

3:47:31the city ordinance.

3:47:32But there's some obligation to have to provide the service

3:47:36oftentimes with mandated services

3:47:38you are required to provide it.

3:47:41But the level of service is not mandated.

3:47:44And so there is some flexibility within that.

3:47:47You'll see we start to rate it but that will start there.

3:47:50The next program attributes that there's a community reliance

3:47:54that the city provides the program there's

3:47:55no other provider and so were residents

3:47:59businesses and visitors look to the city

3:48:02for that service or program.

3:48:03There's no alternative.

3:48:04So that's another criteria.

3:48:06After recovery some programs pay for themselves

3:48:11or at least pay for a portion of themselves.

3:48:13And so that's a factor we will be evaluating against programs.

3:48:16So the cost savings that may be available

3:48:21could be much smaller than one would otherwise think given

3:48:24the full cost of the program.

3:48:27The next item is the demand for the program.

3:48:29And so programs that are demonstrating high level

3:48:32with current or even anticipated demand or usage

3:48:35will be more highly rated and the anticipated demand.

3:48:39You can look on the horizon sometimes and know because

3:48:43of trends in that in the community or other reasons

3:48:46that there is there's a shift in in demand.

3:48:50So we'll be evaluating usage rate

3:48:53to inform that conversation.

3:48:55And then lastly the portion of the community

3:48:58served we want to try to ensure that the programs and services

3:49:02that are serving the broadest segment of the community

3:49:05are those that are maintained.

3:49:07So we will be evaluating him in that regard.

3:49:09If you're serving a very small fraction

3:49:12it might be ripe for finding alternative provider

3:49:15for example.

3:49:16So that's criteria a basic program attributes

3:49:19we'll be using to evaluate each of the programs and services

3:49:23or strategies and then the second set of criteria

3:49:26reflects the city priority.

3:49:28And so these are the five that are listed here

3:49:32are the strategic goals that emerged through

3:49:35the strategic planning process.

3:49:37You will see in red not intentionally goal number

3:49:41one which is securing the financial help and long term

3:49:43stability of the city And so in the short term in the mid-term

3:49:47and in long term this is we believe the highest priority.

3:49:51And so it's reported that such not far behind that as was

3:49:56mentioned in earlier presentations this evening

3:49:58and comments ensuring public safety public safety

3:50:02has a broad definition we have certainly

3:50:04a health crisis among our residents and the community.

3:50:07So it's not just public safety in the traditional sense

3:50:11of police and fire but other factors

3:50:14that drive the safety of our residents and the community.

3:50:17We see that as also a high priority for the short term

3:50:21mid-term and long term the next three set of priorities

3:50:25are all of importance to the community we heard about them

3:50:29in our engagement activities The question

3:50:32becomes the level of urgency in the next six months

3:50:36versus the horizon.

3:50:38And so this is where we want to have some conversation make

3:50:41sure you feel comfortable with the ratings

3:50:44that they're applied here.

3:50:46This is not to say that if a focus for goal or priority

3:50:51is identified in the short term as a low priority

3:50:53you know low applicability that is unimportant

3:50:57but what it does mean is that you're

3:50:59going to want to prioritize low cost activities

3:51:02or shifting priorities to other providers

3:51:05to I'm sure you can still meet the objectives that

3:51:07are intended for the community.

3:51:09But in a different manner what we're really looking for what

3:51:13are those things that are going to be essential

3:51:15that the city deliver at a level while still

3:51:22securing the financial health of city so here's

3:51:24a discount structure.

3:51:26So then using those two sets of criteria

3:51:29we apply the framework so each proposed budget reduction

3:51:33strategy will be evaluated and scored on the factors

3:51:37that we just went through that results in a composite score.

3:51:41And it sounds a little academic but stay with me because it

3:51:44is a very useful tool.

3:51:47The composite store score gives us an indicator

3:51:50that it's going to be a cost savings that's significant

3:51:56and it falls within those criteria.

3:51:58So it's a good place to start in building a financial plan.

3:52:01So that informs the conversation.

3:52:02It doesn't give you the answers but it's certainly

3:52:04informed the conversation the strategies that receive a lower

3:52:08overall score meaning that they didn't have a high rating

3:52:11in the numbers are the starting point for including in that

3:52:15plan the big fiscal target at the bottom

3:52:20is what I mentioned earlier in terms

3:52:22of understanding the nature of the problem

3:52:25we're trying to solve.

3:52:26So we will be looking at those scenarios

3:52:29and doing our best to determine are kind of our best

3:52:36estimate of that target.

3:52:38We'll continue to evaluate that goal make sure that there's

3:52:41some some options in a room within the framework

3:52:47So let's look at the rating system

3:52:49so this is how we get to the scoring.

3:52:51So using a zero to four score basically how high does it

3:52:54where you Reagan so many to service Is it

3:52:56100 percent mandated and yes the service level mandate is

3:53:00in its critical role gets a for something

3:53:03that's completely discretionary it's not required

3:53:05but it's really nice to have that

3:53:08may not get any scoring at all.

3:53:10And so you can see how that will affect

3:53:14the the overall scorecard.

3:53:18So if you go to the next slide you

3:53:21will get a sneak peek of what a scorecard might look like.

3:53:24And so there's actually a larger tables so the description

3:53:27the strategy title where resides the timing and ease

3:53:32of implementation and the fiscal impact which is very important

3:53:36are all contained in a separate column.

3:53:40Here you can see we score based on desired goals

3:53:44and the basic program attributes that

3:53:47then some self into a composite score which is that far right.

3:53:50Green column just adjacent to the purple.

3:53:53So the combined score coupled with the financial impact

3:53:57really starts to paint a picture of those options

3:54:00that you might want to consider.

3:54:03And so this will be all totaled and you'll be able to see

3:54:05what that looks like.

3:54:07So that's the scorecard.

3:54:09Some examples of types of strategies and using

3:54:14that those four categories I mentioned and these are

3:54:18are generic and their explanation.

3:54:23But let me give you some ideas of what they what they look

3:54:25like.

3:54:26So for the expenditure control and cost shift

3:54:30discontinuing retiree health coverage for new hires

3:54:32not something that to have looked

3:54:35has been explored by I actually extracted these

3:54:37from other other engagements and considering options

3:54:44for less extensive classification

3:54:45using non foreign versus warrant a lot less expensive.

3:54:49There may be places to explore that

3:54:52and these are the things that we'll be looking at as we're

3:54:55evaluating program options for budget reduction options

3:54:59for service delivery changes.

3:55:01Looking at alternative service delivery methods

3:55:03are there ways that you can outsource certain types

3:55:06of programs still maintain services to the community

3:55:10but you become a project manager as opposed to a service

3:55:13provider directly franchising programs is another way

3:55:17to do that to still maintain a service with the city having

3:55:21some oversight but not delivering it

3:55:23directly partnering with late with neighboring agencies

3:55:26and nonprofits.

3:55:28There are lots of good examples of communities

3:55:30that partner with adjacent cities

3:55:33to provide recreation programs or to provide

3:55:35other services where you can work together a nonprofit.

3:55:39They're certainly a valuable resource

3:55:42to look at as well in terms of providing services and service

3:55:46offering arrangement regionalization to the degree

3:55:49that the city neighboring El Serino are

3:55:52facing similar problems which we know that they are.

3:55:54There may an appetite for looking at regional innovation

3:55:57that would not otherwise be appealing so these

3:56:00are things we can look at.

3:56:02You mentioned revenue enhancement and the challenges

3:56:04associated with that in the times

3:56:05but could be other examples aside from doing special taxes

3:56:10are looking at user fees.

3:56:13We talked last time I think with Parking Day parking

3:56:17revenue adding an administrative fee

3:56:20to certain kinds of contracts.

3:56:22So this is the types of things that can and assessed

3:56:25and the ease implementation and the ability to do

3:56:28so is part of that analysis.

3:56:31And then lastly service reductions elimination

3:56:33And so eliminating services where others can provide

3:56:37the service helps you to maintain that service

3:56:40for the community without providing a directly or just

The criteria were set out.

The first: “is the program or service mandated” — required “whether it's by federal, state, county law, maybe the city ordinance.”

Then a qualification: “oftentimes with mandated services you are required to provide it — but the level of service is not mandated. And so there is some flexibility within that.”

The second criterion: “community reliance” — whether “the city provides the program [and] there's no other provider.”

The remaining attributes are cost recovery, since some programs pay for themselves; demand; and the portion of the community served. The second set of criteria is the five strategic goals, with long-term financial health first and public safety second. A goal rated low in the short term should be pursued through low-cost activities or other providers.

The scale runs “using a zero to four score”: a service that is “100 percent mandated” with a mandated service level and “a critical role gets a four,” while “something that's completely discretionary” scores lower.

And the target the whole exercise runs toward: “the big fiscal target at the bottom” — “understanding the nature of the problem we're trying to solve.”

Example strategies were drawn from other cities: ending retiree health coverage for new hires, using non-sworn staff in place of sworn, outsourcing or franchising programs, partnering with neighbors or nonprofits, regionalizing, user fees, and eliminating services others can provide.

Significant

“With mandated services you are required to provide it — but the level of service is not mandated.” Each option is scored against mandate, community reliance, cost recovery, demand and portion served, and against the five strategic goals.

21 Zero to four captions 3987–4100

3:56:43making a decision that the city is not going

3:56:45to be in X Y business anymore.

3:56:48There's a community up in the Pacific Northwest

3:56:50we've worked with that provided much valued Marine patrol

3:56:56and special services but it was really a high cost high cost

3:57:01point for the community.

3:57:03And the city didn't have the resources

3:57:05so they were able to kind of carve that away

3:57:07and say it's not critical we don't need to do it and make

3:57:10a big savings in their budget.

3:57:13Also looking at service levels and the frequency of doing

3:57:18maintenance of doing replacement all of these sorts of things

3:57:22can save dollars in the long term.

3:57:25And so those are some examples.

3:57:27So how is that for a fly through Temple.

3:57:30I want to make sure that I to answer any questions that you

3:57:35may have about the approach about the criteria

3:57:40if you have concerns or you're comfortable with it

3:57:43or whatever.

3:57:44Let me take your question I've got some but I'm

3:57:50looking at Janet you're on muted so maybe

3:57:52I'll start the first question I had was on that scoring system

3:57:57I didn't really understand how you were using

3:58:00that I said zero dash or right.

3:58:05So let me tell you what we had.

3:58:09Let's pick an example so I'm How many is the one that was up

3:58:12in the Pacific Northwest because it's not something

3:58:13that we're going to do here and I want to make

3:58:15anything as uncomfortable.

3:58:16So they had this Marine unit that they

3:58:19were going to evaluate to whether or not

3:58:21they should continue.

3:58:22So they looked at that.

3:58:23They figured the cost the total cost to the city

3:58:26and then they applied the criteria.

3:58:28So that mandate is not mandated.

3:58:31Is there someone else who can provide it.

3:58:33So you went through each of those categories

3:58:35and rated them on a 0 to 4 for being absolutely essential

3:58:38core zero.

3:58:41We don't have to do it.

3:58:42It's nice to have we wish we could.

3:58:43Right.

3:58:44And so for each of those criteria

3:58:47that budget strategy would receive a number from either 0

3:58:51to 4 the composite score then is the total

3:58:54of all of those numbers.

3:58:55And so for the the question about

3:58:58whether it's mandated the question about whether someone

3:59:00else can do it your total is and that's how you can be developed

3:59:03or somebody will do it.

3:59:06What square would you give what it

3:59:10would just be like a one for something

3:59:13or that particular one.

3:59:15Yeah right there.

3:59:18So there were like five priorities

3:59:20and there were five of those those basic program attributes

3:59:24so there's 10 different categories you're

3:59:26going to receive a number.

3:59:27So they're going to vary depending on

3:59:29So the analogy is that the item is being evaluated

3:59:33again it could receive it.

3:59:35For example it could receive.

3:59:37So they could receive a 2 for the demand for service maybe

3:59:42you know maybe they have a group in the committee

3:59:45in the community that really relies on that right.

3:59:49But it's a solid group.

3:59:50It's very big.

3:59:51And so maybe that could give them a lower number.

3:59:54So and we'll bring it back and you

3:59:55can do it you can ask those questions

3:59:57why would this be here.

3:59:58I would put it here.

4:00:00And that's part of the conversation

4:00:03but it helps to give us a roadmap.

4:00:05First of all it gets all of the budget strategies identified.

4:00:09Here are the things that to be considered

4:00:11gives you the dollars that can be saved and also give you

4:00:15some information to talk about whether or not

4:00:18it's a good choice.

4:00:19You know maybe it's easy to do and it's not important

4:00:22but you don't say very much so very much at the margin

4:00:25That's not going to be as impactful as something that

4:00:28might be more significant and more painful but are you

4:00:32going to have bigger dollar savings

4:00:33and if you kind of move more quickly.

4:00:35So these are the conversations we'll have a we're together

4:00:38at that budget workshop that Karen

4:00:40mentioned that's for the night get Paul

4:00:48looks like you wanted to go.

4:00:50Yeah.

4:00:52I just want to thank our manager and management

4:00:54partners for this.

4:00:56It's a really good document and it

4:00:58is like you say Nancy a roadmap that I'm hoping our resident

4:01:03and us can follow and begin to mold and improve on.

4:01:07I love your priorities and four and five

4:01:10that you had on their environmental and other things

4:01:12are really important to me.

4:01:14But we need to deal with no one right now that solvents

4:01:17of our city and we all got move in that direction

4:01:21and find I think what's really helpful is your strategy

4:01:25your types and examples that lastly kind

4:01:28of showing exactly what some of the choices

4:01:31are that we have to make.

4:01:32I want to fill that out and get it out to our residents

4:01:35and hopefully on our Web site so people can be involved.

4:01:39Those are the choices we're gonna have to make

4:01:41and I'd like to get the feedback from our folks

4:01:43about what that means to them and how we move forward.

4:01:46So thank you.

4:01:47I look forward to the workshop coming up

4:01:50whatever that date is I'll figure it out when I'm tired

4:01:54and let's all do.

The scoring method was explained.

The approach: take a service, establish its “total cost to the city,” then score it against criteria from zero to four.

The criteria named: whether the service is mandated or not, and whether “there [is] someone else who can provide it.”

Her worked example was deliberately from elsewhere: a city “up in the Pacific Northwest, because it's not something that we're going to do here and I want to” avoid making “anything… uncomfortable.”

That city's “marine unit” was a high-cost service that the city decided was not critical: “they were going to evaluate… whether or not they should continue.”

Each of ten categories, five strategic goals and five program attributes, gets a number from 0 to 4. The composite score is their total.

A councilmember pressed on the mechanics: “I didn't really understand how you were using that… zero dash” or three.

Fadelli wanted the strategies and examples published on the city's website so residents could be involved.

Significant

Services are scored 0 to 4 across ten categories and the scores summed. The worked example is from another state, so no El Cerrito service is named in the demonstration.

22 The bottom line of the spreadsheet captions 4101–4476

4:01:57Let's take go with that.

4:01:58Thank you.

4:01:59Thank show Gabe first come first served and striking his head.

4:02:06We shall questions and look forward to discussing it

4:02:10in the upcoming workshop Nancy I do have some questions

4:02:15in on Slide 11 You did.

4:02:19It's the basic program attributes

4:02:21you can rank them effectively.

4:02:24You know that the mandated down to a portion of the community

4:02:30served IT YOU WENT A through E do

4:02:34these have a hierarchy is is one more important than the other.

4:02:37These are all equal well so the way that the scorecard works

4:02:43is they're equal among those but we're going to have the detail.

4:02:47And so for example I mean those things that are mandated.

4:02:52Yeah that's that's if that's going to bump them right.

4:02:55And so if you have to provide something then

4:02:58the question simply becomes what level.

4:03:01And so there may still be some opportunities

4:03:03within various programs or services

4:03:05to evaluate reduction service level

4:03:08but we need to be mindful of what is required in Toledo.

4:03:13So these five criteria are are because I

4:03:16notice on your scorecard you're treated equally.

4:03:18And so in essence the scoring would those that those things

4:03:24are mandated zero to four scoring would create

4:03:29the preference or or the the higher score for the mandated

4:03:32programs if something is cost recovery like our hour after

4:03:36school programs where they're fully covered that they would

4:03:40get a higher score versus programs that are not fully

4:03:43right because where you may have a man manager a program

4:03:47on the one hand or and you might have a fully cost recovery

4:03:50program they get on for another hand those are going to be

4:03:52at the same level and that composite score because there

4:03:55are different reasons they're both getting a for on on Slide

4:03:58twelve you had the

4:04:01criteria 2 which is the true strategic goals and there

4:04:05you rank you listed them 1 to 5 and in your temperature chart

4:04:11that you had there you had lows mediums and highs based on time

4:04:15six months 18 five years there there is clearly

4:04:20a they shouldn't be handled equally

4:04:24and yet the score card is handling them equally.

4:04:27And so I'm wondering why the score card would handle those

4:04:32equally That's an excellent question because what we want

4:04:38to know actually actually probably

4:04:41add we need to link the numbers to the high medium or low

4:04:47rather than that description that we're

4:04:50listed on that rank criteria table

4:04:53to provide greater weighting to those that are high.

4:04:57That is something that that is the answer I was hoping for.

4:04:59But on your simplistic scorecard where you were doing 0 to fours

4:05:03for those five criteria which was the purple ones on Slide 15

4:05:10they they weren't waiting.

4:05:12And so that is the basis of this line of questioning

4:05:14is that the score card is is disproportionately potentially

4:05:20scoring something that is not necessarily

4:05:24as ranked as well on your heat chart that's on on Slide 12.

4:05:30So I appreciate that question is an important clarification

4:05:34the high medium and low need to tie to the numbers that size.

4:05:39I don't think we did a very good job of making that nexus

4:05:43but that I don't like the term you

4:05:46have the heat rating that you have

4:05:47for each that's the driver.

4:05:50And so we are saying for the short term in terms priorities

4:05:54those strategies that improve the security of the long term

4:05:58financial health and public safety as the highest priority

4:06:02those that are three through five are still important

4:06:06but there are going to be a longer term horizon there

4:06:08not for the immediate term.

4:06:10Got it.

4:06:10So if I'm looking at Slide twelve

4:06:14the green lows would be in your zeros

4:06:16and ones the yellow medium would be your twos

4:06:19and maybe your threes your your red highs

4:06:22would be your threes and fours is what

4:06:24you're suggesting Excellent.

4:06:28And the the rose in the scorecard

4:06:35the strategy is you now call them strategies

4:06:37but when you were talking about them before we're talking

4:06:40about programs the strategies.

4:06:44And I agree council member fidelity the strategies that

4:06:47are listed on Slide 16 where you're

4:06:49giving examples of strategies that's really clear.

4:06:53But when you are talking on Slide 11 and 12

4:06:56you were talking about programs and evaluating

4:06:59programs against these criteria that criteria 1 and criteria 2

4:07:04can you.

4:07:06What's the what's the relationship

4:07:07between the programs you're using when you were talking

4:07:10about criteria and strategies like the examples

4:07:13given on slide 16.

4:07:16So when we're evaluating programs or services which

4:07:21are part of the the evaluation that needs to occur those

4:07:25may develop into strategies.

4:07:27And so if we are evaluating for example recreation programs

4:07:32there may be a strategy to outsource a portion of those

4:07:35just by way of example.

4:07:36And so there's a tie between we're

4:07:37evaluating programs and services in order to develop strategy.

4:07:42That's the better way to put it.

4:07:44Got it.

4:07:44So.

4:07:45So is so when.

4:07:47So when you look at the scorecard that already

4:07:51going to have evaluated the programs

4:07:52to identify the strategies.

4:07:55That's right.

4:07:56That's right.

4:07:57The strategies will be listed in the scorecard.

4:08:00That's right.

4:08:03But it's program you're going to go through it

4:08:07programmatically to identify the strategies

4:08:11we are going to be looking.

4:08:13We are turning over all the rocks

4:08:15to look at the array of how you deliver services.

4:08:19And the programs that you're offering in order

4:08:21to identify if there are different ways

4:08:23of doing work or work and maybe not

4:08:26at the top or core level service.

4:08:29And so by evaluating all those those those programs

4:08:32and how you do the work the services we'll

4:08:34be able to develop strategies will

4:08:36then populate that scorecard to develop that to evaluate them.

4:08:41And so in essence you might have 10 strategies associated

4:08:45with recreation and 10 strategies associated with you

4:08:50know public works and infrastructure You may have

4:08:5210 strategies associated with public safety

4:08:56and an eight strategy will have.

4:08:58They won't have unique scores because you don't have

4:09:00enough score variability but we'll

4:09:04end up with with strategies with scores.

4:09:08And then we'll have to test the strategy we'll

4:09:11drop into buckets with stratify into buckets based on the score

4:09:16Where does cost come in to this.

4:09:18You mentioned cost but on your scorecard

4:09:20I'm not seeing cost there.

4:09:23I gave you I apologize I recognize

4:09:26that if you get it in front of me here on the scorecard.

4:09:32So right.

4:09:33Right.

4:09:33You see actually maybe highlight Can

4:09:36you pick and bring about back of or quit the slide Slide 15.

4:09:41So what you're seeing here is how how

4:09:45to develop the composite score.

4:09:47Thank you very much.

4:09:48So the category that are in those bullet you

4:09:51know what is the strategy title what the description where the

4:09:54reside the timing and the fiscal impact

4:09:57are additional column in the spreadsheet.

4:10:00Okay.

4:10:00So for example if we say all right a portion of a recreation

4:10:05program strategy is to outsource a portion of recreation which

4:10:10is that hypothetically that's this one

4:10:12we might be defining what that is.

4:10:14Right.

4:10:15Giving the description determining what

4:10:17the fiscal impact is of removing that from the city budget then

4:10:21that can be totaled all the way to the bottom.

4:10:24Once we have an idea of what number

4:10:27we're trying to hit it's going to be important because then

4:10:30you can say well I don't want that while it's like okay

4:10:32let's do it.

4:10:33That's the bottom line.

4:10:34Right.

4:10:35And so it's an important tool in that regard.

4:10:37So you're not seeing the full of the spreadsheet

4:10:40but each of those bullets are a separate column that

4:10:42can be that extends across the Yeah I'd like to extend

4:10:47the meeting till 11 15.

4:10:49Yes there's a motion to extend to live marketing seconded

4:10:52by Ables and made by Quinto.

4:10:53Roll call please me I'm in.

4:10:57Yes ma'am.

4:10:58Freedom fidelity Mayor Pro Tem Vanilli Sure.

4:11:06Council member Wilson Yes Councilman Burke do you matter.

4:11:11No.

4:11:13Council member came to my case.

4:11:18Thomas I cannot promise promise.

4:11:21Rochelle well we'll try and get up early in your presentation.

4:11:26Nancy you'd said you were going to analyze fiscal strategies.

4:11:30We're going to determine the impact

4:11:32and you used impact again here on this scorecard slide.

4:11:35It's actually hopefully it's the end benefit depending

4:11:39on which side of the coin you want

4:11:40to look at a fiscal benefit as it will save money for us.

4:11:46We had impact because we didn't want to say budget reduction

4:11:50because if you if there is a revenue

4:11:52option then actually that is just a different terminology.

4:11:55And so at the time a few other the other term that you used

4:12:01early on was feasibility I don't see feasibility

4:12:04on this scorecard right.

4:12:07Well that goes into some of the analysis

4:12:09that will presented to understand

4:12:13the city that is the timeframe.

4:12:16So the timing for implementation and how easily that can

4:12:19be executed will be reflected in that timing

4:12:23for implementation component.

4:12:24So something you might be able to do right

4:12:26away others may require confer.

4:12:29They may require other steps to finding a provider

4:12:32or other things that will take longer that's

4:12:34going to be the timing piece.

4:12:36So feasibility will be captured in timing.

4:12:45That concludes my question I'm speaking term for Steve

4:12:48but I believe that's right.

4:12:50Any other questions I see none.

4:12:58Do we need any other information regarding this.

4:13:02Do we want to reiterate the fact that we're going to be meeting

4:13:05on June 2nd June 9th and June 16th on budget items

4:13:10and I mean we still had public comment on this item as well.

4:13:13Okay.

4:13:14I know there's at least one public comment.

4:13:15Let's go to public comment We did not

4:13:23have any public comments submitted in advance

4:13:25but we did receive two submissions

4:13:27that I will read into the record now eight for submission.

4:13:33And can you confirm to you want to stay with the two

4:13:36and a half minutes.

4:13:37Yes please.

4:13:38OK.

4:13:39First comments are submitted by Dan

4:13:41Shulman starting his time now.

4:13:43Is city council I just read the management partners

4:13:46presentation released today.

4:13:47And I would like to raise a concern regarding the city

4:13:50wide priorities they identified and reference

4:13:52in their scored scorecard with the city wide priorities.

4:13:56They list in this presentation do not match the residents top

4:13:59five priorities as management partners listed in their April

4:14:027th 2020 presentation from the April presentation

4:14:06the top five priorities were one schools in education two

4:14:10long term financial health three public safety for emergency

4:14:15preparedness and five economic development in today's

4:14:18presentation schools and education as

4:14:20well as economic development are noticeably

4:14:22absent from the list.

4:14:23They are both important priorities

4:14:25for the future of El Serino.

4:14:27While the city does not directly run schools

4:14:29any program supporting educational enrichment

4:14:32or other supporting our city's children

4:14:34and families should be a top priority

4:14:36economic development is necessary to sustain

4:14:39our city for the long term.

4:14:40I ask the city council to please make sure those priorities

4:14:43returned to the top of the list for the priority base

4:14:46budget framework Thank you.

4:14:47Daniel Schulman else Rita resident second submission

4:14:52is from Howdy Gowdy starting his time now.

4:14:56Airline man and city council members.

4:14:58The strategic goal prioritization table

4:15:00presentation slide twelve or page seventy

4:15:03seven of eighty two sends the wrong message by suggesting

4:15:06that quality of life sense of place

4:15:08and environmental sustainability are low priorities

4:15:11over the next six months.

4:15:12The message should instead be that all five

4:15:15with the strategic Strategic Plan goals

4:15:17remain guiding principles and priorities within

4:15:20the current fiscal challenge.

4:15:22While it is understandable that there may not

4:15:24be budget to create new programs or even continue some existing

4:15:28ones all good ongoing activities should be informed equally

4:15:32by all the strategic Strategic Plan goals and every employee

4:15:36should internalize and internalize

4:15:40and apply these values.

4:15:41If any work in any work they do they are never a lower priority

4:15:46or deserve less consideration even

4:15:47if we have less money to spend.

4:15:49It can still be a thoughtful part of whatever activities are

4:15:51funded submitted by having can be read

4:15:54or resonant and very modest that concludes

4:15:58public comments on this item.

4:16:00Thank you Nancy.

4:16:03The economic development would be a strategy that would make

4:16:08me that we spend money to do that

4:16:10and that's certainly one of the comments

4:16:11that we got back in February.

4:16:13Was that if we need to be strategic and spend money

4:16:16to do certain things that are revenue generating then

4:16:21we should.

4:16:22I'm assuming that economic development

4:16:24is a strategy that would be evaluated Yeah that's right.

4:16:29And if I if I met Mayor so in the strategic planning document

4:16:34that we where we outline strategies initially

4:16:37prior to our shifting of focus this sustaining quality of life

4:16:42and securing financial health both incorporated economic

4:16:46development has strategies because they touch on that

4:16:51and I would also want to point out

4:16:52that the ensuring public safety input includes preparedness.

4:16:56And so that's part of that area it's broadly defined.

4:17:00And so we try to keep it simple for this.

4:17:02And remember that this is going to be

4:17:07a starting document a place to have conversations

4:17:10from with council.

4:17:11And so it doesn't prescribe the answer

4:17:15it provides direction about how these criteria apply

4:17:19to the various strategies.

4:17:21Thank you any additional questions comments.

4:17:27I see we're supposed to make some type of guidance

4:17:33to you by roll call vote.

4:17:34I'm not certain that it doesn't feel like we need to.

4:17:37But just curious if what the thought was that Nancy that you

4:17:41need at this time I would do that want him to confirm

4:17:45that our members have cared you and members of council

4:17:47feel comfortable with the criteria

4:17:50as we've laid them out knowing that if a tool

4:17:53for your future conversations so that we can agree that we'll be

4:17:56using this as we evaluate your strategy

4:18:00then any any follow up for based on my round of comments

4:18:04certainly the my round of questions lined with one

4:18:08of the public speakers.

4:18:09With regards to whether there whether

4:18:11the strategic priorities the city priorities

4:18:16see what priorities are balanced or not.

4:18:19That would be the only area where I think we have

4:18:21opportunity to give guidance.

4:18:23I don't know if anybody wants to opine on that Janet.

4:18:31And then part I'm not totally sure what you mean when you say

4:18:35that but one of the things that occurs to me

4:18:38is that as this feels like a new process

4:18:41and as such it seems to me like it could be that we forgot

4:18:45something or or whatever and that we need to leave

4:18:51in their room for manipulating that and that I'm not I

4:18:56don't even know what I'm talking about.

4:18:58No I do though it's it's somebody who is just actually

4:19:02implemented a new scoring system for public safety or safety

4:19:07and public contracting It's you have to be nimble as you

4:19:14realize you've left something out

4:19:15or you've overlooked something.

4:19:17So I completely understand what you're saying

4:19:18and I agree with you Mr. Benelli that was gonna be my plan.

4:19:22I hope we remain flexible it's left eight may be things

4:19:26we haven't quite thought of but I think

4:19:27this document and this road path is good enough to be

4:19:31able to fine tune as we move forward

4:19:35It's definitely a good start.

4:19:37Yes.

4:19:38And it is a process by which we'll make decisions with that.

4:19:43I will conclude Item 7 D and move on to item 8.

4:19:47City Council Local and Regional Liaison assignments.

4:19:51Does anyone have any assignment reports Mr. Kane.

4:19:58Thank you Mayor.

4:19:59I'd like to lend everyone know that Council Member Paul

4:20:03FDLE and I were joined on a phone call with Chris Gray

4:20:09and with Marc Freedman and the owners

4:20:13of the clinic that plans to be open at the big chip

4:20:19mall in El Salvador.

4:20:21And know that on Friday we will be getting an update

4:20:25at the owner did mention that they look forward

4:20:30in opening the new location within the let us know

4:20:36on Friday whether it will be after from thirty

4:20:41to forty five days and Paul do want to add anything

4:20:45else on that one looks like there was lots of things

4:20:52are happening and they're open for that

4:20:56a communique with their city.

4:20:58Then as Gabe mentioned two or three years

4:21:00and we haven't seen any And I'm very pleased to hear

4:21:03that they are responsive.

4:21:05Yes we will now get an update every Friday

4:21:09and they look forward in and working with staff to finish

4:21:14the building painting the outside finishing day inside

4:21:19and they look forward and working with staff

4:21:21and inviting the counsel when this completed.

4:21:26So they said within 30 to 45 days

4:21:29but we'll see what happens on Friday.

4:21:32Excellent.

4:21:32I'll look forward to routine reports from the two of you

4:21:35Thank you ma'am.

4:21:37Seeing no other seeing no other reports that will conclude Item

4:21:428 will move on Item 9 which is a German of the regular city

4:21:47council.

4:21:49It is now 11 0 9 and our next regularly scheduled city

4:21:54council meeting is Tuesday June 2nd at 7 p.m.

4:21:58Via teleconference.

4:21:59We are adjourned.

4:22:01Good night Rochelle

The Mayor questioned the scorecard's weighting.

The strategic goals had been ranked high, medium or low by time horizon, yet the scorecard weighted them equally. The consultant agreed the ratings should tie to the numbers, so that highs score threes and fours and lows score zeros and ones. Strategies come from evaluating programs; outsourcing part of recreation was the example.

How it works in practice: define a strategy — “outsource a portion of recreation” — give “the description, determin[e] what the fiscal impact is of removing that from the city budget,” and “that can be totaled all the way to the bottom.”

Why the total matters: “once we have an idea of what number we're trying to hit, it's going to be important — because then you can say, well, I don't want that, [and] it's like, okay, let's do it. That's the bottom line.”

Pardue-Okimoto asked where feasibility appeared. The consultant said it was captured in the timing column.

The screen showed only part of it: “you're not seeing the full” spreadsheet, “but each of those bullets [is] a separate column.”

The meeting was extended to 11:15 on a motion by Quinto, seconded by Abelson, with Pardue-Okimoto voting no.

Two written comments followed. One said schools and education, and economic development, had dropped off the priority list given in April. The other said the slide wrongly suggested that quality of life and environmental sustainability were low priorities. The consultant said economic development sat within the strategies. Councilmembers accepted the framework as a starting point to be refined.

In liaison reports, Quinto said he and Fadelli had spoken with the owners of a clinic planning to open in El Cerrito, who expected to open within 30 to 45 days and would give weekly updates. The meeting adjourned at 11:09.

On 11 August the Council gives direction on the fiscal response plan, with at least $1.5 million more needed and reserves restored by 2026 (11 Aug 2020).

Significant

“Once we have an idea of what number we're trying to hit… then you can say, well, I don't want that.” The scorecard's goals are to be weighted by priority after the Mayor points out they are not. The framework leads to the fiscal response plan on 11 August.